Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Q about paddle material

17 views
Skip to first unread message

Red Demi

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 2:19:12 AM2/11/01
to
random thought of the night...

has anyone ever made paddles out of fiber composites? i figure not all
paddles need to be made out of wood, leather and acrylic.
fiberglass/epoxy-resin composites are cheap, light-weight, thin, and
strong. and you can buy the materials in a lot of places (boating
stores, autobody type places). kevlar/epoxy-resin is much stronger and
more flexible (and yellow!), but last i heard, kevlar was mail-order
only and more expensive.

ya know, sometimes i wonder where these ideas come from.....

demi


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 6:38:40 AM2/11/01
to
Red Demi wrote:
>
> random thought of the night...
>
> has anyone ever made paddles out of fiber composites? i figure not all
> paddles need to be made out of wood, leather and acrylic.
> fiberglass/epoxy-resin composites are cheap, light-weight, thin, and
> strong. and you can buy the materials in a lot of places (boating
> stores, autobody type places). kevlar/epoxy-resin is much stronger and
> more flexible (and yellow!), but last i heard, kevlar was mail-order
> only and more expensive.

When fiberglass fials, the "fracture is "fuzzy" which might be a good
thing.

On the other hand, it also tends to "spray" short lengths of the glass
fiber when it fails, which is *definitely* a bad thing as they can work
into skin and cause various sorts of irritation.

--
Leonard Erickson (aka Shadow)
sha...@krypton.rain.com <--preferred
leo...@qiclab.scn.rain.com <--last resort

Sockermom9

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 1:34:48 PM2/11/01
to
Demi writes:

>has anyone ever made paddles out of fiber composites? i figure not all
>paddles need to be made out of wood, leather and acrylic.

At a party last night, a couple of friends and I were talking about the Toys
From Hell that we'd come across. The gentleman had made a "rubber hose" type
of thing out of what would otherwise have been cut into o-rings for airplanes
engines--a dense, plastic sort of material. Apparently, as his partner said,
it "made you see god" quite easily. She also mentioned a flogger made from the
plastic spaghetti stuff that girls make some sort of craft-projects out of,
that felt like one was being flayed alive. We decided it would make a fun
night, a show and tell of homemade implements of extreme sadism.

Lynn


New to the world of submission? Check out http://members.aol.com/oldrope/ for
some thoughts for newcomers from those who've been there and decided to stick
around.

Philip the Foole

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 2:16:07 PM2/11/01
to
> Sockermom: Ee decided it would make a fun night, a show and tell of homemade implements of extreme sadism.

My own humble contribution to the arsenal of extreme sadism is the
"Foole Clip." These are wooden clothepins that have a pair of push-pins
facing each other to ensure a "non-slip grip." Adjust the pin points so
that they just barely project beyond the wood, not far enough to break
the skin. These things are *incredibly* cruel, and will have most folks
safewording in seconds. To make them more tolerable, put a wing bolt
through the clothespin handles. Tightening the bolt will then hold the
jaws apart. Loosening it will let them come closer together.

Another surprisingly cruel device is a simple loop of thin rubber hose,
with the ends braided into a handle. A friend made one for me as a
gift. It is easily carried in the pocket, with not much more bulk than
a large rubber band. Adam and Gillian have a more elaborate version of
the same concept which they call a "Loopy Johnny."
http://www.aswgt.com/DOCS/3/loopy_johnny.htm

Your Humble Jester,

Philip the Foole

BobP

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 2:55:59 PM2/11/01
to
>>has anyone ever made paddles out of fiber composites? i figure not all
>>paddles need to be made out of wood, leather and acrylic.

In a totally different context, I have learned that carbon composits are even
worse (or at least as bad) as fiberglass when tit comes to micro splinters.

My only experience messing with Kevlar, again in another context, the stuff was
incredibly abrasive. Don't know if all kevlar is like that...


Bob Peerce

"Never store garlic with other victuals."
-- L. Long

You can probably guess what to remove to reply... ^_^

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 3:28:41 PM2/11/01
to
On 11 Feb 2001 19:55:59 GMT, bobp...@aol.comiluvspam (BobP) wrote:

....
=>In a totally different context, I have learned that carbon composits
are even
=>worse (or at least as bad) as fiberglass when tit comes to micro
splinters.
....


A little Freudian slip there, Bob? <g>


--John


Silly Filter #32

Write down the missing letter from each string to find me.

abcdefghiklmnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmnpqrstuvwxyz
abcdefgijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefhijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmnopqstuvwxyz
abcdefghjklmnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklnopqrstuvwxyz

abcdefghijklmnoqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmnopqrsuvwxyz
abcefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

abcdefghijklmopqrstuvwxyz
abcdfghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmnopqrsuvwxyz

Daisy

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 4:16:56 PM2/11/01
to

In article <3a871f66...@news.ptd.net>, Jo...@notmyemail.com wrote:

1 line in response to someone's post, and a
22 line .sig, explaining how to find his email address.

Hey John, could you keep your sigs shorter? I understand that you want
to spam-block your email address, but there are other ways to do it,
that don't require the reader to see 22 lines of text AND go through the
alphabet 20 times in order to translate your email.

In general, Usenet netiquette recommends a sig line no more than 4 lines
long.

http://www.faqs.org/usenet/index.html
has links to various faqs and netiquette guides.

thanks in advance, I hope,
~Daisy~

Binder

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 4:53:31 PM2/11/01
to
Red Demi wrote:
>
> random thought of the night...
>
> has anyone ever made paddles out of fiber composites?

Not yet. <blush> But I've been taught how to work composites, including
mold making, captive foam, and lost foam methods. This was back in my model
airplane days, about 5 years ago, or so.

> i figure not all
> paddles need to be made out of wood, leather and acrylic.
> fiberglass/epoxy-resin composites are cheap, light-weight, thin, and
> strong. and you can buy the materials in a lot of places (boating
> stores, autobody type places). kevlar/epoxy-resin is much stronger and
> more flexible (and yellow!), but last i heard, kevlar was mail-order
> only and more expensive.

If you aren't too squeamish, kevlar can be gotten from wrecking yards. Air
bags aren't reusable, but they are recyclable. The downside to working
kevlar is that it's hell on tools; special shears are adviseable.

IIRC, kevlar by itself as a composite isn't ideal; for model airplane
applications, it was used in combination with carbon fiber and fiberglass,
since the kevlar composite by itself tends to shatter on impact.
Reinforcing with CF and skinning with lightweight fiberglass (or nylon or
wood) results in smoother, stronger, more dent resistant product. When
you've got a 10 pound missile moving at over 100 miles per hour, durability
is important.



> ya know, sometimes i wonder where these ideas come from.....

It's the water. :)

Binder
--
LLEbootLHSLG -- SSBB Dip Corp, Vallejo CA
Spammers will be Spade (see wwww.samspade.org for more info)
SSBB Charter is at: http://www.mindspring.com/~frites/charter.htm

Sockermom9

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 5:12:45 PM2/11/01
to
Philip writes:

>My own humble contribution to the arsenal of extreme sadism is the
>"Foole Clip." These are wooden clothepins that have a pair of push-pins
>facing each other to ensure a "non-slip grip."

Holy fuck! (A phrase I used more than few times last night.) Ow!

Will you send me one so I can bring it to show & tell?

Volcano

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 5:17:43 PM2/11/01
to
Sockermom9 wrote:
>
> She also mentioned a flogger made from the
> plastic spaghetti stuff that girls make some sort of craft-projects out of,
> that felt like one was being flayed alive.

Try heading over to the hardware store and get a coil of screen
spline. Basically, a roughly 1/8" rubber tube with ridges
lengthwise down the outside. A flogger made from this is truly
vicious.

--
,~~~~
/ \
/ \ Volcano - Secretary of Interior for the Foole Administration
Corps Diplomatique SSB; San Antonio, TX
Board Member; Darkest Desires Central Texas

BobP

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 5:45:42 PM2/11/01
to
>carbon composits
>are even
>=>worse (or at least as bad) as fiberglass when tit comes to micro
>splinters.
>....
>
>
>A little Freudian slip there, Bob? <g>
>
>
>--John

How DARE you refer to my freudian slip as little? It is a huge throbbing
Freudian Slip glistening and throbbing hugely....

Oh, never mind.

BTW IRT a later post in this thread, I lIKKE your silly (if long) filter. No
need for anyone to wade through it unless they want to tlak to you, then, why
not get creative... and make 'em WORK for it!

Dem NN Dom

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 5:55:21 PM2/11/01
to
In article <20010211133448...@ng-mk1.aol.com>, socke...@aol.com
(Sockermom9) writes:

>. . . She also mentioned a flogger made from the


>plastic spaghetti stuff that girls make some sort of craft-projects out of,

>that felt like one was being flayed alive. . . .

Ah, The Electric Kool Aid Acid Flogger (TM Elle) I was part of that shopping
trip to Toys R Us. The Mylar Pom Poms(1), Keesh, EKAAF, and a few other things
I can't remember. That was my first non-solo shop/play day.

(1) Later found to be wonderful Violet Wand toys.


Dem NN Dom

Philip the Foole

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 7:50:54 PM2/11/01
to
>> Foole: My own humble contribution to the arsenal of extreme sadism is the "Foole Clip." These are wooden clothepins that have a pair of push-pins facing each other to ensure a "non-slip grip."

> Sockermom: Holy fuck! (A phrase I used more than few times last night.) Ow!


Will you send me one so I can bring it to show & tell?

Foole: Sure, Lynn. I would be *delighted* to provide you with a
custom-made set of Foole Clips for show & tell. I'll just need to take
a couple of measurements first to ah, ensure an exact fit. Meanwhile, I
need a place to put these neat velcro "tool hanger" straps I just bought
at the hardware store. Your wrists will do nicely.

For those who don't live close enough to Spokane for me to take their
nipple measurements, each clip requires one wooden clothespin, two push
pins, and one wing bolt for the fancy version. Drill a hole through
both of the handles and insert the wing bolt through the holes. Drill
holes slightly smaller than the push pins through the jaws, sandpaper
the jaws smooth to avoid splinters, add the push pins to the desired
depth, adjust the wing bolt for desired jaw spread, and you're all set.
Don't overdo the point depth. These things are *very* nasty even when
the points just barely protrude. I *don't* recommend using these on a
clothespin "zipper cord."

Your Humble Jester,

Philip the Foole

Speaking of clothespins, I highly recommend Cleo Dubois' "The Pain
Game."
It contains a clothespin zipper scene that is one of the most intense
moments I've ever seen on video.
http://www.cleodubois.com

Bruce Mills

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 7:52:08 PM2/11/01
to
Dem NN Dom (demn...@aol.com) wrote:

> Ah, The Electric Kool Aid Acid Flogger (TM Elle) I was part of that
> shopping trip to Toys R Us. The Mylar Pom Poms(1), Keesh, EKAAF, and a
> few other things I can't remember. That was my first non-solo shop/play
> day.

> (1) Later found to be wonderful Violet Wand toys.

Do tell?

Bruce
--
I'm into sadism, necrophilia, and bestiality.
But sometimes it just seems that I'm flogging a dead horse.

Bruce Mills

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 7:50:21 PM2/11/01
to
Sockermom9 (socke...@aol.com) wrote:

> She also mentioned a flogger made from the plastic spaghetti stuff that
> girls make some sort of craft-projects out of, that felt like one was
> being flayed alive. We decided it would make a fun night, a show and
> tell of homemade implements of extreme sadism.

Can you be a little more explicit about what this material is?

Bruce
--
"I used to be snow white - then I drifted."

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 8:29:24 PM2/11/01
to
On 11 Feb 2001 21:16:56 GMT, Daisy <da...@zorna.com> wrote:

=>
=>In article <3a871f66...@news.ptd.net>, Jo...@notmyemail.com
wrote:
=>
=>1 line in response to someone's post, and a
=>22 line .sig, explaining how to find his email address.
=>
=>Hey John, could you keep your sigs shorter? I understand that you
want
=>to spam-block your email address, but there are other ways to do it,

=>that don't require the reader to see 22 lines of text AND go through
the
=>alphabet 20 times in order to translate your email.
=>
=>In general, Usenet netiquette recommends a sig line no more than 4
lines
=>long.
=>
=>http://www.faqs.org/usenet/index.html
=>has links to various faqs and netiquette guides.
=>
=>thanks in advance, I hope,
=>~Daisy~


Well, aren't you sweet! But the fact, little one, is that after
having written a few newsgroup FAQs myself over the years (decades,
actually), I am well versed in Usenet etiquette. Like any other body
of rules, some of it is steak and some of it is baloney. The sig
thing being a case in point for meat by-product.

<sigh>

So let's just say that I am one of those cranky old bastards who has
been around forever, has had more names and hookups than he can
remember, and does as he damn well pleases because absolutely no one
can touch him, er, me. Well, except for Carol. When I let her. <g>

If you still want to waste your time, you can write to ab...@ptd.net
with my blessing. No doubt they will grind me into a fine paste with
which to lubricate the Great Internet Machine. And about time, too.


--John

PS: How do you like the new sig? <G>


Write down the missing letter from each string to find me.

abcdefghiklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmnpqrstuvwxyz/abcdefgijklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefhijklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmnopqstuvwxyz/abcdefghjklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmnoqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmnopqrsuvwxyz/abcefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmopqrstuvwxyz/abcdfghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmnopqrsuvwxyz

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 8:40:46 PM2/11/01
to
On 11 Feb 2001 22:45:42 GMT, bobp...@aol.comiluvspam (BobP) wrote:

....
=>BTW IRT a later post in this thread, I lIKKE your silly (if long)
filter. No
=>need for anyone to wade through it unless they want to tlak to you,
then, why
=>not get creative... and make 'em WORK for it!
....


Damn right! <g>


-John


Write down the missing letter from each string to find me.

abcdefghiklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmnpqrstuvwxyz/abcdefgijklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefhijklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmnopqstuvwxyz/abcdefghjklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmnoqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmnopqrsuvwxyz/abcefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmopqrstuvwxyz/abcdfghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz/abcdefghijklmnopqrsuvwxyz

Red Demi

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 9:18:01 PM2/11/01
to
In article <20010211145559...@ng-ct1.aol.com>,

bobp...@aol.comiluvspam (BobP) wrote:
> >>has anyone ever made paddles out of fiber composites? i figure not
all
> >>paddles need to be made out of wood, leather and acrylic.
>
> In a totally different context, I have learned that carbon composits
are even
> worse (or at least as bad) as fiberglass when tit comes to micro
splinters.

well, yes and no. a properly done carbon composite of appropriate
thickness (say 3-5mm, with a small core layer of something else) is
going to be so much stronger than the body of the person you're beating,
that i really wouldn't worry about it. :)

> My only experience messing with Kevlar, again in another context, the
stuff was
> incredibly abrasive. Don't know if all kevlar is like that...
>
> Bob Peerce

yup. very abrasive. and if you're going to cut it to shape, buy the
bulk box of x-acto blades.

Sockermom9

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 10:39:29 PM2/11/01
to
John writes:

>If you still want to waste your time, you can write to ab...@ptd.net
>with my blessing. No doubt they will grind me into a fine paste with
>which to lubricate the Great Internet Machine. And about time, too.

John is a Terribly Important Person. Much too Important to be bothered with
what us little peons think or want. Thus, he's arranged a way for us to become
totally uninterested in figuring out how to email our petty, unimportant ideas
to him, since no one appreciates that he's Important Enough to bother with
figuring out which of 26 letters is missing from nearly-identical strings of
letters. I think John should go do the Important Things that really ought to
occupy his Terribly Important Time, rather than wasting it here. Really, John;
we'll be ok.

Lynn


Sockermom9

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 10:43:35 PM2/11/01
to
Bruce asks:

>> She also mentioned a flogger made from the plastic spaghetti stuff that
>> girls make some sort of craft-projects out of, that felt like one was
>> being flayed alive. We decided it would make a fun night, a show and
>> tell of homemade implements of extreme sadism.
>
>Can you be a little more explicit about what this material is?

Well, she described it, but I didn't get a clear image. I'm hoping I'll get to
see it soon, and then we'll all know.

Dem NN Dom

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 11:24:19 PM2/11/01
to
In article <967c3o$r7c$2...@mohawk.hwcn.org>, aj...@freenet.hamilton.on.ca (Bruce
Mills) writes:

>> shopping trip to Toys R Us. The Mylar Pom Poms(1),

. . .


>> (1) Later found to be wonderful Violet Wand toys.
>
>Do tell?

As Freep reported learning in his recent scene report [1], the VW the can be in
contact with the receiver and anything conductive enough coming near will pull
an arc from said victim (me :^) Mylar being metalized plastic, or is it
plasticized metal? It does nicely. And not a wimpy 5 or so arcs like can be
gotten from a hand but dozens all firing nearly simultaneously.

The actual discovery happened as I was being zapped by two tops in said manner.
Suddenly my foot was on *FIRE*! I brushed it against a stray strand that flew
off the pom poms in an earlier scene. Needless to say we tried it out right
away.

[1] I am surprised that Freep didn't know about the technique as the scene I
mentioned above was in his living room. He must have been otherwise occupied
at the time. It was a great party. Thanks again.

--
Dem NN Dom

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 1:17:24 AM2/12/01
to
On 12 Feb 2001 03:39:29 GMT, socke...@aol.com (Sockermom9) wrote:

....


You're cute. <g>


--John


24# RETLIF MAPS

U?S F?D O?M (TOD) E?C U?S Q?O (TA) N?L J?H S?Q H?F O?M I?G P?N K?I

Philip the Foole

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 1:22:42 AM2/12/01
to
> Jo...@notmyemail.com [to Sockermom]: You're cute. <g>

>
> --John
>
> 24# RETLIF MAPS
>
> U?S F?D O?M (TOD) E?C U?S Q?O (TA) N?L J?H S?Q H?F O?M I?G P?N K?I

Foole: T?R S?H F?D I?G T?R U?S B?Z I?G U?S

Your Humble Jester,

Philip the F?D M?K P?N P?N G?E

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 1:46:53 AM2/12/01
to
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:22:42 -0800, Philip the Foole
<fo...@uswest.net> wrote:

=>> Jo...@notmyemail.com [to Sockermom]: You're cute. <g>

....

=>Foole: T?R S?H F?D I?G T?R U?S B?Z I?G U?S


<H?F> E?C F?D F?D S?Q H?F B?Z

Kirsten M. Berry

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 1:43:32 AM2/12/01
to
Bruce Mills looked up from the want-ads, turned to me and said:

}Sockermom9 (socke...@aol.com) wrote:
}
}> She also mentioned a flogger made from the plastic spaghetti stuff that
}> girls make some sort of craft-projects out of, that felt like one was
}> being flayed alive. We decided it would make a fun night, a show and
}> tell of homemade implements of extreme sadism.
}
}Can you be a little more explicit about what this material is?

If it's what I'm thinking of, it's called (don't ask, I didn't name
it) "boondoggle," and should be available in most craft stores. Think
boy-scout lanyard projects....
--
Kirsten M. Berry, Techno-Dyke at Large ksha...@mindspring.com
http://www.mindspring.com/~kshandra/ Home of the Samurai Webmistress
Once you've come out as a pagan, bisexual, married leatherdyke,
everything else in life is that much easier.

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:35:12 AM2/12/01
to
Philip the Foole wrote:
>
> >> Foole: My own humble contribution to the arsenal of extreme sadism is the "Foole Clip." These are wooden clothepins that have a pair of push-pins facing each other to ensure a "non-slip grip."
>
> > Sockermom: Holy fuck! (A phrase I used more than few times last night.) Ow!
> Will you send me one so I can bring it to show & tell?
>
> Foole: Sure, Lynn. I would be *delighted* to provide you with a
> custom-made set of Foole Clips for show & tell. I'll just need to take
> a couple of measurements first to ah, ensure an exact fit. Meanwhile, I
> need a place to put these neat velcro "tool hanger" straps I just bought
> at the hardware store. Your wrists will do nicely.
>
> For those who don't live close enough to Spokane for me to take their
> nipple measurements,

Gee, I grew up in Spokane. Small world.

If you are ever down in Portland, and don't mind playing with a guy,
maybe you can fit me with a pair?

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:42:25 AM2/12/01
to
Sockermom9 wrote:
>
> Bruce asks:
>
> >> She also mentioned a flogger made from the plastic spaghetti stuff that
> >> girls make some sort of craft-projects out of, that felt like one was
> >> being flayed alive. We decided it would make a fun night, a show and
> >> tell of homemade implements of extreme sadism.
> >
> >Can you be a little more explicit about what this material is?
>
> Well, she described it, but I didn't get a clear image. I'm hoping I'll get to
> see it soon, and then we'll all know.

Sounds like the plastic "lacing" that we braided lanyards out of in
summer camp lo these many years ago.

Philip the Foole

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 9:54:40 AM2/12/01
to
> Leonard Erickson: Gee, I grew up in Spokane. Small world. If you are ever down in Portland, and don't mind playing with a guy maybe you can fit me with a pair?

Foole: I suppose that in the interest of encouraging cultural
diversity, I *might* be willing to expand my range by playing with a guy
someday.

Your Humble Jester,

Philip the Foole

Foole: If you want to pretend to be a native, you've got to pronounce
it Spo KAN.
Margaret Morecock: Why on *Earth* would anyone want to pretend to be a
native of Spo KANE?
- Ancient Kung Foole Proverb

"Are there going to be any men playing together at this party?"
"If I get lucky."
- Ancient Kung Foole Proverb

TyMeDwn1st

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 11:24:45 AM2/12/01
to
demn...@aol.com (Dem NN Dom) wrote:

>As Freep reported learning in his recent scene report [1], the VW the can be
>in
>contact with the receiver and anything conductive enough coming near will
>pull
>an arc from said victim (me :^) Mylar being metalized plastic, or is it
>plasticized metal? It does nicely. And not a wimpy 5 or so arcs like can be
>gotten from a hand but dozens all firing nearly simultaneously.
>
>The actual discovery happened as I was being zapped by two tops in said
>manner.
> Suddenly my foot was on *FIRE*! I brushed it against a stray strand that
>flew
>off the pom poms in an earlier scene. Needless to say we tried it out right
>away.
>
>[1] I am surprised that Freep didn't know about the technique as the scene I
>mentioned above was in his living room. He must have been otherwise occupied
>at the time. It was a great party. Thanks again.

Otherwise occupied? You mean, aside from the fact that it was (if memory
serves) his first party with Alyssa? Whom you and I and many others listened
to, over and over and over <evil grin>?

And *my* thanks, too, for that long ago party; it was my first party, ever.


Ty
Who is mostly just
a slightly skewed
Donna Reed

(To reply via email, simply remove my pearls...)

TyMeDwn1st

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 11:29:40 AM2/12/01
to
Jo...@notmyemail.com wrote:

>Well, aren't you sweet! But the fact, little one, is that after
>having written a few newsgroup FAQs myself over the years (decades,
>actually), I am well versed in Usenet etiquette. Like any other body
>of rules, some of it is steak and some of it is baloney. The sig
>thing being a case in point for meat by-product.
>
><sigh>
>
>So let's just say that I am one of those cranky old bastards who has
>been around forever, has had more names and hookups than he can
>remember, and does as he damn well pleases because absolutely no one
>can touch him, er, me. Well, except for Carol. When I let her. <g>
>
>If you still want to waste your time, you can write to ab...@ptd.net
>with my blessing. No doubt they will grind me into a fine paste with
>which to lubricate the Great Internet Machine. And about time, too.

Asshole.

It was a reasonable request, phrased politely, and in complete accord with the
SSBB charter. Given the way you've posted here thus far, it's pretty hard to
believe you have any familiarity with either usenet conventions *or* with
FAQ's, but at least now you've confirmed your general impression of yourself
and us.

Perhaps you can do what you damned well please somewhere else, where folks
might actually give a shit?

Hans

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 12:05:26 PM2/12/01
to
tymed...@aol.comPEARLS (TyMeDwn1st) wrote IRT John Clueless:

>Perhaps you can do what you damned well please somewhere else,
>where folks might actually give a shit?

What she said.

Hans


Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 12:46:54 PM2/12/01
to
On 12 Feb 2001 16:29:40 GMT, tymed...@aol.comPEARLS (TyMeDwn1st)
wrote:

....

=>Asshole.
=>
=>It was a reasonable request, phrased politely, and in complete
accord with the
=>SSBB charter. Given the way you've posted here thus far, it's
pretty hard to
=>believe you have any familiarity with either usenet conventions *or*
with
=>FAQ's, but at least now you've confirmed your general impression of
yourself
=>and us.
=>
=>Perhaps you can do what you damned well please somewhere else, where
folks
=>might actually give a shit?


And we can only hope that newcomers to s.s.b-b will learn all about
Usenet etiquette from your lovely message. FYI, what you have posted
is commonly referred to as a "flame". A sad lowbrow flame, of course,
but a flame nevertheless.

And isn't flaming just the sort of behaviour that someone like
yourself wants to encourage on Usenet? I mean, people do learn by
example. And you certainly have set the bar at a new low for this
newsgroup. Keep up the good work, Ty. You are an exemplary member of
s.s.b-b.

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 12:47:03 PM2/12/01
to
On 12 Feb 2001 17:05:26 GMT, whyn...@aol.com (Hans) wrote:

=>tymed...@aol.comPEARLS (TyMeDwn1st) wrote IRT John Clueless:
=>
=>>Perhaps you can do what you damned well please somewhere else,
=>>where folks might actually give a shit?
=>
=>What she said.


Hans, my friend, practicing your rimjobs again? <g>

Elisabeth Riba

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 12:46:35 PM2/12/01
to
Well, I'd suggest she take it to e-mail, but you certainly seem damned
and determined to keep anyone from doing that...

Maybe someone with enough time & patience could decode his alphabet
game and share it with the group?

[If you just want to deter spammers from auto-collecting, without making a
nuisance of yourself, there's always ROT-13, you know...]
--
----------> Elisabeth Anne Riba * l...@osmond-riba.org <----------
"[She] is one of the secret masters of the world: a librarian.
They control information. Don't ever piss one off."
- Spider Robinson, "Callahan Touch"

John Warren

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 12:56:20 PM2/12/01
to
<Jo...@notmyemail.com> wrote in message news:3a904809...@news.ptd.net...

> On 12 Feb 2001 16:29:40 GMT, tymed...@aol.comPEARLS (TyMeDwn1st)
> wrote:
>
> ....
>
> =>Asshole.
> =>
> =>It was a reasonable request, phrased politely, and in complete
> accord with the
> =>SSBB charter. Given the way you've posted here thus far, it's
> pretty hard to
> =>believe you have any familiarity with either usenet conventions *or*
> with
> =>FAQ's, but at least now you've confirmed your general impression of
> yourself
> =>and us.
> =>
> =>Perhaps you can do what you damned well please somewhere else, where
> folks
> =>might actually give a shit?
>
>
> And we can only hope that newcomers to s.s.b-b will learn all about
> Usenet etiquette from your lovely message. FYI, what you have posted
> is commonly referred to as a "flame". A sad lowbrow flame, of course,
> but a flame nevertheless.

Actually a flame is a personal (ad hominem) attack. What ty wrote was a
comment on your behavior in this newsgroup... a perfectly on-target comment,
I might add. I'll admit that calling you an asshole may have been over the
edge. It called into disrepute an organ that many in this group use to
advantage. Maybe she should have called you a puss-filled syphilitic
canker. That would be approaching the outer edge of flaming.

But then a newcomer to newsgroups probably isn't aware of the subtle
distinctions in the meanings of words in the vocabularly that more
experienced users employ.

--
Diversified Services supplying toys, books and videos to the scene since
1992
www.diversified--services.com
New department added on 2/09/01 now carrying The Pain Game (Cleo Dubois)


Sockermom9

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 1:02:48 PM2/12/01
to
Leonard asks:

>Sounds like the plastic "lacing" that we braided lanyards out of in
>summer camp lo these many years ago.

It did to me at first, too, but then she said it was round and rubbery. I'll
find out.

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 1:35:03 PM2/12/01
to
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:56:20 -0500, "John Warren" <Men...@bdsbbs.com>
wrote:

=>> On 12 Feb 2001 16:29:40 GMT, tymed...@aol.comPEARLS (TyMeDwn1st)
=>> wrote:
=>>
=>> ....
=>>
=>> =>Asshole.

=>....a flame is a personal attack....


Yes, it is.

Spike

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 1:31:22 PM2/12/01
to

In article <967h4k$1js$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Red Demi <red...@my-deja.com>
wrote:

> [...] a properly done carbon composite of appropriate


> thickness (say 3-5mm, with a small core layer of something else) is
> going to be so much stronger than the body of the person you're beating,
> that i really wouldn't worry about it. :)

This got me thinking... I suspect that fiber composite material would
make a very unusual kind of paddle.

While it's very stiff, composites are also very light. And that means
that that a composite material paddle can't carry as much energy as a
more massive paddle, and (at the same impact velocity) won't displace
nearly as much of the target material as a higher-mass paddle. The
impact (energy transfer) would be very quick and surface-level, as
opposed to the more protracted and "deeper" impact profile of a
high-mass paddle.

So now (a) anyone want to spot-check my material science and/or physics,
and (b) care to speculate as to whether suface-level-impact equals
"stingier"?

-Spike

BobP

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:01:15 PM2/12/01
to
(entire refferent snipped -- so there)

Why care about the long sig? I ask sincerely 'cause I don't get the problem.

I looked at it once, thought it was clever, now when I hit the bottom of the
message and it starts to show up, I stop scrolling down and go on to the next
message.

There seems to be a strong adverse reaction, though, and if anybody can explain
why without calling me an &%@#%$#&, I'd be actually interested in learning.

Or is it just an anti-John thing?


Bob Peerce

"Never store garlic with other victuals."
-- L. Long

You can probably guess what to remove to reply... ^_^

Bacchae

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:17:03 PM2/12/01
to
<Jo...@notmyemail.com> ...

>Keep up the good work, Ty. You are an exemplary member of
> s.s.b-b.

Yes, please do keep up the good work, Ty. You are indeed an exemplary
member of ssbb.

Oh, and John, I agree with Ty. You are an asshole.


- Sandy

BobP

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:15:52 PM2/12/01
to
>
>Bruce
>--
>I'm into sadism, necrophilia, and bestiality.
>But sometimes it just seems that I'm flogging a dead horse.
>
>
I just laughed so hard I am now in physical pain......

And not the fun kind...

BobP

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:19:27 PM2/12/01
to
>> In a totally different context, I have learned that carbon composits
>are even
>> worse (or at least as bad) as fiberglass when tit comes to micro
>splinters.
>
>well, yes and no. a properly done carbon composite of appropriate
>thickness (say 3-5mm, with a small core layer of something else) is
>going to be so much stronger than the body of the person you're beating,
>that i really wouldn't worry about it. :)

I'm not worrying about it breaking or not being strong enough -- even just
handling it , I get little ^#&^ splinters that are a negatively stimulating
pain -- espeecially if it "slips" along the skin at all...

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:30:46 PM2/12/01
to
On 12 Feb 2001 17:46:35 GMT, Elisabeth Riba <l...@osmond-riba.org>
wrote:


=>Well, I'd suggest she take it to e-mail, but you certainly seem
damned
=>and determined to keep anyone from doing that...


Not at all, and I apologize if that's the impression I gave. I didn't
realize that *anyone* would have a problem finding my email addy. My
only concern was with filtering spam. I had no intention of filtering
out other subscribers to s.s.b-b.


=>Maybe someone with enough time & patience could decode his alphabet
=>game and share it with the group?


Okay, *now* I'm confused. Why are "time & patience" required to fill
in a few letters? There's no decoding required, trust me. I haven't
even used a simple substitution cypher, e.g., ROT-13. My spam filters
are just fill-in-the-blanks.


=>[If you just want to deter spammers from auto-collecting, without
making a
=>nuisance of yourself, there's always ROT-13, you know...]


Yes, I know. As do the people running autocollectors, etc. Most
spammers aren't very bright, but a few are. "Never underestimate your
opponent." It requires very little programming experience to write
software that will reconstruct valid addresses from munged ones simply
because most munges are tediously predictable.

Anyway, I appreciate the fact that you've presented yourself in a calm
and reasonable fashion. I have no use for all of the insults,
name-calling, and "me, too!"s that other subscribers to s.s.b-b are
exercising as examples of what they consider to be good Usenet
etiquette.

There seems to be an awful lot of "Do as I Say, Not as I Do" around
here. That's what I call a dead giveaway.

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:33:11 PM2/12/01
to
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:17:03 -0700, "Bacchae"
<bac...@nospam.cadvision.com> wrote:

=><Jo...@notmyemail.com> ...
=>
=>>Keep up the good work, Ty. You are an exemplary member of
=>> s.s.b-b.
=>
=>Yes, please do keep up the good work, Ty. You are indeed an
exemplary
=>member of ssbb.
=>
=>Oh, and John, I agree with Ty. You are an asshole.


<sigh>

And you are a disappointment. So what else is new.

Janet Miles

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:27:26 PM2/12/01
to
BobP <bobp...@aol.comiluvspam> wrote:

> Why care about the long sig? I ask sincerely 'cause I don't get the
> problem.

1. Many people (especially in England, but also other places) pay by the
minute for their phone and internet connections. Unnecessarily long posts
(including but not limited to overly long .sigs and posts that are not
appropriately snipped) cost them unnecessary money.

2. ISPs (Internet Service Providers) have to store the extra text on their
servers; this can translate to additional costs for their customers. Yes,
one long .sig is only a small fraction of the total byte-count of Usenet,
but it does contribute. Also, consider that that one long .sig is being
transmitted and stored thousands of times, all over the world.

3. It is courteous to comply with accepted netiquette.

4. It reduces the likelihood that you will be killfiled on sight for being
clueless.

It's not an anti-John thing, it's an anti-beavis thing. (And you are not a
beavis for asking. You asked for information, you didn't just tell people
that they were wrong and you were right.)

JanetM
posted
--
Janet Miles (jmi...@usit.net) <www.public.usit.net/jmiles>
Loyal Webcrafter: PenUltimate Productions <www.worthlink.net/~ysabet>
Member: SSBB Diplomatic Corps -- East Tennessee
"Bananas in the fridge. Potassium is important." -- Slash Maraud 1/30/00

Bacchae

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 2:43:44 PM2/12/01
to

<Jo...@notmyemail.com> wrote in message ...

>
> Yes, I know. As do the people running autocollectors, etc. Most
> spammers aren't very bright, but a few are. "Never underestimate your
> opponent." It requires very little programming experience to write
> software that will reconstruct valid addresses from munged ones simply
> because most munges are tediously predictable.

I receive no spam simply by "munging" my return e-mail address and spelling
it out in my posts to the group here. That is an extremely simple and
effective way of preventing spam, I have found.

I have two hotmail accounts that I don't get spam on either (well, okay, two
pieces in the year or so I have had them).

The most spam I get is through the business e-mail I monitor and I attribute
that to being listed as a business on various search engines, particularly
Yahoo.

There are much easier ways to prevent spam than the one you have used.


- Sandy

John Warren

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 3:50:45 PM2/12/01
to
"BobP" <bobp...@aol.comiluvspam> wrote in message
news:20010212140115...@ng-fn1.aol.com...

> Or is it just an anti-John thing?

We got more than one John here so I doubt it is a problem with his name. I
think it is simply a reaction to his snotty response to what seemed to be a
reasonable request.

I read three of his increasingly acrimonious responses and then killfiled
him

BobP

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 4:35:04 PM2/12/01
to
> a composite material paddle can't carry as much energy as a
>more massive paddle, and (at the same impact velocity) won't displace
>nearly as much of the target material as a higher-mass paddle. The
>impact (energy transfer) would be very quick and surface-level, as
>opposed to the more protracted and "deeper" impact profile of a
>high-mass paddle.
>
>So now (a) anyone want to spot-check my material science and/or physics,
>and (b) care to speculate as to whether suface-level-impact equals
>"stingier"?
>
>-Spike
>


a) No.

b) Yes?

Spike

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 5:01:43 PM2/12/01
to

In article <20010212163504...@ng-ft1.aol.com>,
bobp...@aol.comiluvspam (BobP) wrote:

> > a composite material paddle can't carry as much energy as a
> >more massive paddle, and (at the same impact velocity) won't displace
> >nearly as much of the target material as a higher-mass paddle. The
> >impact (energy transfer) would be very quick and surface-level, as
> >opposed to the more protracted and "deeper" impact profile of a
> >high-mass paddle.
> >
> >So now (a) anyone want to spot-check my material science and/or physics,
> >and (b) care to speculate as to whether suface-level-impact equals
> >"stingier"?
>
>

> a) No.
>
> b) Yes?

OK, so speculate away...

Do surface-level impacts (flat and/or lightweight toys) feel "stingier"?
Do deeper-level impacts (from more massive toys) feel "thuddier"?

-Spike

Seth J. Fogarty

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 5:28:48 PM2/12/01
to
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 Jo...@notmyemail.com wrote:

> And we can only hope that newcomers to s.s.b-b will learn all about
> Usenet etiquette from your lovely message. FYI, what you have posted
> is commonly referred to as a "flame". A sad lowbrow flame, of course,
> but a flame nevertheless.


-<plonk>-

wonder if he can translate that one too?

Arav bipsum

Aim: Sorrath ICQ: 47462500

The same person. No difference at all. Just a different Sex. -Orlando
(Orlando, 1993)


Robin Lawrie

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 5:30:38 PM2/12/01
to
Philip the Foole <fo...@uswest.net> wrote in message
news:3A87F930...@uswest.net...

> > Leonard Erickson: Gee, I grew up in Spokane. Small world. If you are
ever down in Portland, and don't mind playing with a guy maybe you can fit
me with a pair?
>
> Foole: I suppose that in the interest of encouraging cultural
> diversity, I *might* be willing to expand my range by playing with a guy
> someday.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAA!

Yes, and if I got my new thigh strap on harness for Valentines Day, purely
in the interests of trying out a new gift, I *might* be persuaded to have
*Hot Lesbian Sex* with the girlfriend.

Robin
"That's not where most people pack a cock, you know."
"I'm not most people."

pam a

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 5:39:38 PM2/12/01
to
>Leonard asks:
>
>>Sounds like the plastic "lacing" that we braided lanyards out of in
>>summer camp lo these many years ago.

Master and i have a flogger made out of this type of lacing. It can indeed
be
*very* severe (and one of the few things i've ever "yellowed" on).
Unfortunately, Master doesn't like the handle on it so it almost never gets
used.

Lynn:


>It did to me at first, too, but then she said it was round and rubbery. I'll
>find out.

Mmmm, that sounds like fun, too.

Ya know, i think it's about time i learned how to make toys, there's just
too
many wonderful ideas floating around here.

under the guidance and protection of my Lord and Master Debbie,

pam

Sockermom9

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 5:41:37 PM2/12/01
to
John writes:

>Okay, *now* I'm confused. Why are "time & patience" required to fill
>in a few letters? There's no decoding required, trust me. I haven't
>even used a simple substitution cypher, e.g., ROT-13. My spam filters
>are just fill-in-the-blanks.

Are you kidding? I have to recite the alphabet how many times to earn the
privilege of emailing you? How about just adding "No spam" to your email
address?

>It requires very little programming experience to write
>software that will reconstruct valid addresses from munged ones simply
>because most munges are tediously predictable.

You must have a very serious allergy to spam. I take no steps at all to block
the stuff, and I get at most two or three spam emails a day, out of the three
or four hundred emails I get from participating in four mailing lists and this
newsgroup. I somehow have managed to live, despite this terrible burden.

Sockermom9

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 5:45:12 PM2/12/01
to
Bob asks:

>Why care about the long sig? I ask sincerely 'cause I don't get the problem.

Well, there are times when I use email to respond to a post rather than post it
on the group. Sometimes I'm giving out personal information, sometimes I'm
saying things that I think a person would be better able to "hear" privately.
John's pretty effectively prevented that. Not that I have a lot to say to him;
he hasn't revealed much of himself, nor has he presented us with any problem or
dilemma.

Sswitcher

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 6:03:43 PM2/12/01
to
Frites wrote:
>
> Here's an excerpt of what Emily Postnews says about it:

Yeah, but that was written ages ago when 2400 b.p.s. modems
were state-of-the-art.

Now if you want to see a *really* long sig, take a look at the
"full" 350-line version of James "Kibo" Parry's sig, which can
be found at:

http://www.birdhouse.org/etc/kibosig.txt

------------------------------------------------------------
Frank "Non me tenent vincula, non me tenet clavis,
quero mihi similes , et adiungor pravis."
------------------------------------------------------------

Jo...@notmyemail.com

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 6:03:53 PM2/12/01
to
On 12 Feb 2001 19:01:15 GMT, bobp...@aol.comiluvspam (BobP) wrote:

....

=>There seems to be a strong adverse reaction, though, and if anybody
can explain
=>why without calling me an &%@#%$#&, I'd be actually interested in
learning.

....

You will undoubtedly hear nothing but excuses from this bunch for
their poor behaviour. Trust me. They don't appear to know any
better.

C'ya around, Bob.

Shalon Wood

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 6:38:03 PM2/12/01
to
Jo...@notmyemail.com writes:

It's real simple: Read RFC1855. Then box up your computer and return
it to the store, because you are too stupid to operate one.

Ooh, *good* sigmonster.

Shalon Wood

--
"The PROPER way to handle HTML postings is to cancel the article, then hire a
hitman to kill the poster, his wife and kids, and fuck his dog and smash his
computer into little bits. Anything more is just extremism." - Paul Tomblin

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 6:44:01 PM2/12/01
to
Philip the Foole wrote:
>
> > Leonard Erickson: Gee, I grew up in Spokane. Small world. If you are ever down in Portland, and don't mind playing with a guy maybe you can fit me with a pair?
>
> Foole: I suppose that in the interest of encouraging cultural
> diversity, I *might* be willing to expand my range by playing with a guy
> someday.

Hey., I'm not about to force anybody.

> Foole: If you want to pretend to be a native, you've got to pronounce
> it Spo KAN.
> Margaret Morecock: Why on *Earth* would anyone want to pretend to be a
> native of Spo KANE?
> - Ancient Kung Foole Proverb

*Definitely* not a native, is she? Sort of like "Ore-e-gone" or
"Willa-met".

--
Leonard Erickson (aka Shadow)
sha...@krypton.rain.com <--preferred
leo...@qiclab.scn.rain.com <--last resort

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 6:46:06 PM2/12/01
to
Robin Lawrie wrote:
>
> Philip the Foole <fo...@uswest.net> wrote in message
> news:3A87F930...@uswest.net...
> > > Leonard Erickson: Gee, I grew up in Spokane. Small world. If you are
> ever down in Portland, and don't mind playing with a guy maybe you can fit
> me with a pair?
> >
> > Foole: I suppose that in the interest of encouraging cultural
> > diversity, I *might* be willing to expand my range by playing with a guy
> > someday.
>
> BWHAHAHAHAHAHAA!
>
> Yes, and if I got my new thigh strap on harness for Valentines Day, purely
> in the interests of trying out a new gift, I *might* be persuaded to have
> *Hot Lesbian Sex* with the girlfriend.

Ok, I've obviously put my foot in it clear up to my knee. Oh well, joke
'em if they can't take a fuck... <g>

> "That's not where most people pack a cock, you know."
> "I'm not most people."

Oh-kay... that's an "interesting" image.

Robin Lawrie

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 6:47:49 PM2/12/01
to
Leonard Erickson <sha...@krypton.rain.com> wrote

> Ok, I've obviously put my foot in it clear up to my knee. Oh well, joke
> 'em if they can't take a fuck... <g>

No, I think we may have been a bit unclear here. PtF is quite notorious for
being bisexually switchy and a stunt pervert. Playing with blokes is not an
unknown occurance for him.

Robin


Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 6:53:01 PM2/12/01
to
Jo...@notmyemail.com wrote:
>
> On 12 Feb 2001 17:46:35 GMT, Elisabeth Riba <l...@osmond-riba.org>
> wrote:
>
> =>Well, I'd suggest she take it to e-mail, but you certainly seem
> damned
> =>and determined to keep anyone from doing that...
>
> Not at all, and I apologize if that's the impression I gave. I didn't
> realize that *anyone* would have a problem finding my email addy. My
> only concern was with filtering spam. I had no intention of filtering
> out other subscribers to s.s.b-b.

Maybe not, but the *effect* is the same.

> =>Maybe someone with enough time & patience could decode his alphabet
> =>game and share it with the group?
>
> Okay, *now* I'm confused. Why are "time & patience" required to fill
> in a few letters? There's no decoding required, trust me. I haven't
> even used a simple substitution cypher, e.g., ROT-13. My spam filters
> are just fill-in-the-blanks.

I *like* puzzles. And I took a look at your "find the missing letter in
the alphabet" sig and gave up after a few lines. It just wasn't worth
the trouble. At least not with *this* software.


> Yes, I know. As do the people running autocollectors, etc. Most
> spammers aren't very bright, but a few are. "Never underestimate your
> opponent." It requires very little programming experience to write
> software that will reconstruct valid addresses from munged ones simply
> because most munges are tediously predictable.

Oddly, that happens so *rarely* that it's not worth the hassles you
cause normal users.

> 24# RETLIF MAPS
"SPAM FILTER #42" backwards

> U?S F?D O?M (TOD) E?C U?S Q?O (TA) N?L J?H S?Q H?F O?M I?G P?N K?I

T E N . D T P @ M I R G N H O J

j o h n g r i m @ p t d . n e t

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 6:55:12 PM2/12/01
to
John Warren wrote:
>
> <Jo...@notmyemail.com> wrote in message news:3a904809...@news.ptd.net...

> > On 12 Feb 2001 16:29:40 GMT, tymed...@aol.comPEARLS (TyMeDwn1st)
> > wrote:
> >
> > ....
> >
> > =>Asshole.
> > =>
> > =>It was a reasonable request, phrased politely, and in complete
> > accord with the
> > =>SSBB charter. Given the way you've posted here thus far, it's
> > pretty hard to
> > =>believe you have any familiarity with either usenet conventions *or*
> > with
> > =>FAQ's, but at least now you've confirmed your general impression of
> > yourself
> > =>and us.
> > =>
> > =>Perhaps you can do what you damned well please somewhere else, where
> > folks
> > =>might actually give a shit?

> >
> >
> > And we can only hope that newcomers to s.s.b-b will learn all about
> > Usenet etiquette from your lovely message. FYI, what you have posted
> > is commonly referred to as a "flame". A sad lowbrow flame, of course,
> > but a flame nevertheless.
>
> Actually a flame is a personal (ad hominem) attack. What ty wrote was a
> comment on your behavior in this newsgroup... a perfectly on-target comment,
> I might add. I'll admit that calling you an asshole may have been over the
> edge. It called into disrepute an organ that many in this group use to
> advantage. Maybe she should have called you a puss-filled syphilitic
> canker. That would be approaching the outer edge of flaming.

Tsk, tsk. John whatever are we going to do with you. That's "PUS-filled
syphilitic canker". <g>

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 7:02:20 PM2/12/01
to
Sswitcher wrote:
>
> Frites wrote:
> >
> > Here's an excerpt of what Emily Postnews says about it:
>
> Yeah, but that was written ages ago when 2400 b.p.s. modems
> were state-of-the-art.

On the other hand, some of us get a *direct* newsfeed to out home
systems. Which means we have to transfer the full text of *every*
article as well as store them. Long sigs add up in both transfer time
and disk space.

Even worse are the folks who reply (at the top) to a long message and
don't trim *any* of it. But I blame that more on the never to be
sufficiently damned defaults on Netscape and Internet Explorer.

And let's not even talk about the jerks posting *huge* binaries to
non-binary groups. Or posting far too *many* binaries at once to
binaries groups. I had to dump a couple of binary groups I was fond of
when a couple of idiots got cable modems. They were posting entire
*episodes* of TV programs. Seeing "part X of 1500" is not a pleasant
experience. Especially when each part is over 900k...

LadyGold

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 7:01:18 PM2/12/01
to
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:17:03 -0700, "Bacchae"
<bac...@nospam.cadvision.com> wrote:

<sigh> And now I have to go off and work away from my e-mail. I do
wish I had found this thread a bit sooner. I really would have
enjoyed explaining the world and nettiquette and Ty and other stuff to
Lord John of the Alphabet.

Now I'll just have to make do with...

<aol> Me too, Ty and Sandy, me too! </aol>

LadyGold, High Sheriff of Nettingham, OCF and PBB

P.S. If you're still here Thursday night, Johnny... I'll construct
an appropriate paean to your intelligence. I guarantee it will be
shorter than your .sig.
--
In a world without walls or fences,
Why do we need Windows or Gates?

...stolen from someone else who didn't attribute it either.

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 7:03:32 PM2/12/01
to

Neither do you, given the above comment.

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 7:08:02 PM2/12/01
to
Spike wrote:
>
> In article <967h4k$1js$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Red Demi <red...@my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
> > [...] a properly done carbon composite of appropriate

> > thickness (say 3-5mm, with a small core layer of something else) is
> > going to be so much stronger than the body of the person you're beating,
> > that i really wouldn't worry about it. :)
>
> This got me thinking... I suspect that fiber composite material would
> make a very unusual kind of paddle.
>
> While it's very stiff, composites are also very light. And that means
> that that a composite material paddle can't carry as much energy as a

> more massive paddle, and (at the same impact velocity) won't displace
> nearly as much of the target material as a higher-mass paddle. The
> impact (energy transfer) would be very quick and surface-level, as
> opposed to the more protracted and "deeper" impact profile of a
> high-mass paddle.

Given the above, *I* would be more tempted to try carving a paddle out
of thick (3/4" to 1") thick "slab" of something like UHDP
(ultra-high-density polyethylene). The stuff is heavy, strong, and has
just a bit of give. It's also smooth, won't splinter, and is resistant
to enough chemicals that you could clean it with stuff that'd *dissolve*
many other materials. Thus making "decontamination" much simpler. :-)

Philip the Foole

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 8:05:32 PM2/12/01
to
>>>> Foole: I suppose that in the interest of encouraging cultural diversity, I *might* be willing to expand my range by playing with a guy someday.

>>> Robin: BWHAHAHAHAHAHAA!

Yes, and if I got my new thigh strap on harness for Valentines Day,
purely in the interests of trying out a new gift, I *might* be persuaded
to have *Hot Lesbian Sex* with the girlfriend.

Robin


"That's not where most people pack a cock, you know."
"I'm not most people."

>> Leonard: Ok, I've obviously put my foot in it clear up to my knee. Oh well, joke 'em if they can't take a fuck... <g>

> Robin: No, I think we may have been a bit unclear here. PtF is quite notorious for being bisexually switchy and a stunt pervert. Playing with blokes is not an unknown occurance for him.

Foole: Let's get back to this thigh strap-on harness. You should
probably practice with that thing first before you try it out on your
girl-friend.

Your Humble Jester,

Philip the Foole

The chicks are packed!
- Ancient Kung Foole Proverb (with an appropriate *Hot Lesbian Sex*
double-entendre) from "The Warriors."

The Buddha rests as comfortably in the slippery, winking eye of my
strap-on as he does in your lotus, Cupcake.
- Ancient Kung Foole Proverb by Margaret Morecock

pest

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 7:59:52 PM2/12/01
to
(Possibly not overriding in importance) caveat: the stuff stains easily,
and forever. Maybe you wanna
use black rather than white.

(pest)

"Leonard Erickson" <sha...@krypton.rain.com> wrote in message
news:3A887AE2...@krypton.rain.com...

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 8:36:32 PM2/12/01
to
pest wrote:

<referring to making toys from UHDP>



> (Possibly not overriding in importance) caveat: the stuff stains easily,
> and forever. Maybe you wanna use black rather than white.

Huh? It's impermeable. *How* can it stain? Or are we talking about
different materials?

Robin Lawrie

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 8:28:09 PM2/12/01
to
Philip the Foole <fo...@uswest.net> wrote
> Foole: Let's get back to this thigh strap-on harness. You should
> probably practice with that thing first before you try it out on your
> girl-friend.

You think? Yes, I guess in order to dazzle her with my instant competence in
handling new equipment, and my intuitive grasp of how to fuck women with a
dick attached to my leg, some practice may be an idea.

Hmmm, on second thought, I might get her one too. Simultaneous lesbian thigh
humping action sounds like a very pleasant way to spend an afternoon. Then
perhaps a cup of tea and a sticky bun.

Oh! And FYI, the girls only night at Ken's of Kensington bath house is on
this wedensday. Hundreds of naked women, steam, heated pool, sauna, spa,
girlie porn vids, and a play room (with two slings <g>). Last year, we
managed to get a group of six girls fucking in the spa. We'll be going for
the record this year.

Robin

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 8:33:09 PM2/12/01
to

Ah. Well, that's all right. In fact, it sounds just fine. <g>

Xiphias Gladius

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 8:51:09 PM2/12/01
to
It's threads like this that make me pine for the glory days of
alt.fan.warlord. Anyone know if afw is still active? Or is Usenet just
plain too target-rich to make it worthwhile?

- Ian
--
Marriage, n: The state or condition of a community consisting of a master,
a mistress, and two slaves, making, in all, two. -- Ambrose Bierce
SSBB Diplomatic Corps; Boston, Massachusetts

Shalon Wood

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 10:43:29 PM2/12/01
to
"Robin Lawrie" <rob...@s054.aone.net.au> writes:

> Oh! And FYI, the girls only night at Ken's of Kensington bath house is on
> this wedensday. Hundreds of naked women, steam, heated pool, sauna, spa,
> girlie porn vids, and a play room (with two slings <g>). Last year, we
> managed to get a group of six girls fucking in the spa. We'll be going for
> the record this year.

I wonder if I can get a plane ticket and a sexchange operation within
48 hours....

BobP

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 12:45:40 AM2/13/01
to
> True, but the joys of again and again encountering that
>long sig remain the same.
>

Ahh. At least that will encourage me to change my sig from time to time. And
in the interest of harmony, I'll keep it short and not show you my ASCII
rendering of DaVinci's Greatest Hits....

