<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>SwitchPipe Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe</link>
  <description>Discussion about the SwitchPipe (switchpipe.org) backend application controller and deployment daemon.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Switchpipe and Thin</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/d1510b3d35a6b3e9</link>
  <description>
  Yes, I have to look deeper (as I&#39;m not a Ruby specialist) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Yes, but I use NGinx and I feel ok with it. Maybe I should try that, &lt;br&gt; mainly for the challenge. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;JY
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/d1510b3d35a6b3e9</guid>
  <author>
	 jysui...@gmail.com
	 (JY35)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 09:52:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Switchpipe and Thin</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/99588fd9457e98a3</link>
  <description>
  If SwitchPipe&#39;s doing that, then either the app is not responding &lt;br&gt; within a certain number of seconds, and SwitchPipe is then forcing a &lt;br&gt; restart (I think this is in the settings) OR the app is simply not &lt;br&gt; responding or SwitchPipe cannot connect to it. I have not come across &lt;br&gt; a Rails application, at least, that takes more than 5 or 6 seconds to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/99588fd9457e98a3</guid>
  <author>
	 pcoo...@gmail.com
	 (Peter Cooper)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:03:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Switchpipe and Thin</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/a59860df3dd2d3ed</link>
  <description>
  Oupsssss ! &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help, it was simply a path problem : the good one &lt;br&gt; should be path: /var/www/nginx-default/rorprot rack &lt;br&gt; Now it works for a little useless app. I&#39;ve tried to set it for &lt;br&gt; another one, but switchpipe kill and restart indefinitely the thin &lt;br&gt; process. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ll have to look futher deep before asking for some help.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/a59860df3dd2d3ed</guid>
  <author>
	 jysui...@gmail.com
	 (JY35)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:25:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Switchpipe and Thin</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/1d790d2e4460c591</link>
  <description>
  Start from something simpler, and work your way up. That should &lt;br&gt; highlight where the problem is. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Also, you need to make sure that wherever &amp;quot;thin&amp;quot; is located is within &lt;br&gt; your path. SwitchPipe will go to /var/www/nginx-default/rorprot ack and &lt;br&gt; then run: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;thin --socket /tmp/switchpipe-[[RANDOMISH NUMBER HERE]].sock -u www-
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/1d790d2e4460c591</guid>
  <author>
	 pcoo...@gmail.com
	 (Peter Cooper)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:19:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Switchpipe and Thin</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/ff03bd6b04ea89cb</link>
  <description>
  I try since several hours to make Switchpipe to launch Thin instance &lt;br&gt; via socket to deliver service for a rails app. &lt;br&gt; Here is the switchpipe app config file : &lt;br&gt; --- &lt;br&gt; type: thin &lt;br&gt; socket_type: unix &lt;br&gt; user: www-data &lt;br&gt; group: www-data &lt;br&gt; path: /var/www/nginx-default/rorprot ack &lt;br&gt; max_instances: 3 &lt;br&gt; timeout: 9 &lt;br&gt; ---
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/ff03bd6b04ea89cb</guid>
  <author>
	 jysui...@gmail.com
	 (JY35)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:18:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Prevent proxying of static assets</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/5de7f335cc826b66</link>
  <description>
  Or both. Even though .htaccess will be in file cache, it&#39;ll still add &lt;br&gt; time, and being prepared to deal with regular expressions will keep &lt;br&gt; rewrites a little slower too. I will try and update the documentation &lt;br&gt; with your example for those who are interested :) (Once I play with it &lt;br&gt; myself, of course - I have something your tips might suit deployed
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/5de7f335cc826b66</guid>
  <author>
	 pcoo...@gmail.com
	 (Peter Cooper)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:28:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Working on FreeBSD</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/6a1561dd7016c5a1</link>
  <description>
  This is a FreeBSD specific init script I&#39;m afraid. Linux works in &lt;br&gt; quite a different way to the rc.d system of FreeBSD. At least that&#39;s &lt;br&gt; as I understand it. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;As shell scripting is pretty generic, it may be possible to turn one &lt;br&gt; or the other into a generic script by testing which platform it is
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/6a1561dd7016c5a1</guid>
  <author>
	 g...@gpdnet.co.uk
	 (Gary Doades)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:29:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Prevent proxying of static assets</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/8b773c405b4798cf</link>
