talk.atheism Google Group

Re: Why Life on mars is impossible

unsurreality_2...@yahoo.com — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:23:18 UT

He must be talking about Charlie Crist, governor of Florida. Although
he's not dead so I'm not sure how anyone could be a Crist killer or
love a Crist killer.

Re: Why Life on mars is impossible

panamfl...@hotmail.com — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:14:18 UT

snippysnippy
Pot. Kettle. Black.
If you superstitious idiots cannot even agree among yourselves upon
the "story" and "teachings" contained within your insipid Bronze Age
comic book, what on earth makes you think that you have *any* ability
at all to convince non-Christians to listen to your moronic fairy

Re: Why Life on mars is impossible

dragonbl...@apexmail.com (Dragonblaze) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:44:02 UT

[snip]
Who is Crist?
Try to evolve a brain. I bet most bacteria have higher IQ than you.
Dragonblaze
- Apes evolved from Creationists! -

Re: Science Caught in YET ANOTHER LIE

harvestdan...@hotmail.com (Jason Harvestdancer) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:40:11 UT

Evidence you wouldn't understand isn't the same as no evidence. Most
of the water that was on Mars has since left that planet by processes
well understood by science but not by you. But it left evidence of it
having been there, evidence understood by those who study science but
not by you.
Have you ever heard of erosion patterns? No? Why am I not surprised.

Re: Why Life on mars is impossible

cnelsonpub...@hotmail.com (Peacenik) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:21:11 UT

Or anyone who does, for that matter, for the simple reason that there's no
such thing as heaven.

Re: Why Life on mars is impossible

x...@operamail.com (I AM A TRUE CHRISTIAN) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:11:24 UT

CRIST KILLER LOVER

Re: The "molecules to man" version of evolution: proven to not be science, but a dishonest religion

mmman...@yahoo.com (Ralph) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:56:02 UT

The best example of science performed with a presupposition that the bible
is literally true. It would truly be the beginning of the new "dark ages"

Re: The "molecules to man" version of evolution: proven to not be science, but a dishonest religion

mmman...@yahoo.com (Ralph) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:55:39 UT

Mmm...guess you haven't heard about genetics.

Re: Science Caught in YET ANOTHER LIE

mmman...@yahoo.com (Ralph) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:54:02 UT

And just what scientific data supports your position?

Re: Why Life on mars is impossible

ananias9...@_gmail.com (Pastor Dave) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:53:18 UT

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:24:29 -0700 (PDT), I AM A TRUE
CHRISTIAN <X...@operamail.com> spake thusly:
1) If you think that anyone believes your handle,
your dumber than your comment, although
I'm sure there are some atheists whom I'm
sure will be glad to falsely claim they do,
to further trash Christ. You know, that guy

Re: Why Life on mars is impossible

ananias9...@_gmail.com (Pastor Dave) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:53:06 UT

Re: Why Life on mars is impossible

ananias9...@_gmail.com (Pastor Dave) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:52:55 UT

Re: The "molecules to man" version of evolution: proven to not be science, but a dishonest religion

ananias9...@_gmail.com (Pastor Dave) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:52:39 UT

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:34:34 -0700 (PDT), skeptic griggsy
<lambert...@hughes.net> spake thusly:
So, another idiot who thinks that claiming that evolution
is reality, means it's so.
Irrational is believing in something without any proof.
That's what you're saying. Yet you have no proof for
what you believe.

Re: Why Life on mars is impossible

jmsasphbau...@windstream.net (DuhIdiot) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:27:08 UT

I AM A TRUE CHRISTIAN, on 24 Jul 2008, in alt.atheism, decided this was a
worthy use of a keyboard:
<snip>

yuo fukking idjits killed Inglish

Re: Science Caught in YET ANOTHER LIE

mmman...@yahoo.com (Ralph) — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:51:42 UT

Man created god. God created nothing.