Bob Peerce

"Never store garlic with other victuals."
-- L. Long

You can probably guess what to remove to reply... ^_^

BobP

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 12:59:09 AM2/13/01
to

>OK, so speculate away...
>
>Do surface-level impacts (flat and/or lightweight toys) feel "stingier"?
>Do deeper-level impacts (from more massive toys) feel "thuddier"?
>
>-Spike
>


OK, but remember, you asked!

And, honesty compels: I am speaking from relatively limited experience (read
ignorant as homemade dirt.)

But, since you asked and all, to me I think a "sting" occurs when you set off
the pain receptors in the skin and that's about all that fires, nueron wise. A
thud seems to happen when you also trigger pressure receptors in the skin, and
deeper in the muscles underneath (I assume there are pressure receptors in the
muscles, but I am not a medical type so could be wrong.)[1]

The neat thing about it all, though, to me, is that the words "sting" and
"thud" were so well chosen that you can sort of instinctively get it without
all the definitons or analysis.

Going further into MHO (YMMV,etc.) the stingy stuff seems to be a lot more
directly stimulating in an erotic sense, for me the thuddy stuff only works
when wrapped in enough trappings -- the situation justifies the thud, the thud
makes the situation more "real," or something, whereas the sting to me is often
a turn on in it's own right.

Does that make sense?

Now I tend to be more of the Stinger than the Stingee, usually, but I try to
remember that reaction (thud needs more situational justificaton, maybe, than
sting) when playing with slavegirl.

Would love to hear other thoughts on that...

Kevin Craig

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 1:07:12 AM2/13/01
to

pest

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 12:57:17 AM2/13/01
to
We are talking about polyethylene, no? (Mind, the variety I worked with MAY
have been merely HDP. Leaving me still highly skeptical of the
impermeability claim for UHDP, based on my experience with HDP.)
It ISN'T chemically impermeable. If you have a piece that is white, it gets
drab quite easily, and takes on shadowy stains from all kinds of exposures,
which ARE then permanently bonded to the surface couple of mm. Only way to
"clean" the stains away is to abrade away the stained part, leaving a less
impermeable exposed surface.
Go with black (assuming it's available.)

(pest)

"Leonard Erickson" <sha...@krypton.rain.com> wrote in message

news:3A888FA0...@krypton.rain.com...

Kevin Craig

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 1:07:55 AM2/13/01
to

Kevin Craig

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 1:07:37 AM2/13/01
to

Kevin Craig

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 1:08:05 AM2/13/01
to

Kevin Craig

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 1:08:16 AM2/13/01
to

Kevin Craig

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 1:08:30 AM2/13/01
to

Kevin Craig

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 1:08:40 AM2/13/01
to

Volcano

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 1:18:34 AM2/13/01
to
Kevin Craig wrote:
>
> In article <3a9254f6...@news.ptd.net>, Jo...@notmyemail.com wrote:
>
> john...@ptd.net

Kevin, I would say that you are repeating yourself, except that you
aren't actually saying anything.

--
,~~~~
/ \
/ \ Volcano - Secretary of Interior for the Foole Administration
Corps Diplomatique SSB; San Antonio, TX
Board Member; Darkest Desires Central Texas

Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 2:18:56 AM2/13/01
to
pest wrote:
>
> We are talking about polyethylene, no? (Mind, the variety I worked with MAY
> have been merely HDP. Leaving me still highly skeptical of the
> impermeability claim for UHDP, based on my experience with HDP.)
> It ISN'T chemically impermeable. If you have a piece that is white, it gets
> drab quite easily, and takes on shadowy stains from all kinds of exposures,
> which ARE then permanently bonded to the surface couple of mm. Only way to
> "clean" the stains away is to abrade away the stained part, leaving a less
> impermeable exposed surface.
> Go with black (assuming it's available.)

UHDP is a lot "harder" and is used for some types of lab gear. It's not
as resistant as teflon, but it's a lot cheaper.

Kevin Craig

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 3:46:17 AM2/13/01
to
In article <3A88D1...@Hotmail.com>, Volcano <Volca...@Hotmail.com> wrote:

> Kevin Craig wrote:
> >
> > In article <3a9254f6...@news.ptd.net>, Jo...@notmyemail.com wrote:
> >
> > john...@ptd.net
>
> Kevin, I would say that you are repeating yourself, except that you
> aren't actually saying anything.

No, I'm saying a mouthful, on behalf of an asshole who takes such care to
hide from the address harvesters.

Kevin

BobP

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 9:49:13 AM2/13/01
to
>> Kevin, I would say that you are repeating yourself, except that you
>> aren't actually saying anything.
>
>No, I'm saying a mouthful, on behalf of an asshole who takes such care to
>hide from the address harvesters.
>
>Kevin
>
>
Ooooh! An e-mail outing!

But will this really make folks MORE open with their e-mails, or just encourage
them to hide them better?

Spike

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 10:43:29 AM2/13/01
to

In article <3A887AE2...@krypton.rain.com>, Leonard Erickson
<sha...@krypton.rain.com> wrote:

> Spike wrote:
> >
> > While it's very stiff, composites are also very light. And that means
> > that that a composite material paddle can't carry as much energy as a
> > more massive paddle, and (at the same impact velocity) won't displace
> > nearly as much of the target material as a higher-mass paddle. The
> > impact (energy transfer) would be very quick and surface-level, as
> > opposed to the more protracted and "deeper" impact profile of a
> > high-mass paddle.
>
> Given the above, *I* would be more tempted to try carving a paddle out
> of thick (3/4" to 1") thick "slab" of something like UHDP
> (ultra-high-density polyethylene). The stuff is heavy, strong, and has
> just a bit of give. It's also smooth, won't splinter, and is resistant
> to enough chemicals that you could clean it with stuff that'd *dissolve*
> many other materials. Thus making "decontamination" much simpler. :-)

I think you're on to something there. I'm sure that somewhere there's a
material scientist looking at a slab of UHDP and thinking *hmmmmmm...*!

Heck- you could even make a serious paddle out of high-density _glass_.
Any glassblowers out there care to comment?

-Spike

Philip the Foole

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 1:01:59 PM2/13/01
to
> Robin Lawrie: Simultaneous lesbian thigh humping action sounds like a very pleasant way to spend an afternoon. Then perhaps a cup of tea and a sticky bun.

Foole: *moan*

One of my more intense erotic experiences was being tied to a torture
table while my partner attached a TENS unit to my balls with alligator
clips, then fucked me with a double-dildo which she also inserted into
herself. A mirrored ceiling above the table enhanced the view.
Unfortunately, she got to thrashing around a bit and knocked the TENS
unit off the table. Luckily, the alligator clips held firm, so the
machine didn't hit the floor.

Your Humble Jester,

Philip the Foole

The last time I saw you,
You looked so much bolder
My famous black strap-on
Rammed up to my shoulders
- Ancient Kung Foole Proverb by Margaret Morecock (after Leonard Cohen's
"Famous Blue Raincoat)

TyMeDwn1st

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 4:52:21 PM2/13/01
to
Volcano Volca...@Hotmail.com wrote:

>Kevin Craig wrote:
>>
>> In article <3a9254f6...@news.ptd.net>, Jo...@notmyemail.com wrote:
>>
>> john...@ptd.net
>
>Kevin, I would say that you are repeating yourself, except that you
>aren't actually saying anything.


The itsy bitsy spider ran down the little post.
Snarfed up the email addy and ran back to its host.
Tossed that little addy into the big spam list,
Then ran back out upon the Web to see who it had missed.

Ty
Who is mostly just
a slightly skewed
Donna Reed

(To reply via email, simply remove my pearls...)

pest

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 5:26:58 PM2/13/01
to
Hmmm. Among several mentions of double-enders in use that I've read, I
haven't yet seen an unambiguous account of whether the vaginal-insertee
partner obtained any real physical benefits from
the action, esp. when the partner on the other end was being rectally
penetrated. I'm curious about the
difficulties, if any, of the relative friction coefficients operating for
the two partners, as well as some
awkwardness involving non-optimal angles.
Can you recall her observations about any of this (or anyone else's)?

(pest)

"Philip the Foole" <fo...@uswest.net> wrote in message
news:3A897696...@uswest.net...

Seth J. Fogarty

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 6:23:34 PM2/13/01
to
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, pest wrote:

> Hmmm. Among several mentions of double-enders in use that I've read, I
> haven't yet seen an unambiguous account of whether the vaginal-insertee
> partner obtained any real physical benefits from
> the action, esp. when the partner on the other end was being rectally
> penetrated. I'm curious about the
> difficulties, if any, of the relative friction coefficients operating for
> the two partners, as well as some
> awkwardness involving non-optimal angles.
> Can you recall her observations about any of this (or anyone else's)?

Depends on the person. I've met people that, er, physically enjoy using
normal, non-user-penatrative, strap-ons. I don't think it's common,
though. And, well, you can contort into SO many positions for
anal-receptive sex :) In general, the j-shaped ones would stimulate the
clitoris more than just penetration, since the pulling and pushing on the
longer end would, assuming the other end is, er, anchored, produce a
torqued rubbing motion.

Arav bipsum

Aim: Sorrath ICQ: 47462500

The same person. No difference at all. Just a different sex. -Orlando
(Orlando, 1992)


Leonard Erickson

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 7:34:02 PM2/13/01
to
Philip the Foole wrote:

> One of my more intense erotic experiences was being tied to a torture
> table while my partner attached a TENS unit to my balls with alligator
> clips, then fucked me with a double-dildo which she also inserted into
> herself.

Just a note. The sensations from a TENS unit are more "interesting" if
you place pads (trimming them to be smaller might be a good idea) on the
balls, and wrap the balls firmly (ace bandage, vet wrap, micropore tape,
that sort of thing) so that the balls can't shift and so the current
actually goes thru them, rather than mostly along the skin of the
scrotum.

> A mirrored ceiling above the table enhanced the view.
> Unfortunately, she got to thrashing around a bit and knocked the TENS
> unit off the table. Luckily, the alligator clips held firm, so the
> machine didn't hit the floor.

Yeah rught. :-)

You mean "luckily the clips held firm so I got some extra pain whe the
unit hit the end of the wires." <g>

Binder

unread,
Feb 13, 2001, 8:01:02 PM2/13/01
to
Spike wrote:
>
> Red Demi wrote:
>
> > [...] a properly done carbon composite of appropriate
> > thickness (say 3-5mm, with a small core layer of something else) is
> > going to be so much stronger than the body of the person you're beating,
> > that i really wouldn't worry about it. :)

[snip]


> While it's very stiff, composites are also very light.

Generally, that's true, but one ought keep in mind that composites are
engineered to be light. They can also be engineered to be haevy.

> And that means
> that that a composite material paddle can't carry as much energy as a
> more massive paddle, and (at the same impact velocity) won't displace
> nearly as much of the target material as a higher-mass paddle.

For any given cross section, of any materials, this will be true as long as
all the moving factors are the same, including (importantly) bounce. A soft
surface won't bounce as much as a had one, and as a result, the impact
force will be lower. Compare a rattan cane with a carbon fiber cane of the
same weight and diameter, and the rattan will impart less energy. IMO, even
a lighter CF cane's impact is harder than that of the rattan.

> The
> impact (energy transfer) would be very quick and surface-level, as
> opposed to the more protracted and "deeper" impact profile of a
> high-mass paddle.

Yup. But, if the weight of the two implements were the same, the composite
would transfer more energy than a less rigid paddle.

> So now (a) anyone want to spot-check my material science and/or physics,
> and (b) care to speculate as to whether suface-level-impact equals
> "stingier"?

I did the first adequately, I hope. As to the second? I don't think so.
Smaller area of impact, and higher relative mass appear to sting more. The
former, I believe, and IIRC my physics lessons, isn't precisely a surface
effect.

Binder
--
LLEbootLHSLG -- SSBB Dip Corp, Vallejo CA
Spammers will be Spade (see wwww.samspade.org for more info)
SSBB Charter is at: http://www.mindspring.com/~frites/charter.htm

Spyral Fox

unread,
Feb 14, 2001, 12:12:00 AM2/14/01
to
In article <20010212174137...@ng-df1.aol.com>, socke...@aol.com
(Sockermom9) writes:

>You must have a very serious allergy to spam. I take no steps at all to
>block
>the stuff, and I get at most two or three spam emails a day, out of the three
>or four hundred emails I get from participating in four mailing lists and
>this
>newsgroup. I somehow have managed to live, despite this terrible burden.

Ditto. Of the three e-mail accounts at home that are enabled,
I get a much larger percentage of spam on the account I run
for an organization -- and use only for webhosting and e-mail
purposes -- than I do either on this account (webhosting and
usenet and e-mail) or on the main account (webhosting and
e-mail). They typically run two to three peices of spam per day,
the same as my work account, but the difference is that the
former only gets a half dozen or so legitimate pieces of e-mail
a week, while my most active account gets several hundred
each day.

- - Spyral Fox
SSBB Diplomatic Corps member & Depooty Charter Enforcer (CLG)

San Diego's Migratory Munch returns in April!
Resource Page: http://members.aol.com/spyralfox/ (not yet updated)
SSBB Cookbook: http://members.aol.com/ssbbcooks/

Spyral Fox

unread,
Feb 14, 2001, 12:12:00 AM2/14/01
to
In article <20010212140115...@ng-fn1.aol.com>,
bobp...@aol.comiluvspam (BobP) writes:

>There seems to be a strong adverse reaction, though, and if anybody can
>explain
>why without calling me an &%@#%$#&, I'd be actually interested in learning.

Because we've got a historical problem on this newsgroup and its
predecessor with people whose siglines grew way the hell out of
proportion to their messages. It's annoying to me, and costly to
many people who pay for their connection by the byte or by time
to have to download one line of original text with 20 or more lines
of .sig at the end. It affects all of us, insofar as the longer the posts
are, the more storage needs to be delegated for the newsgroups,
and this will either affect overall cost due to the hardware needed
or result in a faster expiry. While it's not much on a per-post basis,
it adds up over the thousands of posts made by all.

The grandmasterchampion of this "long-sig" game locally was a
twoll whose .sig file was well over 100 lines in length, and who usually
also managed to quote the entire message he was replying to.

It's an etiquette thing -- usenet protocols are that you should trim
messages when replying, avoid one-line responses most of the
time (it's OK if they're really cogent or funny, and less so if you're
just saying "me, too!") and keep your .sig line at a reasonable length.

The charter for SSBB does allow longer .sigs under specific conditions,
such as when you are including a PGP block, of maximum 20 lines. It
also specifies that commercial .sig line adverts are acceptable if the
.sig is smaller than the original and on-topic section of the body of the
post. Nevertheless, this is a section of the charter that we would probably
word more carefully, were we to write it again today[1], to specify that
.sigs should not be longer than 4-6 lines, per usual usenet conventions.
This amendment cannot be made, as there is no provision to alter
an existing charter, other than by RMgrouping a newsgroup and then
going through the whole charter process again. It is unlikely that
the news.groups mavens would be happy with us if we tried this.


[1] Statement based on previous consensus of threads on .sig
lengths, not on any decision made by the cabal [2]

[2] There is no cabal.

Spyral Fox

unread,
Feb 14, 2001, 12:12:01 AM2/14/01
to
In article <96981u$kbpjg$1...@ID-63352.news.dfncis.de>, "John Warren"
<Men...@bdsbbs.com> writes:

> I'll admit that calling you an asshole may have been over the
>edge. It called into disrepute an organ that many in this group use to
>advantage. Maybe she should have called you a puss-filled syphilitic
>canker.

John, honey, I do very much hope that you meant "pus-filled."
There are lots of places a kittycat will NOT go.

And I fifteenth the suggestion that whats-his-name adhere to
usenet convention, as suggested in the charter, and trim his
.sig file to a reasonable length.

Robin Lawrie

unread,
Feb 14, 2001, 12:13:58 AM2/14/01
to
Shalon Wood <ds...@nospam.dummy.pele.cx> wrote
<about the women's only bath house night>

> I wonder if I can get a plane ticket and a sexchange operation within
> 48 hours....

It's an interesting evening, that's for sure. Last time we heckled the porn
movies, and did special voice overs and dialog additions and sound effects.
We floated one friend around in the spa like a bath toy (well, she did
squeak when squeezed), and I encouraged new friends to put their feet into
the middle while I played with their toes (Mmmmmm <g>). There were 11 girls
in the sling room at one point, which was a bit squishy but fun, and a queue
at the peephole in the door <g>. The indoor pool had a couple of inflatable
ride on pool toys, and so a butch splashing battle erupted at one point. The
cubicles were busy all night, and I amused myself by doing naked chinups on
the door frame, and trying to look very slutty and muscley all at once (a
bit hard to do that "rough trade" look without a flannelette shirt <g>). I'm
not taking the toy bag, but I think I have something in silicone that won't
be affected by chlorine.

If I'm awake enough tomorrow, I'll let you know how it goes tonight.

Robin

Volcano

unread,
Feb 14, 2001, 1:01:57 AM2/14/01
to
Spyral Fox wrote:
>
> In article <20010212174137...@ng-df1.aol.com>, socke...@aol.com
> (Sockermom9) writes:
>
> >You must have a very serious allergy to spam. I take no steps at all to
> >block
> >the stuff, and I get at most two or three spam emails a day,
>
> Ditto. Of the three e-mail accounts at home that are enabled,
> I get a much larger percentage of spam on the account I run
> for an organization -- and use only for webhosting and e-mail
> purposes -- than I do either on this account (webhosting and
> usenet and e-mail) or on the main account (webhosting and
> e-mail).

For that matter, I get far more spam, both percentage and overall,
on my vanilla account than I do on this one. The 'nilla account
is only used for emailing family and for school business.

Kevin Craig

unread,
Feb 14, 2001, 1:40:22 PM2/14/01
to
In article <tmfj8tod8pu80b019...@4ax.com>, Frites
<fri...@address.below> wrote:

> And violating the SSB charter in the process.
>

"... violating the SSB charter"?

For what, a repetitive post?

Okay, ya got me. Mea culpa.

Kevin

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages