Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Creationist Idiots Can't Tell Apes From Humans!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Budikka666

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 5:22:10 PM12/31/09
to
http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/12/telling-apes-humans.html
"AIG is trying to con their readers. This is why creationists usually
gloss over those inconvenient habiline fossils in the 500-700 cc
range, and why, when they do discuss them, they never show pictures of
them. If they did, the absurdity of the creationist position would be
laid bare."

Budikka

ilbe...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 7:10:10 PM1/1/10
to

We know that all of the ApeMen links to Humans are nothing but proven
deliberate frauds, a tooth from an extinct pig, doctored up/ filing
of teeth to make them look very old, .... along with airbrushed
pictures of intermediates in a Book that an Artist was paid handsomely
for the use of his imagination.

Ken

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 7:15:13 PM1/1/10
to
On Jan 1, 4:10 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We know that all.............

You don't know SHIT, Dimwit


BTW----Where's the "proof", Dimwit?

Free Lunch

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 7:17:35 PM1/1/10
to
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 16:10:10 -0800 (PST), "IlBe...@gmail.com"
<ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:

Thank you for reminding us how profoundly ignorant and dishonest you
are.

Do you really claim to believe in God? Does your religion demand that
you lie?

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 7:59:45 PM1/1/10
to

You imply that some group of people has an
agenda to some calculated end. Care to
make an ass of ^H^H^H expound further on
what that agenda might be?

Tim Miller

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 8:46:55 PM1/1/10
to
IlBe...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Dec 31 2009, 4:22 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/12/telling-apes-humans.html
>> "AIG is trying to con their readers. This is why creationists usually
>> gloss over those inconvenient habiline fossils in the 500-700 cc
>> range, and why, when they do discuss them, they never show pictures of
>> them. If they did, the absurdity of the creationist position would be
>> laid bare."
>>
>> Budikka
>
> We know that all of the ApeMen links to Humans are nothing but proven
> deliberate frauds,

"We" know nothing of the sort. *WE* know a bunch of ignorant
folks continue to CLAIM that, without any evidence.

(yawn)

Budikka666

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 6:35:24 AM1/2/10
to
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.

Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.

Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.

Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.

Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.

Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.

Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary

Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.

Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.

Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.

Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave

Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.

Case closed. End of story. End of You.

Budikka

0 new messages