Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

CNN Video: 1,000 pound woman too fat for jail?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

N Grace

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 9:23:58 PM3/28/08
to
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obese.for.j
ail.cnn

Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system? If the
woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.


Omelet

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 10:44:38 PM3/28/08
to
In article <200803290123...@outpost.zedz.net>,
ngr...@nowhere.com (N Grace) wrote:

They can't get her out of her house without taking out a wall.
She also cannot walk. She'd have to be carried.

It's not special treatment per se', it's a matter of mechanics.
--
--

Peace! Om

"Thousands of years ago, cats were worshipped as gods. They have never
forgotten this." - Heinlein

Regina

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 9:52:05 PM3/28/08
to
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>You idiots have her on the gurney with a needle in her arm and she
>hasn't even been arrested.

Did you even bother to watch the video? The 1,000 pound killer has been
charged, but she is too fat to be arrested at this time. The police have
arrested the half ton killer's fat ass sister.

The only reason why you are defending this psychopathic tub of lard is
because you are both homicidal, morbidly obese Mexican chicanas. If this
was a white woman, you would be calling for her to be lynched. Your racism
is well documented.


Real BBW

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 10:01:01 PM3/28/08
to
N Grace wrote:

> http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obese.
> for.j ail.cnn


>
> Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system? If
> the woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.

If she was 110 pounds, she would not be charged with any crime. These
are trumped up charges. Unfortunately, she will not get a fair trial.

The fat bashing comments from Nancy Grace and her guests were
appalling. A BBW cannot get fair treatment in the legal system. She
will be taken to jail eventually and probably starved to death in the
name of swift justice.

--

Vandar

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 10:04:17 PM3/28/08
to
Omelet wrote:

> In article <200803290123...@outpost.zedz.net>,
> ngr...@nowhere.com (N Grace) wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obese.for.j
>>ail.cnn
>>
>>Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system? If the
>>woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
>
>
> They can't get her out of her house without taking out a wall.
> She also cannot walk. She'd have to be carried.

Then they should get Shamu's transport harness from SeaWorld and cart
her beached ass off to a holding tank.

Stromata

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 10:05:45 PM3/28/08
to

Sorry fattie, but 1000lbs goes WAY beyond the possibility of BBW. SSSSSBBW?


spodosaurus

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 10:06:21 PM3/28/08
to

The body in jabba's closet isn't dead, it's just frozen in carbonite.

spodosaurus

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 10:08:32 PM3/28/08
to

And she's not going to starve to death in jail with three meals a day
and 890 pounds of stored food under her tarp.

Zen Cohen

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 11:50:28 PM3/28/08
to

"N Grace" <ngr...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:200803290123...@outpost.zedz.net...

Wow, that is a truly vile woman. Nancy Grace, that is.


Message has been deleted

Top

unread,
Mar 29, 2008, 5:51:55 AM3/29/08
to
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:03:50 +0000, Begay wrote:

> On 28 Mar 2008, Omelet <ompo...@gmail.com> posted some
> news:ompomelet-DE635...@news.giganews.com:

>>> for.j ail.cnn


>>>
>>> Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system? If
>>> the woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
>>
>> They can't get her out of her house without taking out a wall. She also
>> cannot walk. She'd have to be carried.
>>
>> It's not special treatment per se', it's a matter of mechanics.
>

> Any excuse for a hog not to be treated like everyone else. They should
> just hit it a tranq dart, hook a chain around one leg and drag it out
> through the window with a tractor. If it knocks the wall down so be it.

I'd hold the jail door open to put her in but she won't fit. That's the wall that
would have to knocked down.

Top

Message has been deleted

spodosaurus

unread,
Mar 29, 2008, 11:44:13 AM3/29/08
to

Erect a hanger around her. What's she going to do, run away?

aemeijers

unread,
Mar 29, 2008, 7:10:14 PM3/29/08
to

Putting anyone that large in jail strikes me as quite redundant. They
are already prisoners.

--
aem sends...

Lady Veteran

unread,
Mar 29, 2008, 8:09:32 PM3/29/08
to
On 29 Mar 2008 01:52:05 -0000, reg...@nowhere.com (Regina) wrote:

>On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>
>>You idiots have her on the gurney with a needle in her arm and she
>>hasn't even been arrested.
>
>Did you even bother to watch the video? The 1,000 pound killer has been
>charged, but she is too fat to be arrested at this time. The police have
>arrested the half ton killer's fat ass sister.

Yes, I did. She has not been tried yet she is already convicted in the
media. If she is guilty she should go to prison. When that happens
they the city can spend the money to mover her. Is she going anywhere?


>
>The only reason why you are defending this psychopathic tub of lard is
>because you are both homicidal, morbidly obese Mexican chicanas.

The only reason you say that is that you don't have the brains to
cross the street by yourself you fucking stupid skank. You are
useless.

You are one stupid us less idiot.

>was a white woman, you would be calling for her to be lynched. Your racism
>is well documented.

Go fuck yourself brain stem.

>
LV

"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."

---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------
"A fanatic cannot change his mind and will not
change the subject."

---Winston Churchill
----------------------------------------------

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

Lady Veteran

unread,
Mar 29, 2008, 8:11:50 PM3/29/08
to

You have no right to ask. You are a Dizum.

GeekBoy

unread,
Mar 29, 2008, 10:10:13 PM3/29/08
to

"Lady Veteran" <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:i8mtu3pttf99c83g3...@4ax.com...

> On 29 Mar 2008 01:52:05 -0000, reg...@nowhere.com (Regina) wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>You idiots have her on the gurney with a needle in her arm and she
>>>hasn't even been arrested.
>>
>>Did you even bother to watch the video? The 1,000 pound killer has been
>>charged, but she is too fat to be arrested at this time. The police have
>>arrested the half ton killer's fat ass sister.
>
> Yes, I did. She has not been tried yet she is already convicted in the
> media. If she is guilty she should go to prison. When that happens
> they the city can spend the money to mover her. Is she going anywhere?
>>

Initial reports indicated she reported she FELL on the child. How did she
fall on the kid if she cannot even get up?

Patriot Games

unread,
Mar 30, 2008, 12:11:17 PM3/30/08
to
"N Grace" <ngr...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:200803290123...@outpost.zedz.net...

She's TOO FAT to fit in a police car!

She's TOO FAT to fit through a jail door!

Chain her to a stump in the backyard. Call it house arrest.

Patriot Games

unread,
Mar 30, 2008, 12:15:52 PM3/30/08
to
"Real BBW" <real...@nopublicemailaddy.net> wrote in message
news:n9SdnVXKgptAP3Da...@comcast.com...

>N Grace wrote:
>> http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obese.
>> for.j ail.cnn
>> Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system? If
>> the woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
> If she was 110 pounds, she would not be charged with any crime. These
> are trumped up charges. Unfortunately, she will not get a fair trial.

Fill the basement with water, throw her down the steps.

Fat people are beasts.

> The fat bashing comments from Nancy Grace and her guests were
> appalling. A BBW cannot get fair treatment in the legal system.

They don't deserve fair treatment until after they've joined the human race.

> She
> will be taken to jail eventually and probably starved to death in the
> name of swift justice.

Swift? You can't starve a 1,000 pound BEAST swift.

Patriot Games

unread,
Mar 30, 2008, 12:21:11 PM3/30/08
to
"Begay" <Be...@excite.co.jp> wrote in message
news:Xns9A6FE07...@239.242.12.116...

> On 28 Mar 2008, Omelet <ompo...@gmail.com> posted some
> news:ompomelet-DE635...@news.giganews.com:
>>> for.j ail.cnn

>>> Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system? If
>>> the woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
>> They can't get her out of her house without taking out a wall.
>> She also cannot walk. She'd have to be carried.
>> It's not special treatment per se', it's a matter of mechanics.
> Any excuse for a hog not to be treated like everyone else. They should
> just hit it a tranq dart, hook a chain around one leg and drag it out
> through the window with a tractor. If it knocks the wall down so be it.

Then what!?

There is no jail big enough Hogzilla!

They'd have to build a CUSTOM jail for the MASSIVE BEAST!

How many times have we seen King Kong break his shackles and cause death and
destruction?

Just shoot the BEAST, haul it off to the landfill and get on with life.

Patriot Games

unread,
Mar 30, 2008, 12:24:04 PM3/30/08
to
"Lady Veteran" <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:llmtu3tarou834rnm...@4ax.com...

> On 29 Mar 2008 01:23:58 -0000, ngr...@nowhere.com (N Grace) wrote:
>>http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obese.for.j
>>ail.cnn
>>Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system? If the
>>woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
> You have no right to ask.

All NORMAL people have a right to ask WHY we tolerate BEASTS to roam freely!


Message has been deleted

Ragnar

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 10:47:15 AM3/31/08
to
On Mar 28, 10:50 pm, "Zen Cohen" <atu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "N Grace" <ngr...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:200803290123...@outpost.zedz.net...
>
> >http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obese...

> > ail.cnn
>
> > Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system?  If the
> > woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
>
> Wow, that is a truly vile woman. Nancy Grace, that is.

Agreed. Nancy Grace is noted for being very unproffessional.

Ragnar

Ragnar

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 10:50:11 AM3/31/08
to
On Mar 30, 11:24 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> "Lady Veteran" <army...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message

>
> news:llmtu3tarou834rnm...@4ax.com...
>
> > On 29 Mar 2008 01:23:58 -0000, ngr...@nowhere.com (N Grace) wrote:
> >>http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obese...

> >>ail.cnn
> >>Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system?  If the
> >>woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
> > You have no right to ask.
>
> All NORMAL people have a right to ask WHY we tolerate BEASTS to roam freely!

A 1000lb person roams freely???? You are a MORON. But I don't think
that really needed to be said.

Ragnar

Ragnar

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 10:51:49 AM3/31/08
to
> Sorry fattie, but 1000lbs goes WAY beyond the possibility of BBW. SSSSSBBW?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Agreed. Extemes are never beautiful on either end of the weight scale.

The Master

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 12:48:03 PM3/31/08
to
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Naughty Boy wrote:

>> BBW
>
> Redundant. A 1,000 pound hog cannot be beautiful.

Redundant means that it uses two terms that means the same thing... Big
beautiful women IS redundant, because any big woman IS beautiful. Another
example would be "pitch back darkness".

You meant "contradictory", but no one give a shit about your opinions
anyway since you are obviously false.

April

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 9:35:56 PM3/31/08
to

Who has noted Nancy Grace as " being very unproffessional[sic]."?

April

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 9:35:56 PM3/31/08
to
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Ragnar <Ragnar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry fattie, but 1000lbs goes WAY beyond the possibility of BBW.
>> SSSSSBBW?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Agreed. Extemes are never beautiful on either end of the weight scale.

Who decides what are the extremes of the weight scale and what is
beautiful?

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Robin King

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 12:18:18 AM4/1/08
to
"Naughty Boy" <naughtynaughty> wrote in message
news:Xns9A7396...@207.14.116.130...
> The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote in
> news:Pine.NEB.4.64.0...@sdf.lonestar.org:
> Are you really that stupid? I was talking about 1,000 pound hogs.

We thought you were at least smart enough to read and to tell the
difference between a woman (of any size) and a hog. I suppose we were
stupid in assuming that much.

Robin


Message has been deleted

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 9:16:31 AM4/1/08
to
On Mar 31, 10:43 pm, Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote:
> Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:c2d01ea2-3804-46f8-bd17-
> ed15436b0...@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> You mean like your wife, who has to travel using 2 airline seats because one
> isn't enough for her humongous derriere?
>

That's right dick-cheese, her hipps are somewhat wider than the
average 17 inches that airline seats provide. Thats not exactly
extreme.

BTW, she gets the second seat for her own comfort as well as
consideration for others. Are you as considerate? Would your employer
consider you as valuable an employee as to be concerned for your
comfort and welbeing? Judging from the character you have displayed
here, I think not.
It's quite obvious that just because you may not intrude physically on
others, (yet to be determined) it doesn't make your physical presences
any less offensive to decent people.

Ragnar

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 9:24:51 AM4/1/08
to
On Mar 31, 8:35 pm, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:

Of course that becomes a matter of opinion. But for the vast majority
of people, extremes are outside any reasonable range regarding
standards of beauty. Certainly a 1000lb bed-bound monster would fall
into the extreme range, even for the average FA.

Ragnar

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 9:56:12 AM4/1/08
to
On Mar 31, 8:35 pm, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:

Well she's probably the only so-called journalist in recent memory to
have an interviewee commit suicide as a direct result of being
interviewed by her. I believe the wrongful death suit brought against
Grace by the family of Melinda Duckett is still pending.

During the Elizabeth Smart case, when suspect Richard Ricci was
arrested by police on the basis that he had a criminal record and had
worked on the Smarts' home, Grace immediately and repeatedly
proclaimed on CourtTV and CNN's Larry King that Ricci "was guilty,"
although there was little evidence to support this claim. She also
suggested publicly that Ricci's girlfriend was involved in the cover-
up of his alleged crime. Grace continued to accuse Ricci, though he
had died after being released from custody. It was later revealed that
Smart was kidnapped by Brian David Mitchell and Wanda Barzee, two
individuals with whom Richard Ricci had no connection.

Let's not even discuss her antics during the Duke Univ, lacrosse team
rape case. I'm sure CNN loved the out come in that that one after
vehemently accusing Duke Univ. spokespeople of prematurely siding with
the defendants.

There were also allegations of prosecutorial misconduct leveled at her
during her tenure with the Atlanta Fulton County District Attorneys
office, ranging from evidence hiding, failure to disclose witness
lists, Using falsified information during closing arguments, etc, etc,
Need I continue?

She's just another overly zealous headline grabbing Rita Cosby like
piece of shit.

Ragnar

Patriot Games

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 10:04:04 AM4/1/08
to
"Ragnar" <Ragnar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e4f763d2-14e0-4ff0...@d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 30, 11:24 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
>> "Lady Veteran" <army...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
>> news:llmtu3tarou834rnm...@4ax.com...
>> > On 29 Mar 2008 01:23:58 -0000, ngr...@nowhere.com (N Grace) wrote:
>> >>http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obese...
>> >>ail.cnn
>> >>Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system? If the
>> >>woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
>> > You have no right to ask.
>> All NORMAL people have a right to ask WHY we tolerate BEASTS to roam
>> freely!
>A 1000lb person roams freely?

They should be incarcerated in a Fat Asylum!

> You are a MORON. But I don't think
>that really needed to be said.

Shutup, fatboy.

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 10:15:14 AM4/1/08
to
On Apr 1, 9:04 am, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
> "Ragnar" <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

Nice comeback, very well thought out. Wouldn't you be more comfortable
interacting with your play station instead of conversing with the
adults?

Ragnar

Message has been deleted

The Master

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 2:29:23 PM4/1/08
to
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Naughty Boy wrote:

>>> Redundant. A 1,000 pound hog cannot be beautiful.
>>
>> Redundant means that it uses two terms that means the same thing...

<<snip>>
>> You meant "contradictory",

> Are you really that stupid? I was talking about 1,000 pound hogs.

It apears you are, since you still want to use the root term redundant
rather then contradict...

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 4:26:15 PM4/1/08
to
On Apr 1, 10:23 am, Jake wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:18:18 GMT, "Robin King"
> You have made a good point, Robin. Comparing a morbidly obese woman
> to a hog is not the best comparison that one could come up with.
>
> A much better comparison would be to compare them with a Dugong. The
> problem is that many of the readers may not familiar with the
> appearance of a Dugong.
>
> Jason- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Wow we almost have an educated troll in our midst. Notice I said
"almost educated" because in all likelihood you probably only stumbled
across info regarding the dugong while looking up the some juvenile
ammunition regarding sea cows or manatees to sling at the female
members of this group.

You really are a transparent little shit, aren't you?

Ragnar

Lady Veteran

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 7:16:18 PM4/1/08
to

Idiots have been thinking they cornered that market for years.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Charles

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 3:56:24 AM4/2/08
to
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:16:18 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
wrote:

>On 1 Apr 2008 01:35:56 -0000, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Ragnar <Ragnar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry fattie, but 1000lbs goes WAY beyond the possibility of BBW.
>>>> SSSSSBBW?- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>>Agreed. Extemes are never beautiful on either end of the weight scale.
>>
>>Who decides what are the extremes of the weight scale and what is
>>beautiful?
>>
>>
>Idiots have been thinking they cornered that market for years.
>

You managed a post without mentioning "brain stem" large person; you
are to be congratulated on breaking free of this clear indication of
OCD; it is hoped your recovery continues!

In anticipation I take this opportunity to get my retaliation in
first:

You go fuck yourself too!

HTH! ;o)

Omelet

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 5:22:40 AM4/2/08
to
In article <ile6v3l50eg7v3359...@4ax.com>,
Charles <j...@msn.com> wrote:

She is a bit mean spirited isn't she?
It is possible to defend FA without being that way...

Cheers Chas! :-)
--
--

Peace! Om

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a Bitch."
-- Jack Nicholson

Charles

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 4:44:52 AM4/2/08
to
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:22:40 -0600, Omelet <ompo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <ile6v3l50eg7v3359...@4ax.com>,
> Charles <j...@msn.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:16:18 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 1 Apr 2008 01:35:56 -0000, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:
>> >
>> >>On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Ragnar <Ragnar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Sorry fattie, but 1000lbs goes WAY beyond the possibility of BBW.
>> >>>> SSSSSBBW?- Hide quoted text -
>> >>>>
>> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>> >>>
>> >>>Agreed. Extemes are never beautiful on either end of the weight scale.
>> >>
>> >>Who decides what are the extremes of the weight scale and what is
>> >>beautiful?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >Idiots have been thinking they cornered that market for years.
>> >
>>
>> You managed a post without mentioning "brain stem" large person; you
>> are to be congratulated on breaking free of this clear indication of
>> OCD; it is hoped your recovery continues!
>>
>> In anticipation I take this opportunity to get my retaliation in
>> first:
>>
>> You go fuck yourself too!
>>
>> HTH! ;o)
>
>She is a bit mean spirited isn't she?

She/It is a long-term boringly repetitive oaf whose life revolves
around "trolling" and in making what 'she' considers to be clever
responses to other "trolls" who clearly bait 'her deliberately'.

>It is possible to defend FA without being that way...
>
>Cheers Chas! :-)

Cheers mate! ;o)

April

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 6:14:53 AM4/2/08
to

At what weight is a person transformed into a monster?


Charles

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 7:11:47 AM4/2/08
to

Weight is not necessarily the best subjective arbiter, given that some
very heavy people are in fact well-proportioned.

Entering the "monster" category is largely (no pun intended) measured
by the visual impact through the eye of the observer, including the
potential monster's own observations.

The basic rule of thumb is that if you can't see your genitals or
pubic hair when looking down in a standing position, you are becoming
grossly overweight.

If you are incapable of seeing the above accoutrements even with the
aid of a mirror, then you have clearly crossed the line and have
become grossly fat and by crude definition a fucking"monster".

IDHTH! ;o)

Omelet

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 8:09:45 AM4/2/08
to
In article <aih6v3t7u2mej9lja...@4ax.com>,
Charles <j...@msn.com> wrote:

She also does not seem to know how to snip crossposts.
I can, but I chose to do it selectively this time. ;-)

>
> >It is possible to defend FA without being that way...
> >
> >Cheers Chas! :-)
>
> Cheers mate! ;o)

Happy Spring...

Omelet

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 8:12:33 AM4/2/08
to
In article <200804021014...@outpost.zedz.net>,
ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:

I'd say anything past 200 for most females. Anything over that is a
serious risk of life and joint health.

There are limits as to what the human body is engineered to deal with.

I'd say 1/2 ton is just a bit over the top. Especially when you don't
have the muscular support to get out of bed anymore.

I mean, come on!

I honestly don't care how it looks. It's a matter of HEALTH!

The Master

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 1:39:45 PM4/2/08
to
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Naughty Boy wrote:

>> It apears you are, since you still want to use the root term redundant
>> rather then contradict...
>

> And it appears you are a lazy fat fuck who thinks it's cool to be obese.

And it's wonderful that you didn't even address your initial error.
That's ok though, I accept your outburst of stupidity as a troll's form of
an apology. It's ok, all is forgiven.

Patriot Games

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 1:50:53 PM4/2/08
to
"Ragnar" <Ragnars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ce980ed6-29d9-4c2d...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

Well. It IS more fun than FAT PEOPLE!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!

Shutup, fatboy.


Lawdog

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 2:12:13 PM4/2/08
to
On Mar 31, 9:35 pm, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 28, 10:50 pm, "Zen Cohen" <atu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> "N Grace" <ngr...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:200803290123...@outpost.zedz.net...
>
> >> >http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obese...
> >> > ail.cnn
>
> >> > Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system?  If the
> >> > woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
>
> >> Wow, that is a truly vile woman. Nancy Grace, that is.
>
> >Agreed. Nancy Grace is noted for being very unproffessional.
>
> Who has noted Nancy Grace as " being very unproffessional[sic]."?

The appellate courts, that's who.

I'm an attorney in Georgia, and I can't stand Nancy Grace. At least
three times that I know of, she has been scolded by appellate courts
for improper conduct when trying cases as an assistant district
attorney in Atlanta, the job she had before going to tv.

The Georgia Supreme Court scolded her in the cases of Carr v. State
(267 Ga. 701) and Bell v. State (263 Ga. 776). The 11th Circuit Court
of Appeals in Atlanta, in a habeas corpus case, stated Grace had
played "fast and loose" with the rules of ethics when she prosecuted
the case in question. Stephens v. Harris, 407 F.3d 1195.

Basically, Nancy Grace is a mean spirited, hateful bitch.

Message has been deleted

Lady Veteran

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 7:03:46 PM4/2/08
to

In your case it would be the only partner you will ever have.


Your OCD manifests itself in hiding and poking sticks at fat people.

Never grew up from being a schoolyard bully, did you?

That makes you a brain stem.

You shit, piss, eat, run your mouth and contribute absolutely NOTHING
to the world.

Lady Veteran

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 7:07:46 PM4/2/08
to
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:22:40 -0600, Omelet <ompo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <ile6v3l50eg7v3359...@4ax.com>,

Yes it is , Humpty Dumpty, but the brain stems never listen to NICE.
They are still here trying to get their jollies and trying to hide
their identities while doing it.

Do you, Omlette, feel it is appropriate to come into a group and
ridicule the regulars and flood the group with nonsense every fat
person has head a million times.

That doesn't make brain stems right. It makes them repetitive and
annoying.


If you truly believed in your so called mission, would you hide your
identity or would you want to be identified with your cause?


HMMM?

Lady Veteran

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 7:09:17 PM4/2/08
to

It is nice that your imagination is what motivates you. There is no IQ
attached to your blather but at least when your spewing drivel you
aren't hurting anyone.

Cheers, Brain stem.

Lady Veteran

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 7:10:21 PM4/2/08
to
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 06:09:45 -0600, Omelet <ompo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

I can but I won't. Why should only SSFA get your stupidity. If you
want to spew it, share it with the world.

Lady Veteran

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 7:11:59 PM4/2/08
to

She thinks just like some of the brain stems that infest SSFA. They
jump to conclusions so high you can see their ......heads.

Omelet

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 10:01:54 PM4/2/08
to
In article <3748v3l6n72dhd64c...@4ax.com>,
Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> >She is a bit mean spirited isn't she?
> >It is possible to defend FA without being that way...
> >
> >Cheers Chas! :-)
> >--
>
> Yes it is , Humpty Dumpty, but the brain stems never listen to NICE.
> They are still here trying to get their jollies and trying to hide
> their identities while doing it.
>
> Do you, Omlette, feel it is appropriate to come into a group and
> ridicule the regulars and flood the group with nonsense every fat
> person has head a million times.
>
> That doesn't make brain stems right. It makes them repetitive and
> annoying.
>
>
> If you truly believed in your so called mission, would you hide your
> identity or would you want to be identified with your cause?
>
>
> HMMM?
>
>
> LV

I dunno LV. I've watched your posts over the years.
Granted, it is dumb to troll support groups but it's to be expected on
usenet.

It's okay to have a thick skin, but just be sure that you don't lose
your soul...

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 3, 2008, 9:39:57 AM4/3/08
to
On Apr 1, 7:36 pm, Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote:
> Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:ac334bcb-6d60-42b6...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

>
> > On Mar 31, 10:43 pm, Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote:
> >> Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:c2d01ea2-3804-46f8-bd17- ed15436b0...@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> > On Mar 28, 9:05 pm, "Stromata" <d...@d.com> wrote:
> >> >> Real BBW wrote:
> >> >> > N Grace wrote:
>
> >> >> >>http://www.cnn.com/video/
>
> #/video/crime/2008/03/27/ng.killer.too.obe
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> >>se.
> >> >> >> for.j ail.cnn

>
> >> >> >> Why do fat people get special treatment from the justice system?
> >> >> >> If the woman was 110 pounds, she would be in jail right now.
>
> >> >> > If she was 110 pounds, she would not be charged with any crime.
> >> >> > These
>
> >> >> > are trumped up charges.  Unfortunately, she will not get a fair
> >> >> > trial.
>
> >> >> > The fat bashing comments from Nancy Grace and her guests were
> >> >> > appalling.  A BBW cannot get fair treatment in the legal system.
> >> >> > Sh
> >> > e
> >> >> > will be taken to jail eventually and probably starved to death in
> >> >> > the name of swift justice.

>
> >> >> Sorry fattie, but 1000lbs goes WAY beyond the possibility of BBW.
> >> >> SSSSSBBW
> >> > ?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > Agreed. Extemes are never beautiful on either end of the weight
> >> > scale.
>
> >> You mean like your wife, who has to travel using 2 airline seats
> >> because one isn't enough for her humongous derriere?
>
> > That's right dick-cheese, her hipps are somewhat wider than the
> > average 17 inches that airline seats provide. Thats not exactly
> > extreme.
>
> Because she's a hog, and airline seats are designed for normal people who
> look after their bodies.
>
Most grown adults do not fit comfortably in a 17" space for extended
periods of time. You really are an idiot.

> > BTW, she gets the second seat for her own comfort as well as
> > consideration for others.
>
> Thank you for admitting that fat people are an inconvenience to others.
> Right on!
>
Obviously you missed the point and got it wrong again. Not surprising.

> > Are you as considerate? Would your employer
> > consider you as valuable an employee as to be concerned for your
> > comfort and welbeing? Judging from the character you have displayed
> > here, I think not.
>
> How marvellous that you can glean so much from a Usenet post.
>
Nothing marvellous about dissecting the typical troll.

> > It's quite obvious that just because you may not intrude physically on
> > others, (yet to be determined) it doesn't make your physical presences
> > any less offensive to decent people.
>
> Huh? So now you know so much about me? Incredible!
>
It's not hard to figure you out. Don't flatter your self by thinking
that you are oh so complex.

Ragnar

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 3, 2008, 9:50:08 AM4/3/08
to
On Apr 2, 5:14 am, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:
> At what weight is a person transformed into a monster?- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

"Monster" is just a figure of speach. But if you want to push the
issue the term monster can easily be applied to the suspect in
question. I think the beating death of her 2 yr. old nephew qualifies.

Ragnar

Message has been deleted

Lady Veteran

unread,
Apr 3, 2008, 8:44:56 PM4/3/08
to
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:01:54 -0600, Omelet <ompo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

My soul is just fine, thank you.

April

unread,
Apr 3, 2008, 8:48:30 PM4/3/08
to
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Ragnar <Ragnar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 2, 5:14=A0am, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Mar 31, 8:35=3DA0pm, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> Sorry fattie, but 1000lbs goes WAY beyond the possibility of BBW.
>> >> >> SSSSSBBW?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> >Agreed. Extemes are never beautiful on either end of the weight scal=

e.
>>
>> >> Who decides what are the extremes of the weight scale and what is
>> >> beautiful?
>>
>> >Of course that becomes a matter of opinion. But for the vast majority
>> >of people, extremes are outside any reasonable range regarding
>> >standards of beauty. Certainly a 1000lb bed-bound monster would fall
>> >into the extreme range, even for the average FA.
>>
>> At what weight is a person transformed into a monster?- Hide quoted text=

-
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>"Monster" is just a figure of speach. But if you want to push the
>issue the term monster can easily be applied to the suspect in
>question. I think the beating death of her 2 yr. old nephew qualifies.

Perhaps you could explain the context for this comment of yours:

From: Ragnar <Ragnar...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: soc.support.fat-acceptance
Subject: Re: 12-year-old girl gets lap band
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:40:43 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1186778443....@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

In years past their were always the occasional fat kids but these so-=20
called fat kids were not the 300lb 10 year old monsters you see today.=20


**************

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 4, 2008, 9:32:13 AM4/4/08
to
On Apr 3, 5:50 pm, Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote:

> Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:39fee2e9-d7f8-4e33...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 1, 7:36 pm, Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote:
> >> Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote
> >> innews:ac334bcb-6d60-42b6-83dc-0c0
> > cc60c7...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
> Millions of people do. You lie.
>
No, you are an idiot. Most adult males have shoulders considerably
wider than 17". Put them in a space physically smaller than themselves
for several hours and they will be uncomfortable. You must not fly
much or know anyone that flies often or you would know this.

BTW, the average airline seating space is based on a 1930s railroad
seating requirement study and is woefully antiquated in the way it
addresses passenger comfort.

> >> > BTW, she gets the second seat for her own comfort as well as
> >> > consideration for others.
>
> >> Thank you for admitting that fat people are an inconvenience to others.
> >> Right on!
>
> > Obviously you missed the point and got it wrong again. Not surprising.
>

> "consideration for others". Didn't you read what you wrote?
>
You don't have to be fat to infringe upon other peoples personal
space. So-called normal people do it everyday. Being considerate of
others is everyones responsibility but I guess you would know about
that.

> >> > Are you as considerate? Would your employer
> >> > consider you as valuable an employee as to be concerned for your
> >> > comfort and welbeing? Judging from the character you have displayed
> >> > here, I think not.
>
> >> How marvellous that you can glean so much from a Usenet post.
>
> > Nothing marvellous about dissecting the typical troll.
>

> Who points out the obvious. Nothing trollish about that.
>
Nonsense response noted.

> >> > It's quite obvious that just because you may not intrude physically
> >> > on others, (yet to be determined) it doesn't make your physical
> >> > presences any less offensive to decent people.
>
> >> Huh? So now you know so much about me? Incredible!
>
> > It's not hard to figure you out. Don't flatter your self by thinking
> > that you are oh so complex.
>

> So how do you figure what my physical appearance is, silly?
>
I don't care about your physical appearance. Where the hell did you
get that impression? In fact your appearance is even any part of the
issue here. I'm totally referring to you attitude.

If you are going to take the time to respond do try and keep up.

Ragnar

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 4, 2008, 9:40:20 AM4/4/08
to
On Apr 3, 7:48 pm, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 2, 5:14=A0am, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:
> >> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Mar 31, 8:35=3DA0pm, ap...@nowhere.com (April) wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> Sorry fattie, but 1000lbs goes WAY beyond the possibility of BBW.
> >> >> >> SSSSSBBW?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >> >Agreed. Extemes are never beautiful on either end of the weight scal=
> e.
>
> >> >> Who decides what are the extremes of the weight scale and what is
> >> >> beautiful?
>
> >> >Of course that becomes a matter of opinion. But for the vast majority
> >> >of people, extremes are outside any reasonable range regarding
> >> >standards of beauty. Certainly a 1000lb bed-bound monster would fall
> >> >into the extreme range, even for the average FA.
>
> >> At what weight is a person transformed into a monster?- Hide quoted text=
>  -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >"Monster" is just a figure of speach. But if you want to push the
> >issue the term monster can easily be applied to the suspect in
> >question. I think the beating death of her 2 yr. old nephew qualifies.
>
> Perhaps you could explain the context for this comment of yours:
>
"Someone or something that is abnormally large and powerful [syn:
giant]"

monster. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage® Dictionary of Idioms
by Christine Ammer. Houghton Mifflin Company. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/monster
(accessed: April 04, 2008).

The word monster can be used in a verity of ways and the above quote
and citation hopefully will make my meaning plain.

Ragnar

> From:  Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com>
> Newsgroups: soc.support.fat-acceptance
> Subject: Re: 12-year-old girl gets lap band
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:40:43 -0700
> Organization:http://groups.google.com
> Message-ID: <1186778443....@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
>
> In years past their were always the occasional fat kids but these so-=20
> called fat kids were not the 300lb 10 year old monsters you see today.=20
>

> **************- Hide quoted text -

Message has been deleted

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 7, 2008, 1:16:29 PM4/7/08
to
On Apr 6, 9:32 pm, Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote:

> Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:d497c7fe-2193-4329...@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 3, 5:50 pm, Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote:
> >> Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote
> >> innews:39fee2e9-d7f8-4e33-85fa-60f
> > c29ecd...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
> Yet millions of people find it so comfortable they keep flying. Normal
> people do not need an extra seat to hold their hefty frame.

>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> > BTW, she gets the second seat for her own comfort as well as
> >> >> > consideration for others.
>
> >> >> Thank you for admitting that fat people are an inconvenience to
> >> >> others.
>
> >> >> Right on!
>
> >> > Obviously you missed the point and got it wrong again. Not
> >> > surprising.
>
> >> "consideration for others". Didn't you read what you wrote?
>
> > You don't have to be fat to infringe upon other peoples personal
> > space. So-called normal people do it everyday. Being considerate of
> > others is everyones responsibility but I guess you would know about
> > that.
>
> Yet normal people don't need to buy an extra airline seat? While you try
> and justify your fat pig wife's flying habits with lame excuses,
> reasonable people don't feel the need to buy extra seats.
>
Being considerate of others is a "lame excuse"???? Why am I not
surprised that a statement like that is comming from the likes of you?
Did you ever stop to think that maybe she just doesn't want people
like the likes of you touching her or rubbing up against her for her
own comfort and safety. Dealing with the trolls here makes me think it
might not be a bad idea.

> >> >> > Are you as considerate? Would your employer
> >> >> > consider you as valuable an employee as to be concerned for your
> >> >> > comfort and welbeing? Judging from the character you have
> >> >> > displayed here, I think not.
>
> >> >> How marvellous that you can glean so much from a Usenet post.
>
> >> > Nothing marvellous about dissecting the typical troll.
>
> >> Who points out the obvious. Nothing trollish about that.
>
> > Nonsense response noted.
>

> Struck dumb, huh?
>
Yeah, but only by your stupidity.

> >> >> > It's quite obvious that just because you may not intrude
> >> >> > physically on others, (yet to be determined) it doesn't make your
> >> >> > physical presences any less offensive to decent people.
>
> >> >> Huh? So now you know so much about me? Incredible!
>
> >> > It's not hard to figure you out. Don't flatter your self by thinking
> >> > that you are oh so complex.
>
> >> So how do you figure what my physical appearance is, silly?
>
> > I don't care about your physical appearance. Where the hell did you
> > get that impression?
>

> "...your physical presences any less offensive to decent people".
>
> Right there. You cared enough to comment on it.
>
No, I'm comenting on your physical presences not you physical
appearance. The two are not one in the same. You could be the best
looking guy in the world but still be an obnoxious fuck and thus you
very presences would be objectionable, dumbass. I didn't think that
concept was all that difficult to figure out even for an idiot like
you.

> > In fact your appearance is even any part of the
> > issue here. I'm totally referring to you attitude.
>
> > If you are going to take the time to respond do try and keep up.
>

> Yes, you should
>
I have kept up but you still appear to be more than a little slow.

Ragnar

Message has been deleted

Ragnar

unread,
Apr 8, 2008, 10:18:04 AM4/8/08
to
On Apr 7, 6:02 pm, Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote:

> Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:66a4ab3b-ae3c-419b...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 6, 9:32 pm, Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote:
> >> Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote
> >> innews:d497c7fe-2193-4329-a104-cd3
> > 0df798...@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
> You ignored this I see.

>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> >> > BTW, she gets the second seat for her own comfort as well as
> >> >> >> > consideration for others.
>
> >> >> >> Thank you for admitting that fat people are an inconvenience to
> >> >> >> others.
>
> >> >> >> Right on!
>
> >> >> > Obviously you missed the point and got it wrong again. Not
> >> >> > surprising.
>
> >> >> "consideration for others". Didn't you read what you wrote?
>
> >> > You don't have to be fat to infringe upon other peoples personal
> >> > space. So-called normal people do it everyday. Being considerate of
> >> > others is everyones responsibility but I guess you would know about
> >> > that.
>
> >> Yet normal people don't need to buy an extra airline seat? While you
> >> try and justify your fat pig wife's flying habits with lame excuses,
> >> reasonable people don't feel the need to buy extra seats.
>
> > Being considerate of others is a "lame excuse"???? Why am I not
> > surprised that a statement like that is comming from the likes of you?
> > Did you ever stop to think that maybe she just doesn't want people
> > like the likes of you touching her or rubbing up against her for her
> > own comfort and safety. Dealing with the trolls here makes me think it
> > might not be a bad idea.
>
> First you say it's being considerate of others, then in the same paragraph
> you change your mind and say it's for her own comfort. Which is it, chubby
> chaser? Well? Which is it?
>
Hey dumbass, It's for the convenience of others as well as her
comfort, did you miss that several posts ago? Or do you have
difficulty retaining basic information provided for you? The comment
you are referring to was a rhetorical statement directed at the
conduct and overall nasty attitude of most trolls within this group.
Obviously you have difficulty understanding the difference between
actual subject matter and rhetoric so I'll try and keep any further
statements as simple as possible as not to confuse your limited
faculties.

>
>
>
>
> >> >> >> > Are you as considerate? Would your employer
> >> >> >> > consider you as valuable an employee as to be concerned for
> >> >> >> > your comfort and welbeing? Judging from the character you have
> >> >> >> > displayed here, I think not.
>
> >> >> >> How marvellous that you can glean so much from a Usenet post.
>
> >> >> > Nothing marvellous about dissecting the typical troll.
>
> >> >> Who points out the obvious. Nothing trollish about that.
>
> >> > Nonsense response noted.
>
> >> Struck dumb, huh?
>
> > Yeah, but only by your stupidity.
>
> How would you know? You are fat.
>
Are you 8 years old? Please make sense if you want a real response.

>
>
>
>
> >> >> >> > It's quite obvious that just because you may not intrude
> >> >> >> > physically on others, (yet to be determined) it doesn't make
> >> >> >> > your physical presences any less offensive to decent people.
>
> >> >> >> Huh? So now you know so much about me? Incredible!
>
> >> >> > It's not hard to figure you out. Don't flatter your self by
> >> >> > thinking that you are oh so complex.
>
> >> >> So how do you figure what my physical appearance is, silly?
>
> >> > I don't care about your physical appearance. Where the hell did you
> >> > get that impression?
>
> >> "...your physical presences any less offensive to decent people".
>
> >> Right there. You cared enough to comment on it.
>
> > No, I'm comenting on your physical presences not you physical
> > appearance. The two are not one in the same. You could be the best
> > looking guy in the world but still be an obnoxious fuck and thus you
> > very presences would be objectionable, dumbass. I didn't think that
> > concept was all that difficult to figure out even for an idiot like
> > you.
>
> So how do you figure what my physical prescence is, silly?
>
Amazing! You actually have no clue as to just how obnoxious I find
you. Read the previous post AGAIN and figure it out.

> >> > In fact your appearance is even any part of the
> >> > issue here. I'm totally referring to you attitude.
>
> >> > If you are going to take the time to respond do try and keep up.
>
> >> Yes, you should
>
> > I have kept up but you still appear to be more than a little slow.
>

> It's a bit difficult when grammatical manglings such as "In fact your
> appearance is even any part of the issue here." are part of your replies.
> Anybody got an Obese to English dictionary?
>
Lame, perhaps you want to move on to pointing out spelling errors as
well?
I guess that's all you've got. Time to move on.
> --
> Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
> back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?- Hide quoted text -
>
Your sign-off statement though meant to be humorous, in reality is
quite fitting. But then again, we all knew that.

Ragnar

Message has been deleted

Lady Veteran

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 2:49:13 PM11/22/09
to
On 29 Mar 2008 01:52:05 -0000, reg...@nowhere.com (Regina) wrote:

>On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>
>>You idiots have her on the gurney with a needle in her arm and she
>>hasn't even been arrested.
>
>Did you even bother to watch the video? The 1,000 pound killer has been
>charged, but she is too fat to be arrested at this time. The police have
>arrested the half ton killer's fat ass sister.
>
>The only reason why you are defending this psychopathic tub of lard is
>because you are both homicidal, morbidly obese Mexican chicanas. If this
>was a white woman, you would be calling for her to be lynched. Your racism
>is well documented.
>
I expect insanity from you, Pinocchio. You are not even a real person

ab...@dizum.com


My racism is documented just like your identity.

You want both sides of the story go to
http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com

Otherwise I care not what you or anyone else thinks.

LV

"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."

---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------

"Some people are only alive because it is
illegal to kill them."

---Anonymous
----------------------------------------------
How does your idiocy measure up?

My Blog http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------
Are you being harassed on Usenet and want to fight
back instead of leaving the net? Are you willing to
stand up to Internet bullies and stalkers?
Join my group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiCHU
----------------------------------------------
"I am mad as hell and I will not take it anymore!"

---Network

ATP*

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 3:07:45 PM11/22/09
to

"Lady Veteran" <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:o85jg5dqh3uldfldm...@4ax.com...

> On 29 Mar 2008 01:52:05 -0000, reg...@nowhere.com (Regina) wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>You idiots have her on the gurney with a needle in her arm and she
>>>hasn't even been arrested.
>>
>>Did you even bother to watch the video? The 1,000 pound killer has been
>>charged, but she is too fat to be arrested at this time. The police have
>>arrested the half ton killer's fat ass sister.
>>
>>The only reason why you are defending this psychopathic tub of lard is
>>because you are both homicidal, morbidly obese Mexican chicanas. If this
>>was a white woman, you would be calling for her to be lynched. Your
>>racism
>>is well documented.
>>
> I expect insanity from you, Pinocchio. You are not even a real person
>
> ab...@dizum.com
>
>
> My racism is documented just like your identity.
>
> You want both sides of the story go to
> http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
>
> Otherwise I care not what you or anyone else thinks.
>
> LV
>
I for one, will be staying as far away as possible from Lady Veteran's log.


wis...@yahoo.com

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:50:11 PM11/22/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:49:13 -0600, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
wrote:

>On 29 Mar 2008 01:52:05 -0000, reg...@nowhere.com (Regina) wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>You idiots have her on the gurney with a needle in her arm and she
>>>hasn't even been arrested.
>>
>>Did you even bother to watch the video? The 1,000 pound killer has been
>>charged, but she is too fat to be arrested at this time. The police have
>>arrested the half ton killer's fat ass sister.
>>
>>The only reason why you are defending this psychopathic tub of lard is
>>because you are both homicidal, morbidly obese Mexican chicanas. If this
>>was a white woman, you would be calling for her to be lynched. Your racism
>>is well documented.
>>
>I expect insanity from you, Pinocchio. You are not even a real person
>
>ab...@dizum.com
>
>
>My racism is documented just like your identity.
>
>You want both sides of the story go to
>http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
>
>Otherwise I care not what you or anyone else thinks.
>
>LV

Bet most politicans would gobble her snatch, take a bit getting to, if
her vote was important.

Death to child and animal abusers.

ted

Patriot Games

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 3:48:00 PM11/23/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:49:13 -0600, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
wrote:
>My racism is documented just like your identity.
>You want both sides of the story go to
>http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
>Otherwise I care not what you or anyone else thinks.

Did eating greasy Beaner pussy make you fat, Lesbo?

No.

Stuffing your big fat facehole with cheese burritos did!

Bwahahahahahahha!!!

extremeone

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:24:54 AM11/25/09
to
Lady Veteran wrote:

>
> My racism is documented just like your identity.
>
> You want both sides of the story go to
> http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
>
> Otherwise I care not what you or anyone else thinks.
>
> LV

are you a hot looking chick or a butch looking bull dyke?

Wildhare

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 5:45:40 PM11/28/09
to

What do you care? A loser like you wouldn't have a chance with either
type. That's how fuck low on the food chain you actually are.

W.

0 new messages