And the problem is according to Phillip Adams, Australia's most
celebrated atheist. Who in “The Atheist Delusion”, warns militant
atheists against misplaced arrogance and hubris.
I’ve heard recently that Sydney radio shock jock, Karl Sandilands is
suffering from shrinking testicles. You ain't seen nothing until
you've had some fat queen sado-masochistic faggot actor as a gym
junkie from Sydney going troppo at being called a plump frump.
Does your dictionary make haughty a lawful alternative to skanking
whore, or self conceit a synonym for your shit?
Brad (
brad...@gmail.com): “W[hat] T[he] F[uck] are you talking
about?”
atec77 (
ate...@hotmail.com): “No one know[s] or cares. It is after all
just dork talk!”
dolf: “Karl you’re a chook.”
Ish (
m...@g.net): “I thought so. What’s the matter? Afraid of women?”
Denis / Ish (
denis...@yahoo.de /
ish....@yahoo.de): “Is exactly
what I am”
Ish (
x...@c.net): “You can’t consider a faggot like you a ‘woman’.
Is it really beyond you to believe a woman can like baseball and not
necessarily want to read about your obsessions in a baseball group?
Chauvinist!”.
denis (
mrwils...@yahoo.de): “You can't consider a faggot tranny
like you a ‘woman’.”
dolf: “There’s only one queen and that’s Madonna bitch.”
Ishtar (
isht...@gmail.com): “Fucking frog. Awful funny you show up
when the trolls do.”
dolf: “Qu'est-ce? Aren’t you just the trolley dolly from the women's
hospital.” [B-Day Song (feature M.I.A) Madonna MDNA ℗ 2012 Boy Toy
Inc.]
What is a Nation? (Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?) is a 1882 essay by French
historian Ernst Renan (1823–1892), known for the statements that a
nation is "a daily referendum", and that nations are based as much on
what the people jointly forget, as what they remember. It is
frequently quoted or anthologized in works of history or political
science pertaining to nationalism. [Wikipedia 2012: Qu’est-ce?]
M (
st...@c.net): “What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here
gives a damn for your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you.
Too bad...he might have said ‘Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame
playing with homosexual-sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker.’ Now THAT would
be an appropriate job for him.”
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. (greghall@home.fåke): “Dick-sucking: Thank you,
I Bought Databasix!”
Fred Hall (
fkh...@databasix.com): “[snicker] Thank y[o]u, Gary […] for
letting me suck your dick in public: "Not true. Gay is PERFORMING a
gay act like fellatio. Being on the receiving end of fellatio is not
performing. It's sort of like being in an audience and enjoying a
performance. Does it make somebody in an audience an actor when he
watches an actor? No." - Nellie Greg Hall Warren attempts to
rationalize his homosexual desires.
“Gay is gay, gweg, whether yer pitching or catching." Neon explains
the hows and whys of sexuality to clueless Nellie Gweg Hall.”
M (
st...@c.net): “Blibber moofle whine……”
Blibber moofle whine
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 5, nous: 81 [Date: 2012.3.31, Super:
#473 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 - Peace; Tetra:
15 - Reach, Ego: #446 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11
- Peace; Tetra: 15 - Reach]
Nous: #81
Time: 00:40 hrs
Date: 2012.3.31
Torah: #1 #10 #70 %81 = #0
Dao: Propounding the Essential
Tetra: #15 - Reach
I-Ching: H11 - Peace
Latin: Matutinus {God, delight of the children of men} Alt: Vaolyah
{Attached to Nothingness in God} {
1. HELPS & CONSOLES IN ADVERSITY & TO OBTAIN WISDOM
2. CHANGE, PRESERVATION OF MONUMENTS & LONGEVITY
3.THE OCCULT SCIENCES, REVEALS TRUTH
4. Abiou
}
#671 CE
-
http://www.grapple369.com/grapple.html?zen:1,row:1,col:5
@memeBrain [Telos: #913, Super: #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching:
H5 - Delay; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back, Ego: #22 - Point to Reversal?,
Humility's Increase; I-Ching: H8 - Seeking Unity; Tetra: 34 - Kinship]
Male Idea: #13 has 10 Categories: #1, #5, #6, #1 = 'Ahava' (H163): 1)
town or area in Babylonia; #1, #7, #4, #1 = 'azad (Aramaic) (H230): 1)
(P'al) to be gone; #2, #3, #6, #2 = Gob (H1359): 1) a place which was
the scene of two encounters between David's warriors and the
Philistines (also 'Gezer'); #3, #2, #8 = gibbeach (H1371): 1) to be
high, bald (in the forehead), having a bald forehead; #3, #4, #6 =
gedad (Aramaic) (H1414): 1) to cut down, hew down; #3, #5, #5 = gehah
(H1456): 1) a cure, a healing; #6, #5, #2 = Vaheb (H2052): 1) a place
in Moab, site unknown; #7, #2, #4 = zebed (H2065): 1) endowment, gift;
#7, #6 = zuw (H2098): 1) this, such rel pron; 2) (of) which, (of)
whom; #5, #3, #5 = yagah (H3014): 1) (Hiphil) to repel, thrust away,
push away;
Female Idea: #22 has 6 Categories: #5, #1, #3, #3, #10 = 'Agagiy
(H91): 1) said of Haman, Haman the Agagite; #6, #1, #5, #6, #4 =
'Ehuwd (H164): 1) Benjamite judge of Israel, deliverer of Israel from
Moab; 2) another Benjamite, son of Bilhan [1Ch. 8:6]; #1, #6, #10, #5
= 'owyah (H190): 1) woe!; #6, #1, #7, #6, #2 = 'ezowb (H231): 1)
hyssop, a plant used for medicinal and religious purposes; #6, #4, #5,
#2, #5 = dehab (Aramaic) (H1722): 1) gold; #2, #8, #2, #10 = chob
(H2243): 1) bosom;
Barry OGrady (
ath...@hotmail.com.au): “You don't understand yourself
at all. You think it clever not to punctuate. What are trying to
prove?
