wissl wrote:
> +1 for comments in symfony plugin module. It would help immense. The
> forum and ticket system is not the right place to discuss best
> practices and improvement ideas.

> As rating is quite difficult for something that is (hopefully) in a
> dynamic improvement I am not sure that a plugin rating would really
> help.

> On Feb 17, 4:02 am, Gandalf <ganda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,

>> I asked the same a long time ago and got no response, vote/comments on
>> every plugin and api, just like the php manual does.

>> On the php manual half the time i found the solution/examples/edge
>> cases/.../ on the comments.

>> Anyhow, symfony rocks.

>> Best,

>> Pablo

>> On 2/16/09, jukea <jkea...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> +1 for voting/comments on plugins.
>>> Also : some plugins are not returned in the search results.. I think
>>> this has to do with the fact that they don't provide the file
>>> package.xml.
>>> Ex: go there
>>> http://svn.symfony-project.com/plugins/
>>> check out sfDoctrineCommentsPlugin
>>> This looks like a great piece of code. (it's a plugin that adds
>>> commentable functionality to any existing model). I didn't try it yet.
>>> The problem is it doesn't come up in search results. The title at
>>> least should be searchable (ex : to someone searching for "Comments")
>>> On Feb 16, 7:30 pm, Pablo Godel <pgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> +1 for voting/rating plus comments on plugins.
>>>> Pablo
>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Eno <symb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Martino Piccinato wrote:
>>>>>> I agree here. Sure there are lots of great plugins but hard to find
>>>>>> and with lack of coordination. A better site (with voting, improved
>>>>>> search/usability/documentation) would be really a great thing.
>>>>> Definately need a voting / rating system. Allowing comments like the PHP
>>>>> manual would allow people to highlight problems / 'gotchas', etc.
>>>>> I think plugin developers must document installation and usage more
>>>>> thoroughly!
>>>>> --