BrailJOB the Creationist Coward Ran From Budikka 100 Times!

[Budikka666]

On Sep 3, 9:22 am, BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> No atheist yet has been willing to debate me.
> Send your address phone and CV to begin.

I will be happy to send you my address, phone & cv. Please post the
address of the nursing home where you've been dumped because no one
wants you around. I'll deliver it in person if you like.

Or you can keep RUNNING from me as you have done ONE HUNDRED TIMES
ALREADY and thereby admit to everyone on Usenet what a vacuous lying,
hypocritical coward you truly are. Your choice.

BrailJOB the LiarBoi Loonbag DENYING Jesus THRICE, shrinking away like
a limp Peter at the passion:
http://tinyurl.com/6kck7b5
http://tinyurl.com/7d2s93z
http://tinyurl.com/6wyp6se

The above are included in the following examples of BrailJOB running
in every single case when he was given ONE HUNDRED Opportunities to
witness for his LORD:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.creationism/msg/c69a90d07c0a4d79

Budikka

[Budikka666]

On Sep 4, 1:15 am, BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> Ian Wood of Austin TX steps forward.
> Okay 'MrBudikka' what is your
> phone,  address,  CV?

Are you really that stupid? I'm not speaking for Ian Wood. I do not
live in Austin Tx. I am speaking for the Budikka group. But clearly
you have comprehension deficits, so let me spell it out for you in the
simplest terms I can:

1. YOU post your address here

THEN

2. I send you my address, phone number and cv, or I can deliver it to
you personally.

Got that now? Or do I need to dumb it down some more?

Plus, you need to post your rationale for demanding address and phone
number. Since we will not be debating by snail mail why do you even
need an address (especially (as you claim above you already have it!
lol!). What guarantee do you offer that you will not abuse an address
if one is given to you?

Since we will not be debating over the phone, then why do you need a
phone number? What guarantee do you offer that you will not abuse a
phone number if one is given to you?

For that matter, why do you even need a cv, given that you have openly
admitted that you have no academic qualifications whatsoever to
discuss or debate evolution or creation.

Any debate i conduct will not be based on my own original research but
upon peer-reviewed scientific evidence published in mainstream science
journals by those who are eminently qualified in their chosen fields
of research. Can you say the same about the evidence you will
present? Or do you plan on presenting your own original research? If
so where was that research published?

Answer the questions or keep up with those fine excuses and keep on
running LiarBoi. Post your address here if you want mine.

Budikka

[Ken]

On Sep 4, 5:34 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:

> Answer the questions or keep up with those fine excuses and keep on
> running LiarBoi.  Post your address here if you want mine.
>
> Budikka

He's right here.....
IP address latitude:38.0000
IP address longitude:-97.0000
About 1/4 mile east of Holderman Cemetery, Plum Grove, KS off of NW
120St

[Budikka666]

That's the address of his nursing home. I wonder if they've taken his
computer away from him due to all the complaints he's brought down on
their provider because of his bigotry and racism?!

Budikka

[Budikka666]

On Sep 4, 10:05 pm, Ken <flakey...@aol.com> wrote:

That lat and long brings up this interesting exchange on wiki
answers. Do you suppose LiarBoi is running Internet scams from his
nursing home? lol!
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Where_is_Latitude_38_Longitude_-97

Budikka

[Budikka666]

[Caranx latus]

Budikka666 wrote:
> On Sep 4, 10:05 pm, Ken <flakey...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 4, 5:34 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Answer the questions or keep up with those fine excuses and keep on
>>> running LiarBoi. Post your address here if you want mine.
>>
>>> Budikka
>>
>> He's right here.....
>> IP address latitude:38.0000
>> IP address longitude:-97.0000
>> About 1/4 mile east of Holderman Cemetery, Plum Grove, KS off of NW
>> 120St
>
> That's the address of his nursing home.

The Kansas State Home for the Perpetually Bewildered, if I recall correctly.

[Ken]

On Sep 5, 2:18 pm, Caranx latus <aug.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Budikka666 wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 10:05 pm, Ken <flakey...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> On Sep 4, 5:34 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
> >>> Answer the questions or keep up with those fine excuses and keep on
> >>> running LiarBoi.  Post your address here if you want mine.
>
> >>> Budikka
>
> >> He's right here.....
> >> IP address latitude:38.0000
> >> IP address longitude:-97.0000
> >> About 1/4 mile east of Holderman Cemetery, Plum Grove, KS off of NW
> >> 120St
>
> > That's the address of his nursing home.
>
> The Kansas State Home for the Perpetually Bewildered, if I recall correctly.

It's right next door to a 1/2 house for paroled Mid-Western chicken
molesters

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article
<431878b9-85b0-422c...@h5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,

It'll make it easier for the cops when they go to arrest him for his
terrorist threats.

--
JD

"the lybian lier"

[Budikka666]

[Bob Casanova]

On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:33:27 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Budikka666
<budi...@netscape.net>:

>On Sep 4, 1:15 am, BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
>
>> Ian Wood of Austin TX steps forward.
>> Okay 'MrBudikka' what is your
>> phone, address, CV?
>
>Are you really that stupid? I'm not speaking for Ian Wood. I do not
>live in Austin Tx. I am speaking for the Budikka group. But clearly
>you have comprehension deficits, so let me spell it out for you in the
>simplest terms I can:
>
>1. YOU post your address here
>
>THEN
>
>2. I send you my address, phone number and cv, or I can deliver it to
>you personally.
>
>Got that now? Or do I need to dumb it down some more?

Ooooh! <waves hand wildly> I know! I know!

>Plus, you need to post your rationale for demanding address and phone
>number. Since we will not be debating by snail mail why do you even
>need an address (especially (as you claim above you already have it!
>lol!). What guarantee do you offer that you will not abuse an address
>if one is given to you?
>
>Since we will not be debating over the phone, then why do you need a
>phone number? What guarantee do you offer that you will not abuse a
>phone number if one is given to you?
>
>For that matter, why do you even need a cv, given that you have openly
>admitted that you have no academic qualifications whatsoever to
>discuss or debate evolution or creation.
>
>Any debate i conduct will not be based on my own original research but
>upon peer-reviewed scientific evidence published in mainstream science
>journals by those who are eminently qualified in their chosen fields
>of research. Can you say the same about the evidence you will
>present? Or do you plan on presenting your own original research? If
>so where was that research published?

Ummm... Given that the only possible answers are "No', "No"
and "Nowhere, I make up shit and troll Usenet", these are
all rhetorical questions, right?

>Answer the questions or keep up with those fine excuses and keep on
>running LiarBoi. Post your address here if you want mine.

--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."

- McNameless

[Budikka666]

On Sep 4, 1:15 am, BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com> wrote:

> Ian Wood of Austin TX steps forward.
> Okay 'MrBudikka' what is your
> phone, address, CV?

Are you really that stupid? I'm not speaking for Ian Wood. I do not
live in Austin Tx. I am speaking for the Budikka group. But clearly
you have comprehension deficits, so let me spell it out for you in the
simplest terms I can:

1. YOU post your address here

THEN

2. I send you my address, phone number and cv, or I can deliver it to
you personally.

Got that now? Or do I need to dumb it down some more?

Plus, you need to post your rationale for demanding address and phone
number. Since we will not be debating by snail mail why do you even
need an address (especially (as you claim above you already have it!
lol!). What guarantee do you offer that you will not abuse an address
if one is given to you?

Since we will not be debating over the phone, then why do you need a
phone number? What guarantee do you offer that you will not abuse a
phone number if one is given to you?

For that matter, why do you even need a cv, given that you have openly
admitted that you have no academic qualifications whatsoever to
discuss or debate evolution or creation.

Any debate i conduct will not be based on my own original research but
upon peer-reviewed scientific evidence published in mainstream science
journals by those who are eminently qualified in their chosen fields
of research. Can you say the same about the evidence you will
present? Or do you plan on presenting your own original research? If
so where was that research published?

Answer the questions or keep up with those fine excuses and keep on
running LiarBoi. Post your address here if you want mine.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Here's an abridged list of threads in which we've posed serious
questions about his position and from which he has run like diarrhea.

