Re: Anna Kubit Confirms Story 214
Sandra
>Anna_Kubit wrote:
>> Good evening,
>
>> This is Anna Kubit. I am not sure who wrote this post - it is very rude
>
>
>> and it's content false.
>
>
>
>What does any of this have to do with photoshop?
>
>Also, Anna, how does this guy know about your house and mattress if you
>don't have any idea who he is? He may have lied about his name or age,
>but it does sound like some of his story is true since you confirmed it.
>
>
>source:
>http://www.photography-forums.com/t76698-anna-kubit-beware-of-this-wo...
>
>
>
>
>Steve wrote:
>>She said
>>she had a great house, yet when I saw it, it seemed rather unkempt, empty. There were
>>dirty dishes and food laying around and only a small laptop computer in the corner of
>>one room. Her bed was only a ragged foam mattress in the corner of an upstairs loft
>Anna_Kubit wrote:
>>The house I had bought was for renovation. It may have been in bad
>>shape when purchased, but it's in wonderful shape now - where a person
>>lives has nothing to do with how successful he or she might be. That
>>mattress in the corner was Tempur Pedic and the furniture was on order.
Hi Steve, I think this is one of several things that makes the most sense so far. Ms. Kubit has
indeed confirmed that 1. She invited you to her house, 2. You were at her house. 3. She had you come
to her upstairs loft bedroom at some point. 4. There was some type of event surrounding her bed.
Your story does seem to hold up in many ways, only I don't know if it's 90% true or 100% true. Since
Ms. Kubit is denying all of this now, but yet confirmed it earlier, it's obvious to me that she is
hiding at least something, trying to cover something up or there's something she doesn't want people
to know. I know what she did to my friend's son, but that's another issue. Between the two events,
I'd say you're spot on accurate when you say that Ms. Kubit is, at the very least, deceptive.
Sandra :-)
Inez
But Anna's evil is as nothing compared to the blackhearted wickedness
of Casper C. Mellonwieser, and he confirms 93% of a story about two
houses and three beds.
Anna Kubit
Sandra wrote:
> Hi Steve, I think this is one of several things that makes the most sense so far. Ms. Kubit has
> indeed confirmed that 1. She invited you to her house, 2. You were at her house. 3. She had you come
> to her upstairs loft bedroom at some point. 4. There was some type of event surrounding her bed.
>
> Your story does seem to hold up in many ways, only I don't know if it's 90% true or 100% true. Since
> Ms. Kubit is denying all of this now, but yet confirmed it earlier, it's obvious to me that she is
> hiding at least something, trying to cover something up or there's something she doesn't want people
> to know. I know what she did to my friend's son, but that's another issue. Between the two events,
> I'd say you're spot on accurate when you say that Ms. Kubit is, at the very least, deceptive.
>
> Sandra :-)
Sandra, I stated orginally that "Steve" was MAYBE in my house because
he seemed to know of a detail about my mattress. His detail was wrong
though so I felt inclined to correct it. "Steve" claims that he KNOWS
me, which he does not, as if he did, he would know that I have only
been to Yabbas 2x for dinner and maybe 3 times for dancing (dancing for
about 20-30 min each time total) over the last 2 years, and I do not go
to Divas - I was in there 2x in the last 2 years. Frequently? He missed
on where I go frequently. Knowing one detail of my house DOES NOT
automatically imply that "Steve" was in my house (he could have found
the detail about my house in many different ways). When I first replied
I was upset that "Steve" would talk badly about my nice mattress!! I
love that mattress!! So I felt a need to correct him, I did not intend
to say or state that he WAS in my house. I don't even know who "Steve"
is. If I do not know who he is, how can I say whether he was in my
house for sure or not? Anyone can easily say that person's x house was
clean, dirty, blah blah - and it's all so general, that it could be
either true or false, but it does not give the facts either way.
Even if "Steve" was once in my house, it does not mean I had sex with
him. It also does not mean that I gave him AIDS (I don't have it, so
how could I?!). What "Steve" is writing about me are all statements
that anybody could make up and say about anyone. What he says is very
general and could be said about any women; he just happens to like
picking on me for some reason.
ISN'T THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE FACT THAT YOU, STEVE, OR ANY OTHER
PERSON CANNOT COME TO ME DIRECTLY WITH YOUR ISSUES? MOST HUMAN BEINGS
WORK OUT THEIR PROBLEMS THAT WAY, SO WHAT MAKES ME ANY DIFFERENT? I
state on my site and tell people who I associate with that I welcome
all feedback and that I WANT IT, so why can't you bring up your real
issue with me directly? When someone goes online and tries hard to
defame someone without confronting him or her directly, doesn't that
set off some type of signal that maybe that someone is making things
up, being intentionally hurtful, engaging in just gossip, jealous,
etc.?? I don't understand what the issue is because no one is
explaining it to me. I would be happy to accept my mistake if I did in
fact make one (which I may have, I am human after all) - but I need to
know what the mistake is 1st.
And "Steve" needs to apologize publically for lying about me having
AIDS - that would be fair.
sharon1...@yahoo.com
Anna Kubit wrote:
>
> And "Steve" needs to apologize publically for lying about me having
> AIDS - that would be fair.
Hi Anna... the best thing to do, is just leave the group and say no
more about it.
They'll have totally forgotten in a week.
Really, they care *much less* than you think they do. Stop torturing
yourself and leave.
LEAVE NOW WHILE YOU CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cheezits
> Sandra wrote:
[story that no one on talk.origins cares about deleted]
[follow-up set to appropriate group]
Take this crap elsewhere.
Sue
--
"It's not smart or correct, but it's one of the things that
make us what we are." - Red Green
Dr. Khawar
After reading whole story . it seems that the original matter is the
only to dgrade eachother....i think there is no big issue that must be
discussed in this matter and things should be considered on very minor
level....and SHOW MUST GO ON...........
Thanks
Dr. Khawar