Would an Abstract Protocol Notation Spec be Useful?
60 views
Skip to first unread message
Matthew Alton
unread,
Mar 30, 2013, 2:13:20 PM3/30/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to stomp...@googlegroups.com
Would anybody be interested in a formulation of the STOMP specification in the Abstract Protocol Notation? I am interested in eliminating as many ambiguities from my understanding of the semantics and syntax of the STOMP as possible prior to the implementation phase of my project.
Thanks.
--Matt
jgauffin
unread,
Jun 14, 2013, 1:44:34 AM6/14/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to stomp...@googlegroups.com
Yes. That would be great to avoid differences between implementations.