Religious Extremists Not Interested in Founding Fathers AT ALL.

[Eric Gill]

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20020416_1345.html

Or the Constitution. But, then, the rest of us were well aware.

[Forest Ghost]

Eric Gill wrote:
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20020416_1345.html
>
> Or the Constitution. But, then, the rest of us were well aware.

Do you think that next Falwel will be suing to make churches pay taxes
like everybody else? ;)
-Forest Ghost

[Dan]

>Subject: Religious Extremists Not Interested in Founding Fathers AT ALL.
>From: Eric Gill eric...@yahoo.com
>Date: 4/17/02 11:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <Xns91F3661601452...@24.28.95.150>

>
>
>
>http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20020416_1345.html
>
>Or the Constitution. But, then, the rest of us were well aware.

What, you mean just because Ashcroft is ignoring the Fourth Amendment *and*
setting aside the checks and balances by having the Executive Branch wield
power that belongs to the Judicial Brand? Or maybe how Lynne Cheyney wrote in
an essay in the 90's that she thought fascism was a good idea but the Nazi's
strayed too far?

Dan
aa #1617
apatriot #14
2nd Class Citizen

[Dan]

>Subject: Re: Religious Extremists Not Interested in Founding Fathers AT ALL.
>From: Forest Ghost fores...@hotpop.com
>Date: 4/17/02 4:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <3CBDD5BD...@hotpop.com>

Sure. He'll just turn his church into a corporation. Then, like all
corporations, he'll get tax rebates that exceed the amount of taxes paid. It's
a winning proposition.

[Eric Gill]

dannyb...@aol.comnospam (Dan) wrote in
news:20020418002933...@mb-fj.aol.com:

Why not? Combine it with Faith-based Charities stuff, "privatize" welfare
by making the poor work for the churches, recieve money from the "charity"
AND corporate aspect, since they are now "providing jobs for the
community."

Jefferson was more right than he ever knew.