soc.clique
TriStar Remailer
A few members of the clique - Jeem, Mikey... ok very few - are entertaining
to read. Most are luzenet dinosaurs from the slimey mudhole of Geektaceous
period.
The clique has seized control of this region with nothing more than naked
force. As one noted sadist once admitted 'Deservin' ain't got nothing to do
with it.'
As most of thier enemies are even weaker than they are this tactic has
worked pretty well though there are exceptions - Steve and Aaron to name
just two.
In a classic example of sociobiology in action the clique reserves it's
deepest and most savage hatred for those who violate its turf and refuse to
obey its arbitrary rules.
What's fascinating about this is that the clique is essentially parasitic.
Assimilants believe they have a divine right to set the rules for the
millions upon millions of people who now use the internet. But they do not
own usenet. No one owns it. They got where they are by winning a few
engagements in a war of all against all. And now they bitch when people
operate on the same nihilistic principles and attack them. ISPs who do not
toss people off based on the word of some biatch or drone quoting from an
ancient moldering FAQ are deemed 'irresponsible.'
If this were a newsgroup where singles issues were discussed this might
have at least some internal logic. But does someone get flamed for
discussing Kosovo or World War II here? No. Not so long as the assimilants
are enjoying the show.
This demonstrates that the concept of 'on topic' or 'appropriate' is
entirely the product of what a self selected mob of character assassins
enjoys reading and has absolutely nothing to do with being single,
relationships, sex, romance or any other vaguely related subject.
The clique does not exist to promote knowledge the clique exists to prevent
knowledge.
So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
Beats the fuck out of me...
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Brock Hannibal
> soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
> A few members of the clique - Jeem, Mikey... ok very few - are entertaining
> to read. Most are luzenet dinosaurs from the slimey mudhole of Geektaceous
> period.
> The clique has seized control of this region with nothing more than naked
> force. As one noted sadist once admitted 'Deservin' ain't got nothing to do
> with it.'
> As most of thier enemies are even weaker than they are this tactic has
> worked pretty well though there are exceptions - Steve and Aaron to name
> just two.
> In a classic example of sociobiology in action the clique reserves it's
> deepest and most savage hatred for those who violate its turf and refuse to
> obey its arbitrary rules.
[snip some more of anti-hive rant]
> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
> Beats the fuck out of me...
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
What's the matter Jackie? Get dumped or somethin'? Quit yer whinin' and
say something useful, or humorous, instead of just trying to lump everyone
into one category and then dis 'em all in one fell swoop.
Where is this clique, anyway. Is Clarice part of it? Dan? Me? Dawn?
Jet? Fuck no, I don't think so.
And what is that shit about this being a singles newgroup? That's only
partly true. What's the soc stand for if not social? Isn't part of being
single about reaching out and talking to others, no matter what the
subject?
--
Brock
"No rules baby"
David J James
TriStar Remailer napisał(a) w wiadomości:
<1999051723...@cache.sb.vossnet.de>...
>soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
>A few members of the clique - Jeem, Mikey... ok very few - are entertaining
>to read. Most are luzenet dinosaurs from the slimey mudhole of Geektaceous
>period.
>The clique has seized control of this region with nothing more than naked
>force. As one noted sadist once admitted 'Deservin' ain't got nothing to do
>with it.'
>As most of thier enemies are even weaker than they are this tactic has
>worked pretty well though there are exceptions - Steve and Aaron to name
>just two.
>In a classic example of sociobiology in action the clique reserves it's
>deepest and most savage hatred for those who violate its turf and refuse to
>obey its arbitrary rules.
>Assimilants believe they have a divine right to set the rules for the
>millions upon millions of people who now use the internet. But they do not
>own usenet. No one owns it. They got where they are by winning a few
>engagements in a war of all against all. And now they bitch when people
>operate on the same nihilistic principles and attack them. ISPs who do not
>toss people off based on the word of some biatch or drone quoting from an
>ancient moldering FAQ are deemed 'irresponsible.'
>If this were a newsgroup where singles issues were discussed this might
>have at least some internal logic. But does someone get flamed for
>discussing Kosovo or World War II here? No. Not so long as the assimilants
>are enjoying the show.
>This demonstrates that the concept of 'on topic' or 'appropriate' is
>entirely the product of what a self selected mob of character assassins
>enjoys reading and has absolutely nothing to do with being single,
>relationships, sex, romance or any other vaguely related subject.
>The clique does not exist to promote knowledge the clique exists to prevent
>knowledge.
>Beats the fuck out of me...
