info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
What I think on gay marriages
22 views
Skip to first unread message
NefeshBarYocahi
May 10, 2012, 9:38:12 PM5/10/12
to
What I think on gay marriages
Have you ever noticed that queers that don’t use perfume and mouthwash
usually stink of sodomy and fellatio? Just think of it, you go into a
restaurant and a homosexual atheist with AIDS comes up to you to take
your order. The queer is sick and feels like making everybody else
sick so he never washes his hands (Misery Loves Company). After
eating and leaving a tip you go home and then some time later you and
or your spouse and children come down with hepatitis or AIDS or both.
This new status causes strife between you, your spouse and your
children. How can it be you are sick? Haven’t you always said, “Live
and Let Live.” You are not a hater. You have never wished anything
bad on homosexuals or anyone else for that matter. As you sit and
look at your family pet a pit-bull dog named George Bush, as he looks
back at you healthy and vigorous you think to yourself is there a G-
d? Then you pick up your family Bible that has been up on a high dark
shelf in your closet and as you read it dons on you that maybe G-d is
right. Maybe the observant Jews are right. Is it to late to side
with the righteous or will you suffer and die and have your death and
your family’s death mean nothing what so ever? Then you turn your
computer on and read this message. The G-d of Israel hears the
prayers of all those who are suffering and who keep faith in him.
That you turn to HaShem you have a chance. Keep the faith and talk to
a Rabbi for guidance. You need not be Jewish. The Rabbis of Israel
are closer to HaShem than most people give them credit for. Any Rabbi
that is a true ordained Rabbi of Israel and the Jewish people will
never condone gay marriages.
Have you ever noticed that queers that don’t use perfume and mouthwash
usually stink of sodomy and fellatio? Just think of it, you go into a
restaurant and a homosexual atheist with AIDS comes up to you to take
your order. The queer is sick and feels like making everybody else
sick so he never washes his hands (Misery Loves Company). After
eating and leaving a tip you go home and then some time later you and
or your spouse and children come down with hepatitis or AIDS or both.
This new status causes strife between you, your spouse and your
children. How can it be you are sick? Haven’t you always said, “Live
and Let Live.” You are not a hater. You have never wished anything
bad on homosexuals or anyone else for that matter. As you sit and
look at your family pet a pit-bull dog named George Bush, as he looks
back at you healthy and vigorous you think to yourself is there a G-
d? Then you pick up your family Bible that has been up on a high dark
shelf in your closet and as you read it dons on you that maybe G-d is
right. Maybe the observant Jews are right. Is it to late to side
with the righteous or will you suffer and die and have your death and
your family’s death mean nothing what so ever? Then you turn your
computer on and read this message. The G-d of Israel hears the
prayers of all those who are suffering and who keep faith in him.
That you turn to HaShem you have a chance. Keep the faith and talk to
a Rabbi for guidance. You need not be Jewish. The Rabbis of Israel
are closer to HaShem than most people give them credit for. Any Rabbi
that is a true ordained Rabbi of Israel and the Jewish people will
never condone gay marriages.
Michael Ejercito
May 11, 2012, 3:40:40 PM5/11/12
to
Nazis and sand Nazis.
The reason I oppose redefining marriage is because I have not been
presented with a good-enough reason to do so.
Could it be that the prevailing legal definition is at odds with the
social understanding? While that could be the case in certain times
and places, it was not the case in North Carolina. The people of North
Carolina understand marriage to be an opposite-sex union. In over
thirty states the people voted to define marriage, and that vote is a
clear indicator of the social understanding of marriage.
Is there any difference between same-sex and opposite-sex unions?
The answer is yes. There are basic biological differences between men
and women. It is because of these differences that we have different
words for men and women. In addition, several dating blogs highlighted
the different dynamics in human pair bonding between men and women.
And of course, unintentional pregnancies can happen with opposite-sex
couples without outside intervention, while it can never happen with
same-sex couples, pairs of brothers, or trios of sisters. Therefore,
the dynamics of same-sex unions and opposite-sex unions are different.
This is sufficient reason to use different names for same-sex unions
and opposite-sex unions.
To be sure, there are some similarities. Canals and highways have
similarities too, in that they are both used for transportation across
land, and yet they are different. Using different names to describe
different things- whether marriages and same-sex unions, canals and
highways- is not immoral and not oppression.
Can gay couples raise children? To the same extent that pairs of
brothers and trios of sisters can raise children. Society has
recognized alternate arrangements of raising children. Indeed,
monasteries in medieval Europe would often raise orphans. No doubt
what the monks and nuns did were admirable. Most people at the time
were certain the monks and nuns in those monasteries would give all
for each other, and for the orphans they raised. And yet, while
society admired what they did, they were not considered the same as
married couples, nor afforded the same social recognition. Pairs of
brothers and trios of sisters were not considered married, even if
they raised children. Why should same-sex couples be considered
married merely because they raise children?
Is it immoral to define marriage as between one man and one woman?
If something is morally wrong, it is morally wrong always. And yet,
our secular moral traditions lends no support to the idea that it is
immoral to define marriage as between one man and one woman. No
writing or publication dating from the Reformation, Enlightenment,
American Revolution, or American Civil War even hints so.
Does the definition of marriage oppress homosexuals? Is it the only
possible reason for such a definition? The very first dictionary I
read, the 1981 World Book Dictionary, defines marriage as “the act or
fact of living together as husband and wife; relations between husband
and wife; married life; wedlock. Perhaps this line of argument would
have some force if the word marriage was invented in 1981 by
heterosexuals to oppress homosexuals. But this definition clearly
predates 1981. John Locke, one of the Enlightenment philosophers,
wrote that marriage was “made by a voluntary compact between man and
woman.” Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government § 78 (1690) One
hundred seventy-eight years alter, a leading law dictionary was
published affirming this definition. John Bouvier, A Law Dictionary
Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States
105 (1868) Indeed, the concept of sexual orientation itself did not
exist until the late 19th century. See J. Katz, The Invention of
Heterosexuality 10 (1995); J.
D’Emilio & E. Freedman, Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in
America 121 (2d ed. 1997) (“The modern terms homosexuality and
heterosexuality do not apply to an era that had not yet articulated
these distinctions“), cited in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 at
568-569 (2003) Clearly, the purpose of marriage was not to oppress
homosexuals, any more than its purpose was to oppress airline pilots.
And, of course, the nomenclature used to describe same-sex unions is
distinct from the issue of how to treat people in same-sex unions.
After all, women were not oppressed merely by being called women
instead of men, but by denying them property rights, the right to
vote, etc.
See these videos.
http://tinyurl.com/82cy375
http://tinyurl.com/7rmo4eo
Michael
NefeshBarYocahi
May 11, 2012, 5:54:36 PM5/11/12
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
That was an interesting an educational read. It is just good common
sense that society should not allow children to be raised by
homosexuals. Those that look forward to the fall of the USA have been
indoctrinating us since the inception of this country that someday we
will go the way of the Greeks and the Romans. It’s like Merle Haggard
said, “They love our Milk and Honey but they preach about some other
way of living.” Homosexuality is not part of the American Way of
Life. Nor is it part of the Jewish Way of Life. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHAFmFsb9XM
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Michael Ejercito
May 12, 2012, 6:48:15 AM5/12/12
to
On May 11, 10:08 pm, "الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيم╠☼╣Ǚ∑§â€Ð:"
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> you are a kike. No one gives a flying fuck, what your parasitic
> collective considers "right" or wrong for "humans".
>
> I suggest that you study the following:
>
> http://quran.com/search?q=jew
>
> now TALK JEW
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> collective considers "right" or wrong for "humans".
>
> I suggest that you study the following:
>
> http://quran.com/search?q=jew
>
> now TALK JEW
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
Message has been deleted
Michael Ejercito
May 12, 2012, 12:57:56 PM5/12/12
to
On May 12, 4:13 am, "الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيم╠☼╣Ǚ∑§â€Ð:"
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FUCK OFF.
>
> If trying to STOP JEWISH CRIMINAL MAFIA is a NAZI task....then so be
> it.
>
> But my little vermin, I have never condoned the killing of any of you
> cunts. I want YOU CUNTs to HEAR AND LISTEN to the WHOLE WORLD damning
> every single one of you rotten mother fuckers...
>
> I want you to not EVER be able to achieve PEACE in this or the NEXT
> world.....But more importantly, ONLY GOD shall decide on the fate of
> every single one of u.
>
> Just remember, when ISRAEL is ERASED; Then there SHALL NOT REMAIN A
> SINGLE SANCTUARY for YOUR DECEASED CULT!
>
> If no JEW then NO NAZI!
>
> As in for EVERY ACTION, there is an EQUAL and Opposite REACTION.
The near total destruction of Germany in the 1940's was the equal
and opposite reaction to Adolf Hitler starting the war.
>
> But u r either TOO stupid or TOO Jewish to get that....
>
> ini!?
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
Bill explains what nithings are.
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings
by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”
We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”
We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings
Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,
The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.
A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.
The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”
The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”
“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.
The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.
This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.
In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If trying to STOP JEWISH CRIMINAL MAFIA is a NAZI task....then so be
> it.
>
> But my little vermin, I have never condoned the killing of any of you
> cunts. I want YOU CUNTs to HEAR AND LISTEN to the WHOLE WORLD damning
> every single one of you rotten mother fuckers...
>
> I want you to not EVER be able to achieve PEACE in this or the NEXT
> world.....But more importantly, ONLY GOD shall decide on the fate of
> every single one of u.
>
> Just remember, when ISRAEL is ERASED; Then there SHALL NOT REMAIN A
> SINGLE SANCTUARY for YOUR DECEASED CULT!
>
> If no JEW then NO NAZI!
>
> As in for EVERY ACTION, there is an EQUAL and Opposite REACTION.
The near total destruction of Germany in the 1940's was the equal
and opposite reaction to Adolf Hitler starting the war.
>
> But u r either TOO stupid or TOO Jewish to get that....
>
> ini!?
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
Bill explains what nithings are.
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings
by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”
We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”
We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings
Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,
The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.
A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.
The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”
The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”
“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.
The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.
This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.
In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.
Message has been deleted
Michael Ejercito
May 12, 2012, 7:40:35 PM5/12/12
to
On May 12, 3:45 pm, ╠☼╣Ǚ∑§â€Ð_ID_SBR_X|||DI©*J*Ω∏lol؟♫1ﷲ☻∞= 8☺╣☼╠?
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> WRONG PARASITIC CUNT.
>
> Germany was never "totally" destructed. The Romans with all their
> might could not subdue the Forest people of Middle Europe. It might
> have escaped your attention, that Germany now DOMINATES ALL EUROPE.
>
> The Jewish Nation having Declared WAR on GERMANY in 1933. That led to
> the mass murder of over 100 million "non-jews"....
Those 100 million non-Jews were killed as a result of collateral
damage done in Hitler's attempt to exterminate all Jews.
Hitler started by burning Jews, and in the end, most of Europe was
ablaze.
His sand Nazi successors started by blowing up restaurants and
buses in Israel; then came 9/11.
>
> Now without Americans subsidizing UR ENTIRE NATION; Where the FUCK do
> you think you ESCAPE TO!
>
> Are you really so stupid that still on usenet, you spew SHITE that NO
> ONE EVER AGAIN BELIEVES....
>
> You cunts are too imaginitive for your own good. Bet you imagine, that
> YOU can continue to CHEAT GOD and avoid Armageddon or what we call
> THE_END of JEWS, by spewing vicious lies
>
The following link explains you.
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi
Michael
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Germany was never "totally" destructed. The Romans with all their
> might could not subdue the Forest people of Middle Europe. It might
> have escaped your attention, that Germany now DOMINATES ALL EUROPE.
>
> The Jewish Nation having Declared WAR on GERMANY in 1933. That led to
> the mass murder of over 100 million "non-jews"....
Those 100 million non-Jews were killed as a result of collateral
damage done in Hitler's attempt to exterminate all Jews.
Hitler started by burning Jews, and in the end, most of Europe was
ablaze.
His sand Nazi successors started by blowing up restaurants and
buses in Israel; then came 9/11.
>
> Now without Americans subsidizing UR ENTIRE NATION; Where the FUCK do
> you think you ESCAPE TO!
>
> Are you really so stupid that still on usenet, you spew SHITE that NO
> ONE EVER AGAIN BELIEVES....
>
> You cunts are too imaginitive for your own good. Bet you imagine, that
> YOU can continue to CHEAT GOD and avoid Armageddon or what we call
> THE_END of JEWS, by spewing vicious lies
>
The following link explains you.
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi
Michael
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
NefeshBarYocahi
May 13, 2012, 10:57:49 AM5/13/12
to
Nobody wants to read your masturbations fuckner. Now die asshole die!!
Message has been deleted
Michael Ejercito
May 13, 2012, 12:07:55 PM5/13/12
to
On May 13, 1:57 am, "الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيم╠☼╣Ǚ∑§â€Ð:"
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>
> > MichaWhat is a Jew?
>
> A Jew is above all else, a craven coward.
>
> A Jew is afraid to compete with others as
> equals because he knows he can't measure up.
>
> A Jew is afraid of his own inadequacy, so
> he wants to murder his betters.
>
> A Jew is afraid of the truth, so he wants
> to murder those who tell it.
>
> A Jew is afraid of history, so he wants to
> chooses minor children as sexual partners.
> He can't interact with competent adults in
> a consensually sexual way. He needs to be
> able to impose himself on a helpless victim,
> there's nothing polite or honest about it.
>
> Christopher Nortonel, Mr. Re-Thinker
The following article explains your pathology.
History's oldest hatred
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
March 11, 2009
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred
ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so it
is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-
hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)
Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable and unyielding as
anti-Semitism. "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan,
religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis
Prager in Why the Jews?, their classic study of anti-Semitism.
"Fascists have accused them of being Communists, and Communists have
branded them capitalists. Jews who live in non-Jewish societies have
been accused of having dual loyalties, while Jews who live in the
Jewish state have been condemned as 'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied,
and rich Jews are resented. Jews have been branded as both rootless
cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews who assimilate have been
called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay together spark hatred
for remaining separate."
So hardy is anti-Semitism, it can flourish without Jews. Shakespeare's
poisonous depiction of the Jewish moneylender Shylock was written for
audiences that had never seen a Jew, all Jews having been expelled
from England more than 300 years earlier. Anti-Semitic bigotry infests
Saudi Arabia, where Jews have not dwelt in at least five centuries;
its malignance is suggested by the government daily Al-Riyadh, which
published an essay claiming that Jews have a taste for "pastries mixed
with human blood."
Esther Confounding Haman (Engraving by Gustave Doré, 1875)
There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the
king:
"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among ... all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it
be written that they be destroyed." After winning royal assent, Haman
makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and destroy all the Jews, the
young and the elderly, children and women, in one day . . . and to
take their property for plunder."
What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism -- just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the
Church or Islam, or their expulsion from so many lands in Europe and
the Middle East, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and
Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the
president of Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state,
when a leader of Hamas vows to kill Jewish children around the world,
when firebombs are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and
Chicago, it is not because Jews deserve to be victimized.
Some Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. The Jewish
people are the object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the
haters' rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What, after all, do those who vilify Jews as greedy
bankers have in common with those who revile them as seditious
Bolsheviks? Nothing, save an irrational obsession with Jews.
At one point in the book of Esther, Haman lets the mask slip. He
boasts to his friends and family of "the glory of his riches, and the
great number of his sons, and everything in which the king had
promoted him and elevated him." Still, he seethes with rage and
frustration: "Yet all this is worthless to me so long as I see
Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate." That is the
unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend in, to
abandon his values, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting
there -- undigested, unassimilated, and for that reason unbearable.
Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat; so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his national identity or his professional achievements.
Ultimately, however, it is the Jew's Jewishness, and the call to
higher standards that it represents, that the anti-Semite cannot
abide.
With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their
role in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures
too, as obsessive and indestructible -- and deadly -- as ever.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 13, 12:40 am,Michael Ejercito<mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 12, 3:45 pm, ╠☼╣Ǚ∑§â€Ð_ID_SBR_X|||DI©*J*Ω∏lol؟♫1ﷲ☻∞= 8☺╣☼╠?
>
> > <simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 12, 3:45 pm, ╠☼╣Ǚ∑§â€Ð_ID_SBR_X|||DI©*J*Ω∏lol؟♫1ﷲ☻∞= 8☺╣☼╠?
>
> > <simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > MichaWhat is a Jew?
>
> A Jew is above all else, a craven coward.
>
> A Jew is afraid to compete with others as
> equals because he knows he can't measure up.
>
> A Jew is afraid of his own inadequacy, so
> he wants to murder his betters.
>
> A Jew is afraid of the truth, so he wants
> to murder those who tell it.
>
> A Jew is afraid of history, so he wants to
> murder the past, to wipe out the knowledge
> of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
> National Socialism.
>
> Finally, a Jew is afraid of the power of
> of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
> National Socialism.
>
> educated, informed adults. Freedom of
> choice terrifies him... which is why he
> chooses minor children as sexual partners.
> He can't interact with competent adults in
> a consensually sexual way. He needs to be
> able to impose himself on a helpless victim,
> be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a
> mental hospital.
>
> These are the things that a Jew is, and
> mental hospital.
>
> there's nothing polite or honest about it.
>
> Christopher Nortonel, Mr. Re-Thinker
The following article explains your pathology.
History's oldest hatred
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
March 11, 2009
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred
ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so it
is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-
hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)
Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable and unyielding as
anti-Semitism. "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan,
religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis
Prager in Why the Jews?, their classic study of anti-Semitism.
"Fascists have accused them of being Communists, and Communists have
branded them capitalists. Jews who live in non-Jewish societies have
been accused of having dual loyalties, while Jews who live in the
Jewish state have been condemned as 'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied,
and rich Jews are resented. Jews have been branded as both rootless
cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews who assimilate have been
called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay together spark hatred
for remaining separate."
So hardy is anti-Semitism, it can flourish without Jews. Shakespeare's
poisonous depiction of the Jewish moneylender Shylock was written for
audiences that had never seen a Jew, all Jews having been expelled
from England more than 300 years earlier. Anti-Semitic bigotry infests
Saudi Arabia, where Jews have not dwelt in at least five centuries;
its malignance is suggested by the government daily Al-Riyadh, which
published an essay claiming that Jews have a taste for "pastries mixed
with human blood."
Esther Confounding Haman (Engraving by Gustave Doré, 1875)
There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the
king:
"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among ... all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it
be written that they be destroyed." After winning royal assent, Haman
makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and destroy all the Jews, the
young and the elderly, children and women, in one day . . . and to
take their property for plunder."
What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism -- just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the
Church or Islam, or their expulsion from so many lands in Europe and
the Middle East, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and
Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the
president of Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state,
when a leader of Hamas vows to kill Jewish children around the world,
when firebombs are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and
Chicago, it is not because Jews deserve to be victimized.
Some Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. The Jewish
people are the object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the
haters' rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What, after all, do those who vilify Jews as greedy
bankers have in common with those who revile them as seditious
Bolsheviks? Nothing, save an irrational obsession with Jews.
At one point in the book of Esther, Haman lets the mask slip. He
boasts to his friends and family of "the glory of his riches, and the
great number of his sons, and everything in which the king had
promoted him and elevated him." Still, he seethes with rage and
frustration: "Yet all this is worthless to me so long as I see
Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate." That is the
unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend in, to
abandon his values, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting
there -- undigested, unassimilated, and for that reason unbearable.
Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat; so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his national identity or his professional achievements.
Ultimately, however, it is the Jew's Jewishness, and the call to
higher standards that it represents, that the anti-Semite cannot
abide.
With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their
role in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures
too, as obsessive and indestructible -- and deadly -- as ever.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)
NefeshBarYocahi
May 13, 2012, 12:34:43 PM5/13/12
to
On May 13, 9:18 am, "الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيم╠☼╣Ǚ∑§â€Ð:"
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So what if i die. U r still a PARASITIC vermin.
>
> However as long as I am alive, means ur god is not listening to u JEW
> or ALL of you CUNTS who wish me dead.
>
> Do u get the message from GOD....cupcake!?
>
> So where do u live then. I come to u then u try and kill me ok....
>
> Show Jew Cowardice is a myth....if u can
A Vietnamese girl said you had a homosexual relationship with Donald
Fermacker.
<simonb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 13, 3:57 pm, NefeshBarYocahi <lbitf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Nobody wants to read your masturbations fuckner. Now die asshole die!!
>
> is that the best u can do, girly boy....wish i was dead.
>
> > Nobody wants to read your masturbations fuckner. Now die asshole die!!
>
>
> So what if i die. U r still a PARASITIC vermin.
>
> However as long as I am alive, means ur god is not listening to u JEW
> or ALL of you CUNTS who wish me dead.
>
> Do u get the message from GOD....cupcake!?
>
> So where do u live then. I come to u then u try and kill me ok....
>
> Show Jew Cowardice is a myth....if u can
A Vietnamese girl said you had a homosexual relationship with Donald
Fermacker.
NefeshBarYocahi
May 13, 2012, 12:11:55 PM5/13/12
to
On May 13, 9:18 am, "الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيم╠☼╣Ǚ∑§â€Ð:"
> > Nobody wants to read your masturbations fuckner. Now die asshole die!!
>
>
> is that the best u can do, girly boy....wish i was dead.
>
> So what if i die. U r still a PARASITIC vermin.
>
> However as long as I am alive, means ur god is not listening to u JEW
> or ALL of you CUNTS who wish me dead.
>
> Do u get the message from GOD....cupcake!?
>
> So where do u live then. I come to u then u try and kill me ok....
>
> Show Jew Cowardice is a myth....if u can
You are a dishonorable candyass palse.
>
> So what if i die. U r still a PARASITIC vermin.
>
> However as long as I am alive, means ur god is not listening to u JEW
> or ALL of you CUNTS who wish me dead.
>
> Do u get the message from GOD....cupcake!?
>
> So where do u live then. I come to u then u try and kill me ok....
>
> Show Jew Cowardice is a myth....if u can
0 new messages