From: Marco Pivetta <ocram...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:41:30 +0200
Local: Mon, Oct 22 2012 4:41 pm
Subject: Re: [symfony-devs] Di-Extra phpdoc-like injecting
Annotations in Doctrine Common are meant to fill a gap of annotations
Marco Pivetta
On 22 October 2012 22:25, Nikita Nefedov <inefe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep, I understand. But as long as php don't have annotations like in Java,
> our "annotations" is just comments. > Don't get me wrong, I'm not against annotations, but this just looks ugly. > Either way, they are handy, because they are right near to code they > related to, but we don't have annotation mechanism like Java have and we > shouldn't use it like Java forces Java-ers to use it just because it's not > Java (or C#). > On Monday, October 22, 2012 11:01:15 PM UTC+4, Marco Pivetta wrote:
>> While PHPDoc is metadata that is useful and does not have effect on how
>> Marco Pivetta
>> http://twitter.com/Ocramius
>> http://ocramius.github.com/
>> On 22 October 2012 09:15, Nikita Nefedov <inef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I just though, why we are using so complicated style for declaring
>>> use JMS\DiExtraBundle\Annotation\Service,
>>> /**
>>> /**
>>> But can't we just use default @param annotation for that purposes?
>>> use JMS\DiExtraBundle\Annotation\Service,
>>> /**
>>> /**
>>> The thing is: we are already at that point, where all this annotations
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||