An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design!
Budikka666
atheists, but there you have it:
http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2010/01/an-atheist-defe.html
This just goes to show what liars the creationist scum are when they
say that evolution is an atheist science! I guess theirs is too,
now! LoL!
Budikka
Budikka666
bobsyo...@yahoo.com
"Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1945a68a-29c2-4d45...@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
You forgot to mention that his area is philosophy - NOT science.
ilbe...@gmail.com
How about THIS world famous 'atheist' ???? : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoncJBrrdQ8
Ken
PUT UP or SHUT UP, Fool
thomas p.
How about him? He doesn't defend the idea of creation in that video.
He was asked to speculate on a possibility, and he did.
Budikka666
The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken BAM
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed. End of story. End of You.
Budikka
Devils Advocaat
If you think Richard Dawkins was defending Intelligent Design, you
clearly didn't listen to what he said, he referred to the
"possibility" that an alien civilization that had evolved in a
Darwinian manner could perhaps have seeded this world with life.
That is actually the concept of directed panspermia and not
Intelligent Design, and as you would have known if you had listened
more closely he never defended the claim made by IDists that certain
structures and systems are too complex to have evolved.
And if you think about it the putative alien civilization, would
undoubtedly have created a simple seed and then allowed it to evolve
in to what we see today.
If they hadn't then we would have a scenario like that of the Dominion
in which the Vorta and the Jem'Hadar had been genetically engineered
and designed by the Founders who were worshipped by them as gods.
Do you honestly think that you could cope with the idea of your god
walking among us on this world and demanding of you complete obedience
on pain of death?
ilbe...@gmail.com
If you listen to the video, you hear Dawkins clearly appealing to a
higher authoratative PERSONAL intelligence ... whether 'magically
evolved' or not . When pushed, even the most staunchest of alleged
atheists show their willful deciet at playing along with the atheism
charade. Even they know it takes A PERSON for a personal Universe.
Its great when you hear it bubble forth thru their own mouths ----
sort of gives you hope they will one day dispense with their pride and
arrogance and surrender a bit of their life to our Creator of the
Universe before it is simply too late to do so.
Devils Advocaat
Gosh, where did he use the words "higher authoritative personal
intelligence" in that video?
Answer; nowhere at all.
He said higher intelligence.
He also said that this higher intelligence was part of this universe.
And that it would have evolved by Darwinian means.
And he also said it could not have "jumped into existence".
Which in no way fits in with your notion that God did the designing.
thomas p.
No he was not.
snip of remaining idiocy.
thomas p.
More important he did not claim the existence of such an
intelligence. He was asked to speculate on such a thing, and
he did.
archie dux
Ah, so Dawkins has convinced you that we were created
by space aliens?
Of course you won't answer this, any more than
you've ever answered the same question
regarding "top atheist" Francis Crick.
archie
Devils Advocaat
Exactly, he referred to it as a possibility.
Budikka666
Pink Freud
"IlBe...@gmail.com" <ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fa71c7fe-8674-431b...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
Liar.
Ken
nothing worth quoting or even reading
Where your creator "proof" Dumbwit?
bobsyo...@yahoo.com
******************************
As per your usual ignorance, it's nothing but "world famous crap".