You probably think its cool to wear a baseball cap on backwards. You
conform to what you think is non conforming.”
dolf: “That Catholic bitch apologist Kristina Keneally is dismissing
the fact that religious unbelief and disbelief which are your matters
of conscience as indulgence and belief is also someone else's human
rights claim which you are diminishing--Keep silent you skanking whore
because I am speaking in judgement against your soul.
Your fucked up Catholic Religious belief gives you, as an American
refugee, the right to Australian Citizenship and political party
privilege--But not Me!”
Ish (
m...@g.net): “What part of "I'm a straight female baseball fan"
didn't you understand? Can you read or is your life all cut and
paste?”
dolf: “I accuse you of indifference. Stop buying your meat pies from
Tony Abbott, you are no longer welcome.”
This pastry became a staple dish in medieval times, and was eventually
called "pyes" or "pies". The origin of this name comes from the type
of meat commonly used as filling. Beef, lamb, and duck were employed,
but a majority of the time it was the magpie pigeon that was the main
ingredient. Magpies in medieval England were originally named pie.
Some historians think that the popular usage of 'pie' birds led to the
pastry dish being named pie as well, while etymologists suggest that
pies were named after these birds "from a supposed resemblance between
the miscellaneous contents of pies and the assortment of objects
collected by thieving magpies." The first use of the word "pie" as
food is referenced in 1303 by the Oxford English Dictionary; also
stating that the term became popular and widely utilized by 1362.
[Wikipedia 2012: Meat Pies]
Thom Madura (
Tomm...@optonline.net): “WE do not need religion to be
kind and generous with others - Dolf”
dolf: “How is your pedophile porno collection going--still doing it
for you?”
Thom Madura (
Tomm...@optonline.net): “YOU are mixing me up with YOU
- Dolf
IF you are mentioning it - it can only be to compare it to yours.
REST assured that I have no time for that nonsense - so YOU are still
the leader in that area?”
dolf: “You haven't answered the question about your pedophile porno
collection...”
Thom Madura (
Tomm...@optonline.net): “Yes - I did - as I noted YOUR
record collection in that area - is unmatched by me - I am not a
participant in that.”
dolf: “Porn isn't my thing.
So what are you now saying about "YOUR record collection in that
area?"
That you don't star in any of them.”
% (
per...@gmail.com): “Stupid replies get stupid replies.”
Barry OGrady (
ath...@hotmail.com.au): “Dolt is a poof of God!”
dolf: “Forget the punctuation, learn to spell.”
% (
per...@gmail.com): “Gin what?”
dolf: “Fuck wit!”
M (
st...@c.net): “Cool. But it ain't baseball [in newsgroup:
comp.sys.mac.apps]”
Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): “The subject is
UNIX, not eunuchs.”
dolf: “Why do Americans always find that funny--Are you Mormon?”
Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): “No. Did you get
that impression about me (and if so, how?)?”
dolf: “I had a mormon friend once, who was into Unix and typically
drove a BMW: a Big Mormon Wagon.
I once called Eric Anderson from a phone box in Oxford Street,
Darlinghurst Sydney outside the court house and near where the Mardi
Gras Parade goes by.
Joked with him about his vasectomy--apparently that’s a slip of the
Mormon rules who to this today believe Jesus has stood on their soil.”
Fred Hall (
fkh...@databasix.com): “Izzit you, Qolon?”
dolf: “In tights? No! But in my RM Williams Brookstead Jean: Yes!”
Fred Hall (
fkh...@databasix.com): “Kook Hall of Fame vote recorded,
Qolon”
dolf: “It's a true story.
Hence factual.
Sorry kooks...”
Solon (Greek: Σόλων, c. 638 BCE – 558 BCE) was an Athenian statesman,
lawmaker, and poet. He is remembered particularly for his efforts to
legislate against political, economic and moral decline in archaic
Athens. His reforms failed in the short term, yet he is often credited
with having laid the foundations for Athenian democracy. [Wikipedia
2012: Solon]
-
http://www.grapple369.com/memeBrain_files/nedkellygame.gif
Fred Hall (
fkh...@databasix.com): “Sure, but what about Ned Kelly?”
dolf: “At least with my story you can listen to Madonna's newly
released MDNA album...”
Fred Hall (
fkh...@databasix.com): “No thank you. DataBasix -
Continuing to kick USENet ass.
