I noticed the DynamicURLRequest object in the framework, but it does
not return an AsyncToken to be used with the CommandChain.
Any ideas?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Swiz Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to swiz-fr...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to swiz-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swiz-framework?hl=en.
Did someone already thought about using some sort of state pattern
around this?
Say for example if you have a transition from state C to state E run
eventChain1 etc
Cheers,
Roland
On Feb 5, 5:41 am, Ben Clinkinbeard <ben.clinkinbe...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > swiz-framewor...@googlegroups.com<swiz-framework%2Bunsubscribe@go oglegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/swiz-framework?hl=en.
>
>
>
> swiz-framework.swc
> 69KViewDownload
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to swiz-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to swiz-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
Thoughts?
I have this running using the CommandChain just fine, or at least all
three HTTP requests are sent off, and the results handler is
triggered. However, for some reason the results handler is getting
called twice for every request (3 requests gets me 6 calls to the
results handler). Any ideas on why that might be?
Any help is appreciated.
On Feb 5, 12:49 pm, Ben Clinkinbeard <ben.clinkinbe...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Chris and I are using it on a production project but we don't go live that
> soon. The 15th is actually our target date for the beta release, so things
> should be pretty stable by then. Without knowing all of your requirements
> its hard to say, but I feel like the code is pretty solid.
>
> Ben
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Duro <a...@duromedia.com> wrote:
> > Thanks guys. My last question is this. Do you think that using the
> > 1.0.0-alpha is a bad idea on a production project that goes live in a
> > week. It's a pretty small widget, but still, it needs to be production
> > ready by the 15th. I'm happy to be an alpha tester, but I guess my
> > biggest concern is if I run into problem, that I won't be able to get
> > them resolved quick enough to get this baby live.
>
> > Thoughts?
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Swiz Framework" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to swiz-fr...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > swiz-framewor...@googlegroups.com<swiz-framework%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
See: http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-22333 (for 4.0-beta2) and
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-22883 (3.4)
The workaround is to explicitly add the following when building the
HTTPService object:
httpService.addEventListener(ResultEvent.RESULT, function():void{});
httpService.addEventListener(FaultEvent.FAULT, function():void{});
Adam