An open letter to the ISTQB

68 views
Skip to first unread message

Brian Osman

unread,
Apr 28, 2013, 5:32:26 PM4/28/13
to software-teste...@googlegroups.com
Keith Kain (Head of Barclay's GTC) recently published an open letter to the ISTQB - http://qualityremarks.com/an-open-letter-to-the-istqb/?goback=.gde_690977_member_235895136 ...

Also circulating with this is an online petition asking the ISTQB to report back on the questions Keith raises... http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/istqb-foundations-exam-review/

Andrew Robins

unread,
Apr 28, 2013, 5:55:07 PM4/28/13
to software-teste...@googlegroups.com
I have just signed.



On 29 April 2013 09:32, Brian Osman <brian...@gmail.com> wrote:
Keith Kain (Head of Barclay's GTC) recently published an open letter to the ISTQB - http://qualityremarks.com/an-open-letter-to-the-istqb/?goback=.gde_690977_member_235895136 ...

Also circulating with this is an online petition asking the ISTQB to report back on the questions Keith raises... http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/istqb-foundations-exam-review/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Software Testers New Zealand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to software-testers-new...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to software-teste...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/software-testers-new-zealand?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



--
Test Manager, Tait Radio Communications


This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended recipient. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or lost by reason of this transmission.
If you are not an intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or reproduce such email, any attachments, or any part thereof. If you have received a message in error, please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message and any attachments.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been altered or corrupted during transmission nor can we guarantee that any email or any attachments are free from computer viruses or other conditions which may damage or interfere with recipient data, hardware or software. The recipient relies upon its own procedures and assumes all risk of use and of opening any attachments.

Tessa Benzie

unread,
Apr 28, 2013, 9:04:09 PM4/28/13
to software-teste...@googlegroups.com
Me too!

Aaron Hodder

unread,
Apr 28, 2013, 9:07:34 PM4/28/13
to software-teste...@googlegroups.com
I'm lucky number 13

David Greenlees

unread,
Apr 28, 2013, 9:15:26 PM4/28/13
to software-teste...@googlegroups.com
i'm lucky number 90...

is that lucky?

Craig McKirdy

unread,
Apr 28, 2013, 10:33:13 PM4/28/13
to software-teste...@googlegroups.com
Very interesting.   My own recollection is that the exam was much more difficult in regards to how the questions were asked than they were in the course provided practice exams. I later found out that the exam here is set by ANZTB whereas the course and practice exams are from the ASTQB.

Brian Osman

unread,
Apr 30, 2013, 9:41:49 PM4/30/13
to software-teste...@googlegroups.com
Yesterday , i posted the same thing on the ANZTB linkedin group and as of now my post has not appeared. Whilst I acknowledge that its entirely within their right to moderate whatever message/post they like, it doesn't show them as a transparent organisation and in fact (in my opinion) lends weight to a perceived "forget and neglect" policy ANZTB might have on being challenged.

Silence does say a lot sometimes... :)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages