is there some way to mark TODO tests

[opensas opensas]

that would be tests that haven't been implemented yet

I'd like them to appear as TODO (not implemented yet) not as failing tests

I don't know if anything like that is supported at all, or if there's some way to emulate it...

BTW, anybody out there think it might be a good idea?

[opensas opensas]

it would also be useful for those following tdd practice, to spot that tests that fail, not because we broke something, but because they still need to be implemented.

[etorreborre]

You can use "todo" in your examples:

  "we need to do this" >> todo

This is described here: http://etorreborre.github.com/specs2/guide/org.specs2.guide.Matchers.html#Standard+results

Eric.

[Sebastian Scarano]

exactly what I was looking for

thanks a lot eric!

(and thanks for not telling me to RTFM...)

[etorreborre]

> (and thanks for not telling me to RTFM...)

I can't blame anyone for not RTFM, it's big! One thing I'd like to add one day is a search function (well there are so many things I'd like to add but I don't have the bandwidth for that now...).

[Daniel Sobral]

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:17 AM, etorreborre <etorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> (and thanks for not telling me to RTFM...)
>
> I can't blame anyone for not RTFM, it's big! One thing I'd like to add one
> day is a search function (well there are so many things I'd like to add but
> I don't have the bandwidth for that now...).

By the way, that tabs thingy you are using in some places such as
matchers, I really appreciate it.

>
>
> On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 11:58:21 AM UTC+11, opensas opensas wrote:
>>
>> exactly what I was looking for
>>
>> thanks a lot eric!
>>
>> (and thanks for not telling me to RTFM...)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:07 PM, etorreborre <etorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You can use "todo" in your examples:
>>>
>>> "we need to do this" >> todo
>>>
>>> This is described here:
>>> http://etorreborre.github.com/specs2/guide/org.specs2.guide.Matchers.html#Standard+results
>>>
>>> Eric.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 3:14:58 AM UTC+11, opensas opensas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> it would also be useful for those following tdd practice, to spot that
>>>> tests that fail, not because we broke something, but because they still need
>>>> to be implemented.
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, October 22, 2012 1:04:52 PM UTC-3, opensas opensas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> that would be tests that haven't been implemented yet
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like them to appear as TODO (not implemented yet) not as failing
>>>>> tests
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if anything like that is supported at all, or if there's
>>>>> some way to emulate it...
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, anybody out there think it might be a good idea?
>>
>>
>

--
Daniel C. Sobral

I travel to the future all the time.