Other opinions about this Flash embedding article

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Keith Purtell

unread,
Dec 26, 2010, 3:15:41 PM12/26/10
to swfo...@googlegroups.com
I'm very curious as to what other web developers think about this article regarding embedding Flash, which includes some discussion of swfobject. (There is also a reference at the end to an improved method developed in conjunction with the man to created swfobject, but the link appears broken.)

http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashembedcagematch/

- Keith

Kyle Simpson

unread,
Dec 26, 2010, 3:59:18 PM12/26/10
to swfo...@googlegroups.com
1) That article is quite out of date, from Feb 2007.
 
2) The "improved method" talked about at the end is actually what we currently have today with SWFObject. A couple of years ago, SWFObject and UFO combined forces, and SWFObject 2.x is the result. We are currently on 2.2.
 
 
We've talked about doing a bug-patch 2.3 release, but at present the need for the release (ie, problems without workarounds) hasn't justified the work to do so, so we're in a slowed down maintenance phase for the time being.
 
As far as I (and I believe the other co-maintainers of the project) am concerned, SWFObject 2.2 still represents the most robust, standards-compliant, and flexible solution for SWF embedding.
 
We provide the markup-generator to assist web authors in creating the best markup/code for their site scenario. We also have several popular SWF-centric projects that we've coordinated compatibility with, including SWFFit and others. We think this represents a solid and stable ecosystem for SWF-in-HTML publishing use-cases.
 
--Kyle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group.
To post to this group, send email to swfo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to swfobject+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages