[proposal] optional WebSockets support

30 views
Skip to first unread message

Jeff Mesnil

unread,
Jun 16, 2010, 10:16:41 AM6/16/10
to stomp...@googlegroups.com
Somehow related to protocol version negocation, it'd be great to
support WebSockets[1] in STOMP 1.1 (or more likely 2.0) as STOMP is
well suited to integrate messaging with the browsers.
When we describe the protocol negotiation, we could add the (optional)
WebSockets protocol handshake in it too or have a few words about it.

regards,
jeff

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSockets

--
Jeff Mesnil
jme...@gmail.com
http://jmesnil.net/weblog/

Hiram Chirino

unread,
Jun 16, 2010, 11:15:17 AM6/16/10
to stomp...@googlegroups.com
+1

--
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/

Dejan Bosanac

unread,
Jun 16, 2010, 11:55:30 AM6/16/10
to stomp...@googlegroups.com
+1

Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb

Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net

Komuny

unread,
Jun 16, 2010, 9:41:23 PM6/16/10
to stomp-spec
+1

On Jun 16, 12:55 pm, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac -http://twitter.com/dejanb
>
> Open Source Integration -http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action -http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog -http://www.nighttale.net
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>
> > +1
>
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Jeff Mesnil <jmes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Somehow related to protocol version negocation, it'd be great to
> > > support WebSockets[1] in STOMP 1.1 (or more likely 2.0) as STOMP is
> > > well suited to integrate messaging with the browsers.
> > > When we describe the protocol negotiation, we could add the (optional)
> > > WebSockets protocol handshake in it too or have a few words about it.
>
> > > regards,
> > > jeff
>
> > > [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSockets
>
> > > --
> > > Jeff Mesnil
> > > jmes...@gmail.com

Komuny

unread,
Jun 16, 2010, 10:13:45 PM6/16/10
to stomp-spec
+1

On Jun 16, 12:55 pm, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac -http://twitter.com/dejanb
>
> Open Source Integration -http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action -http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog -http://www.nighttale.net
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>
> > +1
>
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Jeff Mesnil <jmes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Somehow related to protocol version negocation, it'd be great to
> > > support WebSockets[1] in STOMP 1.1 (or more likely 2.0) as STOMP is
> > > well suited to integrate messaging with the browsers.
> > > When we describe the protocol negotiation, we could add the (optional)
> > > WebSockets protocol handshake in it too or have a few words about it.
>
> > > regards,
> > > jeff
>
> > > [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSockets
>
> > > --
> > > Jeff Mesnil
> > > jmes...@gmail.com

Timothy Bish

unread,
Jun 16, 2010, 1:25:05 PM6/16/10
to stomp...@googlegroups.com
+1
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages