|
|
stopbadware |
I sent a note to stopbadware.org and go the following auto-reply,
of course...
When I'm done at my ISP I'll be spending the rest of my day writing
This will be fun eventually.
On Jan 29, 9:02 am, -Brent <gros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Couldn't adding a statement like "This site may harm your computer."
> Wouldn't "seeking their consent" be something like sending us an email
> Finally, badware isn't even a word. You're engaged in potentially
> According to MY guidelines of being a nice company (not a real thing),
> Stopbadware.org and Google may think they're more righteous than me
> I finally understand why so many people want control over their
"Unfortunately, we receive so much feedback that we may not have time
to respond to every suggestion and question, though we do read all of
it."
about this. I'm probably the only person that has been affected by
this to be ale to cause stopbadware.org more pain than they have
caused me. Small axe on a big tree...
> From this website...
> <b>"According to our guidelines, badware is software that engages in
> potentially objectionable behaviors without adequately informing the
> user and seeking their consent."</b>
> under someone's online brand on the web be considered "objectionable
> behavior"? Isn't leaving the specific reason for labeling someone's
> online brand out of the discussion also"adequately informing the
> user"?
> before you label our brand as "harmful"?
> mislabeling websites based on a word you've mad up! Maybe you think
> you're writing righteousware?
> your own guidelines label your own efforts as hypocritical at best.
> but I promise you can't possibly hurt me as much as you're hurting
> yourself.
> content on google.com. I am now in that camp. Thanks for the
> perception change all you self-righteous badware fighters. You are so
> right.