Here's the most recent example of Duke's Shameless cowardice:
Challenged to a formal debate on the existence of Jesus, Duck & Run
Dipshit-For-Christ Duke RAN:
http://tinyurl.com/7mo8j5l
3/25/2012

In the massive slaughter of Usenet creationists, *every* *single*
*one* of whom fled because they could not post even on item of
positive scientific evidence for a creator or for a creation, Duped
was merely one of a host of creationists who RAN AWAY:
http://tinyurl.com/8yqo8fw
(3/18/2012)

Challenged to identify the two species on either side of this "missing
link" he lies exists, Dumbass Duke RAN AWAY!
http://tinyurl.com/7k2w6jc
(2/25/2012)

The Valentine's Day Massacre!
http://tinyurl.com/7mdvcep
(2/14/2012)

Duck & Run starts the new year in fine fettle - runs three times in
one day!
http://tinyurl.com/7eotebl
http://tinyurl.com/7b2waz8
http://tinyurl.com/7o23uvn

Dec 27th, 2011
Challenged to debate his 100% evidence for Jesus, Duck & Run ducked
and ran.
http://tinyurl.com/6m4ub5q

Dec 26th, 2011
Duck & Run claimed he had 100% of the evidence for a god, yet when
*given* *a* *second* *chance* to produce it, he fled the challenge!
http://tinyurl.com/7kawokn

Dec. 24th 2011
Duck & Run claimed he had 100% of the evidence for a god, yet when
challenged to produce it, he fled the challenge!
http://tinyurl.com/6m4ub5q

Sept. 5th 2011
asked for evidence for this Jesus of his. Duck & Run ducked & ran!
http://tinyurl.com/3brposl


On January 22, 2011, under the title: "Chicken Duke Has a Beautifully
Clean Pair of heels Does he Not?" We requested "Please provide
independent evidence - that is, from *outside* the Bible - that there
ever was a Jesus Christ, miracle working son of a god."
Chicken Duke couldn't do it.
http://tinyurl.com/4h6wdzm

Then there was this:
http://tinyurl.com/4dk7aoz
Jan 16, 2011, We requested this of Chicken Duke:
please provide *positive* *scientific* evidence for a creator or for a
creation, and post it right here in response to this message.
This was in response to his assertion that "Existence mandates
creation".
He ran away.

http://tinyurl.com/29hkt7j
December 22nd 2010, in which Chicken Duke was challenged to support
statements he has made repeatedly on Usenet. Once again he ran from
them like the stinking diarrhea he is and hid behind an irrelevant and
dishoenst non-sequitur.

Prior to that he ran from a similar challenge just the day before(!):
He ran from a challenge to support his bullshit on December 21st,
2010:
http://tinyurl.com/29hkt7j

And just the month before that:
http://tinyurl.com/2d5xtf3

November 20th 2010, he ran form these five simple questions rather
than support his god, thereby proving that he's nothing but another
limp Peter at the passion!

Here are the questions:
1. That the figure you quoted is true.
2. That they all believe in the *same* deity.
3. That this single deity actually exists
4. That this single deity actually created the universe
5. That this single deity is not a figment of their imagination
Here's my prediction at the time:
Time to show us that clean pair of heels again, Chicken Duck & Run.
Yep - he ran!

Claimed there are "gargantuan holes" in the Theory of Evolution and
then RAN when we called him on it:
http://tinyurl.com/27kf2da

The entire "Why There Isn't a God" series, started here:
http://tinyurl.com/6b9et

Duck & Run Ran Away - that is to say he failed 100% to actually get to
grips with the subject matter in any of those threads, his 'response'
consisting solely of chanting "no it isn't" or words to that effect.
He could offer no rebuttal, let alone refutation, he could not support
a single thing he claimed and he could offer zero rationale for his
position.

Let's face it, on this basis, he's run away from the entire "Why the
Holy Bible Lies" series, the entire "Why There Was No Flood" series,
and all of the the "Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid"
series so far.

Petition to Save the Hubble Telescope
Duck & Run makes yet another blind claim "Ok, you foot the bill to
keep looking at the same "sky" that's already been looked at" he
blathers, like there couldn't possibly be anything new to discover,
yet we proved him entirely wrong - again.
http://tinyurl.com/74p46nj

Scientists find new face on back of Turin shroud
http://tinyurl.com/2bx6jcf
Duck & Run, shrouded in cowardice, ran away.

The Inquisition
http://tinyurl.com/4pokf
Duck & Run didn't expect the inquisition....

Another Problem for Creation IDiots
http://tinyurl.com/3px9j
Duck & Run proved to be a creation IDiot.

Human aspect of Jesus
http://tinyurl.com/4w488
Duck and Run has provided us with a de facto admission that there was
no Jesus Christ, miracle-working son-of-a-god.

Jesus's three days sacrifice
http://tinyurl.com/3jhop
Duck & Run sacrificed the truth and got caught.

Which is the real God???
http://tinyurl.com/6bnoo
Duck & Run didn't know.

God isn't very smart about spreading his word, is he?
http://tinyurl.com/7xjux
Neither is Duck & Run.

Why did Mekkla run away from a discussion of Heb 8:7-13?
http://tinyurl.com/4v759
Duck & Run opened this thread to accuse someone else of running away.
As soon as he was challenged, Duck & Run ran away!

Why Didn't Jesus Die Sooner?
http://tinyurl.com/5gevm
Duck & Run's claims died sooner.

Why is Duke Such a Coward?
http://tinyurl.com/5p3qt
Duck & Run ran away, proving what a coward he is.

Duck & Run's five evidences of god
(that he later admitted were not evidences):
http://tinyurl.com/3otzr

Questions that Duke Can't Answer
(in which we accused Duck & Run of running away and from which
he...**RAN AWAY**! The questions remain unanswered. There are only
ten numbered questions in this thread, assembled from previous threads
from which
Duck & Run ran away. Duck & Run lied there were 75 questions
and...ran away!)
http://tinyurl.com/5ozyl

There are now well over one hundred unanswered questions that Duck &
Run has fled. Here's the bulk of them:
http://tinyurl.com/ad89u
http://tinyurl.com/9ky7y

Duck & Run thinks Christianity, which post-dates Mithraism by seven
centuries, gave rise to Mithraism:
http://tinyurl.com/yzp9bk
Duck & Run ran away.

Duke: Global Flood Challenge
A thread which we opened specifically at Duck & Run's request, and
from which he, predictably, ran away. He admitted there is no
evidence for a global flood, we presented abundant evidence that there
never was one,
Duck & Run offered zero rebuttal and ran away as he again did in the
recent flood series.
http://tinyurl.com/4l83y

Evidence that Duke can't refute:
http://tinyurl.com/5l2av
Duck & Run failed to refute the evidence and ran away, thereby proving
my case

An Answer to Pascal's Wager
http://tinyurl.com/4y63n
In which we accuse Duck & Run of running away. He ran away!

Thread: "Why Puke is Such a Pathological, Unregenerate, Cowardly,
Lying, Hypocritical Asshole"
http://tinyurl.com/4ant3
Duck & Run ran away because he's a pathological, unregenerate,
cowardly, lying hypocritical asshole.

Thread: "Duke's Chronic lying"
http://tinyurl.com/3ra8l
Duck & Run ran away.

Thread: "aqotm - bud(ikka) style"
http://tinyurl.com/4r4gz
Duck & Run ran away from his own clueless stupidity

Thread: "Duke: Global Flood Challenge"
http://tinyurl.com/3qd5m
Duck & Run was out of his depth - as he's recently proven again - and
so he...ran away!

Thread: "The Bland Assumption of Jesus' Existence"
http://tinyurl.com/5kj3m
Duck & Run ran away as we blandly assumed he would.

Thread: "Running Scriptural Circles Around Duke"
http://tinyurl.com/3ozwo
Duck & Run ran away after we ran scriptural circles around him

And my favorite:
http://tinyurl.com/487vc
This was a cowardly thread Duck & Run opened titled "Budikka Runs
Away". He set this up because he was peeved that he didn't get an
instant response from me in another thread! He never told me he'd
opened this alternate thread, yet he accused me of running away in
it! LoL! When we finally happened across it and challenged him in
it, he ran away! How pathetic is that?!

And more than once/month for an entire 12 month period starting April
2009:
April 21st, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yzywu7q
July 12th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ybrmfxp
August 16th,2009: http://tinyurl.com/kjjmn4
September 10th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/oasqn8
October 3rd, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ybvtw53
November 9th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yjlmbrf
November 19th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yj64yqj
November 20th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ybrkvyh
November 22nd, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ycw6s8l
November 25th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ygafw5d
November 29th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yakpje3
November 29th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ygafw5d
December 5th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yzt9f4m
December 7th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yllcb6q
December 8th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ybzvv33
December 13th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yakex6v
December 23rd, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/y9k8kpv
January 1st, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ybnesb2
January 24th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ybsqw3l
January 27th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ycgm8u8
January 31st, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ycemfpo
February 3rd, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ybsqw3l
February 15th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/yjjj93v
February 16th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ycemfpo
February 22nd, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ye59brz
March 1st, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ykgtezr
March 6th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/yjhe3fe
March 9th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ybnahkb
March 11th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/yl8hcea

The best comment from him was in alt.atheism on January 5th, 2004, at
5:46 pm when he said, "I've heard myself say a lot of vocal things,
but I've never heard myself think." (http://tinyurl.com/f48bq). This
explains everything, including why he's such a gashole. All he can do
is impotently snipe at people, since he has nothing of value or
intelligence to say and he demonstrably cannot support a single claim
he makes.

He has no proof, no evidence - not even an intelligent argument. He
does not think because he cannot. He's quite loco, and like a loco,
he's stuck on a pair of narrow rails. He has no clue he's on them,
let alone how to get off. And the track to which he's limited leads
to a dead end - which he hilariously thinks is "Heaven"!

The best "evidence" of a god he was ever capable of producing was a
lackluster five items he posted in thread "Scientists find new face on
back of Turin shroud" in a.a. on April 18 2004, 9:52 am:
http://tinyurl.com/c6hkg.

He appears to have appropriated "his" five evidences from Thomas
Aquinas who, c1245, published "Summa theologiae" which contained five
"Ways" to "prove" some god's existence, all of which have been
thoroughly discredited.

He admitted his "own" five ways were nothing but blind belief in alt
atheism in a thread called "The Inquisition" message posted on
Saturday, 12 June, 2004 11:52am:
http://tinyurl.com/bc5ud
but that was all he could do after the massive pounding he got.

We used those same five items in a spoof edition of my "Why There is
no God" series (http://tinyurl.com/bz54w). We changed a word here and
there and all of his five "evidences" miraculously became evidence for
the non-existence of a god! Naturally we didn't count them in the 666
since they were so pathetic.

His comments aren't born of smarts, logic, rational or evidence,
they're born of desperation. Neither are his comments aimed at the
material - they rarely are. He's incapable of having a rational
exchange on a topic. He spits out idiocy and insult and runs away.

His comments are not designed to enlighten, help, or exchange
anything, but to abuse people. He's the very antithesis of this
purported Christian love he's supposed to dispense.

He never documents or supports a single thing he says, whereas the
cowardice and lies of this pathetic hypocrite for Christ have been
fully documented on Usenet. His despicable behavior and his
slanderous unfounded charges (he thinks turning the other cheek means
mooning someone) are why he was mass-plonked by pretty near the entire
regular set on a.a.:
http://tinyurl.com/9gycg

It's a sign of how pathetic he is, how low he's sinking and how
desperate he's become since he was cut off, that he now has to beg for
atheists to talk to him by posting inane rants against us - this from
the guy who claims to be a Christian, who claims to do unto others as
he would be done by, and who lies about turning the other cheek!

His cowardice in "debate" or even discussion is legendary:
1. http://tinyurl.com/ac2vg
2. http://tinyurl.com/4dyok
3. http://tinyurl.com/664yu
4. http://tinyurl.com/apenc

He thinks Christianity, which post-dates Mithraism by seven centuries,
gave rise to Mithraism:
http://tinyurl.com/yzp9bk

He's quite literally astronomically stupid:
http://tinyurl.com/yhyopg
("the same "sky" that's already been looked at."!)
http://tinyurl.com/6fbwqh

He claims he can run rings around anyone on scripture, but when he was
actually taken up directly on this claim:
http://tinyurl.com/3z47u
he ran away!

He has numerous documented lies:
http://tinyurl.com/5zlzx
http://tinyurl.com/ablwm

He regularly demands people open discussions on his god, and when they
do, he runs away. We personally had him run from the *same topic*
well over 100 times in direct response to a challenge *he* made!

He dismally failed the simplest intelligence test imaginable:
http://tinyurl.com/7zm43

He has fifty questions he can't answer or daren't answer honestly
here:
http://tinyurl.com/ad89u (October 22nd 2004)

and fifty more here:
http://tinyurl.com/9ky7y (July 16th 2005)

In short, he's a waste of a human being and not worth any response
other than this.

End of Douche. Case closed.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Whassup LiarBoi? You challenged me to a debate, I am right here ready
and waiting! Where are you other than RUNNING as you have RUN from me
100 times already:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/4336abbaff04a8b0

Budikka

[Budikka666]

I don't see how anyone could RUN if they *honestly* thought they had
an omnipoent god to back them up!

Budikka

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

Whassup LiarBoi?  You challenged me to a debate, I am right here ready
and waiting!  Where are you other than RUNNING as you have RUN from me
100 times already:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/4336abbaff04a8b0

I don't see how anyone could RUN if they *honestly* thought they had

an omnipotent god to back them up!

Budikka

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

I guess you're nothing but a cheap piece of trash LIAR and as big of a
whack-job as is your favorite presidential candidate.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

On Sep 3, 9:22 am, BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> No atheist yet has been willing to debate me.
> Send your address phone and CV to begin.

[Budikka666]

No, it was spelled right. He's been weak for three weeks showing how
weak his trinity is!

DAY 21!

[Budikka666]

DAY 26!

[Budikka666]

I guess it's "Run Awayyyyyy" yet again for BrailJOB the LiarBoi.

Kepe running you Chickenshit for Christ™, it's what you do best,
after all.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Still running, BrailJOB the LiarBoi?

Keep running you Chickenshit for Christ™, it's what you do best, after
all. And it proves that even you admit that there is no omnipotent
creator to help you.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

Stil running after forty days and forty nights. What a dmap squib you
are! And you're the most vociferous spokeswimp that creationism has
in alt.atheism? That's pretty pathetic, dontcha think?

Budikka

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

What a hypocrite to even comment on the presidential debates when you
have RUN 100 TIMES you pathetic coward and lowlife hypocrite.

http://tinyurl.com/8c7u2z8

Budikka

[Budikka666]

I'm stil waiting on you finding the guts to debate me. You're still
running like diarrhea.

Budikka

[us4...@aol.com]

Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> wrote in message
<c8e15ad9-0d08-4097...@n16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
Subject: "BrailJOB the LiarBoi, Creative Cowardice for Christ™, Still
Running From his Own Debate Challenge - Day 45" :

>I'm stil waiting on you finding the guts to debate me. You're still
>running like diarrhea.
>
>Budikka

After you learn to spell be advised that BroilJab is running the boards
and isn't concerned atall with your piddly requests.

Fools swinging and batting the air wildly are a waste of time.

"The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." (Psalm 53:1)

CBN News has obtained a never-before-seen video produced by the Iranian
regime that says all the signs are moving into place -- and that Iran will
soon help usher in the end times.

While the revolutionary movements gripping the Middle East have created
uncertainty throughout the region, the video shows that the Iranian regime
believes the chaos is divine proof that their ultimate victory is at hand.

'The Coming is Near'

The propaganda footage has reportedly been approved at the highest levels
of the Iranian government.

It's called The Coming is Near and it describes current events in the
Middle East as a prelude to the arrival of the mythical tweflth Imam or
Mahdi -- the messiah figure who Islamic scriptures say will lead the
armies of Islam to victory over all non-Muslims in the last days.

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/March/Iranian-Regime-Video-Says-Mahdi-is-Near-/

There are several ways to help usher in the "end times" for these camel
jockeys. And they don't include "apologies".

I just don't see Mitt apologizing like Obama does.

Do you?

u4z

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

If oyu ahve an omnipotnet god behind you, why are you such a flaming
coward?

Budikka

[Budikka666]

You claim you have an omnipotent god behind you - so why are you such
a flaming coward?

Budikka

[Budikka666]

I still here waiting for you to show up for the dfebate you want,
you're still running like the pathetic Coward-for-Christ™ you are.
What does that say about your worhtless god?

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Keep running you worthless chickenshit for Christ.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

BroilJAB is still a Coward for Christ two months on. Nothing new
here. Thanks for helping me to prove what a waste of skin you are.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Keep running you worthless lowlife scum.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Another day, another creaitonist coward.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Still running two months later. Wjy is it no surprise that your
worthless god can only you only cowardice?

Budikka

[Budikka666]

[Budikka666]

Still running two months later.  Why is it no surprise that your
worthless creator can't support you and all you have left is your
cowardice?

Budikka

[Budikka666]

BroilJAB has been prioven as wrong in his election lies as he has been
in everything else - including his cowardly debate proposal from which
he's still running over two months later!

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Keep running, Jackass for Jesus. Every day one of you scum runs from
debate proves that your creator god is just as worthless as you are.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Keep running, Jackass for Jesus.  Every day that one of you cowardly

[Budikka666]

Stil no spine from yoru omnipotent creator?

Why is that no surprise at all?

But do please keep running: every day that one of you creaitonshit
scum shows that he has no faith is another nail in the coffin of
creaiton.

Budikka

[Freedom Man]

See what RELIGION does to peoples' minds?

Adults no longer believe in the Tooth Fairy - but they still torture and
kill each other over ancient myths and superstitions.

"We all remember how many religious wars were fought for a religion of love
and gentleness; how many bodies were burned alive with the genuinely kind
intention of saving souls from the eternal fire of hell." --- Karl Popper

"When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many
people suffer from a delusion, it is called Religion."
--- Robert M. Pirsig

Either God wants to abolish evil and cannot, or he can but does not want to.
If he wants to but cannot he is impotent. If he can but does not want to, he
is wicked. If he neither can nor wants to, then he is both powerless and
wicked.
--- Epicurus, Greek philosopher, circa 300 B.C.

"Act of God" disasters like the Japanese earthquake expose the myth. Either
God can do nothing to stop catastrophes like this, or he doesn't care to, or
he doesn't exist. He is thus either impotent, evil, or imaginary.
--- CNN Belief Blog, 3-20-11

"With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and
evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that
takes religion."
--- Steven Weinberg, quoted in The New York Times, April 20, 1999

"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false,
and by rulers as useful."
--- Seneca the Younger (4? BC - 65 AD)

"Religion once ruled the world. It was called the Dark Ages." --- Ruth
Green.

"Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings." ---
Victor Stenger.

"I don't believe in God because I don't believe in Mother Goose." ---
Clarence Darrow

"As my ancestors are free from slavery, I am free from the slavery of
religion." --- Butterfly McQueen

"Religion was invented when the first con-man met the first fool." - Mark
Twain

"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." --- Mark Twain

"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in
all fiction." --- Richard Dawkins

"Cult today, religion tomorrow."

The Freedom From Religion Foundation: http://ffrf.org/
The Secular Coalition for America: www.secular.org
Secular Student Alliance: www.secularstudents.org
www.infidels.org
www.humaniststudies.org
www.atheistalliance.org
www.americanhumanist.org

[Wombat]

On Nov 10, 7:27 pm, "Freedom Man" <freespe...@4eva.com> wrote:
> See what RELIGION does to peoples' minds?
>
> Adults no longer believe in the Tooth Fairy - but they still torture and
> kill each other over ancient myths and superstitions.

snip spam

How about you actually engage in a discussion now and again rather
than posting your spam every time.

[Budikka666]

Keep running scumBoi. Every day you run proves how useless your god
is.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Whassup LiarBoi? Your omnipotent god can't help you to beat me in a
debate?

I wonder why that is?

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Still running like the sitnking diarrhea you and your ilk are.
Nothing new here.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

It's been over two months now and you're sitll running like the
cowardly piece of theist trash you are.

Why is this not a surprise? Your omnipotent god is useless to you and
you all admit it. Thanks for proving the atheist case for us.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Still running like the pathetic coward-for-Christ that you are?

Keep running: it keeps everyone up to date on exactly what you are.

[Budikka666]

Still a coward 80 days later. Thanks for admitting that your
supposedly omnipotent creator god can't help you beat me in debate.

Are you having a party in your nursing home in Kansas?

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Thanks for admitting that your supposedly omnipotent creator god can't
help you beat me in debate.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Thanks for admitting that your supposedly omnipotent creator god can't
help you beat me in debate.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Still running like diarrhea. No surprises there, LiarBoi.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

BroilJAB the Lamebrain still running almost three months on.

No surprises there.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

BroilJABBER the Internet's most famous Chronic coward is *still*
running, eighty-eight days later, from *his* *own* debate challenge!
lol!

Budikka

[Budikka666]

It's been ninety two days since I accepted your debate offer and
you've been running every day since then. Why is this no surprise at
all to anyone?

Budikka

[Ken]

I don't believe his IQ is anywhere near that high. You probably meant
29

[Virgil]

In article
<04b369e6-2c8e-4577...@b9g2000pba.googlegroups.com>,

Ken <flak...@aol.com> wrote:

> I don't believe his IQ is anywhere near that high. You probably meant
> 29

On the other hand, if 92 is his age, ordinary senility would explain a
lot about his behavior.
--

[Zacharias Mulletstein]

"Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:4d8bc4ad-037d-40a2...@f19g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...

> It's been ninety two days since I accepted your debate offer and
> you've been running every day since then. Why is this no surprise at
> all to anyone?

Every time I agree to debate you, you disappear like the coward that you
are, Mr. BuddiKKKa.

[Budikka666]

On Dec 2, 8:03 pm, "Zacharias Mulletstein"

<zachariasmulletst...@isright.com> wrote:
> Every time I agree to debate you, you disappear like the coward that you

> are, Mr. Buddikka.

Here i am. You provide your five best evidences for a creator god and
I'll formally debate them with you right here. You have until the
coming weekend to take me up otherwise you will be lableled a liar and
a coward, and I'll add you to the BrailJOB jeering.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

Here I am. You provide your five best evidences for a creator god and

I'll formally debate them with you right here. You have until the

coming weekend to take me up on this, otherwise you'll be labeled a liar
and a coward, and I'll add you to this BrailJOB jeering thread.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

On Dec 6, 8:23 pm, "Zacharias Mulletstein"
<zachariasmulletst...@isright.com> wrote:
> "Budikka666" <Budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message
>
> news:k9r777$fks$1...@dont-email.me...

> I only need one piece of evidence: The Bible.

Evidently you can't count to five. Let me spell it out for you:
Please present the top FIVE (5) items of evidence for your creator
from your Bible and show us what support they have in the real world,
and how this evidences a creator rather than the unaided natural
workings of the universe

That clarify things for ya?

Budikka

[Budikka666]

You had until this weekend to present your five items of evidence and
you've presented none so far. All you offered is a vague reference to
the Bible. Unfortunately, since it's the Bible that's in quesiton,
your vapid attempt to use it to verify itself is doomed to fail.
Despite this, I extended my offer and requested five items of evidence
from the Bible for which you will then show us what support they have
in the real world, and how these items evidence a creator rather than
the unaided natural workings of the universe.

You have one more day. At that point, if you have faield to find the
guts and the evidence, you'll be officially decalring *yourself* a
coward and admitting you ahve no evidence.

Got it, godboi?

Budikka

[Zacharias Mulletstein]

"Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote in message

news:377a0cac-3034-4898...@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

*PLONK*

[Andrew]

"Budikka666" wrote in message news:377a0cac-3034-4898...@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

> evidence from the Bible for which you will then show us what
> support they have in the real world, and how these items evidence
> a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the universe.

Here at Budikka's request are passages from the Bible which
tell us who the active Agent was in the creation of all things.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not
anything made that was made." John 1:1-3

"By Him were all things created." Colossians 1:16

Now, how does science support the above in the real world and
give evidence of a Creator rather than that of unaided naturalistic
workings only?

There could be no universe without the purposeful involvement
of an omnipotent Creator. Budikka should know this from the
laws (or principles) of science. Such as the law of conservation
of mass/energy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass

They above is true in reference to what is called a "closed system."
The outside 'factor' in the "system" of our universe is our Creator,
who possesses omnipotence, through which He creates matter, the
universe and also the life therein. This is where all of the evidence
points....to a Creator.


