Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion SPDY and the SSL requirement
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mark Nottingham  
View profile  
 More options Nov 23 2009, 4:51 pm
From: Mark Nottingham <m...@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:51:36 +1100
Local: Mon, Nov 23 2009 4:51 pm
Subject: Re: [spdy-dev] Re: SPDY and the SSL requirement
Broken transparent proxies are just one thing in a laundry list of reasons why pipelining can't be used on the open Internet; no need to attribute *all* of the Web's evils to them :)

Cheers,

On 24/11/2009, at 8:25 AM, Bram Cohen wrote:

> SSL is, however, rather useful for getting around broken transparent
> proxies. The fact that the major web browsers currently don't do
> pipelining for exactly that reason is an extremely alarming data point
> which makes me think anything other than an absolutely foolproof
> method of avoiding it is going to fail.

--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.