Re: Kubit Deceptions: An e-book by Anna K. - Remarks
Steven
>Hmm, so "Steve," because I advocate that women shouldn't open up as
>quickly as they normally do, it makes me deceptive and manipulative? I
>advocate friendship first - what's wrong with that?
What's wrong with it is that you know quite simply that this isn't the truth. It's
false and a lie. Your form of advocating "friendship" first is very, very different
than what you'd have people believe. Naturally you're going to leave out the
deceptive tactics being employed. Would we expect anything less?
The joke being on me... in the end the sheet fling was so dead it wasn't even worth
it. You're a very unanimated person. In more common terms, you're lousy.
>
>I never used men for any kind of experiments - that's all in your head
>for who knows what reason.
So you say. Let 10 people scrutinize your tactics, come-ons and method of behavior
and at least 9 out of 10 will agree--you're methods are willfully deceptive, and
harmful. Stepping outside the realm of what's believed to be possible is one thing.
Stepping out too far, and in the wrong areas, is another. You don't make any
distinction. It's open season and everything's fair game.
> I date in hope of finding Mr. Right for me -
>for a meaningful, long term, loving relationship.
You don't know the meaning of the word. You are quite frankly incapable of love, in
spite of what you profess. You're emotionally sterile, which is what allows you to do
to others what you do.
>And some of the men I
>turned down
Have you yet told of the men who've turned you down? Most likely for being a
deceptive person? Or perhaps a mind numbingly dead f__k, to the point a person almost
can't wait to escape?
> - can tell you just that - that I wanted something more
>than just fun, or that I didn't feel there was chemistry enough so I
>put an end to it right there and then -- normal behavior.
No, not normal behavior, when everything you do and say in the initial mental and
physical interactions say completely otherwise. Bring yourself to admit it anna, you
deceive people, knowingly, in almost every area of life. Such as your "life quantum
physics" seminars. I forget more about quantum physics in one day than you'll learn
in a month, and I can tell you, you ain't got it. Don't lie to people as you relieve
them of their pocketbooks. It's wrong.
>But, yep in
>your mind that would automatically make me deceptive, manipulative and
>doing experiments on men - only because I have not found the right one
>yet, correct?
You know what you do, and you know it's misleading. So yes, you're deceptive. What's
more, you KNOW you're being deceptive at the TIMES you're being deceptive.
> So because I chose to be a dating consultant,
Please. Give it up. You have about as many requirements to be a dating consultant as
Ray Charles does a forward observer for artillery.
>it
>automatically means that I experiment on men?
Yes.
> I survey people - I ask
>questions, I read on the topic of men/women, observe and gain most of
>my knowledge that way.
You also strategically LEAD them to make assumptions, assumptions you know they'll
make based on your cognizant, well organized and deliberate behavior towards them.
You do nothing to correct the assumptions since it's all part of the sham. The person
doesn't find out about the deception until it's too late. This is your method of
"surveying" people.
Steve
sharon
Steven wrote:
> anna kubit wrote:
> > So because I chose to be a dating consultant,
>
> Please. Give it up. You have about as many requirements to be a dating consultant as
> Ray Charles does a forward observer for artillery.
You two sock puppets are still fighting? Anna is not a good dating
consultant. If she had any sense about relationships, she would not
still be corresponding with you, now would she?
WARNING!
Hi sharon. It's women like anna kubit who give women like you a bad name.
I don't think that's right.
Steve
Scooter the Mighty
anna....@yahoo.com
There is nothing that anyone needs be "beware of." I turn a lot of men
down in online dating and I do not think that this justifies for
someone to say that others should be beware of me.
All of you who are on "Steve's" side make me sick, and you can
all go to hell.
Anna
www.konsultar.com
www.datingconsulting.com
www.annakubit.com
sharon
anna.ku...@yahoo.com wrote:
> There is nothing that anyone needs be "beware of." I turn a lot of men
> down in online dating and I do not think that this justifies for
> someone to say that others should be beware of me.
>
> All of you who are on "Steve's" side make me sick, and you can
> all go to hell.
>
> Anna
Everywhere Steve turns up, you follow just minutes behind. You should
not be doing dating consulting but offering psychic services. How do
you know everywhere he is? One of the regular women here "Sue" aka
"Cheezits", posted some weeks ago, this is an advertising scam you are
running.
I believe Sue is correct. If somebody is stalking me, I do not spend
every minute of my life tracking their moves around the internet. I
ignore them. They go away and leave me alone. It is crazy to expect
anyone to believe Steve spends his life stalking you, and you following
his trail of posts... just so you can post urls to your business site.
I checked on the "WARNING" poster too earlier, and that poster has only
posted a couple times on the internet. You are working 3 sockpuppets?
1. Steve
2. WARNING!
3. Anna Kubitz
Please go away. You insult everyone's intelligence, especially the
women here.
-----------------------------------
Wed, Oct 18 2006 10:38 pm , Cheezits writes:
[story that no one on talk.origins cares about deleted]
[follow-up set to appropriate group: alt.kooks]
Take this crap elsewhere.
Sue
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/browse_frm/thread/991b5f6b5c949b61/1f796c15c3611f4d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1&hl=en#1f796c15c3611f4d
-----------------------------------
Fri, Oct 13 2006 8:36 am, Cheezits writes:
"Anna Kubit", a spammer <annakSPAM...@SPAMdatingSPAMconsultingSPAM.com>
spammed:
[SPAM deleted]
> SBC & everyone else in this blog, make it an awesome day!
This is not a blog, this is a newsgroup. Take your spam elsewhere
before
someone alerts your ISP.
------------------------------------
Cheezits
[SPAM deleted]
Take your SPAM somewhere appropriate.
Sue
--
"It's not smart or correct, but it's one of the things that
make us what we are." - Red Green
anna....@yahoo.com
I get alerts sent to me whenever a new post goes up and it's taking
TOO much of my email space and time! Get over these posts already
and find something more interesting to do -- you're too lazy and DUMB
to find the truth and you're losers like "Steve" is. Whatever my issues
are they are MY issues; my personal business, not anyone else's -- they
don't need to be broadcast all over the web like this and I'm getting
sick of it.
Anna
www.konsultar.com
www.datingconsulting.com
www.annakubit.com
anna....@yahoo.com
sharon
anna....@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> I get alerts sent to me whenever a new post goes up and it's taking
> TOO much of my email space and time! Get over these posts already
> and find something more interesting to do -- you're too lazy and DUMB
> to find the truth and you're losers like "Steve" is. Whatever my issues
> are they are MY issues; my personal business, not anyone else's -- they
> don't need to be broadcast all over the web like this and I'm getting
> sick of it.
>
> Anna
"Whatever my issues are they are MY issues; my personal business, not
anyone else's "
But they are very off topic. And nobody is interested in consulting you
for dating.
If you have anything to say here, say it without posting your
commerical SPAM urls. How about that?
-------------------
"Marc" (a regular) writes to an earlier abuser on this group:
I have (again) posted a "report abuse" notice to google-groups about
you and your *spam* - posted to many different groups and posted here
on several occasions.
YOU ARE DOING A BAD THING.
Post messages about biology, evolution, or teaching science in the
classroom here. Post about how life was created.
-------------------
sharon
anna....@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> I get alerts sent to me whenever a new post goes up and it's taking
> TOO much of my email space and time!
You are wasting our bandwidth with your spam.
> Get over these posts already
No bitch. **YOU** get your spam off the newsgroup like you were
politely asked to do? Get my drift?
> and find something more interesting to do -- you're too lazy and DUMB
And you're a fucking spammer.
> to find the truth and you're losers like "Steve" is. Whatever my issues
Get the spam off the group.
> are they are MY issues; my personal business, not anyone else's -- they
> don't need to be broadcast all over the web like this and I'm getting
> sick of it.
I AM SICK OF IT.
>
> Anna
MARC WROTE:
> Make over £10,000 a month, using PAYPAL and a proven process,
Since I know you won't be looking in this group for replies
(was that instruction in there somewhere: "Go back to the
group(s) you have spammed and answer the comments
that people have made to your illegal MMF post." ?), so
this information is for the LURKERS reading this group.....
Google Groups has this neat feature called "Report Abuse"
and while normal stupid spam is reported as "spam", this
sort of Make Money post is (by me) reported as "illegal
content" ... wait and see if this post gets nuked from the
archive. Just watch...
CreateThis
But not sick enough to ignore them and let them die away.
