Received: by 10.180.8.137 with SMTP id r9mr945162wia.2.1332703858776;
        Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: synergy-plus-dev@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.78.134 with SMTP id b6ls4741680wix.4.canary; Sun, 25 Mar
 2012 12:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.94.136 with SMTP id dc8mr523490wib.0.1332703858055;
        Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.94.136 with SMTP id dc8mr523489wib.0.1332703858045;
        Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <m...@kerrickstaley.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ga1si6761184wib.2.2012.03.25.12.30.57
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 74.125.82.177 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m...@kerrickstaley.com) client-ip=74.125.82.177;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.125.82.177 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m...@kerrickstaley.com) smtp.mail=m...@kerrickstaley.com
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id p11so4986718wer.22
        for <synergy-plus-dev@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:x-gm-message-state:content-type;
        bh=jul9sJ1d7zgvbnTIzWzxzGmnZHy3Eu9Fs/qW63nMTSs=;
        b=bbWLolZ89zVDz6R63jL4aAJQn/sxZ46O95TMs9SBSMqkIEmoh/qL/B5xzUtYp7GUAT
         lqRhUlXdO6i+UZ3HH6aIVKvEOKrypDh6OHj17c9LEAPRCDELlrr4ggCam3NqIhOFx/6t
         JlbAfimMADsEIGF7xNDJWjcMxGNCGLXQc37rYEDsIBsLDlcJ5Wsnx/LyLr0uHx+91eyT
         bwBUUq9fmdZX8NSivkqDa5TmDaNi9b1EWpdgb8T3taounqB5ToLEAvI03QqQh/W2oRde
         OFIqTehRh0OSEQqyf8YGDVa/+8htOLd0wwLqPWSqp+Wz6y0ZYWGB1ykwm8b9h4gMw/2h
         uwZg==
Received: by 10.180.82.132 with SMTP id i4mr12678295wiy.12.1332703857624;
        Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <m...@kerrickstaley.com>
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f50.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b3sm34552055wib.4.2012.03.25.12.30.55
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lahm13 with SMTP id m13so3435517lah.9
        for <synergy-plus-dev@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.129.69 with SMTP id nu5mr14505613lab.9.1332703854658; Sun,
 25 Mar 2012 12:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.30.197 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [64.113.90.67]
In-Reply-To: <CA+hOJUDbSNvwVPV4C6dx9BxK+F73D5GsXhLm0-wiS_2LR_d...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANaWP3zmuST9v06UmZiyBWyGiJFYkFFx0JgoVho9CDRONbx...@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hOJUDsgQUTVqZ6r7NO+J6tHQA-_7H_MjarubheKvv=jSP...@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANaWP3xi+-Lt0T8K_V76RLGDMnu18BRzzKko_F7TTwkvQYw...@mail.gmail.com> <CA+hOJUDbSNvwVPV4C6dx9BxK+F73D5GsXhLm0-wiS_2LR_d...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kerrick Staley <m...@kerrickstaley.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:30:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CANaWP3y6ZoJRSG+zDxstghYgK1b+PGFaibW=h6KLkNi6CvF...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [synergy-dev] Re: [synergy] Refactoring Synergy
To: synergy-plus-dev@googlegroups.com
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmMjGedS93L/Dky0ogKDJ2hDqggiv+RJKeXSLeMwqzOPyf/ejqd45XuS94UeTfGJJxDIaTd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

> There's merits for and against rewriting a program, it depends what
> you want to achieve. Making the code cleaner would not be my objective
> -- as you stated, we can do this just by refactoring. There's no point
> discussing my objectives here, as it would be a total waste of time
> (since it's already been discussed).
Where are these objectives discussed (could you give a link or two)?

Thanks,
Kerrick