I just shot a Discovery Channel project with the 5D, although this was
a third camera for pickup shots next to a HDX900 the image quality
just blew me away. we brought it into the same time line with the HDX
and the EP from Discovery liked the look of it and is allowing me to
use it for the next show for all the reenactments. the frame size is
much larger the the HDX and even though i am not editing it and do sit
down with the editor and check each shot for exposure and image
quality. no issues on the playback because we are using a 8 core mac
with 12 gigs of ram. on the next shoot i am using a full frame lens
100mm 200mm 300mm, 50mm, 35mm and 18mm. i will post some of the edited
footage on my youtube page by the end of the week for your review.
On Oct 4, 4:21 pm, Larry Vaughn <
lancechar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would think so, since the 7D's depth of field is closer to 35mm film
> camera that want comes from the5D, and focusing might be a bit less
> critical. There are some online comparisons, including the5DII and
> anotherCanonEOS that makes video, other than the 7D.
> On Oct 4, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Brooks Reid wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > The "full frame"5Dis more inline with pro gear. Allan has covered
> > this topic in his article but I still think a full frame sensor is a
> > significant advantage because there is no magnification factor in the
> > lenses. I have not seen a side by side comparison of the images from
> > both cameras but since they are both shooting 1080 and both encoding
> > to H.246 then I would think it would be hard to tell them apart.
>
> > Brooks
>
> > On Oct 4, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Larry Vaughn wrote:
>
> >> Brooks, your last sentence answered part of my question. Do they then
> >> consider theCanon5DII good enough for HD work? Can we assume the
> >> 7D
> >> is not far behind?
>
> >> LV
> >> On Oct 4, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Brooks Reid wrote:
>
> >>> Yes Allan you are quite right about audio on the Digital SLR cameras
> >>> but if the shoot includes an audio mixer then you can deal with it.
> >>> I worked with Discovery for a shoot last week where we used 2Canon
> >>>5DMkII cameras. I recorded sound "wild" on a digital recorder and
> >>> did audio syncs for post. I've edited with wild audio tracks and
> >>> it's
> >>> not a big deal if you have a visual and audio slate. Just like the
> >>> old days with film!
> >>> The other cameras on the shoot were Panasonic HVX200 with P&S Prime
> >>> Lens adapters. There are a lot of "gotchas" using the Depth of Field
> >>> adapter on a fixed lens video camera and the setup with the rail rig
> >>> becomes unwieldy. The DOF is great for portrait type shots but other
> >>> type shots, not so good. So a lot of what we shot was with theCanon
> >>>5DMk II and an array of lenses. One other caveat, theCanon5Dhas
> >>> no steady shot so hand held shots are challenging.
> >>> BTW, Discovery has very strict guidelines on what cameras and
> >>> equipment you can shoot with and theCanon5Dwas just approved.
>
> >>> Brooks
>
> >>> On Oct 4, 2009, at 2:10 PM, Allan Tépper wrote:
>
> >>>> René,
>
> >>>> For video people, the GH1 has some Achilles' heels, and the 7D has
> >>>> others.
> >>>> The 7D is much better for framerates (as you just pointed out), but
> >>>> the 7D (just as the5D) limits you to a maximum of 12 minutes of HD
> >>>> recording. This is an issue for some types of video productions
> >>>> (i.e. covering a long live event) but not for many other types of
> >>>> events.
>
> >>>> For the 7D, there is a huge offering of used directly-compatible
> >>>>Canonlenses, while for the GH1, there are practically no offering
> >>>> used directly-compatible lenses, since (even though it is an open
> >>>> standard) the mount is so new.
>
> >>>> Both the 7D and the GH1 are weak for live audio, unless you add
> >>>> external converters or record the audio separately with a
> >>>> professional recorder at 48KHz.
>
> >>>> El oct 4, 2009, a las 1:57 p.m., Rene Borroto escribió:
>
> >>>> I'm hoping that Panasonic comes to their senses and updates their
> >>>> GH1 firmware to NOT record 23.976p over 1080i, or at the very least
> >>>> give the user the option. Now that theCanon7D is 1080/23.976p
> >>>> native (albeit at a somewhat higher price than the GH1) the
> >>>> Panasonic is on the back burner for me.
>
> >>>>
rborr...@yahoo.com
> >>>>
http://home.rborroto.comcast.net
>
> >>>> On Sep 15, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Allan Tépper wrote:
>
> >>>>> René,
>
> >>>>> The 23.976p is definitely native recording (no pulldown in the
> >>>>> recording).
> >>>>> It still isn't clear whether the 25p and 29.97p are native or not,
> >>>>> but I hope so.
>
> >>>>> The HDMI output is active during recording, but at 480 (okay for
> >>>>> composition, but no good for recording on a nanoFlash or KiPro).
>
> >>>>> El sep 15, 2009, a las 10:40 p.m., Rene Borroto escribió:
>
> >>>>> There's a new player entering the digital SLR market, theCanon
> >>>>> EOS 7D
> >>>>> (not yet released). It boasts 1080p and 720p HD video (at every
> >>>>> frame
> >>>>> rate you can dream up) and external stereo audio input. And
> >>>>> STILL no
> >>>>> manual audio recording capability. I don't know if the 24p
> >>>>> (23.976p)
> >>>>> frame rate is natively recorded, or if it resides over a 1080i
> >>>>> stream
> >>>>> with pulldown like in the Panasonic GH1. I'd also like to know if
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> HDMI output is active while shooting video.
>
> >>>>> Clips are limited to 4 GB in size (MPEG-4 AVC). The MSRP is $1,699
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> the body only.
>
> >>>>> René Borroto
> >>>>> Media Consulting
> >>>>>
rborr...@yahoo.com
> >>>>>
http://home.rborroto.comcast.net
> Larry Vaughn
> Video
Productionwww.vprod.blogspot.com