--- c...@netcom.com (C J Silverio) writes: |If you were going to build your own house, what would |you do?
Nobody will read this. But WTF, I've written it. I will POST, and the bandwidth used will fill the teeny gaps between alt.binaries.erotica.blondes posts. Followups to alt.housing.pipe-dreams. Killfile me now.
I've been thinking about livable homes recently. I've been thinking about how unlivable the standard US mass-produced tract-ish house is. Specifically, I've been thinking about how unlivable the house I rent is. Architects have clearly given cheap fast construction a higher priority than usability. They must die. Or worse: be forced to live in one of their horrible creations.
Some questions:
What does a house exist for? What do I do in my house? What external considerations put restrictions on the design?
Some ideas:
Materials: Exterior: stone, slate. Fire resistant things. Earthquake resistant. In tones that integrate with the Calif. landscape. Interior: wood, stone, real plaster. Wood floors. (If they're stone, they should be heated for energy efficiency in winter.) Built to last: my grandchildren should be able to live there.
Design considerations: Energy efficiency. Passive solar. Integrated with landscape/trees to stay cool in summer & warm in winter. High ceilings. Lots of natural light. Clear travel routes through house. It doesn't have to be big. It just has to be carefully put together.
Spaces that must exist: Workspaces for me & Lance. Music room. Living room/hang-out space for visitors. Should be large & open: the default space from which rooms are sliced. An actual comfy bathroom, with a tub sized for two. Library space, with built-in shelves. Bedroom with fuckloads of closet spaces. Extra bedroom. If (child) { AddToHouse(anotherBedroom) }. Kitchen: gas stove, breakfast eating space, work space for two simultaneous cooks. Counter space for appliances. Racks to hang pots & pans. Energy-efficient fridge. NO FORMICA. Greenhouse. Or at least greenhouse windows in the kitchen, for herbs, etc. Garage for two cars & two motorcycles & the odd bicycle. Workspace in garage.
Fripperies: Some fast computer networky thing in the walls, outlets in all rooms. Suitable for Mac plug-n-play. Electrical wiring DONE RIGHT for once. Properly grounded outlets everywhere. NO intercoms. NO computer control of everything. NO stereo in the walls. Hot tub. Tiled patio-thingie outside.
I'll never have money to do this, not even if GM succeeds beyond my wildest dreams.
--- c j silverio I apologize for the "if (child)" crack. I have been nerding too much recently.
C J Silverio (c...@netcom.com) wrote: : If you were going to build your own house, what would : you do? Design it yourself (with an architect's aid)? : Borrow a classic design? What would you put in it?
Design it yourself...
A big kitchen with lots of elbow room Inside, separate laundry An attic and a basement Formal dining room and entry way Greenhouse(in cold climate) Pool(big) I like brick exteriors with winding driveways etc.
-- The Raspberry "Interior Designs R Us" Wizard ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You can go a long way with a smile. You can go a lot farther with a smile and a gun. -- Al Capone Some days you eat the bear, and some days the bear eats you. -- Anon ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Skylights, fireplace, large kitchen with a island, gas stove (duh), more cabinet space than I need, lots of windows (more expensive to heat and cool, but what the hell).
Large areas that don't serve a specific purpose - CJ's "hanging out room," I suppose. Workroom, small bedroom with attached bath. I want a bathtub I can do laps in. Dammit. (I've lived in apartments too long.) Clear glass shower doors, closet space *in* the bath for linens.
No formica. No sofas. No dogs. No wallpaper. No formal dining room.
Lots of wood on the inside, built in bookshelves *everywhere*, minimal furniture, maximal floor sprawlage (I keep going back and forth on wood floors - they're gorgeous, but you don't want to lie down on them).
In article <ceejCI1nzo....@netcom.com>, C J Silverio <c...@netcom.com> wrote:
>I've been thinking about livable homes recently. I've been >thinking about how unlivable the standard US mass-produced >tract-ish house is.
It's the same in the UK. The particular problem we have here is that it's cold enough to kill old people, but not cold enough that it's clear to even the dumbest person that it's stupid to build uninsulated houses. Thus there are *still* people building houses with no cavity walls, no loft insulation, and no double glazing. (I know this as I looked at a few when trying to find a place to buy.)
>What does a house exist for?
I think it was Corbusier who said that a house is a machine for living in.
>What do I do in my house?
Given that you live in California, I think I'd rather not speculate.
>What external considerations put restrictions on the design?
Mainly planning permission. That's the real pig; in England, it's practically impossible to get planning permission for any kind of "interesting" house design. Badly-designed postmodern crap can be build wherever you like, but if you want (say) a wedge of solar glass, you're out of luck.
It's not just housing. The UK has practically no buildings to compare with the beauty of (say) the modern buildings of Paris; no Pompidou centre, no opera house... People like Prince Charles whine on about "monstrous carbuncles", and praise buildings which their ancestors whined about in exactly the same way. (Chazzer likes St Paul's Cathedral, for example, which was originally whined about a great deal when it was built, and described as being like a giant pimple on the face of London.)
>Materials: > Exterior: stone, slate. Fire resistant things. Earthquake > resistant. In tones that integrate with the Calif. landscape.
Cavity walls with foam insulation.
> Interior: wood, stone, real plaster. > Wood floors. (If they're stone, they should be heated for > energy efficiency in winter.)
Underfloor heating, I reckon. After all, heat rises, so it was bloody obvious even to the Romans how to heat a house.
>Design considerations: > Energy efficiency. Passive solar. Integrated with > landscape/trees to stay cool in summer & warm in winter.
There's a guy in England who has built his house underground. (Bill Gates is doing the same, I gather.) Once you go down 10cm, the temperature is pretty much constant all year round. And windows in the ceiling let in light all day.
> Clear travel routes through house.
Drive-thru? Surely not, but you never can tell with Americans...
> Music room.
Acoustically insulated. Like listening rooms at hi-fi shops.
> Kitchen: gas stove, breakfast eating space, work space > for two simultaneous cooks. Counter space for appliances. > Racks to hang pots & pans. Energy-efficient fridge. > NO FORMICA.
Plenty of ventilation.
> Some fast computer networky thing in the walls, > outlets in all rooms. Suitable for Mac plug-n-play.
With a small computer room where all the boxes can go. So the actual bit you use is just a screen and keyboard, or even a Newton A4 pad, connected to the real crunch which is hidden away out of sight.
> Electrical wiring DONE RIGHT for once. Properly grounded > outlets everywhere.
Earth leakage circuit breakers instead of a fusebox.
> NO intercoms. NO computer control of everything. NO > stereo in the walls.
Speakers in the living room connected through to the music room, though.
> Hot tub.
Well, like I said, I'd rather not speculate.
As to the designing, I'd get a qualified structural engineer to help me do it myself. A friend of the family is a builder, and his opinion of architects is that they produce buildings which often look good but are completely unlivable. I tend to agree, having lived in a building designed by Sir Denis Lazden (he who was responsible for the National Theatre).
mathew -- /X-Attribution:/h:j -- just say no to SuperCite GOD IS MY MODERATOR Will betray country for food Somebody reset talk.bizarre --assuming nothing read.
In article <ceejCI1FC9....@netcom.com> c...@netcom.com (C J Silverio) writes:
>If you were going to build your own house, what would >you do? [ ... ] >If you were going to build your own house, what would >you do? Design it yourself (with an architect's aid)? >Borrow a classic design? What would you put in it?
First, I'd make sure it was situated on at least 100 acres, so I'd have plenty of elbow room.
Then, I'd want a nice limestone hill to dig into, that had a good strategic command of the surrounding area.
And some mining equipment to dig it into the hill.
-- Gary Heston SCI Systems, Inc. g...@sci34hub.sci.com site admin The Chairman of the Board and the CFO speak for SCI. I'm neither. "Quit while you're ahead. All the best gamblers do." Baltasar Gracian
In article <15DEC199305212...@summa.tamu.edu> btsh...@summa.tamu.edu (Evolve or Perish) writes:
>No sofas.
The French are consummate idiots.
First that whole, uncomfortable "Louis N" period, and now they're pissing on the planet's future by vetoing GATT in the EC because they want gross points in "Home Alez III."
"Cultural integrity" my Mike Milken action-figure. They're greedy, whining, snail-sucking perverts who don't even have the cojones to deal up-front like men. We ought to end-run on them and sell them lock, stock, and Provence to South Africa for some cracked quartz and Winnie Mandela's pile of old turbans. I hope Mickey Mouse takes a big crap right on the Champs Elysees on his way to EuroDisney tomorrow.
And their language is nothing more than euphemism-laden babytalk.
In article <2en66f$...@reznor.larc.nasa.gov> klu...@grissom.larc.nasa.gov (Scott Dorsey) writes: >I'm losing my mind trying to find a mason that >can build a real fireplace. They all want to put in a cheap stovepipe >and brick around it. I do not want a metal insert, I want a real >fireplace.
You're expecting maybe Santa Claus will show up?
There are two options, here:
1. Bag it. The stovepipe version is incredibly safe, incredibly easy and cheap to get cleaned, and less likely to encourage squirrel nesting. It's also much less expensive and more amenable to interesting exterior designs. The ones built in modern (tile-roofed) Phoenician homes are surrounded by wood, styrofoam, chicken wire, and textured stucco. If this was not already the cliche' style it would have been necessary to order it special, and I would have.
2. Buy a "tip-up" and have it shipped to you. These are built off-site, usually by large developers who want to install fifty houses in six months. They pour the foundation and tip the fireplace and chimney up off a truck into a slot. In order to maintain structural integrity during the tipping, they build the chimney extra strong, sometimes with rebar. These things do not crack or crumble. This is how older (asphalt-shingled) Phoenician houses were built. You might not even be able to find these, any more.
Well, three:
3. Keep looking, but expect then to pay as much for the chimbley as you would have for the kitchen had you just bagged it. Also expect whopping chimney-sweep bills: it takes them ten times as long to do large, square, masonry flues as it does to run a round, properly calibred brush down a steel tube.
>Then again, I still have a 1948 vintage fusebox in my >house (and it's going soon... it's the next project after >getting the gas installed).
I want gas soooooo fucking bad. The neighborhood doesn't even have a feedpipe. It'd cost me fifty grand just so I can saute' mushrooms and prawns properly. Fuck, fuck, fuck.
>> NO intercoms. NO computer control of everything. NO >> stereo in the walls.
>Amen, brother.
Bugger that. I want Echelon(TM)-upgradable wiring. Lights that follow me around the house. Automatic adjustment of stereophonic balance and surround delay. A tub with a timer. Automatic air-duct flow control. And a magnetohydrodynamic water fountain by the pool.
>> Hot tub.
>This is something that Hallie keeps adding to my list. I don't know >who is going to keep it clean.
Microbes. Designer bacteria. Our infinitesimal friends. Hint: bathe before tubbing.
Hot tubs are mandatory. There is no more suitable place to conduct foot massages.
>>I'll never have money to do this, not even if GM succeeds >>beyond my wildest dreams.
>You're right. You can get closer if you do all the work yourself, though, >and start by modifying an existing structure.
I can see her now: "Lance, get the crowbar; we're taking out the coal-hole today..." Some structures start from a greater disadvantage...
In article <ceejCI1FC9....@netcom.com>, C J Silverio <c...@netcom.com> wrote:
>--- >If you were going to build your own house, what would >you do?
if i was going to build my own house, i would build a magnificent stucco spanish-style mansion with large airy rooms and open doorways and tile floors.
but i wouldn't build my own house. what i want to do is buy a '30s vintage bungalow, or possibly an old farmhouse. i want a studio in the attic under the eaves, with sloping ceilings and old, warm-sounding wood everywhere. i want big ornate moldings and an elegant stair rail and REAL RADIATORS although they don't have to work; i just want them as cat perches. i want a bathroom all in black and white tile, and a big porch with a swing, and bookshelves built into the walls in unexpected places. i want front steps, and huge old trees, elms and oaks and maples, that dwarf the house.
if i end up with the bungalow, i want to live in a quaint old neighborhood full of houses just like mine. if i get the farmhouse, i want to live on several acres, far enough back that i can't see the road.
i expect i will have one or the other of these in the next five years or so. of course, i'll probably be renting, but WTF.
m
smaller dreams of better things -- "INside I'm CRAWLING with TENDERMINTS but OUTside all HOO-RAW!" - Pogo
>> Built to last: my grandchildren should be able to live there. >Impossible. You can't get good slow-growth lumber any longer, even if >you could afford it. All the slow-growth forests that could be chopped >down, have been. You can thank the lumber industry a hundred years ago >for this problem. When I had to replace a beam in my attic due to water >damage, I had to go with oak since the only pine I could get was shoddy >junk, even the douglas fir.
I don't know about support beams, but it is possible to buy century (or two)-old floorboards. There's an entire industry of people who strip out old houses (probably for nouveau wealthy idiots who want w/w carpeting instead of wooden floors) and then sell the boards to folks who want that genuine historically correct restoration (where they're undoing the work of the wankers who gutted the house 40 years ago).
--Pat "lovely saltbox with w/w shag, sliding glass doors ..."
In article <ceejCI1nzo....@netcom.com> c...@netcom.com (C J Silverio) writes:
>--- >c...@netcom.com (C J Silverio) writes: >|If you were going to build your own house, what would >|you do?
>I've been thinking about livable homes recently. I've been >thinking about how unlivable the standard US mass-produced >tract-ish house is. Specifically, I've been thinking about >how unlivable the house I rent is. Architects have clearly >given cheap fast construction a higher priority than usability. >They must die. Or worse: be forced to live in one of their >horrible creations.
Or worse yet: be lured into the crawlspace with promises of a really good French amber, and be studded up, despite protests, behind several ply of sheetrock.
>Some questions:
>What does a house exist for? >What do I do in my house? >What external considerations put restrictions on the design?
I'm sorry, but this line of thought gives me amusing images of a bunch of housing contractors sitting around the jobsite, scratching their crotches and asking Zen-like questions. "Like, man, is my house not an extension of MYSELF?"
>Some ideas:
>Materials: > Exterior: stone, slate. Fire resistant things. Earthquake > resistant. In tones that integrate with the Calif. landscape. > Interior: wood, stone, real plaster. > Wood floors. (If they're stone, they should be heated for > energy efficiency in winter.) > Built to last: my grandchildren should be able to live there.
You'll need to pour the love into the construction of this baby. Wood houses are notoriously shortlived unless they are well put-together. The old wooden mansions you hear about which have never been restored are wonders of construction. Use sanded and treated cherry for the floors, or something similar, if you want it to last.
>Design considerations: > Energy efficiency. Passive solar. Integrated with > landscape/trees to stay cool in summer & warm in winter. > High ceilings. > Lots of natural light. > Clear travel routes through house. > It doesn't have to be big. It just has to be carefully > put together.
Abandon the classical put-floors-on-top-of-other-floors idea. I'd concentrate on finding lines of sunlight and putting large windows into them. Of course, we need to know how temperate the clime is; this idea isn't pragmatic if you're in the arctic zone where you *need* some stacking to stay warm.
>Spaces that must exist: > Workspaces for me & Lance. > Music room. > Living room/hang-out space for visitors. Should be large & > open: the default space from which rooms are sliced.
Well, I guess we know where the next BOB is.......
> An actual comfy bathroom, with a tub sized for two. > Library space, with built-in shelves. > Bedroom with fuckloads of closet spaces. > Extra bedroom. > 10 If (child) { AddToHouse(anotherBedroom) }.
20 Goto 10
Hey, I'm kidding, okay?
> Kitchen: gas stove, breakfast eating space, work space > for two simultaneous cooks. Counter space for appliances. > Racks to hang pots & pans. Energy-efficient fridge. > NO FORMICA. > Greenhouse. Or at least greenhouse windows in the kitchen, > for herbs, etc. > Garage for two cars & two motorcycles & the odd bicycle. > Workspace in garage.
Use a drive-up loft ramp; park cycles upstairs, cars down. Conserves heat.
>Fripperies: > Some fast computer networky thing in the walls, > outlets in all rooms. Suitable for Mac plug-n-play. > Electrical wiring DONE RIGHT for once. Properly grounded > outlets everywhere.
Do it yourself, then. I've yet to find an electric man who does his job exactly right.
> NO intercoms. NO computer control of everything. NO > stereo in the walls. > Hot tub. > Tiled patio-thingie outside.
DEFINITE BOB site.
>I'll never have money to do this, not even if GM succeeds >beyond my wildest dreams.
Aw, hell......
I'll spot ya.
-- HWRNMNBSOL "Sex between a man and a woman can be a wonderful thing if one is between the right man and the right woman." - Woody Allen
C J Silverio wrote: >--- >If you were going to build your own house, what would >you do?
A yurt. Decent computer, newsfeed, espresso machine. Rugs and mats. Horses or camels picketed outside.
I want a planet of disseminated and invisible technology. I want to cohabit with the cold weather rather than fight it. Hardwood floors. Feh.
.................................................................. Kate McDonnell, infographiste c_mc...@pavo.concordia.ca "A female is, shortly put, a she, or, put more at length, a woman- or-girl-or-cow-or-hen-or-the-like." - Fowler's English Usage
People who don't want to be in the t.b. coffeehouse, press 'n'.
cj writes about her dream house. Or more likely her ideal practical house.
My father was an architecht. When we decided to have a second, summer home, he designed it himself. In theory, then, he designed it to be practical, and to be what he wanted, for himself if not the family.
Materials: Exterior: Wood or apparently wood. Interior: Wood, plaster. Floors: Wall to wall carpet, probably over wood. Stairs are bare wood. Hallways, bathrooms, and kitchen/dining are some kind of tile.
Hopefully it'll last. Have to see if I inherit it.
Design considerations: Energy efficiency: Passive solar. Most of south side of house is entirely glass (sliding glass doors; top floor features 45 degree windows above them. In summertime trees cover pretty well, although I believe at least one tree is closer than legal. Also used a wood stove as secondary heating source. "Inverted" design puts bedrooms lowest, keeping them cooler in summer, but usually have to fall back on per-room electric heat in winter.
High ceilings: Reasonable headroom everywhere, especially stairways. Top "floor" is 1.5 stories or more.
Lighting: Glass house, as mentioned. Main bedrooms feature indirect lighting via recessed bank of lights.
Clear travel routes: split-level design means there's only one way to get anywhere. Have to use stairs a lot though. Not sure whether it's any beefit; I never minded it as a youth.
Areas: Decks: Both bottom-floor bedrooms have separate square decks, no railings, 2'-5' off the ground. Fine for hanging out on, but I hate the West Virginia insects.
Marc Moorcroft <sma...@turing.toronto.edu> wrote: >In article <ceejCI1FC9....@netcom.com>, C J Silverio <c...@netcom.com> wrote: >>--- >>If you were going to build your own house, what would >>you do?
>If corrugated cardboard were waterproof, and fireproof.. but it's not.
>Somewhere on a blasted heath, but no more than a quarter of an hour's >walk away from an all-night variety.
>Just imagine: The second day in the dream apartment you've sought for >over a year, and then...
> "We just let the blueprints into our sight for a second!"
> ...you're going to build your own house.
>What will you do? What WILL you do?
my ideal house would be built underground or , if i wanted a view, which i don't, i build it into the side if a mountain or a hill.
chevyn [ sounds good. ] mc auley
--
'You know when you put a stick in the water and it looks like it's bent but it's not? <pause> That's why I don't take baths.' --- Steven Wright
In article <ceejCI1nzo....@netcom.com> c...@netcom.com (C J Silverio) writes:
>--- >c...@netcom.com (C J Silverio) writes: >|If you were going to build your own house, what would >|you do?
I have been looking at houses recently, and found a pretty OK one that I would consider purchasing if nothing else comes up. This house is in the Park Avenue area of Rochester, NY, in the cultural district. Culture doesn't mean a cheese factory, but the house is within walking distance of a bunch of way qool museums, nature freak food stores, a bus station, a mall (not TOO close), a bunch of universities, and best of all, Java Joe's coffee house with open mike on Tuesday nights. The location can't be beat, but let's talk about the house.
The house is a Victorian style house, which means that it was built in the 20's, has lots of space going up, but not much of wide. Walking around gives me a feeling of being squeezed into a spaghetti thin strand of human, and there is a lot of room in the attic and the basement, and the rooms are fairly decent sized for the city.
What made this house really good is the charm and character oozing out from everywhere. The floor is maple, the walls are plaster (no drywall), and the wood staircase are all original wood from when it was built. The house has been remodeled so many times it looks pretty weird with the room layout, but in the same time it's a welcome change from my cookie cutter apartment, with everything all arranged in some logical but boring way. This house has a lot of odd closets and cabinets that must have had some other purpose in a different time.
However, the house isn't nooky or cranny enough, so I am placing this house as a default house. If I don't see anything better, the place would be a very acceptable purchase.
This house is a multi family unit, meaning it was cut into two, with the ground level floor being a studio apartment and the upstairs a two bedroom apartment. The studio apartment is absolutely beautiful, while the upstairs is a bit cheesy. The upstairs is rented to tenants, so it's not too bad if they like it that way. Eventually I might remodel it between tenants.
Multi-family houses are not always well executed. Single family homes are usually much more nicer and tasteful than multi family homes. In most cases the multi family homes are done very cheaply and only the portion where the owner lives is the decor updated, or in some cases, not at all.
I saw two multi family houses before this one, and they were awful. One was owned by a old woman, who thought that her strech lime green pants (true!) were the hottest thing since her Elvis figurines on her fireplace mantle (true again!). THe wallpaper was the most hideous she could find. It was brown with a portrait of George Washington facing left, and Abraham Lincolin facing right. A wallful of dead presidents is very patriotic, but it doesn't even match the faux blue marble motif vinyl covering on the floor. Grody! She remodeled her kitchen recently, but she had no taste. The kitchen shouted "SEARS! SEARS! 60% OFF SELECTED SEARS REMODELING CABNETRY!"
I was feeling pretty depressed until I saw the house where the owner had a tiny shred of good taste (ie, one that I share).
Why multi family houses? It works out great tax-wise, and the best thing of all is that for a $625 montly mortage, I can charge $475 to rent the upstairs, and the resulting $150 is cheaper than my current crummy apartment. Wow!
The important thing, I think, is that houses are really something to have a sense of belonging to. The house should reflect your lifestyle, and the quality of the house should be to your standards. Buying a house is pretty much trying to find one that's as close as possible to how you want to live, but bulding one can be a chance to design everything in the way you like it. Going through many houses with many types of architecture really gives you a feel of what you want and don't want.
Of course, you do tend to build a huge list of what you don't want, but that's OK as well.
Derrick
tb bob villa -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Derrick Williams Rochester Institute of Technology | Insert snappy - - adw3...@ultb.isc.rit.edu Computer Science | quotation here - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <2en3rt$...@news.mantis.co.uk>, Snakes of Medusa <mat...@mantis.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <ceejCI1nzo....@netcom.com>, C J Silverio <c...@netcom.com> wrote: >> Some fast computer networky thing in the walls, >> outlets in all rooms. Suitable for Mac plug-n-play.
>With a small computer room where all the boxes can go. So the actual >bit you use is just a screen and keyboard, or even a Newton A4 pad, >connected to the real crunch which is hidden away out of sight.
I'm beginning to think it may be impossible, but high-speed wireless would be one step towards the dream system. If the real mips/gigs have to be bulky and blocky and have those DAMN cooling fans in them, at least let me curl up with the interface in bed or on the desk or in the kitchen or wherever. By the time a high-speed low-power touch-sensitive high-impact washable solar or ambient AC charging foldable colour display pad is something I can afford, I think it may have the wherewithal to make a noisy space heater in a closet somewhere unnecessary. But I'm not making any bets.
I called the above "the" dream system, because while it is much on my mind, I'm not sure it's *my* dream. I'm uncomfortably uncertain that I didn't let someone dream it for me. I think of the newspad in 2001, and how dull and useless it seems now in my memory. Will the information appliance of the future be used for anything more pointful than what amounts to television?
On the other hand. I can imagine reading a stirring novel in wire-sharp black and white with vivid colour illustrations, and wanting to thumb back and forth through it, and just *seething* with irritation. I don't *want* to stroke the page in various directions, or tap on a scroll bar. Scroll bars have always pissed me off - why the hell do people use them? I don't want to *describe*, in words *or* gestures, what I want to do. I want to *do* it.
Which brings me, courtesy of a discussion of trends in integrated circuit densities (how may transistors in a pentium? a super sparc? how many in a 6502? how much chip space is 64k of dram, at the densities 16meg SIMMs use?) to my choice for the information technology of the future: smart paper. It *knows* you're scribbling equations on it, and an unclosed parenthesis or an ambiguous index variable stands out at a curious, questioning angle. If your chain of reasoning gets to be too much and it follows numbly without understanding, be patient, or lay a few of them together, they can team up and make enough sense of it to make themselves useful. A notepad is formidably clever, but woefully ignorant, and gets taken apart as fast as it becomes informed, regressing to a stack, a sheaf, back to the womb, a mere sheet.
High on a bookcase, mystic and massive, discursive and discomfiting, learned and wise, the grimoire knows there is much yet to discover, and confers with books on either side, whispering to those on other shelves, feeding the currents of cross-reference and cataloging flowing through the library..
The information technology of the future will be powerful and convenient, a compliant instrument at our fingertips. It will be far better informed and wiser than we are, and if you believe that...
sma...@turing.toronto.edu (Marc Moorcroft) writes: >I'm beginning to think it may be impossible, but high-speed wireless >would be one step towards the dream system. If the real mips/gigs have >far better informed and wiser than we are, and if you believe that...
Think spread spectrum. Drop a note to Arlan or Telxon, and they'll set you up with a nice system for about 5 grand. If you only have a couple stations, the bandwidth is MORE than adequate. One of my real life projects is setting up a wireless network in our half million square foot warehouse. I can walk around anywhere in the place with an 8 ounce handheld terminal, and log into either mainframes or our Unix server. 30 or so other people can be doing the same, and end up with about 9600bps each, or more if not too many people are trying to transmit at once. It works much like ethernet.
No Nubus or PCMCIA radio cards yet, but they're supposed to be delivering the latter Real Soon Now. *
In article <2en66f$...@reznor.larc.nasa.gov> klu...@grissom.larc.nasa.gov (Scott Dorsey) writes: >In article <ceejCI1nzo....@netcom.com> c...@netcom.com (C J Silverio) writes: >> NO FORMICA. >Have you looked at the Dupont stuff. I want to say Cor-Ten.... it's >rather soft, but pleasant to work on, and hard to damage. [ ... ]
Corian. Cultured marble (marble powder mixed with resin. Looks nice, easy to work with, costs almost as much as real marble.
Go with granite; about the same price as Corian, will not get damaged stained, or worn out, and you don't have to look for a pastry board.
>I really want is one of the 25,000 BTU 8" gas rings that they use in >Chinese restaurants, but I don't have the space in the existing kitchen.
Don't forget to vent it.
>>I'll never have money to do this, not even if GM succeeds >>beyond my wildest dreams. >You're right. You can get closer if you do all the work yourself, though, >and start by modifying an existing structure.
It would also help if she'd get out of California, and go someplace with lower costs and fewer regulations.
-- Gary Heston SCI Systems, Inc. g...@sci34hub.sci.com site admin The Chairman of the Board and the CFO speak for SCI. I'm neither. "Quit while you're ahead. All the best gamblers do." Baltasar Gracian
Scott Dorsey <klu...@grissom.larc.nasa.gov> wrote: >Just more crap to produce more EMI to cause more problems with cheap unshielded >consumer electronics.
While in general I support the principle that any electronic communications device within reach of a wall socket should be plugged into it, I'd like to interrupt this rant to point out that *if* you have to do this kind of thing, CDMA is obviously the smart way to do it.
Low coherence, low spectral density, low susceptibility to interference from other devices, low potential for interfering with other devices.
If I say any more, they'll have to kill all of me. You'd be amazed at what is still classified information.
This Radio Geek Minute has been brought to you by the Society of Frustrated Non-hams. We now return you to your regularly-scheduled Bob Vila wannabes.
In article <ceejCI1nzo....@netcom.com>, C J Silverio <c...@netcom.com> wrote:
>I've been thinking about livable homes recently. I've been >thinking about how unlivable the standard US mass-produced >tract-ish house is. Specifically, I've been thinking about >how unlivable the house I rent is. Architects have clearly >given cheap fast construction a higher priority than usability. >They must die. Or worse: be forced to live in one of their >horrible creations.
required reading for non-believers in modern architecture:
_Form_Follows_Fiasco_. available, I'm sure, in any reasonably stocked university or large public library. Author's name escapes me at the moment.
friendly advice: read this book, master the concepts, and then keep the whole thing to yourself. This is not the kind of book that makes for light-hearted banter with architecture buffs.
jkc (whose wife the architectural historian does not concur)
Scott Dorsey <klu...@grissom.larc.nasa.gov> wrote: >With modern sheetrock, they could punch right through it. You should >see what houses are like in Florida. We're talking 1/4" sheetrock walls. >That's quarter-inch. Not one-inch plaster or half-inch sheetrock. We >are talking about studs that are only an inch wide, and roofs that are >asphalt tile laid over particle board. Not plywood, which is cheesy >enough, but particle board.
Hold on. Are you talking about 1" *finished* studs? 1x4s?
And keep in mind that a solid roof is not necessarily standard equipment on the American house. In my neighborhood in Seattle, the houses with solid rooves (usually flat composition rooves) are the tenement dwellings. The aesthetically desirable homes have simply cedar shakes laid over slats.
And most of the homes I've seen, even the well-built ones, have 3/8" sheetrock, not 1/2". For one thing, half-inch sheetrock is *heavy*. Ever carried a couple of half-inch panels on your back?
I don't mean to come to the defense of cheesy builders here. In some markets (here in Northern Virginia, for example) it's *impossible* to buy a well- built home. In some markets (Seattle, for example) you can buy good houses, but you have to *pay* for them. In some markets (Indiana), most of the houses are pretty good.
I have some friends who live in a $300,000 house out in Herndon in which the *floor joists* aren't even nailed in.
In article <2ep3cj$...@cs.umb.edu>, Kevin W. McAuley <stu...@eris.cs.umb.edu> wrote:
>my ideal house would be built underground or , if i wanted a view, >which i don't, i build it into the side if a mountain or a hill.
These are somewhat popular in Indiana. About a mile from where my parents live up there, there's a guy who built the house above ground level, then buried it.
He's a fool in other ways too.
Then there's Bill Gates, who bought and ravaged a couple of acres of prime Seattle Eastside lakefront to build an underground house.
Is this a bizarre thread? No. Is schmoozing about one of life's basic concerns, with some of the most intelligent people on the net [except for that killfile hit in there...Chebbin, was that you?] a valid use of t.b bandwidth? Answer: Mu.
Karen and I just closed on a house yesterday, so I feel obliged to add my blather to this nesting discussion. What we bought in no way resembles the fine dreams spun here, but I think it's going to work - we have a basic ranch house with enough room for us, the two kids, and my disabled mom - who will move in after the New Year.
I never liked ranches, until I thought about wheelchairs. Now, I am very happy to have a one-story house.
We have a garage. This is my first requirement in a house, as my motorcycle needs a bedroom every bit as much as I do.
But we have a VIEW. A deck with a VIEW. A breakfast bar with a VIEW. I can contemplate the slow flush of green creeping over the thirty-mile-distant hills of Napa, and watch turgid oil tankers violate the narrow waters of the Carquinez Strait. I shall have to put much energy into maintaining the slow-motion landslide to which this house (like most Californian hill dwellings) is glued, but I'm confident that I can improve the drainage enough to prevent any sudden changes of address.
Crockett, USA, is out of the main light-pollution belt of the Bay Area (it's also out of the main sequence of history, but let's not get into that just now), so I intend to spend many nights on the back deck staring into deep space through decent optics.
We move in on New Year's Eve. Rather, we will spend Dec. 31st ripping out the cursed wall-to-wall carpeting. Pray for our hidden hardwood.
In article <ceejCI1FC9....@netcom.com> c...@netcom.com (C J Silverio) writes:
> I've seen two answers to this question. Lance's > brother Tony found a Frank Lloyd Wright design which
My Great Uncle Robert lived in a Wright house for a while. It had no electric wall outlets; they marred the simplicity of the design. The ceilings were ten feet high and the walls were nine feet high; at the top of each wall was a one-foot gap. When people fucked at one end of the house you could hear them at the other end.
Now they live on Connecticut Avenue. Much more sensible.
Le Corbusier had the right idea: A house is a machine, not a work of art. Architects shouldn't be artists; they should be industrial designers. --
-- If you never did, / you should. / These things are fun / and fun is good. Mark-Jason Dominus m...@central.cis.upenn.edu
>If you were going to build your own house, what would >you do?
Funny you should ask. Last night, I went to bed around 2:00 am, but I didn't fall asleep until after 6:00, mainly because I was thinking about my Dream Home.
Ok, so it's not really a house, but I was going to post about it anyway, and this seems like a good occasion.
What I want, is a loft-type thing, preferably located in the middle of everything, like downtown Toronto or something. I'll buy it totally unfinished, hopefully with a bare cement floor and walls. I would move in immediately and probably spend a couple years fixing it up.
I don't know what's considered a "loft": what I have in mind is something with a sizable open area (~2000 square feet?) with a 20 foot ceiling plus a raised area for some largish bedrooms. Below the bedrooms could be the kitchen, eating facilities and storage space.
Everything will be black. Painting the walls black seems a little severe, maybe I could use some of that cheesey fibre-wall stuff if it's not too expensive. With the right lighting, the blackness would be really qool.
One of the first things I would buy is a nice snooker table. A bed isn't important. A LOUD stereo would turn the 2000 square feet area into a wicked party place.
I figured out a way to protect the pool table from being sat-upon by party-goers: I would make a plywood cover for it with about a million nails sticking up around the edges. I suppose that could be a bit nasty if a fight broke out nearby and someone decided to use the table as a weapon. Messy blood everywhere. But the table would be safe.
I want to be able to control everything in my house through spoken commands. (Sorry, CJ et al.) I want to be able to say "computer, I'm roasting" and have it turn the heat down.
I want to control every appliance in the house from anywhere in the house. I will put microphones everywhere, then for each command the computer decides which mike has the best signal, then parses and executes the command.
I want feedback from the computer to be either spoken or superimposed on one of the TV screens as text or graphics. The computer has to have net.access, and I want to be able to call up any document available on Internet.
``How does Webster's define `verisimilitude' ?''
``Show me the current satellite photo of North America.''
``Does the Boulder public library have Madonna's _Sex_?'' (Yes, 9 copies, 2 checked out, 1 missing... Markian?)
``What's the weather going to be like tomorrow in Montreal?''
``I would like to read Alice in Wonderland.''
You get the drill.
I will also be able to control everything through a touch-tone phone call or e-mail. All household devices will be finger(1)-able. I want 50 million people to know the last time my toilet was flushed. I want to be able to program my VCR from South Africa.
Ack. Stop me before I gnee again.
I won't even start about the twisting stairway/slide or the trapeze.