Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  17 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Just Another Sailor  
View profile  
 More options Feb 24 2005, 6:41 pm
From: "Just Another Sailor" <guydeb...@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:41:34 -0800
Local: Thurs, Feb 24 2005 6:41 pm
Subject: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits

Here are the results of my early reasrch regarding SP Section Splits
for upcoming regattas. This list includes designs that I am aware of
sailing in NA. I may have missed some, so please speak up!!! Several
ULDB designs I feel are questionable in my opionion and this needs to
be addressed.

Let's start hearing from everyone, ok.

Class 0

Azzura 310
B-32
Columbia 30 Sport Sailor
Farr 36 OD
Henderson 30
Hobie 33
KIWI 35
Melges 30
Melges 32-1
Melges 32-2
Moore 30
Thompson 30
Thompson 35
Thompson 850
Thompson 870

Class 1
BOAT
Antrim 27
B-25
Backman 21
Beneteau 25 PLATU
Blusail 24
Capri 235 Catalina
Carrera 280
Carrera 290
Cork 1720
Dibley 23
Elliott 770
Hobie Magic 25
Hotfoot 20
Hotfoot 24
J 80
JS9000
Martin 24-3
Melges 24
Moore 30
Phuket Sports 8
Rocket 22
Rocket 22 (2004)
Sierra 26
SR 21
SR 25
SR 27
Thompson 590
Thompson 650
Thompson 750
Thompson 830
Ultimate 20
Ultimate 24
Viper 640
Viper 830
Wabbit 24


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Christian  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2005, 1:32 am
From: "Christian" <chjen...@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:32:02 -0800
Local: Fri, Feb 25 2005 1:32 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
Why don't you publish the spreadsheet you have with boat data - would
be very helpful for this exercise!

I would think you would want 3 divisions ideally.  In PHRF speak I
would think up to 70, 71- 110, 111 and up in PHRF speak.

Some comments on boats in the list:

Viper 830 move to class 0 (PHRF rating 63 - on par with T870)
B32 a sportsboat?
Hobie 33 a SB?
B25 not a SB (SA/D 25)
Bendytoy25 not a SB
Capri 235 not a SB
J80 Not a SB (SA/D 27)
SR21,25,27 SB??


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Just Another Sailor  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2005, 8:16 am
From: "Just Another Sailor" <guydeb...@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:16:38 -0800
Local: Fri, Feb 25 2005 8:16 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
Rating are just part of the equation, displ/LWL is a more telling
feature of the similar sailing charatistics.

To have section splits you need competitors, if we can actually get 20
boats for 2 sections ot start that would be super, you would need 30
for 3 sections, where was the last time you saw 30 SP at a single event?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
erich2o@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2005, 11:21 am
From: "eric...@gmail.com" <eric...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:21:05 -0000
Local: Fri, Feb 25 2005 11:21 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
How is the Capri 23.5 not a sport boat? I think you are confused with
another boat.......

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Just Another Sailor  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2005, 3:07 pm
From: "Just Another Sailor" <guydeb...@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:07:31 -0800
Local: Fri, Feb 25 2005 3:07 pm
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
The discussion regarding what makes a sport boat is just starting... In
today's world there really are two distinct types of SP. The eariler
Displ type and the newer higher performance style. Your 23.5 does
qualify in my opionion.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Christian  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2005, 3:32 pm
From: "Christian" <chjen...@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:32:02 -0800
Local: Fri, Feb 25 2005 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
My bad - was thinking about another boat

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
michael-compwest  
View profile  
 More options Feb 28 2005, 5:40 am
From: "michael-compwest" <compw...@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:40:49 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 28 2005 5:40 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
In using various ratios to help determine  the Sboat reletivity
index,,,methinks the ballast/disp ratio only gives 1/2 the story.--It'd
be useful to relate the SailArea/disp(SAD) #'s just as
much!!--basically a power/weight ratio in addition to a righting moment
criteria.

.....CHOICE OF RULES....On these --weight sensitive boats......does ANY
measurement rule take into account the actual sailing displacement,,and
righting moment of a --sailing weight',with crew on???.......
.........................I'm not a designer,,but imho,,these
considerations would seem CRUCIAL in accomodating a wide range of
boats---------otherwise,go KISS,,,and start with PHRF,,which would
probably the easiest for event organizers to accomodate!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
michael-compwest  
View profile  
 More options Feb 28 2005, 6:14 am
From: "michael-compwest" <compw...@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:14:37 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 28 2005 6:14 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
oh,yeh,,,would many designs be excluded if a
lifting-keel,ramp-launchable aspect was added to the definition??

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Just Another Sailor  
View profile  
 More options Feb 28 2005, 9:49 am
From: "Just Another Sailor" <guydeb...@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:49:38 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 28 2005 9:49 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
I can only think of three,

Thompson 35
Diode 36
Farr 36


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
gybeset  
View profile  
 More options Feb 28 2005, 8:15 pm
From: "gybeset" <heavil...@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:15:13 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 28 2005 8:15 pm
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits

Just Another Sailor wrote:
> I can only think of three,

> Thompson 35
> Diode 36
> Farr 36

and Cork 1720 has a 'removable' fixed keel, I think gets trailered in a
'high' keel on position.

JAS do you know of any owners of these big (not the cork)boats that
wanna play ?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Just Another Sailor  
View profile  
 More options Mar 1 2005, 7:04 am
From: "Just Another Sailor" <guydeb...@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 04:04:30 -0800
Local: Tues, Mar 1 2005 7:04 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
I haven't spoke w/ anyof them as of yet. If the big boats opt out then
we will definitly simplify our class, all smaller and light!

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Cork1720USA  
View profile  
 More options Mar 1 2005, 8:26 am
From: "Cork1720USA" <cork1720...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 05:26:01 -0800
Local: Tues, Mar 1 2005 8:26 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
Gybeset is right about the Cork 1720.  It is trailerable but it is high
with the keel on.  The total towing weight is easily handled by most
SUVs or small trucks.  It is not ramp launchable though, you must use a
hoist.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Just Another Sailor  
View profile  
 More options Mar 1 2005, 10:10 am
From: "Just Another Sailor" <guydeb...@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:10:52 -0800
Local: Tues, Mar 1 2005 10:10 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
I don't understand the need for making the rule exclude non ramp
launchable designs. There are better ways to limiting the design
chartaristics of these boats.

Making non-overlapping jibs & ass spins would make the designs sail
simular in a wide range of conditions.

It is also my vote for the executive committe to vote on which designs
fit within our rules.
Mumm 30 out unless sailed w/ Ass spin as an example.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
michael-compwest  
View profile  
 More options Mar 1 2005, 10:23 am
From: "michael-compwest" <compw...@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:23:00 -0800
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
--I guess I'm too much of a dinghy-sailor/anarchist!!!---I like the
idea of developing some of our own events where all we need is a launch
ramp!!,,and that can also be a good selling point for event hosts
,too!!
........fixed keels just seem too 'yachtie' for me!--and just like the
'trailer-sailer' aspect of what the Sboat definition might be,,,as in
too big for a dinghy,,too small for a yacht.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Just Another Sailor  
View profile  
 More options Mar 1 2005, 7:26 pm
From: "Just Another Sailor" <guydeb...@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:26:02 -0800
Local: Tues, Mar 1 2005 7:26 pm
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
Totally agree, however there are barely enough Sp in NA to start trying
to weed some of them out. All we need is good section breaks to develop
good racing. We need big events as our drawing card to get the
available SP to go to onlty seclected big regional events. As more
sailors see how much fum we're having we will grow!

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Cork1720USA  
View profile  
 More options Mar 2 2005, 10:26 am
From: "Cork1720USA" <cork1720...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:26:32 -0800
Local: Wed, Mar 2 2005 10:26 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
I agree with Just another sailor "there are barely enough Sp in NA to
start trying to weed some of them out".  But if you are going to start
somewhere why the keel?  Are we going to restrict this to retractable
keels only?  What about canting keels?  The Cork1720 with its fixed
keel draws less water than many of the other retractable keels out
there.  Where are you going to race, where there are only ramps?  fresh
water lakes?  I would bet anywhere you are limited by a ramp you would
be limited by water depth as well. This group is supposed to help boats
not established in OD yet race competitively with other similar boats.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
michael-compwest  
View profile  
 More options Mar 2 2005, 11:31 am
From: "michael-compwest" <compw...@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:31:55 -0800
Local: Wed, Mar 2 2005 11:31 am
Subject: Re: Early Research on NA Sport Boat Section Splits
you guys are totally.........RIGHT!!,,,,,this issue can be addressed
later when different divisions are set-up!

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google