Received: by 10.42.133.68 with SMTP id g4mr1943852ict.17.1316195218081;
        Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: software_craftsmanship@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.65.148 with SMTP id j20ls1233741ibi.6.gmail; Fri, 16 Sep
 2011 10:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.156.138 with SMTP id z10mr1850136icw.3.1316195215300;
        Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.156.138 with SMTP id z10mr1850135icw.3.1316195215288;
        Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <rao...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gz12si1994305icb.2.2011.09.16.10.46.55
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rao...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.182;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rao...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rao...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-iy0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k27so5434820iad.27
        for <software_craftsmanship@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=TwNBktFq2C8L4HvKmJnYxsrWK++JWSDk/jR3mDJ0xjU=;
        b=KRGK+GWp4TBQonnMPsOlYg4tF73DmiO/24pO+xkkehUHyKYt6qkYR4K6d+vUHe6yrH
         3nLNY1Q+kDUBZUCbp1reEC0zlGWfuHFmghvE90dwJBM88eclI6BKf3SNAVyjEkI25bNl
         p6UD9AR36kDhTd0r4n/MNSnJu5jl7kVoS6Rj0=
Received: by 10.42.161.201 with SMTP id u9mr231880icx.192.1316195215180; Fri,
 16 Sep 2011 10:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.77.4 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:46:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJ7XQb4y4i2HDPj9cX7yRiP=WEGf9yJgs6yCb0j1swRKiFnwcw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: a follow-on question for you, after my blithering blog posting
To: software_craftsmanship@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

hi,

Q.1: where do you draw the line between "this person is different and
diversity is good" and "this person is too alien in their approach and
thinking and either it would just be wrong or too
much change or we'll take for ever just to be able to explain
ourselves to one another which will mean we either never see eye-2-eye
which sucks, or we never ship anything which sucks"?

Q.2: how do you asses this in job interviews?

thanks :-)