Re: Religious Leaders: Civil Disobedience OK to Protect Faith
Sid9
"muto2100" <mani...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
news:6bf056d9-4ac5-4c0d...@k9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/289471.html
.
.
.
No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection.
Jack G.
> "muto2100" <maniek...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
>
> news:6bf056d9-4ac5-4c0d...@k9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...>http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/28...
>
> .
> .
> .
> No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection.
I am glad to see you are still alive and kicking.
I was a little worried when you stopped posting on this site.
Jack G.
Sid9
"Jack G." <jgra...@pioneernet.net> wrote in message
news:e28e7287-1d6a-4466...@b25g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
.
Glad to see you missed my enlightening posts....cruisin' the Caribbean
slowed me down considerably
Jack Pine Savage
"Sid9" <si...@belsouth.net> wrote in message
news:heh0ut$lat$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
No doubt looking for a new gay cabana boy eh Sid0?
>
>
>
Frank Pittel
: "muto2100" <mani...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
:
Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience?
--
-------------------
Keep working dumbo needs the money
Sid9
"Frank Pittel" <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:afKdnS0WkpJx3JHW...@giganews.com...
> In alt.politics.usa.republican Sid9 <si...@belsouth.net> wrote:
>
> : "muto2100" <mani...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
> :
> news:6bf056d9-4ac5-4c0d...@k9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> : >
> http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/289471.html
> : .
> : .
> : .
> : No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection.
> :
>
> Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience?
>
.
.
Insurrection implies violence.
MLK was totally none violent on the protesters side.
Frank Pittel
: "Frank Pittel" <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
none violent??
Where in the article you linked to was there any mention of insurrection
or violence??
RichTravsky
> In alt.politics.usa.republican Sid9 <si...@belsouth.net> wrote:
> : "muto2100" <mani...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
> :
> : No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection.
>
> Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience?
How was that insurrection?
RT
Frank Pittel
: How was that insurrection?
You're asking the wrong person. It's sidney that made the claim that civil
disobedience is insurrection not me.
Frank Pittel
: none violent??
Couldn't find it I see.
Sid9
.
The implication is there.
The comments in these news groups are a drumbeat for RRR loonies.
They simply don�t understand that they are advocating insurrection.
Lack of understanding is not new for RRRs
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
> In alt.politics.usa.republican Sid9 <s...@belsouth.net> wrote:
>
> : "muto2100" <maniek...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
>
> :news:6bf056d9-4ac5-4c0d...@k9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> : >http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/28...
> : .
> : .
> : .
> : No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection.
> :
>
> Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience?
>
> --
>
> -------------------
> Keep working dumbo needs the money
King's civil disobedience was NON-violent. King's people didn't carry
guns, didn't call for murdering the president, didn't call to "water
the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants," didn't rush out and
stockpile guns and ammo.
The people who opposed King, on the other hand . . . .
Frank Pittel
: On Nov 24, 3:28??pm, Frank Pittel <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote:
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican Sid9 <s...@belsouth.net> wrote:
: >
: > : "muto2100" <maniek...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
: >
: > :news:6bf056d9-4ac5-4c0d...@k9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
: > : >http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/28...
: > : .
: > : .
: > : .
: > : No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection.
: >
: > Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience?
: >
: > --
: >
: > -------------------
: > Keep working dumbo needs the money
: King's civil disobedience was NON-violent. King's people didn't carry
: guns, didn't call for murdering the president, didn't call to "water
: the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants," didn't rush out and
: stockpile guns and ammo.
The current call for civil disobedience by the religious leaders is
also for non-violent disobedience of laws that are countrary to
religious beliefs. If you bothered to read the link given by the moron
that started the thread and called non-violent civil disobedience an
insurrection you'll note that the religious leaders advocating the
non-violent civil disobedience want the non-violent civil disobedience
to be non-violent.
Sid9
.
.
Your so called "religious groups" are hand and glove with the "water
the tree off liberty..." insurrectionists.
They are one, they are the same.
Frank Pittel
: "Frank Pittel" <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
You're insane. Only an insane idiot would claim that pastors like Martin
Luther King are insurrectionists.
Sid9
.
.
Goodbye.
Clairbear
news:hf21fn$m85$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>
> "Frank Pittel" <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
> news:vtudneHb6ZnEFYnW...@giganews.com...
>> In alt.politics.usa.republican Sid9 <si...@belsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>> : "Frank Pittel" <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
>> : news:1uqdnReUKeKE64nW...@giganews.com...
>> : > In alt.politics.usa.republican Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
>> : > <old_r...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> : > : On Nov 24, 3:28??pm, Frank Pittel
>> <f...@warlock.deepthought.com>
>> : > wrote:
>> : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican Sid9 <s...@belsouth.net>
>> wrote:
>> : > : >
>> : > : > : "muto2100" <maniek...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
>> : > : >
>> : > : >
>> : >
>> :news:6bf056d9-4ac5-4c0d-89bb-ac5a72f672f5
@k9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com
>> :...
>> : > : > :
>> : >
>> >
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/2
>> >8...
Go ahaed sidnet run and hide like a little girl when someone calls you
for what you are...A wrongtard senile old stooge
Frank Pittel
: "Frank Pittel" <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
: news:vtudneHb6ZnEFYnW...@giganews.com...
Typical of the looney tune brain dead lying fascist loser lib dems
to run and hide like cowards when called out on thier idiocy.
RichTravsky
>
> In alt.politics.usa.republican RichTravsky <traR...@hotmmoveail.com> wrote:
> : Frank Pittel wrote:
> : > In alt.politics.usa.republican Sid9 <si...@belsouth.net> wrote:
> : > : "muto2100" <mani...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
> : > : > http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/289471.html
> : > :
> : > : No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection.
> : >
> : > Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience?
>
> : How was that insurrection?
>
> You're asking the wrong person. It's sidney that made the claim that civil
> disobedience is insurrection not me.
I'm asking the right person. You compared civil disobedience to insurrection.
RT
Frank Pittel
Wrong again moron.
RichTravsky
Sid9
"RichTravsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4B1B228D...@hotmMOVEail.com...
.
Pittel conflated MLK who preached peaceful non-violent protest with
some RRRs today who say the "Tree of Liberty needs to be watered with
blood"
.
.
That's a creation of his warped ?mind?
These people speak of armed insurrection daily on these pages.
Limbo's technique, bush,jr's technique...deceptive, lies. Nothing new
here.
Frank Pittel
: Frank Pittel wrote:
: > In alt.politics.usa.republican RichTravsky <traR...@hotmmoveail.com> wrote:
: > : Frank Pittel wrote:
: > : > : Frank Pittel wrote:
: > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican Sid9 <si...@belsouth.net> wrote:
: > : > : > : "muto2100" <mani...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
: > : > : > : > http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/289471.html
: > : > : > :
: > : > : > : No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection.
: > : > : >
: > : > : > Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience?
: > : >
: > : > : How was that insurrection?
: > : >
: > : > You're asking the wrong person. It's sidney that made the claim that civil
: > : > disobedience is insurrection not me.
: >
: > : I'm asking the right person. You compared civil disobedience to insurrection.
: >
: > Wrong again moron.
: "Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience"
Not at all. It's sidney that called his use of civil disobedience an insurrection not me.
Frank Pittel
: "RichTravsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
You need to try actually reading the article that you post the link to.
When you do maybe can quote the part where an insurrection is called for.
I am interested in what part of this quote from the article you cited that you
disagree with
`"Throughout the centuries, Christianity has taught that civil disobedience is not only permitted,
but sometimes required," says the document, which cited civil rights icon Martin Luther King and
his willingness to go to jail for his beliefs. `
Where in that quote was an insurrection called for?? Where in the article that you cited was an
insurrection called for?? What drugs were you on when you made your original post?
RichTravsky
> In alt.politics.usa.republican RichTravsky <traR...@hotmmoveail.com> wrote:
> : Frank Pittel wrote:
> : > In alt.politics.usa.republican RichTravsky <traR...@hotmmoveail.com> wrote:
> : > : Frank Pittel wrote:
> : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican RichTravsky <traR...@hotmmoveail.com> wrote:
> : > : > : Frank Pittel wrote:
> : > : > : > In alt.politics.usa.republican Sid9 <si...@belsouth.net> wrote:
> : > : > : > : "muto2100" <mani...@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
> : > : > : > : > http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/wuerl_colson_christian/2009/11/21/289471.html
> : > : > : > :
> : > : > : > : No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection.
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience?
> : > : >
> : > : > : How was that insurrection?
> : > : >
> : > : > You're asking the wrong person. It's sidney that made the claim that civil
> : > : > disobedience is insurrection not me.
> : >
> : > : I'm asking the right person. You compared civil disobedience to insurrection.
> : >
> : > Wrong again moron.
>
> : "Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience"
>
> Not at all. It's sidney that called his use of civil disobedience an insurrection not me.
"No matter what the cause, insurrection is still insurrection." - Sid
"Do you disagree with Martin Luther King's use of civil disobedience?" - You