I recently experimented with chrome://net-internals/#events&q=type:SPDY_SESSION%20is:active
in Chrome and noticed that
1) Chrome's stable version utilizes SPDY
2) almost all Google service I tried to access with https is actually
using SPDY (Gmail, Search, Chrome Sync, Ads etc.).
If my facts are correct, I don't really understand why don't they have
more publicity. It's cool as... something very cool!
Also, since what version of Chrome is the SPDY lib compiled in?
Yes, indeed SPDY is enabled in Chrome and on Google servers for all SSL traffic at this point. (Actually, we do 90% on SPDY, with a 10% holdback for purposes of A/B comparisons).
We're currently analyzing the traffic and making small tweaks. We'll publish results when we can.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, SyP <syp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello,
> I recently experimented with > chrome://net-internals/#events&q=type:SPDY_SESSION%20is:active > in Chrome and noticed that
> 1) Chrome's stable version utilizes SPDY > 2) almost all Google service I tried to access with https is actually > using SPDY (Gmail, Search, Chrome Sync, Ads etc.).
> If my facts are correct, I don't really understand why don't they have > more publicity. It's cool as... something very cool!
> Also, since what version of Chrome is the SPDY lib compiled in?
> Yes, indeed SPDY is enabled in Chrome and on Google servers for all SSL
> traffic at this point. (Actually, we do 90% on SPDY, with a 10% holdback
> for purposes of A/B comparisons).
> We're currently analyzing the traffic and making small tweaks. We'll
> publish results when we can.
> Mike
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, SyP <syp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I recently experimented with
> > chrome://net-internals/#events&q=type:SPDY_SESSION%20is:active
> > in Chrome and noticed that
> > 1) Chrome's stable version utilizes SPDY
> > 2) almost all Google service I tried to access with https is actually
> > using SPDY (Gmail, Search, Chrome Sync, Ads etc.).
> > If my facts are correct, I don't really understand why don't they have
> > more publicity. It's cool as... something very cool!
> > Also, since what version of Chrome is the SPDY lib compiled in?
I just compared FF4b12 and Chrome. On "normal" HTTP sites, both
browsers are very fast. But when traffic uses SPDY with Google servers
(e.g. Google Maps), it's amazingly fast.
Robert
On Jan 19, 5:24 pm, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote:
> Yes, indeed SPDY is enabled in Chrome and on Google servers for all SSL
> traffic at this point. (Actually, we do 90% on SPDY, with a 10% holdback
> for purposes of A/B comparisons).
> We're currently analyzing the traffic and making small tweaks. We'll
> publish results when we can.
> Mike
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, SyP <syp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I recently experimented with
> > chrome://net-internals/#events&q=type:SPDY_SESSION%20is:active
> > in Chrome and noticed that
> > 1) Chrome's stable version utilizes SPDY
> > 2) almost all Google service I tried to access with https is actually
> > using SPDY (Gmail, Search, Chrome Sync, Ads etc.).
> > If my facts are correct, I don't really understand why don't they have
> > more publicity. It's cool as... something very cool!
> > Also, since what version of Chrome is the SPDY lib compiled in?
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Robert Stupp <robert.st...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> cool!
> I just compared FF4b12 and Chrome. On "normal" HTTP sites, both > browsers are very fast. But when traffic uses SPDY with Google servers > (e.g. Google Maps), it's amazingly fast.
Thanks for the kind words -
I wish SPDY could take credit for that - but maps is still just HTTP. So that's just chrome being chrome... :-)
> On Jan 19, 5:24 pm, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote: > > Yes, indeed SPDY is enabled in Chrome and on Google servers for all SSL > > traffic at this point. (Actually, we do 90% on SPDY, with a 10% holdback > > for purposes of A/B comparisons).
> > We're currently analyzing the traffic and making small tweaks. We'll > > publish results when we can.
> > Mike
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, SyP <syp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello,
> > > I recently experimented with > > > chrome://net-internals/#events&q=type:SPDY_SESSION%20is:active > > > in Chrome and noticed that
> > > 1) Chrome's stable version utilizes SPDY > > > 2) almost all Google service I tried to access with https is actually > > > using SPDY (Gmail, Search, Chrome Sync, Ads etc.).
> > > If my facts are correct, I don't really understand why don't they have > > > more publicity. It's cool as... something very cool!
> > > Also, since what version of Chrome is the SPDY lib compiled in?
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Robert Stupp <robert.st...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> > cool!
> > I just compared FF4b12 and Chrome. On "normal" HTTP sites, both
> > browsers are very fast. But when traffic uses SPDY with Google servers
> > (e.g. Google Maps), it's amazingly fast.
> Thanks for the kind words -
> I wish SPDY could take credit for that - but maps is still just HTTP. So
> that's just chrome being chrome... :-)
> Mike
> > Robert
> > On Jan 19, 5:24 pm, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, indeed SPDY is enabled in Chrome and on Google servers for all SSL
> > > traffic at this point. (Actually, we do 90% on SPDY, with a 10% holdback
> > > for purposes of A/B comparisons).
> > > We're currently analyzing the traffic and making small tweaks. We'll
> > > publish results when we can.
> > > Mike
> > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, SyP <syp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I recently experimented with
> > > > chrome://net-internals/#events&q=type:SPDY_SESSION%20is:active
> > > > in Chrome and noticed that
> > > > 1) Chrome's stable version utilizes SPDY
> > > > 2) almost all Google service I tried to access with https is actually
> > > > using SPDY (Gmail, Search, Chrome Sync, Ads etc.).
> > > > If my facts are correct, I don't really understand why don't they have
> > > > more publicity. It's cool as... something very cool!
> > > > Also, since what version of Chrome is the SPDY lib compiled in?
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Robert Stupp <robert.st...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Oops - I should have taken a look into the events log before writing > (shame on me) ;-) > I just saw that there are SPDY sessions to maps server URLs.
Ok! Well, if that is the case, then my information must be dated :-) Things move fast around here :-)
> On Mar 2, 1:40 pm, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Robert Stupp < > robert.st...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > > cool!
> > > I just compared FF4b12 and Chrome. On "normal" HTTP sites, both > > > browsers are very fast. But when traffic uses SPDY with Google servers > > > (e.g. Google Maps), it's amazingly fast.
> > Thanks for the kind words -
> > I wish SPDY could take credit for that - but maps is still just HTTP. So > > that's just chrome being chrome... :-)
> > Mike
> > > Robert
> > > On Jan 19, 5:24 pm, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, indeed SPDY is enabled in Chrome and on Google servers for all > SSL > > > > traffic at this point. (Actually, we do 90% on SPDY, with a 10% > holdback > > > > for purposes of A/B comparisons).
> > > > We're currently analyzing the traffic and making small tweaks. We'll > > > > publish results when we can.
> > > > Mike
> > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, SyP <syp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > I recently experimented with > > > > > chrome://net-internals/#events&q=type:SPDY_SESSION%20is:active > > > > > in Chrome and noticed that
> > > > > 1) Chrome's stable version utilizes SPDY > > > > > 2) almost all Google service I tried to access with https is > actually > > > > > using SPDY (Gmail, Search, Chrome Sync, Ads etc.).
> > > > > If my facts are correct, I don't really understand why don't they > have > > > > > more publicity. It's cool as... something very cool!
> > > > > Also, since what version of Chrome is the SPDY lib compiled in?
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Robert Stupp <robert.st...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > Oops - I should have taken a look into the events log before writing
> > (shame on me) ;-)
> > I just saw that there are SPDY sessions to maps server URLs.
> Ok! Well, if that is the case, then my information must be dated :-)
> Things move fast around here :-)
> Mike
> > On Mar 2, 1:40 pm, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Robert Stupp <
> > robert.st...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > cool!
> > > > I just compared FF4b12 and Chrome. On "normal" HTTP sites, both
> > > > browsers are very fast. But when traffic uses SPDY with Google servers
> > > > (e.g. Google Maps), it's amazingly fast.
> > > Thanks for the kind words -
> > > I wish SPDY could take credit for that - but maps is still just HTTP. So
> > > that's just chrome being chrome... :-)
> > > Mike
> > > > Robert
> > > > On Jan 19, 5:24 pm, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > Yes, indeed SPDY is enabled in Chrome and on Google servers for all
> > SSL
> > > > > traffic at this point. (Actually, we do 90% on SPDY, with a 10%
> > holdback
> > > > > for purposes of A/B comparisons).
> > > > > We're currently analyzing the traffic and making small tweaks. We'll
> > > > > publish results when we can.
> > > > > Mike
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, SyP <syp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > I recently experimented with
> > > > > > chrome://net-internals/#events&q=type:SPDY_SESSION%20is:active
> > > > > > in Chrome and noticed that
> > > > > > 1) Chrome's stable version utilizes SPDY
> > > > > > 2) almost all Google service I tried to access with https is
> > actually
> > > > > > using SPDY (Gmail, Search, Chrome Sync, Ads etc.).
> > > > > > If my facts are correct, I don't really understand why don't they
> > have
> > > > > > more publicity. It's cool as... something very cool!
> > > > > > Also, since what version of Chrome is the SPDY lib compiled in?
