Description:
Evolution versus creationism (sometimes hot!). (Moderated)
|
|
|
Question for Ray
|
| |
What about dogs. Are they also one of your specially created species, or are their existence the result of selective breeding, starting with wolves? With selection beginning about 14.000 years ago?
|
|
|
Your opinion please.
 
|
| |
Recently an intresting question was posed only to creationists regarding living matter and non-living matter. From a creation standpoint, i take the position that there must have been an element that was added to non living matter that annimates the non-living matter into a state of living matter that we call life. Also from a creation... more »
|
|
|
Economics: An Opportunity for ID “Science”?
|
| |
I have been meaning to write about this for years, but have not been sure how to go about it, because economics is far from my area of expertise. Given the urgency of financial crisis I’ll just throw out my half-baked idea for comment. As usual, a little background is in order. I remember hearing a radio... more »
|
|
|
Higher Education World University Guide
|
| |
Higher Education World University Guide Schools - Colleges - Universities: Alumni and Genealogy Education, [link] now includes comprehensive University list, noted among the top 500 best ranked sites, with A to Z indexes. Each country or national... more »
|
|
|
Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
|
| |
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:47:51 -0700 (PDT), snex <x...@comcast.net> wrote: ... But didn't we evolve from reptiles, too? So which is it? Are we apes? Fish? Reptiles? Apefish? Repta-apes? Apefishtiles? What about the original primordial soup? Aren't we that instead? And the insanity continues. People are free to believe they are fish just because... more »
|
|
|
Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
|
| |
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:33:51 -0400, Jack Dominey <l...@my.sig> wrote: ... It has been addressed. You cannot address or refute what single-handedly debunks the fish to man version of evolution presented above as being a false version: it's not observable, and it's also not testable/verifiable. It's that simple.... more »
|
|
|
Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
|
| |
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:45:39 -0700 (PDT), snex <x...@comcast.net> wrote: ... They are a life that has some similarities (although huge differences). So such tests are not rock solid that the results will be the same on human life, but it's a starting point. Notice we do these tests whether we believe fish learn, over... more »
|
|
|