  <description>
  It just seems simpler than using rewrite rules (to me). &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Testing on FreeBSD 7.0 64 bit platform, Xeon 2.33 Mhz dual core, this &lt;br&gt; arrangement only seems to add about 1ms overhead using Switchpipe as &lt;br&gt; opposed to just sending the request to a mongrel instance alone. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Using rewrite with .htaccess files uses about twice that. Don&#39;t know
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/8b773c405b4798cf</guid>
  <author>
	 g...@gpdnet.co.uk
	 (Gary Doades)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:28:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Working on FreeBSD</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/bff4d95e9f04c350</link>
  <description>
  Just a question.. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Am I going to need to have an init script for BSD and one for Linux? &lt;br&gt; Or are the additions you&#39;ve made pretty generic in terms of rc.d init &lt;br&gt; scripts? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Pete
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/bff4d95e9f04c350</guid>
  <author>
	 pcoo...@gmail.com
	 (Peter Cooper)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:19:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Prevent proxying of static assets</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/e2d4fa5f31562b02</link>
  <description>
  That is a really cool example you&#39;ve given; thanks! I didn&#39;t realize &lt;br&gt; you could do that with ProxyPass. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Cheers, &lt;br&gt; Peter Cooper
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/e2d4fa5f31562b02</guid>
  <author>
	 pcoo...@gmail.com
	 (Peter Cooper)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:15:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Working on FreeBSD</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/c442b239f4806f80</link>
  <description>
  Excellent work, and thanks for the information! I&#39;m going away for two &lt;br&gt; days tomorrow but will get this sorted out at the weekend. I&#39;m also in &lt;br&gt; the middle of migrating SwitchPipe to Github so that contributions &lt;br&gt; will become a lot easier :) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Pete
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/c442b239f4806f80</guid>
  <author>
	 pcoo...@gmail.com
	 (Peter Cooper)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:08:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Prevent proxying of static assets</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/0b4883e6c115da2c</link>
  <description>
  If you can&#39;t use rewite rules for some reason, proxying works just &lt;br&gt; fine. The setup instructions currently state that getting apache to &lt;br&gt; serve static files is a problem in this case. However, the following &lt;br&gt; example will prevent proxying of the static assets for a standard &lt;br&gt; rails application. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Inside a VirtualHost perhaps.....
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/0b4883e6c115da2c</guid>
  <author>
	 g...@gpdnet.co.uk
	 (Gary Doades)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:48:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Working on FreeBSD</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/bcbf05cd6d337b9e</link>
  <description>
  If anyone is interested I have managed to get switchpipe (1.04) &lt;br&gt; working on FreeBSD 6.2/7.0 &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;During setup the only thing that doesn&#39;t work according to the &lt;br&gt; instructions is the automatic installation of the required gems &lt;br&gt; because FreeBSD doesn&#39;t have a sudo command by default. You can either &lt;br&gt; intall sudo from ports or just install the gems manually first. The
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/bcbf05cd6d337b9e</guid>
  <author>
	 g...@gpdnet.co.uk
	 (Gary Doades)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:41:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Fix for no trailing slash</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/adcacd6a5a54630f</link>
  <description>
  Definitely keep me / us informed of how this goes :) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Just so you know, another thing I have on the cards is to rewrite all &lt;br&gt; of SwitchPipe into Python or Perl once the feature set is reasonably &lt;br&gt; solid. This won&#39;t radically improve performance because most of the &lt;br&gt; latency is in the networking and the process management, but should
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/adcacd6a5a54630f</guid>
  <author>
	 pcoo...@gmail.com
	 (Peter Cooper)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:58:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Fix for no trailing slash</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/b1bf39f52c9b48ad</link>
  <description>
  Yeah, I would definitely agree that the 301 approach makes more sense &lt;br&gt; long term. Also, I&#39;m glad to bring things like this up, since if I &lt;br&gt; roll SwitchPipe out in my production environment, it will definitely &lt;br&gt; make life easier for me.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/switchpipe/msg/b1bf39f52c9b48ad</guid>
  <author>
	 maucl...@nicusa.com
	 (Mike Auclair)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:44:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
