You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to storm-user
Is the acker latency, as reported by ui, an adequate indication of
whether I need more ackers? Or is there something else to watch?
Nathan Marz
unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 4:34:08 AM1/31/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to storm...@googlegroups.com
The hard indication that you need more ackers is if your spouts start failing a lot of tuples for no apparent reason. This means the ackers are bottlenecked and are not sending completion messages before the topology timeout.
A better metric to use to understand the load on the ackers is messages processed per acker task per second.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Chip Salzenberg <rev....@gmail.com> wrote:
Is the acker latency, as reported by ui, an adequate indication of
whether I need more ackers? Or is there something else to watch?