[sm-users] StructureMap 3.0 Plans
6 views
Skip to first unread message
Jeremy Miller
Apr 26, 2010, 7:36:56 PM4/26/10
to structuremap-users
Guys,
I think I'm going to make the next release be 3.0. The plans, such as
they are, are here: http://wiki.github.com/structuremap/structuremap/30-release-plans.
The 2 highlights are the improved nested containers and *eliminating*
all the [Obsolete] methods.
Feedback welcome,
Jeremy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
I think I'm going to make the next release be 3.0. The plans, such as
they are, are here: http://wiki.github.com/structuremap/structuremap/30-release-plans.
The 2 highlights are the improved nested containers and *eliminating*
all the [Obsolete] methods.
Feedback welcome,
Jeremy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
Philip Holroyd
Apr 27, 2010, 11:04:42 AM4/27/10
to structuremap-users
What's the thinking behind removing VB support?
“On Startup” actions sound interesting, could you explain a little
further.
Philip
“On Startup” actions sound interesting, could you explain a little
further.
Philip
Jeremy D. Miller
Apr 27, 2010, 11:23:15 AM4/27/10
to structure...@googlegroups.com
Removing VB support was a joke on Chris Patterson's part. StructureMap will continue to be (vaguely) usable in VB, but obviously very optimized for C#.
Jeremy D. Miller
The Shade Tree Developer
jeremy...@yahoo.com
From: Philip Holroyd <p.i.h...@btinternet.com>
To: structuremap-users <structure...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 10:04:42 AM
Subject: [sm-users] Re: StructureMap 3.0 Plans
The Shade Tree Developer
jeremy...@yahoo.com
From: Philip Holroyd <p.i.h...@btinternet.com>
To: structuremap-users <structure...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 10:04:42 AM
Subject: [sm-users] Re: StructureMap 3.0 Plans
What's the thinking behind removing VB support?
“On Startup” actions sound interesting, could you explain a little
further.
Philip
On 27 Apr, 00:36, Jeremy Miller <jeremydmil...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I think I'm going to make the next release be 3.0. The plans, such as
> they are, are here: http://wiki.github.com/structuremap/structuremap/30-release-plans.
>
> The 2 highlights are the improved nested containers and *eliminating*
> all the [Obsolete] methods.
>
> Feedback welcome,
>
> Jeremy
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-users+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-users+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
Frank L. Quednau
Apr 28, 2010, 10:21:47 AM4/28/10
to structuremap-users
I have stumbled once or twice over a StackOverflowException by doing
silly things like A -> B -> A dependencies (which are in many ways a
mistake). Maybe you remember me setting the default instance to
something that is unknown :) That would fall into the same class of
problem.
Is it interesting for other people as well when StructureMap would
have some kind of tracking when building an object and throw a more
meaningful exception when it finds it isn't getting to an end?
Jeremy, do you think that is a complicated thing to achieve?
On Apr 27, 5:23 pm, "Jeremy D. Miller" <jeremydmil...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
> ________________________________
> From: Philip Holroyd <p.i.holr...@btinternet.com>
silly things like A -> B -> A dependencies (which are in many ways a
mistake). Maybe you remember me setting the default instance to
something that is unknown :) That would fall into the same class of
problem.
Is it interesting for other people as well when StructureMap would
have some kind of tracking when building an object and throw a more
meaningful exception when it finds it isn't getting to an end?
Jeremy, do you think that is a complicated thing to achieve?
On Apr 27, 5:23 pm, "Jeremy D. Miller" <jeremydmil...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Removing VB support was a joke on Chris Patterson's part. StructureMap will continue to be (vaguely) usable in VB, but obviously very optimized for C#.
>
> Jeremy D. Miller
> The Shade Tree Developer
> jeremydmil...@yahoo.com
>
> Jeremy D. Miller
> The Shade Tree Developer
>
> ________________________________
> From: Philip Holroyd <p.i.holr...@btinternet.com>
> To: structuremap-users <structure...@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 10:04:42 AM
> Subject: [sm-users] Re: StructureMap 3.0 Plans
>
> What's the thinking behind removing VB support?
>
> “On Startup” actions sound interesting, could you explain a little
> further.
>
> Philip
>
> On 27 Apr, 00:36, Jeremy Miller <jeremydmil...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Guys,
>
> > I think I'm going to make the next release be 3.0. The plans, such as
> > they are, are here: http://wiki.github.com/structuremap/structuremap/30-release-plans.
>
> > The 2 highlights are the improved nested containers and *eliminating*
> > all the [Obsolete] methods.
>
> > Feedback welcome,
>
> > Jeremy
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 10:04:42 AM
> Subject: [sm-users] Re: StructureMap 3.0 Plans
>
> What's the thinking behind removing VB support?
>
> “On Startup” actions sound interesting, could you explain a little
> further.
>
> Philip
>
> On 27 Apr, 00:36, Jeremy Miller <jeremydmil...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Guys,
>
> > I think I'm going to make the next release be 3.0. The plans, such as
> > they are, are here: http://wiki.github.com/structuremap/structuremap/30-release-plans.
>
> > The 2 highlights are the improved nested containers and *eliminating*
> > all the [Obsolete] methods.
>
> > Feedback welcome,
>
> > Jeremy
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
Jeremy D. Miller
Apr 28, 2010, 10:32:05 AM4/28/10
to structure...@googlegroups.com
StructureMap already detects and throws a specific exception for circular references. That's been there for a couple releases now. Are you saying that you want a better exception message? Got any suggestions?
jeremy...@yahoo.com
From: Frank L. Quednau <fque...@googlemail.com>
To: structuremap-users <structure...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wed, April 28, 2010 9:21:47 AM
From: Frank L. Quednau <fque...@googlemail.com>
To: structuremap-users <structure...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wed, April 28, 2010 9:21:47 AM
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-users+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-users+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-users+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-users+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
Frank L. Quednau
Apr 29, 2010, 3:54:54 AM4/29/10
to structuremap-users
Sorry Jeremy, might be I only got the Stackoverflow on an older
release we are using in a project where I don't want to switch yet.
I'll try my silly cases on the newer version.
Thanks
Frank
On Apr 28, 4:32 pm, "Jeremy D. Miller" <jeremydmil...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
> ________________________________
> From: Frank L. Quednau <fqued...@googlemail.com>
release we are using in a project where I don't want to switch yet.
I'll try my silly cases on the newer version.
Thanks
Frank
On Apr 28, 4:32 pm, "Jeremy D. Miller" <jeremydmil...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> StructureMap already detects and throws a specific exception for circular references. That's been there for a couple releases now. Are you saying that you want a better exception message? Got any suggestions?
>
> Jeremy D. Miller
> The Shade Tree Developer
> jeremydmil...@yahoo.com
>
> Jeremy D. Miller
> The Shade Tree Developer
>
> ________________________________
> From: Frank L. Quednau <fqued...@googlemail.com>
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/structuremap-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to structure...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages