Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  11 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Stan Slonkosky  
View profile  
 More options Apr 7 2010, 1:12 pm
From: Stan Slonkosky <stan.ke...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:12:43 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 7 2010 1:12 pm
Subject: Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight
http://ww2.cityofpasadena.net/planning/environmental/Clearwater/Clear...

Maybe this is part of Sprint's Southern California 4G wireless rollout
mentioned at http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2010/03/tmobile-hspa-sprin...
.

I'd go to the hearing but I have to be elsewhere this evening.
--
Stan Slonkosky


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Richard  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Apr 7 2010, 1:16 pm
From: Richard <brightli...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:16:07 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 7 2010 1:16 pm
Subject: Re: [SOCALWUG] Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight

Wish LA had that kind of money...

...they are sure barking about letting City People stay home multiple days a
week and no talk of much else.

_

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Stan Slonkosky <stan.ke...@gmail.com>wrote:

--
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the
people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
-- Patrick Henry

"Show me a young conservative, and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show
me an old liberal, and I'll show you someone with no brains."
-- Winston Churchill


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "wireless 5g/2g in an oversubscribed environment" by Charlie Wallace
Charlie Wallace  
View profile  
 More options Apr 7 2010, 1:22 pm
From: "Charlie Wallace" <char...@finitemonkeys.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:22:12 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 7 2010 1:22 pm
Subject: wireless 5g/2g in an oversubscribed environment
I need some help setting up a reliable 2g and 5g wireless network that's in
a very overpopulated wireless area, like >100's of units. I only need one
floor covered. I've tried a few things, but I'm running out of ideas. the 2g
is literally covered with devices mostly channel 6, but they're all over.
the 5g doesn't have any wireless network except us but it does have a bunch
of those phones that cause it to drop out every so often. I've done the
basic stuff, moved channels etc.

maybe equipment suggestions ? or am I just SOL :)

cheers,
charlie


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Richard  
View profile  
 More options Apr 7 2010, 1:33 pm
From: Richard <brightli...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:33:28 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 7 2010 1:33 pm
Subject: Re: [SOCALWUG] wireless 5g/2g in an oversubscribed environment

Hey Charlie,

I started looking around and saw this paper on the use of "Milton." It is
over six years old, but the thinking in here might give you some ideas?

http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/Cognitive/CR%20Workshop/Nov1%2...

http://www.ieee802.org/16/human/contrib/80216hc-00_12.pdf

Hardware possibilities...

http://kbserver.netgear.com/datasheets/enus_ds_wndr3300_16jan08.pdf

When the "junk" is on your slice of spectrum, maybe you could offer that
other device user options to move??

_

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Charlie Wallace
<char...@finitemonkeys.com>wrote:

--
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the
people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
-- Patrick Henry

"Show me a young conservative, and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show
me an old liberal, and I'll show you someone with no brains."
-- Winston Churchill


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight" by Stan Slonkosky
Stan Slonkosky  
View profile  
 More options Apr 7 2010, 1:40 pm
From: Stan Slonkosky <stan.ke...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:40:19 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 7 2010 1:40 pm
Subject: Re: [SOCALWUG] Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Richard <brightli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wish LA had that kind of money...

> ...they are sure barking about letting City People stay home multiple days a
> week and no talk of much else.

I'm not sure what this has to do with how much money the city has. I
think Clearwire has to pay fees to the city in order get the necessary
permits. Unless this is not part of a planned 4G rollout, I suspect
they will want to be doing the same thing in the City of L.A. and that
the City of L.A, will be collecting money from them.

--
Stan Slonkosky


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "wireless 5g/2g in an oversubscribed environment" by Charlie Wallace
Charlie Wallace  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Apr 7 2010, 1:43 pm
From: "Charlie Wallace" <char...@finitemonkeys.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:43:37 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 7 2010 1:43 pm
Subject: Re: [SOCALWUG] wireless 5g/2g in an oversubscribed environment

Thanks Richard,

The Milton looks look interesting.

I've tested the Dlink DIR 825 http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=681 and the Linksys/cisco E3000 http://homesupport.cisco.com/en-us/wireless/linksys/E3000

The dlink didn't seem to be as good as the e3000, it has a lot of configuration options, but it drops out on larger contiguous transfers over 5G.

It's insane how many wireless access points there around here, I'm amazed any of them work it just shows you just how good 802.11 really is.

I wonder if the phones are doing frequency skipping.

From: Richard
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 10:33 AM
To: socalwug@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [SOCALWUG] wireless 5g/2g in an oversubscribed environment

Hey Charlie,

I started looking around and saw this paper on the use of "Milton." It is over six years old, but the thinking in here might give you some ideas?

http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/Cognitive/CR%20Workshop/Nov1%2...

http://www.ieee802.org/16/human/contrib/80216hc-00_12.pdf

Hardware possibilities...

http://kbserver.netgear.com/datasheets/enus_ds_wndr3300_16jan08.pdf

When the "junk" is on your slice of spectrum, maybe you could offer that other device user options to move??

_

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Charlie Wallace <char...@finitemonkeys.com> wrote:

  I need some help setting up a reliable 2g and 5g wireless network that's in a very overpopulated wireless area, like >100's of units. I only need one floor covered. I've tried a few things, but I'm running out of ideas. the 2g is literally covered with devices mostly channel 6, but they're all over. the 5g doesn't have any wireless network except us but it does have a bunch of those phones that cause it to drop out every so often. I've done the basic stuff, moved channels etc.

  maybe equipment suggestions ? or am I just SOL :)

  cheers,
  charlie

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SOCALWUG" group.
  To post to this group, send email to SOCALWUG@googlegroups.com
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SOCALWUG-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SOCALWUG
  SOCALWUG website: http://www.socalwug.org

  To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.

--
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
-- Patrick Henry

"Show me a young conservative, and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old liberal, and I'll show you someone with no brains."
-- Winston Churchill

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SOCALWUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to SOCALWUG@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SOCALWUG-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SOCALWUG
SOCALWUG website: http://www.socalwug.org


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight" by Richard
Richard  
View profile  
 More options Apr 7 2010, 1:45 pm
From: Richard <brightli...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:45:40 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 7 2010 1:45 pm
Subject: Re: [SOCALWUG] Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight

In that case, rock on!

The fuzzy relationship that developed with Cable TV providers when that
technology first rolled out brings up error messages when I compile the
ideas of implementation of "City Wide" tech. That's all...

You going to it then, Stan?

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Stan Slonkosky <stan.ke...@gmail.com>wrote:

--
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the
people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
-- Patrick Henry

"Show me a young conservative, and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show
me an old liberal, and I'll show you someone with no brains."
-- Winston Churchill


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Frank Keeney  
View profile  
 More options Apr 8 2010, 12:23 pm
From: "Frank Keeney" <fr...@wlanparts.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:23:46 -0700
Local: Thurs, Apr 8 2010 12:23 pm
Subject: RE: [SOCALWUG] Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight
I just upgraded to the pictured 4g USB dongle. 3g is very nice, can't wait
for 4g!

Thank you

Frank Keeney
Pasadena Networks, LLC
Antennas, Cables and Equipment:
http://www.wlanparts.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Richard  
View profile  
 More options Apr 8 2010, 12:36 pm
From: Richard <brightli...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:36:05 -0700
Local: Thurs, Apr 8 2010 12:36 pm
Subject: Re: [SOCALWUG] Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight

[image: Sprint-4g]

Looks like the tech is finally here... The 3G AT&T that is free with the
Kindle from Amazon is fascinating and works in places where Verizon's 3G is
dismal or non-existent. 86441 for example has no EVDO from Verizon but full
AT&T 3G with Wispernet and it is in the middle of no-where.

--
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the
people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
-- Patrick Henry

"Show me a young conservative, and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show
me an old liberal, and I'll show you someone with no brains."
-- Winston Churchill


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Stan Slonkosky  
View profile  
 More options May 24 2010, 1:30 pm
From: Stan Slonkosky <stan.ke...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:30:05 -0700
Local: Mon, May 24 2010 1:30 pm
Subject: [SOCALWUG] Re: Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight

I asked someone at the Sprint booth at Interop a few weeks ago and he said
that they plan to roll out 4G in Southern California in the 3rd Quarter of
this year.

On one or more of Leo Laporte's podcasts there was a report that some people
found 4G to be great but that others found it to be about the same speed as
3G (I presume those people were farther from the towers). One thing that
makes me hesitate to go with Sprint is that, as far as I know, all the
modems are Wimax, and Clearwire has indicated they might switch to LTE.
http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/clearwire-holding-any-lte-switch-...
they wouldn't do that until 2012. From what I have heard the only
areas
in the West that have 4G currently are Seattle, Portland, Las Vegas and
Santa Clara (a guy I met from San Jose says the coverage area is very small
and he has to drive to Santa Clara in order to get it.)

In the meantime, people who need 3G coverage and don't want to be locked
into a 2-year contract might be interested in a month-to-month plan on
Verizon from 3gstore.com/lease . You pay $50/month (instead of $60). You
also have to pay $90 for a MiFi 2200 or $60 USB760. You have to return the
modem if you terminate the service in less than two years.

I have heard that some people are getting MiFis to use with their iPads
because Verizon and Sprint have much better 3G coverage than AT&T and
because the MiFi can be used with other devices as well. A few weeks ago, I
drove to Reno via the 395 and had pretty much continuous 3G coverage on
Verizon until I passed Bridgeport. Service resume when I got into the
Gardnerville area. Sprint has some 3G coverage around Bishop that almost
reaches to Big Pine. I was in the Big Pine Triangle Campground at the north
end of town last summer with a Sprint USB modem and it kept switching
between 1X and EVDO. AT&T maps show no 3G coverage in the Bishop area at
all, only EDGE or GPRS.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:12, Stan Slonkosky <stan.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://ww2.cityofpasadena.net/planning/environmental/Clearwater/Clear...

> Maybe this is part of Sprint's Southern California 4G wireless rollout
> mentioned at
> http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2010/03/tmobile-hspa-sprin...
> .

> --

Stan Slonkosky

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SOCALWUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to SOCALWUG@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SOCALWUG-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SOCALWUG
SOCALWUG website: http://www.socalwug.org


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jonathan Kramer  
View profile  
 More options May 24 2010, 2:42 pm
From: "Jonathan Kramer" <kra...@cabletv.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:42:01 -0700
Local: Mon, May 24 2010 2:42 pm
Subject: RE: [SOCALWUG] Re: Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight

Stan, et al:

Clearwire has something north of 3,500 permit applications going in SoCal
(Ventura to Mexico).  They intend to have the network up for testing in the
Summer, and have indicated a target launch in November of this year.  They
are just now starting to deploy their sites in the L.A. market, generally
first collocated with Sprint/Nextel.  Key: Look for new 2’ diameter
microwave antennas hanging below or positioned above a replaced Sprint or
Nextel panel, generally 1 per existing sector.

Clearwire is also now starting its big push into the SF Bay area.

Jonathan, Your Friendly Wireless Planner/Attorney for Local Governments

____________________________
Jonathan L. Kramer, Esq.
Kramer Telecom Law Firm, P.C.
2001 S. Barrington Ave., Suite 306
Los Angeles, CA 90025-5379 USA
Tel: (310) 312-9900 x121
Fax: (310) 473-5900
www.TelecomLawFirm.com <http://www.telecomlawfirm.com/>
www.CellularPCS.com <http://www.cellularpcs.com/>

Notices: Privileged And Confidential Communication. This electronic
transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a) are protected by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC §§ 2510-2521), (b) may contain
confidential and/or legally privileged information, and (c) are for the sole
use of the intended recipient named above. If you have received this
electronic message in error, you must immediately notify the sender and
delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use
of the contents of the information received in error is strictly prohibited,
and not very nice, either. If you have received this communication in error,
please immediately notify us by telephone at (310) 312-9900 x121, delete
this message from your computer's memory, destroy all printed and copied
documents that contain this message, and utterly erase your entire mind.
Blah, blah, blah. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with IRS
requirements, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this
communication (including any attachments hereto) is not intended or written
to be used-and cannot be used-for the purpose of (a) avoiding tax-related
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (b) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. Basically, don't
commit tax fraud. Those IRS goons will get you if you do. Audio, video,
disco. You? E-SIGN Notice: Unless specifically indicated in the body of this
message, none of the identifying marks contained in this electronic message
are intended by the writer to be an 'electronic signature' within the
meaning of P.L. 106-229, Cal. Civil Code 1633.1 et seq, or any other
galactic, federal, state, or local law.  Enough?

From: socalwug@googlegroups.com [mailto:socalwug@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Stan Slonkosky
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 10:30 AM
To: socalwug
Subject: [SOCALWUG] Re: Clearwire hearing in Pasadena tonight

I asked someone at the Sprint booth at Interop a few weeks ago and he said
that they plan to roll out 4G in Southern California in the 3rd Quarter of
this year.

On one or more of Leo Laporte's podcasts there was a report that some people
found 4G to be great but that others found it to be about the same speed as
3G (I presume those people were farther from the towers). One thing that
makes me hesitate to go with Sprint is that, as far as I know, all the
modems are Wimax, and Clearwire has indicated they might switch to LTE.
http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/clearwire-holding-any-lte-switch-...
012/2010-05-10 says they wouldn't do that until 2012. From what I have heard
the only areas in the West that have 4G currently are Seattle, Portland, Las
Vegas and Santa Clara (a guy I met from San Jose says the coverage area is
very small and he has to drive to Santa Clara in order to get it.)

In the meantime, people who need 3G coverage and don't want to be locked
into a 2-year contract might be interested in a month-to-month plan on
Verizon from 3gstore.com/lease . You pay $50/month (instead of $60). You
also have to pay $90 for a MiFi 2200 or $60 USB760. You have to return the
modem if you terminate the service in less than two years.

I have heard that some people are getting MiFis to use with their iPads
because Verizon and Sprint have much better 3G coverage than AT&T and
because the MiFi can be used with other devices as well. A few weeks ago, I
drove to Reno via the 395 and had pretty much continuous 3G coverage on
Verizon until I passed Bridgeport. Service resume when I got into the
Gardnerville area. Sprint has some 3G coverage around Bishop that almost
reaches to Big Pine. I was in the Big Pine Triangle Campground at the north
end of town last summer with a Sprint USB modem and it kept switching
between 1X and EVDO. AT&T maps show no 3G coverage in the Bishop area at
all, only EDGE or GPRS.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:12, Stan Slonkosky <stan.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

http://ww2.cityofpasadena.net/planning/environmental/Clearwater/Clear...
sp

Maybe this is part of Sprint's Southern California 4G wireless rollout
mentioned at
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2010/03/tmobile-hspa-sprin...
g.html
.

--
Stan Slonkosky

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"SOCALWUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to SOCALWUG@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
SOCALWUG-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/SOCALWUG
SOCALWUG website: http://www.socalwug.org

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SOCALWUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to SOCALWUG@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SOCALWUG-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SOCALWUG
SOCALWUG website: http://www.socalwug.org


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »