Re: SW Dog Park Re: Lansburgh Dog Park
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Cperry727
Jun 9, 2012, 12:26:52 AM6/9/12
to sw-do...@googlegroups.com
You are welcome but ot is a major concern of mine since I have 2 small dogs...and one of them is a chihuahua !
Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
-------- Original message --------
Subject: SW Dog Park Re: Lansburgh Dog Park
From: K9 Caesar & Family <bridget...@msn.com>
To: SW Dog Park <sw-do...@googlegroups.com>
CC:
Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
-------- Original message --------
Subject: SW Dog Park Re: Lansburgh Dog Park
From: K9 Caesar & Family <bridget...@msn.com>
To: SW Dog Park <sw-do...@googlegroups.com>
CC:
Thank you for illustrating the importance of having two separate areas
at the dog park.
On Jun 8, 2:24 pm, Carol <cperry...@cs.com> wrote:
> June 8, 2012
> To: District Department of Parks and Recreation
>
> RE: Paws of SW Dog Park Application for Lansburgh Dog Park
> Park Plans MUST include SEPARATE Small and Large Dog areas
>
> Dogs need to be separated by size because they can be unpredictable. Even though it may be a sweet dog at home, it's not known how it's going to react to other dogs. Placing large and small dogs together in a
> play area is just asking for trouble and without knowing the temperament of other dogs, it is a recipe for
> disaster. A prime example: A woman in a suburb of Cleveland, Ohio faces a misdemeanor charge in
> municipal court after her Siberian husky fatally mauled a Chihuahua at a dog park. The Chihuahua
> owner told police the larger dog grabbed her dog, Rizzo, and shook her "like a rag." Rizzo died on the way to an emergency vet clinic.
> The bottom line is big dogs and little dogs should never play together at the dog park. it is not just a matter of dogs of all sizes being comfortable; it is ALL about safety and liability.
>
> Thank you,
> Concerned and responsible SW Residents,
> John and Carol Perry
> 355 O St. SW
> Washington, DC 20024
> 202-232-8208
>
> cperry...@cs.com
>
> SW Dog Park.docx
> 23KViewDownload
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SW Dog Park" group.
To post to this group, send email to sw-do...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sw-dog-park...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sw-dog-park?hl=en
at the dog park.
On Jun 8, 2:24 pm, Carol <cperry...@cs.com> wrote:
> June 8, 2012
> To: District Department of Parks and Recreation
>
> RE: Paws of SW Dog Park Application for Lansburgh Dog Park
> Park Plans MUST include SEPARATE Small and Large Dog areas
>
> Dogs need to be separated by size because they can be unpredictable. Even though it may be a sweet dog at home, it's not known how it's going to react to other dogs. Placing large and small dogs together in a
> play area is just asking for trouble and without knowing the temperament of other dogs, it is a recipe for
> disaster. A prime example: A woman in a suburb of Cleveland, Ohio faces a misdemeanor charge in
> municipal court after her Siberian husky fatally mauled a Chihuahua at a dog park. The Chihuahua
> owner told police the larger dog grabbed her dog, Rizzo, and shook her "like a rag." Rizzo died on the way to an emergency vet clinic.
> The bottom line is big dogs and little dogs should never play together at the dog park. it is not just a matter of dogs of all sizes being comfortable; it is ALL about safety and liability.
>
> Thank you,
> Concerned and responsible SW Residents,
> John and Carol Perry
> 355 O St. SW
> Washington, DC 20024
> 202-232-8208
>
> cperry...@cs.com
>
> SW Dog Park.docx
> 23KViewDownload
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SW Dog Park" group.
To post to this group, send email to sw-do...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sw-dog-park...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sw-dog-park?hl=en
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages