Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. put forth the notion that...
>
> "Ragnar" <
rapier...@live.com> wrote in message
> news:cba21a2d-ccb9-43d1...@l1g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 7, 2:43 pm, " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <gregh...@home.fake>
> wrote:
> > "Ragnar" <
rapierfen...@live.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:131d74d6-9f05-457d...@y10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
> > On Feb 3, 8:32 pm, "Free Willy" <freewi...@invalid.invalid> wrote:> Lady
> > Veteran aka Bobbi Sanchez seems to have an IQ of about 50-60. She's
> > > only capable of repeating the same old lame misandrist insults time
> > > after
> > > time. She hasn't posted an original word since about 1985 when she
> > > shamed
> > > herself with that fantastic lie about the M-1 Garand rifle. Her
> > > usefulness
> > > on Usenet has long since past. It's proof of her low IQ that she can't
> > > see
> > > the reality of it. It is further proof that she's too stupid to
> > > understand
> > > that she should have retired from Usenet about ten years ago. Her fat
> > > ass
> > > is obsolete. Is it any wonder they drummed her out of the Army?
> >
> > // What ?fantastic lie? regarding the M1 Garand would that be, pray
> > // tell?
> > //
> >
> > Pay attention, several posters have discussed that already in the recent
> > past. From what I read they pretty much proved Blobbi was lying about
> > ever
> > using one.
> >
> >Idiocy snipped.
>
> As usual you are a fucking moron and you have no Idea what you are
> talking about; which by the way, is par for the course when it comes
> to trolls like you.
>
> Now that you?ve walked into this one like the dunce that you are;
> LISTEN UP.
>
> Have you wondered why the OP didn?t answer me? No of course you hadn?t
> because you are a defective brained fag. The so-called ?fantastic lie?
> that LV was supposed to have told stems from her claim that the M-1
> Garand was equipped with a folding stock. Every LV troll in the world
> jumped all over this because they claimed (wrongly) that the M-1
> Garand was never equipped with a folding stock, lol.
>
> The fact of the matter is that there is a variant known as the M1E5
> which was specifically designed for tank crews and WAS indeed equipped
> with a folding stock. This variant never saw active service BUT it did
> indeed exist. During the 1950s Berretta in Italy was making Garand?s
> for NATO and they developed the BM59 series M-1 Garand which included
> the mark III variant which also had a folding stock. Berretta M-1 mark
> III?s are still commercially available in limited numbers. I?ve
> personally seen one on the range that I belong to being used in a DCM
> match. They?re decent shooters and furthermore BEFORE the assault
> weapons ban rammed through congress by Slick Willy, after-market
> folding stocks for the Berretta Garand?s were pretty common.
>
> Obviously I?ve debunked this ?fantastic lie? claim many times and some
> of the trolls still don?t get it (defective minds). SO PAY ATTENTION,
> YOU DIRT ENCRUSTED SMELLY FAG, before you end up looking as dumb as
> the OP.
>
> Now whether or not LV ever fired one is a different story and frankly
> I don?t fucking care. In fact I couldn't give a shit if she shot
> herself in the cunt with one. I just get a kick out spanking little
> creeps like you to a pulp with the truth, of which you obviously know
> nothing of.
>
> BTW, Gweggy you had best just shut the fuck up because you show
> yourself to be less and less intelligent each time you put your
> sticky, sperm covered, fingers to the keyboard, lol. Once again your
> "defective mind" has made you look like a fool but you should be used
> to that by now.
>
> Ragnar
>
>
>
>
> ===================[reply]=========================
>
> Your historical perspective of the Garand with folding stock is
> insightful. However, it has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that LV
> claims to have fired the Garand with folding stock during basic training.
> LOL! That's clearly a lie since NONE were ever issued to basic trainees.
> One ONLY fires those weapons one has had issued to one. It follows then
> that you wasted your time giving the history of a weapon that LV never
> fired, never held, probably never even viewed. She lied.
>
> Now, please understand that your vituperative screed, while a rather
> typical display of impudence, does nothing to belie the fact that it
> amounts to rather thinly disguised legerdemain and nothing more. But, you
> may take solace in that your sophistry may have been mistaken as fact by
> the likes of the Blobster or Checkmate; in other words, by your
> intellectual peers.
There's nothing I hate more than thinly disguised legerdemain...
> One final caveat - better concise and urbane like yours truly than
> logorrheic and contumacious like yourself. Perhaps I should couch that
> sentiment in language that won't have you scrambling for a dictionary -
> get a fucking clue, Rube!
...EXCEPT logorrheicness and contumaciousness.
...And, of course, pretentious motherfuckers.