AL GORE PLEASE EXPLAIN
Brian Germein
“The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet. However, this compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA's chief climatologist, Dr James Hansen and his team over at NASA's GISS.
Already, the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been in full retreat after having to concede a 17-year stall in global warming despite levels of atmospheric CO2 rising almost 40 percent in recent decades. The new SABER data now forms part of a real world double whammy against climatologists' computer models that have always been programmed to show CO2 as a warming gas.”
“The fledgling independent science body has repeatedly shown in it's openly peer reviewed papers that atmospheric carbon dioxide does not cause global warming nor climate change.
Some diehard climate alarmists will still say that in the lower atmosphere the action of carbon dioxide is reversed, but there is no actual proof of this at all. PSI suggests it is time for the SABER team to have a word with James Hansen. Watch the full NASA video on Youtube.”
Garry Claridge
Sent from my iPhone
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sustainable Maleny Discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sustainable-mal...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sustainab...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sustainable-maleny?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Brian Germein
Greetings Garry. YES I have read the referenced article. I must assume you read the initial article ?
Was it not self explanatory ? The authors clearly state their case as I have extracted and also they referenced
further at the foot of the article…….
As I am not a scientist I have nothing further to add to the statements made and suggest if you
don’t agree with them then communication directly with these gentlemen might be advisable.
OR … perhaps you can enlighten us with your interpretation of the information supplied, in a digestible form
for the layman.
I suggest it has never been about who is right… merely what is the truth, would you not agree ?