CT
sharon
Of course not. As long as her partner-in-crime "steve" is around, she
has an excuse to run around "defending her good name" with her
commercial spams:
www.consultafraud.com
www.dating-consultafraud.com
www.annaisabitch.com
>
> CT
Desertphile
> There is nothing that anyone needs be "beware of." I turn a lot of men
> down in online dating
Yeah, me too.
> and I do not think that this justifies for
> someone to say that others should be beware of me.
For a few dollars and a few hours of effort you can probably talk a
judge into issuing a TRO against this asshole: then when he violates
it, the police are required to enforce it. Hios behavior sure looks
like "on-line stalking" to me.
> All of you who are on "Steve's" side make me sick, and you can
> all go to hell.
Oooo, lower-deck language from women so turns me on. I wish I knew you
just so I could make a point of not asking you for a date.
Desertphile
> I get alerts sent to me whenever a new post goes up and it's taking
> TOO much of my email space and time! Get over these posts already
> and find something more interesting to do -- you're too lazy and DUMB
> to find the truth and you're losers like "Steve" is. Whatever my issues
> are they are MY issues; my personal business, not anyone else's -- they
> don't need to be broadcast all over the web like this and I'm getting
> sick of it.
If you are "sick of it," why are you broadcasting your personal
business all over Usenet?
Frankly, I think you appear to be more than a little crazy.
Desertphile
> >sharon wrote:
Not sick enough to stop building "sock puppets" for her to argue with;
not sick enough to actually *DO* anything to end the perceived abuse
(such as complaining to ISPs, or get a restraining order issued); not
sick enough to stop engaging in the very behavior she is "sick of."
I agree she appears sick, however.
Goddess help anyone she gives dating advice to.
Desertphile
I just looked at "her" web sites: based only on those web sites, "she"
appears to be a freak, a nutcase, a fear-based manipulator, a con-man,
a fraud, a deceiver. "Her" web sites give me the impression "she" is
"Steve" and that "she" is a he, there being no "Anna" at all. I think
"she" is, as you note, merely spamming via "her" sock-puppets.
Cheezits
> I get alerts sent to me whenever a new post goes up and it's taking
> TOO much of my email space and time!
Then stop SPAMMING newsgroups that don't have anything to do with you or
your mental problems.
Steven
>> Of course not. As long as her partner-in-crime "steve" is around, she
>> has an excuse to run around "defending her good name" with her
>> commercial spams:
>
>I just looked at "her" web sites: based only on those web sites, "she"
>appears to be a freak, a nutcase, a fear-based manipulator, a con-man,
>a fraud, a deceiver. "Her" web sites give me the impression "she" is
>"Steve" and that "she" is a he, there being no "Anna" at all. I think
>"she" is, as you note, merely spamming via "her" sock-puppets.
Sorry to disappoint you, but you're wrong. Anna Kubit is very much a real person,
apart from myself. You see, if you think about it, a kingdom divided against itself
cannot stand. For that matter, a group divided against itself can't stand. What that
means, in other words, is that if Anna was arguing against herself, saying in effect
that as far as scum goes she's the lowest of the low and completely untrustworthy,
manipulative, etc, and then in the next post defending herself, saying she's a great
person that people should want to consult with or whatever.... well, I think you get
the picture. It would be like the quarterback always intentionally throwing the ball
to the other team, ya know? (damn, I never thought I'd hear myself defend Anna Kubit
in any way... but fact is fact).
If Anna wanted to spam newsgroups, it would be far simpler to just spam them, making
posts with her site links in them, rather than degrading (i.e. telling the truth
about) herself and then trying to recover.
Steve
sharon
Desertphile wrote:
> I just looked at "her" web sites: based only on those web sites, "she"
> appears to be a freak, a nutcase, a fear-based manipulator, a con-man,
> a fraud, a deceiver. "Her" web sites give me the impression "she" is
> "Steve" and that "she" is a he, there being no "Anna" at all. I think
> "she" is, as you note, merely spamming via "her" sock-puppets.
I just found this odd. When I responded last night, I only replied in
talk.origins (there were no other newsgroups listed in the followup, if
there had been I would have removed them. Further, my reply is not on
those groups. It propagated to talk.origins only), but somehow, Anna
has added on a lot of newsgroups in her reply to me.
