Okay okay... lots of people are curious about this, so here we go: the
complete list of countries (up to 5700 applications now). "khng" gave
this URL to map the codes to their country names:
http://geotags.com/iso3166/countries.html
1695 US
372 RU
319 IN
274 CA
222 CN
199 DE
181 FR
153 ES
147 UA
127 IT
124 GB
123 PL
100 BR
86 PK
85 AU
82 BE
79 RO
69 TR
61 IL
60 PT
60 EG
58 SK
58 AT
56 GR
54 NL
50 SE
42 BG
39 SI
37 AR
35 LT
35 CZ
34 FI
32 MX
29 HU
27 BY
26 CH
22 CS
21 NO
21 LV
20 EE
19 IE
18 SG
18 JP
18 CO
17 HR
16 ID
16 HK
15 BA
14 TW
14 PH
14 DK
13 LK
13 JO
12 TN
12 CL
10 ZA
10 SA
10 MD
10 KR
9 TT
9 NZ
8 MY
7 VN
7 VE
6 KE
6 IQ
5 UZ
5 DO
5 AE
4 UY
4 PE
4 MK
4 BD
3 PY
3 MO
3 EC
3 BO
2 TM
2 LB
2 KZ
2 GE
2 CY
2 AM
2 AL
1 YE
1 TH
1 PS
1 PR
1 MT
1 ML
1 MG
1 KG
1 IS
1 HN
1 CR
1 CM
1 CF
1 BS
1 BJ
1 AZ
1 AF
One of several:
".cs was for several years the country code top-level domain
(ccTLD) for Czechoslovakia...CS is now the ISO 3166-1 code for Serbia
and Montenegro, which, however, continues to use .yu as its ccTLD. IANA
has .cs reserved for Serbia and Montenegro, with no sponsoring
organizations assigned."
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.cs>
> > 1 PS
> ?
This one's more clear-cut:
".ps is the Internet country code top-level domain (ccTLD) for the
Palestinian territories."
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.ps>
> ".cs was for several years the country code top-level domain > (ccTLD) for Czechoslovakia...CS is now the ISO 3166-1 code for Serbia > and Montenegro, which, however, continues to use .yu as its ccTLD. IANA > has .cs reserved for Serbia and Montenegro, with no sponsoring > organizations assigned."
Montenegro is slowly moving from .YU while Serbia continues using it. Central Bank of Montenegro moved from .YU to http://www.cb-cg.org/ recently...
some hacker with spare time would do great to cross this with population, and make a participantes/population rate, that would be interesting to see :-)
This guy "fromtw" seems to want to confuse the common sense of other people, such as Greg... The very question, whether it's a country or not, should be answered by U.N. :-) Let's leave it behind, I wonder what this guy will say ten year later.
On 6/16/05, hierarchical_polymorphist <hierarchicalpolymorph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To fromtw:
> didn't u see from the top dropdown list it says "Select country or
> location" in that CIA factbook? c'mon, it even has Christmas Island on
> that list.
Greg Stein wrote: > Okay okay... lots of people are curious about this, so here we go: the > complete list of countries (up to 5700 applications now). "khng" gave > this URL to map the codes to their country names: > http://geotags.com/iso3166/countries.html
> 1695 US > 372 RU > 319 IN > 274 CA > 222 CN > 199 DE > 181 FR > 153 ES > 147 UA > 127 IT > 124 GB > 123 PL > 100 BR > 86 PK > 85 AU > 82 BE > 79 RO > 69 TR > 61 IL > 60 PT > 60 EG > 58 SK > 58 AT > 56 GR > 54 NL > 50 SE > 42 BG > 39 SI > 37 AR > 35 LT > 35 CZ > 34 FI > 32 MX > 29 HU > 27 BY > 26 CH > 22 CS > 21 NO > 21 LV > 20 EE > 19 IE > 18 SG > 18 JP > 18 CO > 17 HR > 16 ID > 16 HK > 15 BA > 14 TW > 14 PH > 14 DK > 13 LK > 13 JO > 12 TN > 12 CL > 10 ZA > 10 SA > 10 MD > 10 KR > 9 TT > 9 NZ > 8 MY > 7 VN > 7 VE > 6 KE > 6 IQ > 5 UZ > 5 DO > 5 AE > 4 UY > 4 PE > 4 MK > 4 BD > 3 PY > 3 MO > 3 EC > 3 BO > 2 TM > 2 LB > 2 KZ > 2 GE > 2 CY > 2 AM > 2 AL > 1 YE > 1 TH > 1 PS > 1 PR > 1 MT > 1 ML > 1 MG > 1 KG > 1 IS > 1 HN > 1 CR > 1 CM > 1 CF > 1 BS > 1 BJ > 1 AZ > 1 AF
Vivek wrote:
> U mean 319 people applied alone from India ( IN ).?
> Greg Stein wrote:
>>Okay okay... lots of people are curious about this, so here we go: the
>>complete list of countries (up to 5700 applications now). "khng" gave
>>this URL to map the codes to their country names:
>>http://geotags.com/iso3166/countries.html
>> 1695 US
>> 372 RU
>> 319 IN
>> 274 CA
>> 222 CN
>> 199 DE
>> 181 FR
>> 153 ES
>> 147 UA
>> 127 IT
>> 124 GB
>> 123 PL
>> 100 BR
>> 86 PK
>> 85 AU
>> 82 BE
>> 79 RO
>> 69 TR
>> 61 IL
>> 60 PT
>> 60 EG
>> 58 SK
>> 58 AT
>> 56 GR
>> 54 NL
>> 50 SE
>> 42 BG
>> 39 SI
>> 37 AR
>> 35 LT
>> 35 CZ
>> 34 FI
>> 32 MX
>> 29 HU
>> 27 BY
>> 26 CH
>> 22 CS
>> 21 NO
>> 21 LV
>> 20 EE
>> 19 IE
>> 18 SG
>> 18 JP
>> 18 CO
>> 17 HR
>> 16 ID
>> 16 HK
>> 15 BA
>> 14 TW
>> 14 PH
>> 14 DK
>> 13 LK
>> 13 JO
>> 12 TN
>> 12 CL
>> 10 ZA
>> 10 SA
>> 10 MD
>> 10 KR
>> 9 TT
>> 9 NZ
>> 8 MY
>> 7 VN
>> 7 VE
>> 6 KE
>> 6 IQ
>> 5 UZ
>> 5 DO
>> 5 AE
>> 4 UY
>> 4 PE
>> 4 MK
>> 4 BD
>> 3 PY
>> 3 MO
>> 3 EC
>> 3 BO
>> 2 TM
>> 2 LB
>> 2 KZ
>> 2 GE
>> 2 CY
>> 2 AM
>> 2 AL
>> 1 YE
>> 1 TH
>> 1 PS
>> 1 PR
>> 1 MT
>> 1 ML
>> 1 MG
>> 1 KG
>> 1 IS
>> 1 HN
>> 1 CR
>> 1 CM
>> 1 CF
>> 1 BS
>> 1 BJ
>> 1 AZ
>> 1 AF
On 6/16/05, fieldtest <fieldt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't suppose you could break down US into individual states?
Interesting thought. I'm very busy with trying to handle the flood of
proposals :-) ... but when I get some time, I'll post a breakdown of
the US proposals by state.
To be honest, I don't know how other countries handle their
provinces/states, but I can provide breakdowns for them, too. Should
be pretty easy. Just hang on for a week :-)
It's interesting to see, that Slovenia has the largest percent of applicants on a million inhabitants. Maybe it's because it's so small. 39 out of slightly less than 2 million. :) Well good luck Slovenians. We gonna need it :)
For Italy, for example, i think that a region breakout would not make a lot of sense. But i think that a North/Centre/South breakout could be quite interesting.
Besides it will be a lot of work as in many countries there are no uniform names for the federal states as in the USA. I'm sure some participants of my state will have written "Niedersachsen", others "NDS", and others "Nds." and so on... I don't want to be the one having to evaluate this stuff... :-)
|
