> You say my site is danerous site but it's not listed in your
> "clearinghouse"? I can't even get to the review form. There is no one
> to call, no one to email, the review appears to be automated on
> google's end and I'm stuck going to a google group to rant?

> If this was any other industry you'd be sending me and a few million
> other website owners checks for a dollar and six cents in a few years.

> Do you have any idea how much you are costing google is mindshare? I
> hope not. I feel like I have been personally attacked. Maybe it's
> because one of my client's sites got dropped from the google index for
> no apparent reason.

> Do you think I like malware or badware? Do you think I support
> spammers or spam? Attacking me for something I don't understand isn't
> too kewl and you will pay in the end.

> Here's one idea... When you tell people my site is dangerous, tell
> them why, tell me why and explain how to fix it.

> Leaving the site owner in the dark when you do this will only get your
> *&^$-kicked at the next seo conference. )*(&%*&^%$

> Anything goes from this point forward. I will never support "any"
> effort that uses these kinds of tactics. Without a clear path to
> fixing the problem, you've left me a touch, no a wee-bit upset. You've
> confused the message I'm trying to get across to my visitors and now
> I'll do the same to your "badware" efforts. Specifcally,
> stopbadware.org. I'll also be recommending much less google inclusive
> marketing strategy when I teach. I will probably forget someday why I
> even started disrupting your image by the time I stop.
> (I feel better already...)