Here's a Poser (or Two) for Creationists
Budikka666
Check out that beautiful arch. Clearly it's designed because we know
arches are designed. Aren't they?
Or did it occur by natural process alone? How could it? How could
blind, undirected, unintelligent, random nature make such a beautiful
arch?
Whilst you're boggling your mind on that, creationists, incorporate
this: if, as some 40% of the US adult population believes, Earth is
6,000 - 10,000 years old, then how is that enough time for the wind
and sand to "create" an arch like the one in the photo?
Or did a god create the arch as it looks in the photo, just to give
the appearance of great age? if so, why did he do that? Isn't it
deceitful to make something look other than what it is? Why would a
divine designer have repeatedly created things that make us think
Earth is 4.5 billion years old if it isn't? Why would a divine
designer repeatedly provide solid evidence for evolution if there
never was any?
Budikka
ilbe...@gmail.com
MANY things dont require 'millions of years' to form as has been shown
in this Newsgroup and others . The 'millions of years' mantra is only
necessary for those who MUST have faith that time, matter, accidents ,
and chance.... can accomplish anything and everything ; even Pond
Scum graduating to 206 bone/600 muscle Human Being having a brain
informational capacity outnumbering the U.S. Library of Congress
(which even atheist biologist world reknown Dr. Francis Crick said
was utterly impossible to the 10x40,000 th power probability ! You
dont have that much faith --- no one really does . But the
alternative is unthinkable and must remain so.
Tim Miller
> MANY things dont require 'millions of years' to form as has been shown
> in this Newsgroup and others . The 'millions of years' mantra is only
> necessary for those who MUST have faith that time, matter, accidents ,
> and chance.... can accomplish anything and everything ; even Pond
> Scum graduating to 206 bone/600 muscle Human Being having a brain
> informational capacity outnumbering the U.S. Library of Congress
> (which even atheist biologist world reknown Dr. Francis Crick said
> was utterly impossible to the 10x40,000 th power probability !
Well, no, he didn't. We've pointed out that error HOW many times
now? Why must you CONTINUE to LIE? Is your faith THAT weak?
Ken
you have to be the
dumbest, most ignorant person I've run across in that time"
haiku jones
So, that led Crick to reject evolution and embrace creationism,
right?
Right?
Right?
Are you lying for Jesus, or just lying for the fun of it?
Haiku Jones
Budikka666
The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed. End of story. End of You.
Budikka
Syd M.
wrote:
Yep. It is.
PDW
bobsyo...@yahoo.com
"IlBe...@gmail.com" <ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:72426d4d-42fd-4ccd...@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
******* OK .... from now on, we will never refer to you as "evolved" pond
scum.
AusShane
wrote:
How is it that Illbebauk never answers anything? I have noticed he
makes a statement then runs away - and never answers a direct question
nor acknowledges a falsehood. Is this adult reputable behaviour????
Ralph
Dave really isn't an adult. Must have been something in his childhood
which stunted his development.
Ken
Dave is rumored to have been the result of a failed abortion.
Tim Miller
Why else would he still believe in fairy tales?