Received: by 10.114.77.1 with SMTP id z1mr870295waa.23.1233676369688;
        Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <jc...@portallabs.com>
Received: from zoidberg.portallabs.com (zoidberg.portallabs.com [209.62.28.98])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m37si3271246waf.2.2009.02.03.07.52.49;
        Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jc...@portallabs.com designates 209.62.28.98 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.62.28.98;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jc...@portallabs.com designates 209.62.28.98 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jc...@portallabs.com
Received: from user-0c8hf0j.cable.mindspring.com ([24.136.188.19] helo=[192.168.15.7])
	by zoidberg.portallabs.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jc...@portallabs.com>)
	id 1LUNZr-00015I-0v
	for symfony-devs@googlegroups.com; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:52:43 -0500
Message-Id: <D7104A5D-B0F3-4CBE-9388-842504B9F512@portallabs.com>
From: Jacob Coby <jc...@portallabs.com>
To: symfony-devs@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <49886507.7020301@symfony-project.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [symfony-devs] Re: About this mailing-list
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:52:45 -0500
References: <498856D1.1050902@symfony-project.com> <A5E3A33B-E8B2-43E6-8325-F1D1B7223F3D@gmail.com> <49885B40.508@symfony-project.com> <843a1de40902030659k46e0d1q451c383d2208c159@mail.gmail.com> <e52c06b30902030710n5d6bc91ck9a296e872a398930@mail.gmail.com> <49886507.7020301@symfony-project.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - zoidberg.portallabs.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - googlegroups.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - portallabs.com

I don't think there is enough traffic on either list to warrant  
splitting out the plugins into their own lists.  Having a slow main  
list and a dead plugin list doesn't seem like an advantage.

On top of that, you lose the "cross-pollination" of ideas as people  
discuss issues with plugins (either development or usage).  Seems like  
a lose-lose idea.

Just my $0.02.

On Feb 3, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Fabien Potencier wrote:

>
> Tom Boutell wrote:
>> We'll have the same issue of distinguishing plugin development from
>> plugin use, though. People will want to post their "how do I use
>> sfGuardUser" questions to the plugin-devs list. We might want to  
>> add a
>> plugin-users list as well so there's a clear place for them.
>
> Right, as for the main mailing-lists, we need two of them.
>
>>
>> I'm tempted to comment further on the names of the mailing lists, but
>> the fact is that you can only say much in a few characters. A clear
>> description of the list's purpose in a signature at the bottom of  
>> each
>> message would help more.
>
> I would rather use the same name as we have for the symfony MLs to  
> avoid
> confusion.
>
> Fabien
>
>>
>> -Tom
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Pablo Godel <pgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Fabien Potencier
>>> <fabien.potenc...@symfony-project.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is always better to discuss a problem in the MLs before  
>>>> creating a
>>>> ticket. It you are unsure about the problem, ask the question to  
>>>> the
>>>> user mailing-list.
>>>>
>>>>> And where do plugin related questions belong? On the dev list or  
>>>>> the
>>>>> user list?
>>>> That's a very good question. Perhaps it is time to create a plugins
>>>> mailing-list. What do you think?
>>> I second the idea of a list for plugin development.
>>>
>>> Pablo
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >

--
Jacob Coby