Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Recovery Act Data
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  6 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Adam Stalker  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Jul 5 2012, 11:04 pm
From: Adam Stalker <astal...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 5 2012 11:04 pm
Subject: Recovery Act Data

Wondering if anyone has done any cleanup work on the Recovery data from the
Recovery API.  Trying to find categorized projects and pull out job numbers
when improperly listed in the description instead of the jobs field.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Anthea Watson Strong  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Jul 11 2012, 8:15 am
From: Anthea Watson Strong <anthea.wat...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:15:31 -0400
Local: Wed, Jul 11 2012 8:15 am
Subject: Re: [sunlightlabs] Recovery Act Data

It seems ridiculous that we can't find a cleaned up version of the Recovery
data.  I'm sure academics have studied this data or folks have done some
viz work with it.

Someone on this list must know someone who has done the clean-up, am I
wrong?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tom Lee  
View profile  
 More options Jul 11 2012, 10:56 am
From: Tom Lee <t...@sunlightfoundation.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:56:48 -0400
Local: Wed, Jul 11 2012 10:56 am
Subject: Re: [sunlightlabs] Recovery Act Data

I'm not sure there's much value in cleaning up the data in this way. The
"jobs created/saved" field was something that public interest groups asked
to be included in ARRA reporting requirements, presumably in part to
collect political ammunition to defend the program's effectiveness.  But
this is not how economists measure the impact of fiscal stimulus.

If those responsible for reporting couldn't even manage to enter the data
in the right field, you can imagine how inconsistently they approached the
problem of estimating how many jobs a grant or contract saved/enabled.  And
to be fair, it's an almost impossibly difficult question -- imagine trying
to estimate this at your own workplace around a single client or grant!
 What's the counterfactual?

Even beyond that, nobody on a given project is going to be able to estimate
how many downstream jobs a project enabled through purchases of supplies
and services.  This is why economists look at macro indicators like
unemployment claims instead of trying to suss out the Keynesian multiplier
for every expenditure.

Anyway! All of this is just to say that I wouldn't pay much attention to
the jobs fields in ARRA data.  I don't think that reporting requirement
accomplished very much except to embarrass the Vice President on the Daily
Show:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2009/11/factchecking-bidens-stim...

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Anthea Watson Strong <


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Soren Dayton  
View profile  
 More options Jul 11 2012, 11:33 am
From: Soren Dayton <soren.day...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:33:45 -0400
Local: Wed, Jul 11 2012 11:33 am
Subject: Re: [sunlightlabs] Recovery Act Data

Also, the White House has a strong incentive to keep inflated numbers on
the website. The error bars on the numbers wildly dwarfed the size of the
jobs numbers. I mean ... this BS data was literally front and center on the
recovery.gov website and the WhiteHouse.gov website.

The White House and the public interest groups actually did the
transparency movement a fair amount of damage by publishing very dirty day
and claiming it meant something.

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Tom Lee <t...@sunlightfoundation.com>wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Daniel Schuman  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Jul 11 2012, 12:36 pm
From: Daniel Schuman <dschu...@sunlightfoundation.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:36:46 -0400
Local: Wed, Jul 11 2012 12:36 pm
Subject: Re: [sunlightlabs] Recovery Act Data

I'm not in a position to talk about its results, but there will be a report
coming out on this (from another entity) in the relatively near future.

Daniel

Daniel Schuman
Director | Advisory Committee on Transparency<http://transparencycaucus.org/>
Policy Counsel | The Sunlight Foundation <http://sunlightfoundation.com/>
o: 202-742-1520 x 273 | c: 202-713-5795 | @danielschuman

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Soren Dayton <soren.day...@gmail.com>wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sarah  
View profile  
 More options Jul 11 2012, 3:30 pm
From: Sarah <sarah.h.co...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Jul 11 2012 3:30 pm
Subject: Re: Recovery Act Data

ProPublica has done a lot of work to try to clean up and make available the
data, by adding counties and cleaning up geographies, filling in data where
it can. But I'm not sure (for all of the good reasons mentioned on here) it
has done much with the jobs data:

http://projects.propublica.org/recovery/

Also, OMB Watch has processed the data, but again I'm not sure how much
anyone bothered to use those employment numbers. They were pretty much
trash from the moment they were conceived. I remember calling one of the
first recipients, asking whether the 6 jobs reported were true -- we got in
a long discussion about whether their board might have to raise extra money
to keep them if they didn't get it. But it's really just a number of jobs
directly funded by the federal government, not including subcontractors or
subgrants.

http://www.fedspending.org/rcv/index.php?reptype=a

Sarah Cohen
Duke University


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »