Re: Looks like the warnings about right wing white supremacist extremists by Homeland Security was dead on, with deadly results:
Who Is John Galt
> Looks like the warning about right wing white supremacist extremists by
> HomeLand Security was dead on, with deadly results:
>
You are assuming this guy was.... right wing?
What if he hates Bush and Neo-cons, Racist and Republican are not the
same word. If he was a racist he could be a Liberal-Progressive.
> http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/06/holocaust_museum_shooting_reki.html
>
> In early April the Department of Homeland Security issued a report warning
> that the climate was ripe for an increase in domestic terror by "lone wolf"
> right-wing extremists, possibly with military experience. Conservatives, both
> politicians and political commentators, harshly criticized it for what they
> saw as unfair fearmongering about the right wing and disrespectful attacks on
> veterans. Yesterday, a fatal shooting at the Holocaust Memorial Museum was
> carried out by a white supremacist (and veteran) who raged against Jews and
> blacks. This, of course, comes on the heels of the murder of abortion doctor
> George Tiller at the hands of another extremist. So has the DHS report been
> vindicated after all? And are conservative pundits fueling the fears of right-
> wing extremists? The blogosphere has an opinion.
>
> ? Mike Madden writes that "white supremacist hate groups get a lot more fired
> up when the president is a half-Kenyan man named Barack Hussein Obama, whose
> chief of staff is an observant Jew, than they did when the president was a
> WASP from Connecticut by way of Texas." The DHS report was right about them,
> and "the government shouldn't pretend they don't exist, no matter how loudly
> Rush Limbaugh howls." [War Room/Salon]
>
> ? Ed Morrissey contends that conservatives criticized the DHS report because
> it "didn?t focus on known, specific threats, instead making generalized
> threats about abortion opponents and other vague and broad generalizations
> about conservative issues." And that is still valid ? "despite being well-
> known as a threat since the 1980s, the DHS never bothered to identify von
> Brunn or his organization as a specific threat in the report ? which, again,
> was the heart of our criticism." [Hot Air]
>
> ? Markos Moulitsas tweets, "Attempt by Cons to justify their critique of
> prescient DHS report are an extra special dose of stupid." [Markos
> Moulitsas/Twitter]
>
> ? Michelle Malkin mocks the "political opportunists" who "gloat about
> 'vindication' that isn?t there." [Michelle Malkin]
>
> ? Josh Marshall calls it "half bizarre and half comic" that some conservatives
> can't acknowledge "what everyone else in the world finds transparently obvious
> and unremarkable ? namely that neo-Nazism and white supremacy are forms of
> violent extremism of the right." [TPM]
>
> ? Andy Ostroy, referring to Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh, thinks it's no
> wonder "that these right-wing lunatic freaks feel a sense of duty, of
> obligation, to 'right the wrongs' that these instigators in the media hammer
> into their psychotic heads day after day." [HuffPo]
>
> ? Joan Walsh says that if she were "a marginal, unemployed, angry, racist
> white man right now, I'd be hearing a lot of mainstream conservative support
> for my point of view" from conservative pundits and politicians. "Can that
> help create a climate for more violence? I don't know. I hope not, but I don't
> know." [Salon]
>
> ? Steve Benen applauds Fox News's Shepard Smith for realizing "that these
> increasingly agitated conservatives are incensed, not because of justified
> concerns, but because of 'ridiculous' developments that have been cooked up in
> the far-right imagination." [Political Animal/Washington Monthly]
>
> ? Adam Serwer wonders how conservatives would react if the recent shooters
> were Arab or Muslim instead of white. [Tapped/American Prospect]
>
> ? Jesse Walker says the report was criticized because it "blew the threat of
> right-wing terror out of proportion, just as the Clinton administration did in
> the '90s; because it treated "extremism" itself as a potential threat, while
> offering a definition of extremist so broad it seemed it include anyone who
> opposed abortion or immigration or excessive federal power." It didn't "make
> right-wing terror attacks less likely," it just made "it easier to smear
> nonviolent, noncriminal figures on the right." [Hit & Run/Reason]
>
> ? Matt Yglesias hopes "that everyone who mau-maued the Department of Homeland
> Security for expressing concern about this kind of thing feels appropriately
> ashamed of themselves." [Think Progress]
>
> ? Andy McCarthy maintains that this "is not a wave of domestic terrorism, much
> less right-wing extremism. It's a pair of homicides. They are despicable, of
> course, but to suggest that they validate Napolitano ... is specious."
> [Corner/National Review]
>
> ? Andrew Sullivan asks, "That DHS report doesn't look so iffy any more, does
> it?" [Atlantic]
>
> ? Benjamin Sarlin says that "it seems the government's warnings deserve a
> second look and its critics may owe Homeland Security officials an apology."
> [Daily Beast]
>
> ? Greg Sargent notices that Christian-right groups are "still raising cash by
> mocking the 'right wing extremists' report, despite the identification of the
> suspect in yesterday?s Holocaust Museum shooting as a white supremacist and
> anti-government zealot." [Plum Line/Who Runs Gov]
>
> ? Jason Zengerle is tired of the "cheap political point-scoring."
Ouroboros Rex
> Another Right Wing Fascist Murderer wrote:
>> Looks like the warning about right wing white supremacist extremists
>> by HomeLand Security was dead on, with deadly results:
>>
>
> You are assuming this guy was.... right wing?
Yeah, he was only whining about "liberalism" for his health, don'tcha
know. =)
http://www.arsenalofhypocrisy.com:80/blog/?p=463
Anthony Allende
"Who Is John Galt" <"Men Of The Mind"@Talkn-n-dog...com> wrote in message
news:UoeYl.53720$b9....@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> Another Right Wing Fascist Murderer wrote:
>> Looks like the warning about right wing white supremacist extremists by
>> HomeLand Security was dead on, with deadly results:
>>
>
> You are assuming this guy was.... right wing?
>
>
>
> What if he hates Bush and Neo-cons, Racist and Republican are not the
> same word. If he was a racist he could be a Liberal-Progressive.
The only reason he hated Bush was he wasn't racist and fascist enough for
his tastes. Keep pushing this line of reasoning. We see how far it's getting
you.
john fernbach
that's what this is about.
But what the FUCKALL does this have to do with "ALT.GLOBAL-
WARMING" ????
NOTHING - is the answer. NADA.
Why don't you post it in some other damned usenet group, then.?
There are plenty of them available to debate/discuss this kind of
horrible hate crime.
When you post hate crime news in "Alt.Global-Warming," you're just
gumming up the group. And you're inspiring people like me, who want
to debate "Global-Warming," to despise you and your cause, whatever it
is.
On Jun 11, 5:13 pm, Who Is John Galt <"Men Of The Mind"@Talkn-n-
> > ? Jason Zengerle is tired of the "cheap political point-scoring."- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
kangarooistan
Looks like the right wing white supremacist extremists failed to
hang the crime on Muslims
They MUST be slipping
Western media will some how find some Muslim country somewhere that
planned the attack and demand another WAR to defend Israel
kanga
======
derrick lawrence
kangarooistan
<gi...@uniserve.com> wrote:
> Looks like the warning about right wing white supremacist extremists by
> HomeLand Security was dead on, with deadly results:
>
&rlz=1B3GGGL_enAU291AU291&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
Ouroboros Rex
And you are clearly just a concerned citizen. ROFLMAO
whiteslave
Scotius
Murderer <gi...@uniserve.com> wrote:
>Looks like the warning about right wing white supremacist extremists by
>HomeLand Security was dead on, with deadly results:
>
>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/06/holocaust_museum_shooting_reki.html
>
Ho hum.
It may or may not interest you (I don't care whether it does
or not) to know that Von Brunn was an ardent leftist. He hated all the
same things that the leftists at Ber(ser)kley do.
He also idolized William Pierce, the neo nazi founder of the
"National Alliance", who said not far back that as much as he hated
the Democrats, he hated the Republicans even more because he
considered them more pro-Israel.
Von Brunn was a left winger. The head of the DHS is a bit
confused, but don't worry; the truth will come out.