Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
SysML Forum
Home
+ new post
Pages
Files
About this group
Join this group
Alternatives to XMI format
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Erik Engbrecht  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10, 7:22 pm
From: Erik Engbrecht <erik.engbre...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 7:22 pm
Subject: Alternatives to XMI format
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Are there any alternatives to the XMI format, preferably ones with
existing transforms from XMI, that represents a SysML model in a
manner that more closely resembles the structure of SysML?

I'd like to extract bits and pieces of SysML models for usage in other
tools, and I want it to be easy so that it can be done in close to an
ad-hoc fashion.  Technically XMI provides this, but XMI is an
extremely general format and rather non-intuitive.  I'd like something
at level abstraction close to SysML itself so I don't have to
constantly think about how to reverse the translation from SysML to
XMI when trying to extract information.

Is there any such file format?  Or a tool-independent API that
provides access to the model at a reasonable level of abstraction?

Thanks,
Erik Engbrecht


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google