Her reply to me turns up in:
1. talk.origins
2. adobe.photoshop.windows
3. misc.fitness.misc
4. misc.health.aids
5. uk.rec.bodybuilding
6. alt.health
7. alt.graphics.photoshop
8. misc.fitness.weights
For a woman who does not want her business spread on the internet, she
has brought a lot of attention to it, by *adding* a talk origin-only
reply to many other newsgroups (I did not send my post to any of these
newsgroups, Anna added them), and of course, her commercial spam URLs
are included with all those replies to "Steve".
Anna is a spammer.
You may be right Desertphile. She may be a "he" spamming the group.
Though, it is also possible she/he is more than a spammer. I looked up
"Anna Kubitz" on Google, and it is a German name. Prostitution is legal
in Germany. I think she is a gold-digging tramp trying to find "old
DUMB lonely men to prey on." She thinks men on talk origins are stupid
like she is.
anna.ku...@yahoo.com wrote:
> There is nothing that anyone needs be "beware of." I turn a lot of men
> down in online dating
Including the one who claims he has AIDS.
Right, stupid Anna.
Steven
>>I get alerts sent to me whenever a new post goes up and it's taking
>>TOO much of my email space and time! Get over these posts already
>>and find something more interesting to do -- you're too lazy and DUMB
>>to find the truth and you're losers like "Steve" is. Whatever my issues
>>are they are MY issues; my personal business, not anyone else's -- they
>>don't need to be broadcast all over the web like this and I'm getting
>>sick of it.
>
>But not sick enough to ignore them and let them die away.
Intentionally ignoring a message, or any form of communication, presupposes that the
original sender was looking for a response as an impetus to continue the
communication. Since this isn't the goal or motive in this case, ignoring it can't
make it "die away." The continuation of informational messages regarding her are
therefore not dependant on her responding to them.
In fact, rarely do I respond to anyone regarding my messages, other than the
exception of clearing up a small misunderstandings here or there, such as in this
case.
Steve
Cheezits
[spam deleted]
None of the dozens of newsgroups you've been SPAMMING with this nonsense
has anything to do with your mental problems.
sharon
Steven wrote:
> If Anna wanted to spam newsgroups, it would be far simpler to just spam them, making
> posts with her site links in them, rather than degrading (i.e. telling the truth
Oh you mean, you, her worst enemy is now "defending her"? Suspicious.
> about) herself and then trying to recover.
To avoid being reported for illegal spamming. Prostitution is illegal
where I live.
>
>
> Steve
Steven
>Oh you mean, you, her worst enemy is now "defending her"? Suspicious.
Perhaps a better term was in order. How about "clarifying" a misperception. You see,
I'm about the facts, the truth, which is why I will not let a misperception stand
even if it seems advantageous to me. I'm not Anna Kubit's worst enemy. What I am is a
guy who can't stand what she does to other people as it utterly sickens me, that
could be you or anyone else, things that are plainly wrong... and yes I was in that
lot at one time, and technically still am. Anna knows what I want to see. I made that
clear in one of my posts last month. When she's ready to perform the act of
apologizing, without excuse or qualification, to the men (and women) whom she's
KNOWINGLY harmed or f*cked with in some way, this will stop.
Steve
sharon
Steven wrote:
> KNOWINGLY harmed or f*cked with in some way, this will stop.
It will stop alright, when vice finds out what you're doing.
>
>
> Steve
Jawohl.
How do we say "Mich in Deutschland treffen".
as in "travelling business men" hooked up with on certain male
dominated newsgroups -- educated and older men = financially secure.
Including AIDS groups. Anna is a professional, and knows how to help
her clients practice the "Sicheres Geschlecht".
sharon
According to Google, maybe I'm wrong. Anna knows lots of languages,
besides german I suspect. But copulation doesn't require much more than
grunts and groans, does it?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=konsultar as in one of her
spam url.
sharon
> > > KNOWINGLY harmed or f*cked with in some way, this will stop.
> >
> > It will stop alright, when vice finds out what you're doing.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Steve
> >
> > Jawohl.
> >
> > How do we say "Mich in Deutschland treffen".
> >
> > as in "travelling business men" hooked up with on certain male
> > dominated newsgroups -- educated and older men = financially secure.
> > Including AIDS groups. Anna is a professional, and knows how to help
> > her clients practice the "Sicheres Geschlecht".
>
> According to Google, maybe I'm wrong. Anna knows lots of languages,
> besides german I suspect. But copulation doesn't require much more than
> grunts and groans, does it?
Though, Anna is based in Florida it seems.
http://www.melbourneit.com.au/cc/whois/search
So she is readily available anywhere, for her "old, ugly, stupid, and
"sick" clients".
Phone +1.888-511-4678 to report Anna's spam to her web-server provider.
Whois Result for konsultar.com @ whois.opensrs.net
Registrant
Name konsultar corporation
Domain
Name KONSULTAR.COM
UpdatedDate 01-Nov-2006
ExpiresDate 02-Nov-2007
CreatedDate 02-Nov-2005
NameServer NS1.IPOWERWEB.NET
NameServer NS1.IPOWERDNS.COM
NameServerAddress 64.70.61.130
NameServerAddress 66.235.217.202
Status clientTransferProhibited
Registrar
Name TUCOWS, INC.
AdminContact
Name Kubit, Anna
TechContact
Name Manager, Domain
Email hostma...@ipowerweb. com
Address 2800 28th Street Suite 205
City Santa Monica
StateProvince California
PostalCode 90405
Country US
CountryCode US
Phone +1.8885114678
Fax +1.3103141610
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Name DATINGCONSULTING.COM
UpdatedDate 18-Oct-2006
ExpiresDate 24-Aug-2007
CreatedDate 24-Aug-2006
NameServer NS1.IPOWERDNS.COM
NameServer NS1.IPOWERWEB.NET
NameServerAddress 66.235.217.202
NameServerAddress 64.70.61.130
Status clientTransferProhibited
Name Kubit, Anna
City Naples
StateProvince FL
PostalCode 34107
Country US
CountryCode US
..even provides phone number for her clients to contact her!!! HOW
CONVENIENT. I would never put my phone number on a ffreaking domain
lisence for crazies to contact.. but not Annna. She's a kook.
Name Manager, Domain
Email host...@ipowerweb. com
Address 919 East Jefferson
City Phoenix
StateProvince AZ
Phone +1.8885114678
http://www.melbourneit.com.au/cc/whois/search
sharon
> Though, Anna is based in Florida it seems.
> http://www.melbourneit.com.au/cc/whois/search
> So she is readily available anywhere, for her "old, ugly, stupid, and
> "sick" clients".
oh, I forgot FAT too.
1. talk.origins
2. adobe.photoshop.windows
3. misc.fitness.misc
4. misc.health.aids
5. uk.rec.bodybuilding
6. alt.health
7. alt.graphics.photoshop
8. misc.fitness.weights
>
> Phone +1.888-511-4678 to report Anna's spam to her web-server provider.
> >
sharon
> > Though, Anna is based in Florida it seems.
> > http://www.melbourneit.com.au/cc/whois/search
> > So she is readily available anywhere, for her "old, ugly, stupid, and
> > "sick" clients".
>
> oh, I forgot FAT too.
Anna's got her clients tabbed for the worthless vermin they are.
>
> 1. talk.origins
old
> 2. adobe.photoshop.windows
scrawny, brainy geeks
> 3. misc.fitness.misc
fat
> 4. misc.health.aids
sick
> 5. uk.rec.bodybuilding
fat
> 6. alt.health
sick
> 7. alt.graphics.photoshop
geek
> 8. misc.fitness.weights
fat
I hate women like you Anna, and your sockpuppets too.
Stay off the group or I'll call the Sheriff department to investigate.
I know some law enforcement who can get the FBI / Vice Squad to look
into your background real quick.
I don't like it when some stupid bitfch calls me dumb, but especially
the "lazy" part. I take it as a deep personal insult.
Desertphile
> On 12 Nov 2006 09:35:05 -0800, "Desertphile" <deser...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Of course not. As long as her partner-in-crime "steve" is around, she
> >> has an excuse to run around "defending her good name" with her
> >> commercial spams:
> >I just looked at "her" web sites: based only on those web sites, "she"
> >appears to be a freak, a nutcase, a fear-based manipulator, a con-man,
> >a fraud, a deceiver. "Her" web sites give me the impression "she" is
> >"Steve" and that "she" is a he, there being no "Anna" at all. I think
> >"she" is, as you note, merely spamming via "her" sock-puppets.
> Sorry to disappoint you, but you're wrong. Anna Kubit is very much a real person,
> apart from myself. You see, if you think about it, a kingdom divided against itself
"Dissapoint" me? Do you really believe I give a shit enough to be
"dissapointed" if "Anna" and "Steven" are not the same person?
Sheeeish: get a fucking life already.
You have been told nobody wants to hear your shit in this newsgroup;
nobody, and I mean *NOBODY* give a flying dingo's turd about your wee
little mental problems.
sharon
Desertphile wrote:
> > Sorry to disappoint you, but you're wrong. Anna Kubit is very much a real person,
> > apart from myself. You see, if you think about it, a kingdom divided against itself
>
> "Dissapoint" me? Do you really believe I give a shit enough to be
> "dissapointed" if "Anna" and "Steven" are not the same person?
> Sheeeish: get a fucking life already.
>
> You have been told nobody wants to hear your shit in this newsgroup;
> nobody, and I mean *NOBODY* give a flying dingo's turd about your wee
> little mental problems.
not even a buffalo chip?
Aaron R. Kulkis
>in talk origins, strange.
I was thinking the same thing. Maybe there's more to the whole case than
meets the eye?
What's most strange to me, though, is it doesn't seem to even occur to
anybody that this "steve" dude might, just MIGHT be telling the truth. It's
like these people would rather eat a thousand shit sandwiches rather than
even entertain the possibility that it could be true. Maybe they just like
to
argue. Very weird indeed.
A R K
sharon
Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >i'm blown away that a post that started as spam now has over 30 posts
> >in talk origins, strange.
>
> I was thinking the same thing. Maybe there's more to the whole case than
> meets the eye?
>
> What's most strange to me, though, is it doesn't seem to even occur to
> anybody that this "steve" dude might, just MIGHT be telling the truth. It's
They know, NOBODY cares, because we can't know. It's not our life.
Thank goodness for that, it's the persistent spamming with
consult-a-fraud.com that's became a nuisance. When asked to restrain
that kind of spam somewhere appropriate they became hot-headed. I have
no reason to believe any of it, either sockpuppet and no desire to
know.
I enjoyed the way Desertphile stated so eloquently of the matter:
"You have been told nobody wants to hear your shit in this newsgroup;
nobody, and I mean *NOBODY* give a flying dingo's turd about your wee
little mental problems. "
> like these people would rather eat a thousand shit sandwiches rather than
Nic
Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >i'm blown away that a post that started as spam now has over 30 posts
> >in talk origins, strange.
>
> I was thinking the same thing. Maybe there's more to the whole case than
> meets the eye?
Like what? And why would that cause a high response?
> What's most strange to me, though, is it doesn't seem to even occur to
> anybody that this "steve" dude might, just MIGHT be telling the truth. It's
> like these people would rather eat a thousand shit sandwiches rather than
> even entertain the possibility that it could be true. Maybe they just like
> to
> argue. Very weird indeed.
We can only go by what we see. There must be hundreds of people in the
situation steve claims to be in, and yet we see just one. Moreover one
for which there is a potential commercial explanation. I don't know
whether I'm using Bayesian inference, or the Anthropic Principle, but
my money is on it being spam (for now, at least).
> A R K
Cheezits
> What's most strange to me, though, is it doesn't seem to even occur to
> anybody that this "steve" dude might, just MIGHT be telling the truth.
Who cares if it's true? If it is, he's a spamming moron. If it isn't,
he's still a spamming moron.
David Iain Greig
>
> There is nothing that anyone needs be "beware of." I turn a lot of men
> someone to say that others should be beware of me.
And you and Steve are both banned from talk.origins for spamming.
Now, fuck off and die, both of you.
--D.
--
david iain greig dgr...@ediacara.org
moderator, talk.origins sp4 kox
http://www.ediacara.org/~dgreig arbor plena alouattarum
David Iain Greig
The poster is banned from talk.origins -- anyone complaining to their ISP
can point out they are evading a moderator ban at this point, and I will
support them in email as needed to terminate their ISP account.
David Iain Greig
> On 12 Nov 2006 10:35:53 -0800, "sharon" <sharon1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Oh you mean, you, her worst enemy is now "defending her"? Suspicious.
>
> Perhaps a better term was in order. How about "clarifying" a misperception.
How about you shut the fuck up, and get the fuck off talk.origins.
I'm the moderator, this is MY group, and you are BANNED.
ANY further posting by you on this group will be taken up with your ISP
as TOS abuse.
David Iain Greig
be eating this thread by now. You will likely see few responses, and fewer
as I throttle it to death by procmail. I am prepared to throw QUITE a wide
net to catch this.