Science flew man to the moon. Religion flew man into buildings…”
Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): "It is the fable of
Jesus Christ, as told in the New Testament, and the wild and visionary
doctrine raised thereon, against which I contend. The story, taking it
as it is told, is blasphemously obscene-- Thomas Paine”
Sbalneav (
sbal...@alburg.net): “BWAHAHA. [heads off to server room]”
Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): “Ha ha! I look
forward to an update -- please let us know how this works out.”
"Human behaviour flows from three main sources: Desire, Emotion, and
Knowledge." -- Plato of Athens
Bonnie Bitch (b...@owns.maf&dog): “Your primary goal is bashing
heterosexual men we know that for sure.”
Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): “That
unsubstantiated claim is entirely wrong. In fact, I find most men
interesting, entertaining, and sometimes even challenging at a variety
of levels (and other women often are too), but that's an anecdote that
may be a reflection of my own bias reflective of my circle of
friends.”
dolf: “Still Time To Vote: Usenet Kook Hall Of Fame!”
Gary L Burnore (
gbur...@databasix.com): “I’ve [SLAP] no brain.
[plonk]”
dolf: “You
databasix.com guys are nothing but piss-heads.
Are you the dick Fred Hall mouths off about?
Sorry mate, no cunts allowed. Only those blokes with testicles can vote.”
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler (
fn...@databasix.com): “Yes, boys and
girls, men and women, Dolf Boek has made his triumphal return to
alt.usenet.kooks, dropping 500 line screedbombs across the virtual
landscape. The same Dolf 'Qolon' Boek who is the proud owner of these
AUK awards:
72 Raisins Crackpot Religion Award January 2006
Unabomber Surprise March 2006
Tony Sidaway Memorial Drama Queen Award April 2006
Goofy Azzed Babboon December 2007
Welcome back, Dolf! Perhaps the Grand Wizard will add you to his stable
of fine kooks!”
% (
per...@gmail.com): “Looks like newbies to me.”
sgt.preston (
sgt.p...@gmail.co): “Naaaahh.............just Fred's
"dirty Socks" !!”
dolf: “Are you attempting to unlawfully represent yourself as a member
of the Police Service or Armed Forces?”
Barry OGrady (
ath...@hotmail.com.au): “
http://www.ratbags.com/loon/mailbox/dolf.htm
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2002/92.html”
Fred Hall (
fkh...@databasix.com): “Ah, yes, the Boek k00ksuit. Too funny.”
dolf: “I will not make any submission to the present Parliamentary
Senate enquiry, because I am going to sue Peter Bowditch, the Sceptics
Society and the State of Victoria et al.
And I will visit the same recompense upon all and each of you here now.”
Fred Hall (
fkh...@databasix.com): “Glad we don't have that problem in
New Zealand.”
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. (greghall@home.fåke): “Learn how to trim, you
freaking, rude jerk!”
Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): “Teaching children to
question things is the best defen[c]e teachers can give them against the
dark arts that is religion. Just as they should question evolution so
they should question religion--Les Hellawell”
dolf: “When I was a child I was the only person who didn't believe in
God that I knew. Everyone else had either been born into one of the
major brands of Christianity, or at very least they'd accepted, by a
process of social osmosis, the idea of God, even if they remained, for
all practical purposes, indifferent.
And that's the good thing about the recent ascendancy of our belief,
or rather our disbelief. For atheism does not presuppose, let alone
impose, a set of views. All it does is unite us in religious
scepticism about the existence of gods. Gods plural because, of
course, even within one of the religious brands quite a few variations
on God are made available.
So today is important because it tells people that atheism is all
right. I didn't know it was all right. This greatly intensified my
loneliness as a child. When I tried to tell my grandmother my doubts -
I was raised by grandparents on a tiny farm--she boxed my ears. Ah,
the solitary dissidents, the lonely thinkers, the people who may be
the only disbeliever in a family or community. To that extent we need
to borrow from our enemies and have some missionary zeal. Whilst we
should avoid messiahs we need disciples to go out and spread the word
and seek converts. But as I'll be arguing this morning we must also
have to use our intellectual convictions to calm down the frenzies of
faith.
I see some parallels here between atheism and homosexuality.'The love
that dare not speak its name' as Oscar Wilde pronounced it. Leading to
millions living their life in the closet. Atheism was, and to a large
extent remains, the view that dare not speak its name. And it's only
recently that I've observed atheists coming out. Finally confident
enough to be, to borrow a gay slogan, loud and proud (Incidentally,
spare a thought for gay atheists).
But in becoming prouder and louder I want to argue that we should not
be too loud. And that we should not overestimate our importance as the
tectonic plates of religion move slowly, rubbing against each other to
cause mental and social earthquakes. By all means let us congratulate
each other - but let us not fall prey to hubris.
The disintegration of many a previously monolithic faith cannot be
attributed or credited to us. Roman Catholicism founders because
conservative prelates have tried to undo the progress of Vatican II.
The faithful refuse to comply with anachronistic instructions on the
pill and the condom.
They're embarrassed by their Church's archaic stance on women and
appalled by the ongoing attempts to cover up paedophilia scandals.
Others bitterly resent the undermining of liberation theology--those
valiant social justice campaigns. Or the stacking of the pulpits of
Western Europe with arch conservative priests from Poland.
The woes of the Catholic Church are self inflicted. We've barely laid
a glove on them. Ditto for the Anglican Church which is increasingly
stacked to the rafters with agnostics while Australian Anglicanism and
US Episcopalians self destruct over the issues of women priests and
continuing ecclesiastic homophobia.
But even the foundering of major faiths doesn't necessarily swell our
numbers. There's evidence that the major faiths have atomised,
Balkanised into the ongoing nonsense of cults, the New Age and pseudo
science. Religious energy, like energy itself, cannot be destroyed. It
tends to morph into new forms.
Twenty years ago Dick Smith and I aided and abetted the creation of
the Australian Sceptics, the local branch of CSICOP - the Committee
for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. CSICOP
deals with displaced religiosity. Much of the loss of the market share
for big brand religious beliefs was split up between the
Pentecostalists with their shopping mall religions or the fast faith
franchises, largely generated in California, right alongside the dream
factory of Hollywood. Two worlds that overlap to an extraordinary
extent.
Far from winning, the Sceptics and CSICOP have lost ground to
Millenarian and Shirley Macleanish madness. Turn on cable or free to
air telly and you'll see an ever increasing number of programs based
on paranormal detectives while John Edwards and his fellow frauds talk
to the dead. And the amount of space in newspapers given to astrology
has by no means decreased. We live in a parallel universe to these
people. The beliefs and behaviours that came from the Baptismal font
in mainstream faiths have simply deformed and reformed.
Yes, atheism is on the march in the US, according to statistics. But
we're starting from a very, very low base. And we should look across
the census figures at the equally dramatic growth of Islam in the US.
It's not coming from immigration but from conversion. Conversion
within the prison system! Malcolm X and Mohammed Ali certainly started
something.
So beware of triumphalism. Over the last half century I've learnt that
my euphoria about atheism's progress, inevitable to us, about the
advance of science leading to the retreat of God, was wildly
optimistic. Yet the triumph of science, even in the scientifically
triumphant US, has failed to convince the vast majority of Americans
that evolution is a fact rather than a blasphemy.
Members of religions see atheists as their mortal enemies. Not
immortal, of course, because atheists don't linger on through all
eternity. We simply return to the nothingness that preceded our birth.
Religions' immortal enemy is religion. We might shake our puny fists
at the Vatican, at Islamic fundamentalism, at the religious right who
turbo-charge the US Republican party - but it is the ancient and
modern squabbles, the murderous contests between faiths and within
them, that dwarf our dissent.
Hitchens, Dawkins and the rest of us are, at best, at worst, the most
minor of irritants. The ancient and recent Christian crusades against
Islam, the titanic struggle of the Protestant heretics against Mother
Church, the recent internecine horrors in the Balkans, the genocidal
hatred of the Jews incited by Martin Luther that evolved into
Holocaust - these are the big stories. Savanarola was burnt at the
stake by fellow Catholics - as was Joan of Arc. Atheists neither
gathered the faggots nor fanned the flames. When religions are not at
war with each other they tear themselves apart.
We cannot take the credit for the dramatic decline in religious
observation in most Western nations. At last count, 90 per cent of
Australian Catholics were not attending Mass. But that's not because
of our arguments. It's because of their arguments with their priests,
bishops and the more recent Popes, particularly those from Poland and
Germany. Take us out of the equation and that rapid erosion will
continue, perhaps accelerate.
It's even observable in the United States amongst the Pentacostalists.
Just as the hippies were a reaction against stultifying and
emotionally stunted parents, a great many children of US
fundamentalists are shrugging off the dogmas of Mum and Dad. At very
least they're moving at least fractionally towards the left. And
American religious excess has certainly helped dim the flames of faith
as far away as Western Europe. But it is important for us to realise -
and let me borrow a couple of metaphors from the realms of cutlery -
that it's self inflicted wounds that have done the most damage -
particularly the Christian variants - than the cut and thrust of the
atheists' arguments. We are, perhaps, the beneficiaries of this
process but we cannot claim the credit.
Nor have we laid a glove on Islam or Hinduism. They are indifferent to
us and our arguments. No, indifferent isn't the word, as in some
Muslim countries our lives might well be at risk. You could argue,
perhaps, that secular atheistic Jews are in constant conflict with the
orthodox and ultra orthodox in Israel. Not that they seem to have won
too many rounds (After all, Israel began its life as a secular state
and, over the generations, has had to abandon territory to the
religious right. They mightn't yield territory to the Palestinians but
the religiously xenophobic don't seem to have lost much influence).
So perhaps we should reconsider our role, our allotted tasks, as
people who believe in none of this nonsense we might see ourselves as
honest brokers. Negotiate in their all consuming conflicts. Given our
anthropological detachment from Messianic and Milleranian madness,
from the boiling hatreds between Sunni and Shiia, we might share the
role of the Norwegians. They're not particularly powerful or numerous
but fight above their weight in hosing down dangerous situations.
Confronted by rabid religiosity people who don't believe could try to
ameliorate the hatreds of those who do. Mind you, you could mount an
argument that that's exactly what the likes of us have been doing for
the past few centuries. As to trying to convert the believer to
disbelief - I tried that for the last half century and found it not
only a fruitless but thankless task.
A confession I must admit to is being swept up in a religion as a
teenager. I became, during the 1950s, when the Cold War was at its
coldest and McCarthyism at its height, a member of the Australian
Communist Party. I was 15 when I signed up and 18 when I was kicked
out. And one of the reasons I lost my faith in atheistic communism was
because it revealed itself as a parody of the Catholic Church.
Catholicism had Rome, Communists had Moscow. Catholics had God the
Father and his son Jesus. Communists had Karl Marx as God and Lenin as
the saviour. They had the Bible, we had Das Kapital. They'd had Martin
Luther and we'd had Trotsky. Both of us had forms of dogma, the show
trial, confession, heresy, expulsion. Both published an Index of books
not to read.
I remember noticing the eerie parallels between cheap Catholic tracts
sold by the Catholic's Evidence Guild and cheap Marxist tracts sold at
the international book shop perhaps a mile from where we are today.
One tract would warn against heresy. The other against revisionism.
One would have the upturned bearded face of Christ on the cover, the
other the upturned bearded face of Lenin. Towards the end of my
involvement in the party I used to swap them over, putting communist
tracts into the racks surrounding a Gothic column in St Patrick's
Cathedral - and smuggling the Catholic counterparts into the small
Marxist bookshop. God knows, Marx knows, what happened as a
consequence. How many Catholics were converted to communism, how many
Commos accepted Christ as their own personal saviour.
I mention these parallels to dramatise that the atheist can be as
susceptible to authority and dogma as the Catholic. And that's one of
the reasons I differ in emphasis from Christopher and Richard. Just as
I differed totally from Christopher on the war in Iraq. I've been an
atheist for 66 years. I became atheist at the age of five, a decade
before I knew what an atheist was. Before I'd even heard the word. But
as a little boy, the son of a Christian minister, I realised I
couldn't believe, that the notion of God was totally redundant. The
great argument for God was that there had to be a Creation, a
beginning. Some sort of cosmic orgasm that got things going. But my
objection was simple. If God was the beginning who began God?
When I was discovering why I was not a communist I read Bertrand
Russell's Why I Am Not a Christian. In it he explained that he was 18
or 19 when he asked himself that all important question. If God was
the beginning who began God? And it was at that moment that he lost
the last vestiges of faith.
But I understand the yearning for belief. The poignancy, the wanting
to believe. It is driven, principally, by the fear of death.
Christians postulate a lopsided creation in which personal existence
goes on and on and on for billions of years in Heaven. Yet that
creation had a sudden, magical beginning with God.
I realised, at the age of five, that I'd already been dead forever.
Because what happened before birth - all those billions of years of
non-existence was identical to what happened after death.
Now, although I share much of the anger, indignation and rage that
Hitchens and Dawkins express I am well aware of that vastation of
terror that greets anyone who considers their mortality.
I started writing about that terror in columns almost half a century
ago. It was, I believe, the first time these issues were raised in an
Australian newspaper. As I took advantage of the fact that they were
evolving from newspapers to viewspapers. Unable to compete with the
urgency and immediacy of electronic media newspapers were opening
their pages to interpretation of last night's news and could be
encouraged to give space to philosophical meanderings. So I used that
window of opportunity to start discussing, in newspapers like The Age,
The Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald, the notion of living in
a meaningless universe, without author or purpose - its only destiny
to go cold and dark in obedience to the second law of thermo dynamics.
The notions of personal mortality, our denial of death or its burial
in euphemism - are central to most religious belief.
For a while the attacks in response were deafening and strident but,
little by little, I got a sort of a dialogue going with people of
faith - which I still find valid. Because on a vast variety of the
social issues - the social justice issues that I care about - people
whose beliefs I find ridiculous can become my colleagues.
A decade ago Australia went through the most appalling wave of bigotry
in the way it addressed the so-called problems of a few refugees.
Building on the paranoia of white Australia, the Pauline Hansons and
John Howards - and sadly some on my side of politics - prove that
under the veneer of tolerance Australians remained deeply racist. On
that issue amongst the first people to sign up for justice for
refugees were Jesuit intellectuals and Josephite nuns. Just as Jews
played a major role in the civil rights movement in the US - yes,
largely secular Jews but nonetheless operating within a Jewish
religious tradition - just as Jews joined with black leaders like
Luther King to overthrow America's apartheid, members of Australian
religious organisations (by no means enough of them, in very small
numbers) manned the barricades.
As they did on Aboriginal rights. As they do on a wide variety of
issues. While it's true that atheists have to put up with bullshit
from the religious that deny us any claim to ethics or morality we
must not make the same mistake. There are atheists who refuse to
accept the possibility that Christians, for example, can be taken
seriously as social reformers. They argue that they do it for the
religious counterpart to frequent flyer points. In its crudest form,
they argue that only the atheist can be truly ethical. Well, tell that
to the Reverend Martin Luther King or the many black and white
Christians who played a leading part in overthrowing the repulsive
race laws that had been established by the Dutch Reform Church and
justified by their distorted theology. We saw much the same thing with
slavery. Christians, even Quakers, could justify the slave trade.
Nonetheless, Christians following Wilberforce worked mightily to
destroy it.
Atheists, finally, don't believe. But that doesn't make us better or
nobler or finer people. At least, not necessarily. Many of the great
crimes of the 20th century can be laid as much at our door as at the
doors of the churches. Atheists, like Christians, can be the best or
worst of people. We do not have a monopoly on intelligence, on ethics
or decency. Yes, their beliefs - whether New Age nonsense or full
blown Catholicism - range from the ludicrous to the loathsome. Yes,
the Catholic Church's sickening attitude to human sexuality leads to
paedophilia on a monstrous scale.
Its nonsense about virgin births and immaculate conceptions and the
superiority of celibacy so distorts the human psyche that, decades
ago, when making a film on prostitution and the sex industry, I
discovered an overwhelming majority of prostitutes had had convent
educations. And when I pointed this out in a series of newspaper
columns, linking it to similar findings in the UK, which found that a
remarkably high percentage of men and women in the sex trades were
Roman Catholics, led to me being the target of a Catholic fatwah. On
one particular Sunday an edict was read out from every Catholic pulpit
in this country saying that it was a sin to read any newspaper that
printed me or to listen to any radio station that broadcast me. And I
hadn't even mentioned the paedophilia problem because, at the time, I
didn't know it existed.
But when I look at these phenomena I am not moved to hate Roman
Catholics so much as I am to pity them. And I want atheists to view
these people, dragooned into belief since childhood, or coming upon
them later in life as a consequence of the most profound of fears, the
fear of death, with a degree of understanding and compassion.
It's true that such tolerance has never been extended to us and
remains singularly absent in most major religions. The atheist remains
an ultimate outsider, someone to be demonised, feared and detested.
But that's their problem, not ours.
The current frenzy for faith, and fundamentalism, may be as I've
occasionally speculated, the storm before the lull. The last gasp of
religion as it yields to the mighty analysis and discoveries of
science. That might be the case. But the confidence that I had in my
teens - that religion would be dead by the end of the 20th century -
that the synagogues, cathedrals and mosques would be museums - was
foolhardy in the extreme. Indeed, while the religious monoliths did
seem to be crumbling, the spontaneous combustion of ever more foolish
faiths in the supernatural smorgasbord of cults, largely created in
California, and in the tenacity of superstition to remain alive and
well even in its trickle-down form of those astrological features in
daily newspapers, remains awesome.
Furthermore I'm assailed by people who argue that while God didn't
exist, doesn't exist, he she or it is coming into existence through
the new technologies. That the internet is the harbinger of a vast new
form of consciousness that will fill the galaxies and will, in some
strange way, neutralise the second law of thermo-dynamics. Now I think
this is twaddle. But it shows that even amongst people who claim to be
totally secular, who would see themselves as being atheists of some
degree, there's always a danger of creating a new ism or ology that,
like communism at its worst, may have a disastrous impact.
Yes, we must rage against religious extremism. But we must also be
intelligent enough to understand its origins, in the individual and in
society. We are not strong enough, we don't have sufficient numbers to
change the balance of power. The fact that religious belief may have
evaporated in western Europe, that it really ceased to exist in Japan,
that does not mean that we've won. It simply means that in many areas
religion has lost. But giving up on religious belief is not the same
as becoming a thoughtful, highly rational atheist. There may be 2,500
of us here today but we are still a tiny minority.
Most people who've abandoned religion have not embraced the thoughts
and values we might try and articulate. They've taken up shopping.
They are dulling the pain of existence in the mall, by buying things
they don't need with the credit cards they can't afford. Or they're
dulling the pain in alcohol or narcosis. Or they're just sitting in
front of the telly or the computer screen bathing themselves in
violent drama or hyper violent games. In pornography or the
pornographies of violence.
Don't be fooled into thinking that we're at the edge of victory. That
would be a delusion. It concerns me that by becoming too arrogant, too
strident, too aggressive we will stultify rather than intensify
debate. I've known Christopher Hitchens for decades and know how he
operates. In any area, on no matter what he's tackling, he has two
positions. On or off. And when he's on he can be absolutely
exhilarating.
I remember chortling with delight at his attacks on Mother Theresa -
when he called for Henry Kissinger to be tried as a war criminal. But
I was horrified when he threw his lot in with the Bush administration
and the neo cons. Mind you, many of the neo cons started their
intellectual life as Christopher did, as Trotskyites. In other words
whenever Christopher is writing something he cannot help but pound the
keyboard like a pianist playing one of the noisier works of
Rachmaninoff. His response to what he correctly sees as Islamist
fascism brooks no argument and takes no prisoners. It goes straight to
shock and awe, to the botched invasion of Iraq and ends up with up to
a million dead (Not that we'll ever know the figure because a body
count has always been studiously avoided) and Abu Ghraib. And
Christopher remains unapologetic. Because that's the way he thinks and
that's the way he writes. And nobody does that sort of thing better.
Much of what Richard writes and says and broadcasts has the same...
energy.
I propose, if you like, a third way while recognising how devalued
that notion has become in politics. But a willingness to sit down and
talk to these people who are not necessarily our enemies and who may,
on a raft of issues, be our friends. Sometimes their efforts to be our
friends are grotesque and ludicrous. I think of the Templeton
prizewinners, the long list of scientists, almost all of whom I have
either known or interviewed at length, cop a million dollars for
building bridges of understanding - usually misunderstandings between
science and Christian beliefs. But when it comes to human suffering,
whilst I can see that much of it has been exacerbated by religion, we
must accept the reality that we need 'em on our side if we are to
effect social change.
There was a time when, for example, the Christian world seemed wholly
unsympathetic to the climate change crisis. But there is now a strong
movement, within Christianity, to see the destruction of the planet as
a form of blasphemy.
People of religious faith are, in my view, more to be pitied than
blamed. They are, I believe, victims of the faiths they profess. But
there are countless millions of them who are decent human beings. As
decent as the 2,500 gathered here today. And I return to that notion
of the atheist as honest broker. Of the atheist as go-between. Of the
atheist who can sit down with Protestant, Catholic, Sunni and Shiia,
Muslim and Hindu and try to talk some sense into them.
And I've done it. I've conducted little experiments along these lines
by getting myself invited to some very strange places. For example,
Australia's leading Pentecostal ministers--running vast churches--had
me along to talk to them about atheism. I described myself as a mangy
old lion in a den of Christians and got a very good hearing. And by
the end of the discussion I like to think that they would not be so
quick to condemn, demonise of vilify atheists in the future.
In running this line at this conference I realise that it will not be
popular, that it's much more fun to shake the fist and pound the
table. But in a world where the religious have done so much of that
for millennia, and continue to do it in the 21st century, somebody's
got to be sane. And sanity is, or should be, a characteristic of
atheism.
And may the blessings of Bertrand Russell rain down upon you.
Footnote: While I do not believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ
I'm here to tell you that other apparent corpses have a remarkable
ability to resurrect themselves. Only moments ago Obama's victory
signalled the end of the Republican Party. Now, a little over a year
after his inauguration day, the Republicans are reviving. Not by
compromising, not by changing the packaging, but by becoming even
madder than ever. The Rush Limbaughs, Sarah Palins, Tea Parties, Fox
News and its loony luminaries, are looking forward to the mid-terms
where there will be a bounce back. The pundits, as ever, were totally
unreliable. Ditto for the death of religion. It rises like Lazarus,
like the phoenix from the ashes. In some cases it does some
repackaging. So that Creationism is slightly redefined as intelligent
design. But much of it goes in the opposite direction, becoming even
more reckless and Fundamentalist, more mediaeval. Faith, blind faith
in all its forms, in all its weird and wacky variations, behaves like
a virus. Just when you think you've got it on the run it mutates into
something even more infectious, even deadlier. And the immune system
of human societies isn't getting significantly stronger.
In the last century 150 million people died in wars and genocides. We
would argue that religion played a major role in those statistics.
There's little evidence of it ameliorated fanaticism and much that
exacerbated it.
How will we fare in the 21st century? It certainly not off to an
encouraging start. Truly world wars may be fading but the
intensification of local, nationalist, civil and other forms of
conflict are on the increase. And we have yet to see what will happen
when, inevitably, terrorist groups, motivated by religion, get their
hands on biological or nuclear weapons. When one or more of scores of
would-be Saddam Husseins really do get weapons of mass destruction.
Yes, there are pockets of progress. But they're offset by black holes of
brutal beliefs. It's a fight that's been going on for centuries,
millennia. And it's not over yet.” [© 2010 Phillip Adams, edited version
of a speech given at the Global Atheist Convention]
Fred Hall (
fkh...@databasix.com): “Did you enjoy your stay in the hospital?
[trim, for ClosetBoi]”
Cujo DeSockpuppet (
cu...@petitmorte.net): “So howz the
marsupial-molesting working out for you, freak?”
Cujo: The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"Ad hominem, when it comes to psychology I am a genius. This can be seen
by the wriggling all spinics such as you do--and snipping of logical
definitions that trap you instead of you logically answering
them.”--Edmond 'taking his ego for a ride' Wollmann
Gary L Burnore (
gbur...@databasix.com): “Already boring, ALready
killfiled. When the cancelbots start in, I shall laugh.”
Rick Sabian / Checkmate (
RickS...@gmail.com /
Lunati...@The.Edge): “He's already in my stable of fine plonked
kooks.” [Checkmate: KotAGoR XXXIV, Hammer of Thor February 2012,
Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved]
“[I]ts usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments on the more
intelligent person's , lack of intelligents”--Dave Keating, AKA
"Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining intelligence
“[W]e all think what we do has major significants"--Squiggles explains
why he spends so much time on Usenet... and why he can't play Scrabble
dolf: “Don't over act Rick Sabian alias Checkmate, I've got enough
quotes for my book thanks.
And I reserve my rights as well.
That you are engaged in criminal activity towards me, as deliberate
character assassination of me by abusive, offensive conduct as
indictable crime worthy of attention and action being power of arrest by
your relative police jurisdictions.”
% (
per...@gmail.com): "[I]'m saying [I]'m everything."
dolf: "0% proof! God is a spirit."
% (
per...@gmail.com): “It sounds like you're not having a happy day.”
dolf: “Don't you think that if Zimmerman's story was contradicted by the
physical evidence the police would have charged him?”
Old Jinglebollocks (
old.jingl...@gmail.com): “Doesn't matter any more.
Can't be bothered even to read what you bums are writing on Usenet.
Fuck ye, the whole damned lot o' ye.”
I thought Jamie Rowe was discriminatory in the manner by which he
undertook his seeking of housemates in Liverpool Street with Gay Share-
space was indulgently disrespectful of the person's dignity as
autonomic right. That collectively these radio personalities are by
their fascist dog commentary, not mindful of duty to State. I also
called the Chief Commissioner office with that same calmness of mind--
it is therefore dishonest to convey it as otherwise.
Flag NOT Fag Wa[i]ver (
leo...@aohell.org): “Many targets, one bomb.
B O O M !”
dolf: “...and I want to call in an airstrike...is that wrong?”
Defence Minister Stephen Swan in addressing the media on 7 March 2012,
over ADF shenanigans does raise some matters of parallelism and I do
note as advice in which I agree.
On 13 March 2012 I followed my community health nurse and confidant’s
recent example of determined conduct as a statement of dissatisfaction
made in resignation and contempt over the unlawful character and the
frenzied, brutalising, hate filled manner by which the New South Wales
Police Service and Saint Vincent’s Acute Care Team have conducted
themselves in my affairs.
Following their advice that these persons were seeking to make a
submission to a Magistrate’s Court in order to forcibly gain entry
into my apartment and access me as to the nature, condition and
circumstances of my psychological health--they again resorted to
unlawful, threatening and unbridled aggression in their conduct
outside my premises and a week later they murdered a Brazilian youth
(certainly not a Brazil Holland hero) by tasering him in a
circumstance of mistaken identity over an alleged theft of biscuits (a
wafer perhaps?).
-
http://www.manhunt.net/profile/BRAZIL_HOLLAND
Manhunt (Brazil_Holland): Age: 34, Position: Top, Height: 6’0”, Build:
Twink, Ethnicity: Mixed, Hair: Buzzed, Eyes: Brown, Cock: 9" (Uncut)
This was now the 3rd occasion where this intrusion against me had
occurred and which I viewed as an unwanted, unreasoned and aggressive
conduct against my autonomy and rights under the State as a person of
intellect, integrity and dignity who is generally of a calm and happy
disposition. This conduct by them has unnecessarily tainted,
prejudiced and rendered toxic my living environment--goodness knows
what monstrosity the neighbours think of me.
These grievous incursions by State Authorities who have no desire to
give any accountability for their actions and neither do they wish to
grant me a modicum of credence with respects to my religious belief as
being a substantial reality. Accordingly, I have left both Sydney and
the State of New South Wales with no intention of ever returning to
their culture of disrespect, which lacks civility in its inhumanity. I
have therefore terminated my lease and left 3rd parties to pack and
convey my goods and chattels interstate at a cost of over $4,000.
Given this my book has now reached a level of completeness. I believe
that such actions by me as public defiance of the State’s conduct
which I have taken with due consideration as a calculated exercise of
voluntary will accompanying determined action against them, will
invariably manifest a disturbing effect and consequence upon their
enjoyment as participation in any further ANZAC celebrations.
As I crossed the State border into Victoria as a safer haven from
their persecutions and traumatising conduct, I advised those parties
of my intention to leave the State.
This departure gave me an opportunity to meet a female friend of
Private Jake Kovco who had some life experiences which augmented mine.
There was no disagreement about the plausibility of any aspect about
my belief that Kovco’s conduct was deliberate and being passed off as
accidental. His making of a video record of his service was in itself
an unusual act. I formed the view from the sloppy and casual manner by
which he portrayed himself that it seemed different to how other
soldiers are normally portrayed in the media.
The casualness as his routine conduct was at odds with his disruption
of determined policy events. That the uncharacteristic behaviour about
his making of the video record seems to support the notion as a view
he held, that the Australian soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan were
forgotten by the general populace, who went about their lives as
though they weren’t there and what they were doing wasn’t important.
He was in fact undertaking a course of action which required complex
processes that were not normal for him. That his intention to have his
body return on ANZAC day was a dishonourable and opportunistic conduct
as an attempt to impose himself upon the State in a most undignified
manner.
That I was right to protest as I had done and what a waste of time and
money the Military Tribunals into his death were.
Also conveyed to me was an equivalent experience to my own, about
private sexual acts being recorded by others and unbeknownst to
ourselves, were then publicised amongst a group in an attempt to
dishonour a person’s dignity and privacy--That this was technically a
rape because the sexual act accompanied a video recording which was
made against a person’s will.
Have you met my kangaroo Jingoist bitch prostitute: Shane Dowling?
"We know what you mean by Faceless Men, Krudd, you anti-termite,
errrrhm semite.....Coz Mark Arsebib, is just an ass-licker.” [7 March
2012, Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court Australia @
illusio...@gmail.com]
The dolt defamation on the Internet is going to come to an end!
“[With opposition] 101 [asks “Does the Zionist Lobby have blood on its
hands in Australia?”] [7 March 2012, Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo
Court Australia @
illusio...@gmail.com]
Semantics!
- dolf
- www.grapple369/memeBrain.html
On 1/04/12 1:40 PM, fasgnadh's dad wrote:
>
> Brian Clarke, Implementing Alain de Botton's suggestion for atheists
> that they "Steal ideas from Religion":
>
>
> Metaphor for the Divine.
>
> "Art was cradled in the Church"
>
> Studies for Hovering There
> Talking about Light
>