Worship Him!


> Budikka



Andrew

[Budikka666]

On Dec 9, 4:33 am, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
> "Budikka666"  wrote in messagenews:377a0cac-3034-4898...@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

> > evidence from the Bible for which you will then show us what
> > support they have in the real world, and how these items evidence
> > a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the universe.
>
> Here at Budikka's request are passages from the Bible which
> tell us who the active Agent was in the creation of all things.
>
> "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
>  and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
>  God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not
>  anything made that was made."          John 1:1-3

Once again, fundamental imbecile that you are, you failed to read the
instructions. You were to provide five items of evidence and *then*

"show us what support they have in the real world, and how these items
evidence a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the
universe."

You failed in every regard.

Thanks for once again openly admitting before everyone on Usenet that
you are indeed, without a shadow of a doubt, the most worthless peice
of Christian trash ever born.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

On Dec 8, 7:37 pm, "Zacharias Mulletstein"
<zachariasmulletst...@isright.com> wrote:
> "Budikka666" <budik...@netscape.net> wrote in message

Thanks for proving once and for all what a worthless, useless,
hopeless, shiftless, brainless, cowardly, vacuous hypocritical, lying
piece of Christian filth you truly are. Not that anyone wil be
surprised by this.

Budikka

[Fred^44]

Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>On Dec 9, 4:33=A0am, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
>> "Budikka666" =A0wrote in messagenews:377a0cac-3034-4898-916d-f21d3b3e5aab=

>@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> > evidence from the Bible for which you will then show us what
>> > support they have in the real world, and how these items evidence
>> > a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the universe.
>>
>> Here at Budikka's request are passages from the Bible which
>> tell us who the active Agent was in the creation of all things.
>>
>> "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,

>> =A0and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
>> =A0God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not
>> =A0anything made that was made." =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0John 1:1-3

>Once again, fundamental imbecile that you are, you failed to read the
>instructions. You were to provide five items of evidence and *then*
>"show us what support they have in the real world, and how these items
>evidence a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the
>universe."

>You failed in every regard.

What else did you expect from a Christian or an Islamic? Seriously.

[Budikka666]

Tomorrow is your last chance, BrailJOB - your last chance to prove
that you're not the ultimate coward. Your last chance to show that
you have some faith in your supposedly omnipotent god to help yopu
beat me in a formal debate on his existence.

Your failure to accept will be your unconditional admission that there
is no god and you are nothing but another in a long, long line of
lowlife, lying, vacuous, hypocritical Christian losers.

Budikka

[harry k]

But he's a "true christian" and therefore is allowed those character
flaws.

Harry K

[Andrew]

"Budikka666" wrote in message news:22c9ddac-f0a8-4735...@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> "Andrew" wrote:

>> "Budikka666" wrote:
>>
>> > evidence from the Bible for which you will then show us what
>> > support they have in the real world, and how these items evidence
>> > a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the universe.
>>
>> Here at Budikka's request are passages from the Bible which
>> tell us who the active Agent was in the creation of all things.
>>
>> "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
>> and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
>> God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not
>> anything made that was made." John 1:1-3
>
> Once again, fundamental imbecile that you are, you failed to read the
> instructions. You were to provide five items of evidence and *then*
> "show us what support they have in the real world, and how these items
> evidence a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the
> universe."

If you are unable to address this one point of evidence for a Creator,
then any further attempts would be futile. Therefore if your question
was sincere, please kindly acknowledge the scripture below and the
science to support it.

**************************************************

Here at Budikka's request are passages from the Bible which
tell us who the active Agent was in the creation of all things.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not
anything made that was made." John 1:1-3

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <Wq6dnehAYpjcGFjN...@earthlink.com>,

How is the bible evidence of anything?

Present some real evidence or admit you cannot.

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[The Magpie]

On 09/12/2012 10:33, Andrew wrote:
>
> Here at Budikka's request are passages from the Bible which
> tell us who the active Agent was in the creation of all things.
>
> "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
> and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
> God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not
> anything made that was made." John 1:1-3
>
> "By Him were all things created." Colossians 1:16
>

That's two - not *FIVE*.

And - by the way - the universe is an *OPEN* system not a closed one.

[Besque]

You think by calling people disgusting names, you somehow win debates.
You do not. It only brings to fore evidence of your own absence of
intelligence.

Bill Esque
>
> Budikka
>

[Ken]

Butt watt if what's said about Andrew is true?

[Free Lunch]

On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:48:26 -0800, "Andrew" <andrew....@usa.net>
wrote in alt.talk.creationism:

>"Budikka666" wrote in message news:22c9ddac-f0a8-4735...@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>> "Budikka666" wrote:
>>>
>>> > evidence from the Bible for which you will then show us what
>>> > support they have in the real world, and how these items evidence
>>> > a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the universe.
>>>
>>> Here at Budikka's request are passages from the Bible which
>>> tell us who the active Agent was in the creation of all things.
>>>
>>> "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
>>> and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
>>> God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not
>>> anything made that was made." John 1:1-3
>>
>> Once again, fundamental imbecile that you are, you failed to read the
>> instructions. You were to provide five items of evidence and *then*
>> "show us what support they have in the real world, and how these items
>> evidence a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the
>> universe."
>
>If you are unable to address this one point of evidence for a Creator,

You do not have a point of evidence for a creator. You know that. You
are knowingly making a false claim and blaming God for the lie you tell.

[Besque]

IOW, if you cannot discredit the man's argument, then discredit the man.
But, the man's argument still stands.

[Ken]

Nope.....Both have zero credibility

[Budikka666]

Tday marks ONE HUNDRED DAYS you have run from me. I'm, done with this
thread as far as you're concerned. Now it's time to kick Andrew-a-
Blank's cowardly vacuous brain-dead ass.

In closing, let me remind readers of your *other* century - one
hundred threads from which you have run from me (not even counting
this one):
LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #1
When asked what his academic qualifications were to set himself up as
judge and jury of the Theory of Evolution, Fled the Thread, thereby
proving himself a hypocrite.
http://tinyurl.com/3rf72jl

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #2
Challenged on his 'missing links' LIE. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3um7gc4

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #3
Asked what positive scientific evidence he had which demonstrates that
the entire surface of the Earth was completely under water only about
4,300 years old as the Bible chronology in Luke indicates. Fled the
Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/44c3q94

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #4
Asked if he had any positive scientific evidence which demonstrates
that the Earth and indeed the universe are only about 6,000 years old
as the Bible chronology in Luke indicates. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3d38lwe

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #5
Asked what professionally published positive scientific evidence there
is for a creator or for a creation. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3sya4pn

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #6
Asked what independent objective evidence there is for a creator or
for a creation, posted around the same time as the above. Fled the
Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #7
Asked what intelligent rationale he could offer for a creator or for a
creation, posted around the same time as the above. Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #8
LIED that he posted 180 failures of evolution when he posted only a
handful, all of which were easily refuted. Didn't even *pretend* he
could support his claim! Instead, he Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3ueca9g

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #9
LIED that humans and apes do not have a common ancestry and when asked
for evidence and invited to debate it, he Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3doxezm

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #10
Invited to go toe-to-toe on the existence of this god of his. Fled
the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3s6wwaf

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #11
Invited to discuss unsupported claims he made about the coelacanth.
Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/44kxjxf

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #12
Taken to task over LIES about Richard Dawkins. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3md8lbg

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #13
Called out on his LIE about evolution and invited to discuss it. Fled
the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3q5g5v8

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #14
Called out on his LIE about Jack Kevorkian's whereabouts. Hell? Fled
the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3tw8pja

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #15
Called out on his LIE about convicted criminal Garcia's whereabouts.
Hell? Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/69z2wex

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #16
Called out on his LIE about the Peppered moth, Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3j9cy7b

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #17
Invited to discuss his knowledge of the Bible. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3pfrg53

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #18
Invited to discuss his LIE about the odds of abiogenesis and
evolution. Fled the thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3v5x4or

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #19
Offered a discussion of his shameful LIE about anti-semitism. Fled
the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3shfato

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #20
LIES about Charles Darwin's purported racism were exposed. Fled the
Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3c8mele

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #21
Invited you to define 'Evolution' so that we could discuss it
intelligently. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3grr2tm

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #22
Made several statements on the reliability of the Bible and when
challenged to support them Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3vc4v8o

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #23
LIED about what Charles Darwin said about the evolution of the eye and
when taken to task on this, Fled the Thread:
http://tinyurl.com/3mp9fbs

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #24
We set LiarBoi BrailJOB straight on abiogenesis after he accused us of
making the claims that Joseki (whom he's directly and repeatedly
supported) was making, he FLED THE THREAD:
http://tinyurl.com/3mhzezl

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #25
Challenged on his 'billions of fossils' LIE. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3ce9g8j

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #26
Challenged on Jesus Christ. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/6kck7b5

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #27
Washed out in the Noahic flood. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/4xo7k7v

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #28
Challenged on his Rick Perry LIES. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3w2rkhu

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #29
Big Bang Scares LiarBoi BrailJOB! Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/4xy9hhj

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #30
LiarBoi's Junk Shrivels Away! Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3mb6xts

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #31
Selfish Genes are More Generous Than Skinflint LiarBoi! Fled the
Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/4yh4nyh

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #32
Why species 'A' doesn't become extinct automatically after giving rise
to species 'B'. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3t2l3qf

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #33
The Definition of Speciation. Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3f7m488

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #34
LIED that there was a "mountain of evidence" disproving evolution.
Fled the Thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3k2jtqg

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #35
Didn't dare set foot in a thread which pointed out what a fraud he was
when he talks about Stephen Jay Gould and the visibility of genes to
evolution
http://tinyurl.com/3k8upef

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #36
Ran from his virus lie.
http://tinyurl.com/3om8ps5

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #37
When his lie about scientists skeptical of Evolution was exposed,
LiarBoi BrailJOB Fled the Thread!
http://tinyurl.com/3c6kufl

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #38
Radiometric dating. Fled the thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3gwzkhy

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #39
After having been bitten by Charles Darwin's finches, he flew the
coop!
http://tinyurl.com/6b7sm9o

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #40
Offered a debate on the evidence for evolution, LiarBoi BrailJOB
performed the amazing feat of running up the white flag.
http://tinyurl.com/3lgbdo3

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #41
Talk about fruit and watch LiarBoi fly!
http://tinyurl.com/3gvhqq4

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #42
Offered the chance to discuss transitional fossils, LiarBoi BrailJOB
transitioned into a chicken
http://tinyurl.com/3fq8omp

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #43
Asked to support his claim that a god made men and women, LiarBoi
BrailJOB Ran Away!
http://tinyurl.com/43m6exa

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #44
Challenged to offer his evidence for a god creating the universe.
LiarBoi proves his head is move of a vacuum than space is!
http://tinyurl.com/3twjs48

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #45
Challenged on his admission that he lied about Adam & Eve and a young-
Earth, LiarBoi ran away!
http://tinyurl.com/3pabgsu

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #46
LiarBoi unintelligently designed a lie and then ran away
http://tinyurl.com/3p75lhd

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #47
LiarBoi says one thing in one message, contradicts himself in another,
the runs away when challenged.
http://tinyurl.com/3bflqkr

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #48
Given a chance to discuss design, LiarBoi creatively exited the
thread.
http://tinyurl.com/3oplwuw

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #49
Offered a chance to discuss his lack of guts, spine, and original
thought, and why he has a pipe stuck up his ass, LiarBoi slithered
away.
http://tinyurl.com/3mszdd6

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #50
Offered a chance to discuss the "concilience [sic] of science, math,
and physics: a Creating Intelligent God" LiarBoi Fled the Thread
http://tinyurl.com/3boy8ae

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #51
http://tinyurl.com/3hwywdl
Flood debate was a washout - LiarBoi BrailJOB the Loonbag Fled the
Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #52
http://tinyurl.com/7yyx83c
Challenged to debate atheist knowledge v. theist knowledge, LiarBoi
BrailJOB the Loonbag admitted he knows nothing and Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #53
http://tinyurl.com/8yobgg4
Challenged on his lies about Richard Dawkins, LiarBoi BrailJOB the
Loonbag Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #54
http://tinyurl.com/6wk79as
Challenged on his gullible claims that I'd posted a clearly spoofed
insult to gays, LiarBoi BrailJOB the Loonbag Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #55
http://tinyurl.com/7d2s93z
Offered a second chance to debate Jesus, LiarBoi the Loonbag Fled the
Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #56
http://tinyurl.com/7az9uw6
Offered the chance to debate the efficacy of prayer, LiarBoi the
Loonbag Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #57
http://tinyurl.com/6v6dhy6
Offered the chance to defend his claims that there's a heaven, LiarBoi
the Loonbag Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #58
http://tinyurl.com/6wyp6se
Offered a third chance to debate Jesus, LiarBoi the Loonbag Fled the
Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #59
http://tinyurl.com/c47efyr
LiarBoi BrailJOB used his Flee Will! lol!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #60
http://tinyurl.com/7oq9q7d
Challenged to support his evil characterization of atheists, LiarBoi
the Loonbag openly admitted he had no cv to qualify him to make such a
judgment and then Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #61
http://tinyurl.com/87rrvtf
Challenged to debate the true meaning of Winter Solstice, LiarBoi the
Loonbag froze!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #62
http://tinyurl.com/7mxogt6
Challenged on intelligent design, LiarBoi BrailJOB the Loonbag
intelligently Designed an exit from the thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #63
http://tinyurl.com/7axbzsu
Challenged to discuss evolution, Loonbag the Loinbra evolved into a
chicken!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #64
http://tinyurl.com/7j47ofs
Budikka offered no challenge whatsoever, but cowardly BrailJOB
preemptively ran away! This is the best one ever!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #65
http://tinyurl.com/7xld5j7
Challenged on his lie about what Charles Darwin said about bears and
whales, LiarBoi BrailJOB got all bearish and Fled the Thread!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #66
http://tinyurl.com/77s8om8
Challenged to discuss intercessory prayer failure, LiarBoi the Loonbag
failed to show!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #67
http://tinyurl.com/78p8cl7
Challenged on his cowardly lies about the Shroud of Turin, LiarBoi
left so fast that only his ghostly image remained!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #68
http://tinyurl.com/7grerk9
Challenged to support another random claim about another random
celebrity, LiarBoi went incognito in his predictable way.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #69
http://tinyurl.com/7pr6p3r
Challenged to support yet another of his endless lies about Charles
Darwin, LiarBoi Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #70
http://tinyurl.com/83av5dz
Challenged *again* (see #18) to discuss his LIE about the odds of
abiogenesis and evolution. LiarBoi figured his odds of survival were
better elsewhere and evolved rapidly into a monumental chicken!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #71
http://tinyurl.com/7k6wrtv
Challenged to support his claims about atheists, LiarBoi admitted
there was no god to help him by showing great faith in running and
hiding.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #72
http://tinyurl.com/735e7mu
Challenged to support his rabid claims about a Republican never-been,
LiarBoi Fled the Thread

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #73
http://tinyurl.com/84svchk
Challenged to support his homophobic claim that a "homosexualist"
kidnapped an ape, BrailJOB thought he'd have a gay old time, but was
kicked in the ass!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #74
http://tinyurl.com/7ozbqr7
Challenged to present evidence for this fake god he wants us to
praise, LiarBoi the Loonbag Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #75
http://tinyurl.com/74nvphd
Challenged *again* (See #65) on his lie about what Charles Darwin said
about bears and whales, LiarBoi BrailJOB started wailing and Fled the
Thread!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #76
http://tinyurl.com/86vc75j
Challenged to support his claim that ID is advancing, LiarBoi
intelligently designed his exit from the thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #77
http://tinyurl.com/7xmmaha
Challenged yet again on his lies that Charles Darwin indulged in
racism, LiarBoi races for the exit!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #78
http://tinyurl.com/784skba
Challenged on yet another gay slur and mindless diatribe about birth
control, Loonbag aborted the thread!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #79
http://tinyurl.com/7u9exn5
Challenged to support his lie about Charles Darwin's supposed deathbed
conversion, LiarBoi converted to a sprinter and Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #80
http://tinyurl.com/84k2pp4
Challenged to justify bearing yet more false witness against Charles
Darwin, BrailJOB the LiarBoi bore himself swiftly from the thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #81
http://tinyurl.com/7y3fmpf
In which LiarBadge proves a moron about Mormons.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #82
http://tinyurl.com/8xd4mho
In which LiarBadge proves he lacks a catholic education about
Catholics saving lives.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #83
http://tinyurl.com/8467uwy
Challenged to match non-existent science for the Noahic flood with
solid scientific evidence refuting it, LiarBoi the Loonbag found he
was all washed up!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #84
http://tinyurl.com/7eowjm2
Challenged to support *any* claim he's posted, LiarBoi Fled the
Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #85
http://tinyurl.com/7ggtp9z
Challenged for the third time to support his assertion that there's a
Hell, LiarBoi ran like Hell!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #86
http://tinyurl.com/7abg3xl
Challenged to support his knee-jerk claim that there's a religious
resurgence in the USA, LiarBoi shrunk away.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #87
http://tinyurl.com/6m8868a
Challenged on his obsession with mutilating Charles Darwin's corpse,
Loonbag the BrailJOB Cut & Ran.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #88
http://tinyurl.com/723pbso
Challenged to support his lie that ID is growing, LiarBoi
intelligently Fled the Thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #89
http://tinyurl.com/7tkz7e5
Challenged on the fact that the cowardice of creationists refutes the
very lies they spew, LiarBoi the Loonbag beat a retreat.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #90
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/48a9b0a2028f3393#
Challenged on the afct that the literal thousands of Christian sects
refutes monotheism, LiarBoi split.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #91
http://tinyurl.com/7s3kjat
Challenged to support his claims about the Black Book Holy Bible,
LiarBoi did a Jonah!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #92
http://tinyurl.com/83dk5md
Challenged again on his LIE about the odds of abiogenesis and
evolution, LiarBoi became odd and even Fled the thread.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #93
http://tinyurl.com/8xvag5e
Challenged to post evidence for his god, Liarboi admitted he has none.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #94
http://tinyurl.com/77b6u8f
Challenged to back up his lies about Charles Darwin with Evidence,
Liarboi ran like a Beagle!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #95
http://tinyurl.com/85zhcbd
Challenged to support his odds lie (again) Liarboi Fled the Thread
(again).

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #96
http://tinyurl.com/86p9h8b
Challenged on his T-Rex red blood cells claim, LiarBoi Fled the Thread

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #97
http://tinyurl.com/6s5cfhy
Challenged to post some scientifically supported alternatives to the
Theory of Evolution, LiarBoi Fled the Thread!

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #98
http://tinyurl.com/83xnyrm
Challenged on his fraudulent Kent Hovind-Style "challenge" bullshit,
LiarBoi quietly misled himself away.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #99
http://tinyurl.com/7ml2fhx
LiarBoi Fled the Thread when challenged on his Pascal's wager idiocy.
I'll wager he won't be back.

LiarBoi BrailJOB Cowardice #100
http://tinyurl.com/86tko3z
LiarBoi ran when challenged to discuss the apatosaurus, thereby
proving he's a dinosaur.

Budikka

[Budikka666]

On Dec 10, 12:48 am, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
> "Budikka666" wrote in messagenews:22c9ddac-f0a8-4735...@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

> > "Andrew" wrote:
> >> "Budikka666" wrote:
>
> >> > evidence from the Bible for which you will then show us what
> >> > support they have in the real world, and how these items evidence
> >> > a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the universe.
>
> >> Here at Budikka's request are passages from the Bible which
> >> tell us who the active Agent was in the creation of all things.
>
> >> "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
> >> and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
> >> God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not
> >> anything made that was made." John 1:1-3

Who wrote that, Andrew-a-Blank, and what was his authority? Can you
identify, with independent objective evidence, beyond any reasonable
doubt - i.e. to the same depth and value of evidence as the Theory of
Evolution enjoys - who the author was *and* *also* provide independent
objective evidence as to what his qualification is that would
encourage me to rely upon his testimony?

What is it that assures me that he was passing on some real truth as
opposed to doing what you consistently do: to whit, pulling it out of
his ignorant ass?

How is *his* word any better than your word, which - as you yourself
have convinced me, is utterly worthless?

Go ahead and explain. I'll wait.

> > Once again, fundamental imbecile that you are, you failed to read the
> > instructions.  You were to provide five items of evidence and *then*
> > "show us what support they have in the real world, and how these items
> > evidence a creator rather than the unaided natural workings of the
> > universe."
>
> If you are unable to address this one point of evidence for a Creator,
> then any further attempts would be futile

This is not evidence; it's simply *you* demanding that we accept that
there is a god without offering an iota of anything independent,
objective or verifiable. As if that's not bad enough, here you are
now using as your "authority" some anonymous guy offering me nothing
mroe than the bullshit you've already offered: lies and unverifiable
childish beliefs that make no sense at best and are outright lies at
worst.

How is *his* word any better than yours? And why? In what fantasy
role-playing game system is that in any way, shape, or form,
*independent* *objective* evidence? With what authority is this
invested in any useful, reliable, or meaningful sense? Why should we
believe his word any more than yours?

You claim you've offered one point, but you've offered ZERO. That's
your problem. You ignore *every* single* thing I've stated, then you
pull this juvenile crap out of your lying ass and demand we worship
it. Am I supposed to respect someone who treats me - and has
consistently treated me like that?

Are you seriously this insane or what? Surely you cannot honestly
believe all this bullshit you spew?

You wil get nowhere preaching to me. You will get nothing from me but
disgust and disrespect. You've already filled me with that over the
years I've interacted with you. Is that how you propose to win me to
Christ, by pissing me off with your endless disprespect for me, with
your endless demands that i do exactly as *you* say for no other
reason than that *you* say. when you've shown yourself to be a
pathological liar who has no shame and no bounds to the lies he is
willing to tell?

And people wonder why I am so vehemently against you and your ilk?
They act like something bad happened recently and I just flew off the
handle, but they conveniently forget that I've been dealing with
shamelessly LYING scum like you for over a decade here, and I've never
once seen you offer any evidence, neve ronce seen you offer respectful
interactions. I *have* seen you offer endless lies, and excuses, and
cowardice, and vacuity, and hypocrisy.

No., it's not your bullshit fictitious god I hate. What I despise is
the boundless capacity for outright lies about everything. Your
shamelessness, your disrespect and your bottomless bullshit. You
wonder why I treat you like this, then go back and examine every
encounter I've had with you and your ilk, not today, not yesterday,
not last month, not voer the last eyar, but over a decade of never
once seeing you tell the truith, neve ronce seeing you show any
respect, never once seing you intent upon actually elarnign anyting,
and seeing you lie day after day after day, and make up despicable
lies about everythign, including me.

I don't give a shit what people say or think today because you've had
endless opportunities to be decent with me and to have a dialog, and
you've consistently refused. You've consistently disrespected
scientists all over the world. You have, without compunction,
outright lied about them and their hard work. You've refused point-
blank to consider the evidence and when, despite all of this, you have
been respectfully offered opportunity after opportunity to present
your own evidence in return, evidence of sufficient power to
counteract extant scientific evidence, you've run away tossing out
mindless Bible verses behind you *exactly* as you're doing right hare
and now. Your behavior has *never* changed, not once.

I should respect that? I should accommodate that? I should treat
that with kindless? I should be polite about that? Abouut your
cowardice? About your lies? About yoru vacuity? About yoru
hyposciry? Fuck that.

You will get nowhere demanding that I accept your delusions. Is that
your plan to win people to your fictional Christ - by raping them into
it? You're filth, and that in itself wouldn't be such a bad thing if
you'd shown even the slightest interest in or capacity for digging
yourself out of it, but you haven't. Not once. You;re not only
filth, you;re dedicated filth by choice. You wallow in your filth,
and you revel in it proudly.

You've offered me NO REASON WHATSOEVER to take those words as gospel
any more than I take yours. All you're doing is taking the words of
someone *you* do not know, have never met, have no intelligent reason
whatsoever to believe or trust, and tossing them at me, demanding that
I take them.

I don't take your word. and I know who you are. Indeed, I don't take
your word *because* I know exactly who you are and how empty and
meaningless your word is. So tell me, why should I take his word when
I have no idea whatseover who he is, what his agenda is, or why he's
telling these flagrant lies (although I can make some good guesses on
that score)? He offers no more evidence than you do - which is zero.

Just exactly how does removing a lie from the present by some two
thousand years make it even remotely the truth?

I've seen what that "word' has done to you. It has rendered you more
profoundly stupid than anyone I've encountered on Usenet. It has
turned you into a shameless LIAR. You not only tell lies about the
Bible, you also have told repeated LIES about me personally. You have
made up lies out of nothing whatsoever about me.

If you have shown yourself willing to outright lie to me about me, and
to do it repeatedly, then do you *honestly* believe I would take
*anything* you say seriously or believe it. or accept it?

If you've done such a good job of convincing me that *you* are
completely untrustworthy, then how can you seriously think that I
would take *your* recommendation that someone else is teliing the
truth? On the contrary! My experience with you has shown me that I
should automatically discount everything you say, and automatically
distrust *any* reference you offer.

> Here at Budikka's request are passages from the Bible which
> tell us who the active Agent was in the creation of all things.

A lie is a lie whether you're telling it now, or whether someone else
told it two thousand years ago and someone wrote it down. Why would a
2,000 year old lie be of any more value or interest to me than the
ones coming our of your mouth every day on Usenet?

> "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
>  and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
>  God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not
>  anything made that was made."          John 1:1-3

What authority does this have? Why should *I* believe it? I don't
care why *you* believe it. You're stupid enough to swallow anything.
Why should *I* believe it when you have shown yourself to be a liar
and the father of lies, and have never once offered any kind of
apology for those lies?

Once again you have proven to me one thing and one thing only: that
you neither listen to nor care what I tell you. All you are
interested in is talking over my every word, lying to me, lying
*about* me, and *completely* *ignoring* *every* *single* *thing* *I*
*say* *to* *you*, and then hypocritically demanding that I swallow
everything you spout. You demand we answer your quesitosn and RUN
AWAY when we ask no more of you than you ahve of us.

If you cannot see something tragically wrong with that attiude, then
you truly are a moron of the lowest order.

>  "By Him were all things created."     Colossians 1:16

Prove it.

> Now, how does science support the above in the real world and
> give evidence of a Creator rather than that of unaided naturalistic
> workings only?

It doesn't. And you've failed to even begin to show that it does, as
we'll see (again) below.

> There could be no universe without the purposeful involvement
> of an omnipotent Creator.

Why? because *you* say so, blasphemer? Scientists have found ZERO
evidence of any intelligent design. Every single thing they have
learned so far shows that the universe requires no gods. Your simply
denying this and saying "it does too need a god" is not evidence; it's
nothing more than your blind and childish denial of reality.

The fact that you have no interest whatseover in anything I have to
say, that you consistently ignore what I say, and that you outright
LIE about me and about what I've said is why you are a lowlife scum,
and why I have ZERO respect for you, and no interest whatsoever in
listening to any more of your insane monologs. Why would *anyone*
listen to you when you've conssitently shown that you have no interest
whatseover in listening to *anyone* but yourself?

If you cannot see that there is somehting seriously wrong with your
behavior, then you seriously need some psychiatric attention.

> Budikka should know this from the
> laws (or principles) of science. Such as the law of conservation
> of mass/energy.

I know more that than you can hope to.

>      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass
>
> They above is true in reference to what is called a "closed system."
> The outside 'factor' in the "system" of our universe is our Creator,
> who possesses omnipotence, through which He creates matter, the
> universe and also the life therein. This is where all of the evidence
> points....to a Creator.

Nope. Substituting your ignorance for an unknown, no matter what that
unknown is, does not make your ignorance an answer. To begin with,
our universe is not a closed system, and the laws of physics we enjoy
in this universe were not in existence before this universe arose and
therefore cannot be employed to argue against its eruption. Not that
you will *ever* listen to someone else setting you straight because
you are the blindest and most disrespectful and selfish person I've
ever encountered.

Here's what you need to do: you need to start by closing your mouth
and actually listening respecxtfully to those with whom you would have
an exchange. Your present behior is childish and unacceptable. BUT,
before you close that idiot mouth and listen, you need to apologize to
me for the lies you have made up about me and about what I've said.
Then you need to apologize to the millions of scientists throughout
the world whom you have insulted and demeaned. Until and unless you
do *that*, there can be no dialog between us. And even after that,
there can be no dialig until you learn to *LISTEN* to what is said yo
you, and to *address* what is said instead of ignoring it, and talking
over it, and preaching instead of discussing.

Not that you will *ever* have the smarts to grasp those simple rules
judged by your inexcusable behavior over the years I've known you on
Usenet.

Budikka

[Besque]

Actually when you attempt to discredit the man, it shows you cannot
discredit the man's argument: it may be due to a lack of knowledge
about the subject; or it may be an absence of intelligence; or both.
But, it says nothing about the argument itself.

[Ken]

WRONG....His "argument" is BS, while I was once a postgraduate
scientist, so what does THAT say about the "intelligence" of your
argument?

[Christopher A. Lee]

On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:48:20 -0600, "L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com>
wrote:

>Besque wrote:
>
>> Actually when you attempt to discredit the man, it shows you cannot
>> discredit the man's argument: it may be due to a lack of knowledge
>> about the subject; or it may be an absence of intelligence; or both.
>> But, it says nothing about the argument itself.
>

>Andrew has often said atheist are scum for not being Christian, and that
>Christians are inherently superior - nicer and more moral. When he
>shows himself to be a pathetic, worthless piece of garbage, he
>demonstrates the falseness of his own position since he holds himself as
>an example of what a good Christian is like.

Pretty well all the theists who cross post to alt.atheism, show that
they are neither nice nor moral - and that included Besque.

[Ken]

On Dec 11, 7:56 am, "L. Raymond" <badaddress@....com> wrote:

> That's clear just from this exchange.  Anyone who uses a difference in
> style to insult someone else's intelligence is simply being ugly to no
> purpose.  Insulting the other person may be childish, unprofessional,
> non-responsive or a sign of inexperience, but it is not a sign of low
> intelligence.
>
> --
> L. Raymond

Most of us have actually tried, at one time or another, to have an
intelligent discourse with these Xian creationuts.
All we even get in return is either "goditit" or some quote from a
2000 year old collection of campfire tales, so now we say "Look!
Bright n Shiny" then laugh at their gullible foolish stupidity

[Besque]

The best empirical evidence going for the existence of a creator is the
"fine tuned" fundamental cosmological constants. There are dozen of
constants. If any single one had not the values it does there could be
no life in the universe. Indeed the odds are so critical that if the
ratio between the Big Bang and the force of gravity had not been so
finely tuned the Universe would have failed. IOW had the universe after
the big bang been too slow the universe would have collapsed back on
itself, or too fast it would have expanded too fast to develop stars
planets etc. What are the odds of just the right values having occured
by random events? Dr. Laura Danly on "Universes" stated that the chances
are 1 in 1 quintillion. I quintillion according to Dr Danly is the
number of grains on sand on all of the beaches on the planet.


> >


> Andrew

[Besque]

On 12/11/2012 10:48 AM, L. Raymond wrote:

> Besque wrote:
>
>> Actually when you attempt to discredit the man, it shows you cannot
>> discredit the man's argument: it may be due to a lack of knowledge
>> about the subject; or it may be an absence of intelligence; or both.
>> But, it says nothing about the argument itself.
>

> Andrew has often said atheist are scum for not being Christian, and that
> Christians are inherently superior - nicer and more moral. When he
> shows himself to be a pathetic, worthless piece of garbage, he
> demonstrates the falseness of his own position since he holds himself as
> an example of what a good Christian is like.
>

"Judge not that you be not judged". That applies to Christians too.
Especially Christians.
>

[Les]

Please explain why it needed to do all this 'fine tuning' in order to
be able to create life.



Les Hellawell
Greeting from:
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County

"For the assertion that “There is no God” is just as much a claim to
knowledge as is the assertion that “There is a God.” Therefore, the
former assertion requires justification just as the latter does. "
- William Lane Craig, "Reasonable Faith"

[Besque]

I can only speak for myself, but I respond to what I _find_ on alt.talk
creationism. If someone crosspost from another NG to this newsgroup,'I
do not feel I have a right to delete another NG which I didn't write
in, in the first place.

show that
> they are neither nice nor moral - and that included Besque.
>

I have not attacked the character of you are anyone who responds
to me. I may not agree with you, but I do appreciate you for your
response to me and I respect you enough not to deliberately insult
you or cast dispersions upon your character or you personally.

Regards,
Bill Esque