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>
Cheer up and stop moaning, already!
(Probably nothing much good's happening on the boink anyway.)
David.
TriStar Remailer
>On 17 May 1999, TriStar Remailer wrote:
>
ng
>> to read. Most are luzenet dinosaurs from the slimey mudhole of Geektaceou=
s
>> period.
>> The clique has seized control of this region with nothing more than naked
do
>> with it.'
>> As most of thier enemies are even weaker than they are this tactic has
>> worked pretty well though there are exceptions - Steve and Aaron to name
>> just two.
>> In a classic example of sociobiology in action the clique reserves it's
to
>> obey its arbitrary rules.
>
>> Beats the fuck out of me...
>> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>
Your powers are weak.
>Quit yer whinin' and
>say something useful,
Posting here is a waste of time.
>or humorous,
You're old.
You should do something about that.
>instead of just trying to lump everyone
>into one category and then dis 'em all in one fell swoop.
If the clue fits.
>Where is this clique, anyway.
You're choking in it.
>Is Clarice part of it?
No.
>Dan?
Puh-leeze.
>Me?
You're not an assimilant you're an assimilant sycophant.
As this very message I am replying to so clearly demonstrates.
>Dawn?
Bingo.
>Jet?
She's an independent contractor.
>Fuck no, I don't think so.
The clique attends boinks.
hth
>And what is that shit about this being a singles newgroup?
Yeah, what an outlandish idea that is...
>That's only
>partly true.
In practice it isn't true.
>What's the soc stand for if not social?
Sociopath.
>Isn't part of being
>single about reaching out and talking to others, no matter what the
>subject?
Given a sufficiently nonexistent definition of singles topics...
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
TriStar Remailer
>Cheer up and stop moaning, already!
You misspelled flaming.
hth
>(Probably nothing much good's happening on the boink anyway.)
That's a safe bet.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Brock Hannibal
> Charlton Heston wrote:
> >On 17 May 1999, TriStar Remailer wrote:
> >[snip some more of anti-hive rant]
> >
> >> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
> >> Beats the fuck out of me...
> >> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
> >
> >What's the matter Jackie? Get dumped or somethin'?
>
> Your powers are weak.
Shoot some hoops boyo?
> >Quit yer whinin' and
> >say something useful,
>
> Posting here is a waste of time.
Guilty yer honor.
> >or humorous,
> You're old.
> You should do something about that.
That's the same line you use all the time. I husband my powers carefully
and rarely use them except as necessary to attain my goals. I do attain
them, too.
> >instead of just trying to lump everyone
> >into one category and then dis 'em all in one fell swoop.
>
> If the clue fits.
So you admit you were just on a general rant about soc.singles?
> >Where is this clique, anyway?
> You're choking in it.
For a clique there has been an awful lot of rancour among its members
lately. Maybe they all kissed and made up, but I didn't hear about it if
they did.
> >Is Clarice part of it?
> No.
> >Dan?
> Puh-leeze.
> >Me?
> You're not an assimilant you're an assimilant sycophant.
> As this very message I am replying to so clearly demonstrates.
Huh? You're not a Jedi yet, obviously. Almost everyone around here has
taken their shots at me. Hell, a bunch of them defended you against what
they percieved as attacks from me.
> >Dawn?
> Bingo.
> >Jet?
> She's an independent contractor.
So the only one of these regular posters that you think is a hive-member
is Dawn, huh? You've already eliminated Aaron and Steve, and granted
pardons to Jeem and Mikey. With Clarice, Dan, Jet, me and you on the outs,
what's left? Not very friggin' much, just the drve-by drivelers from some
of the other groups.
> >Fuck no, I don't think so.
> The clique attends boinks.
> hth
None of these people attedended this BeachBoink thing. I've never attended
one, nor do I think I ever will. Which isn't to say I might not look
someone up in RL, I just don't think a boink is my style.
> >And what is that shit about this being a singles newgroup?
>
> Yeah, what an outlandish idea that is...
Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long time, so
I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ, That way at least you can
do something useful in your spare time.
> >That's only
> >partly true.
>
> In practice it isn't true.
Yeah, well, it seems tome only a few even care.
> >What's the soc stand for if not social?
>
> Sociopath.
That explains why you're here then.
> >Isn't part of being
> >single about reaching out and talking to others, no matter what the
> >subject?
> Given a sufficiently nonexistent definition of singles topics...
Give us some guidance, oh wise little jackal, or I'll have to talk to
mother.
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
--
Brock
"Put a twenty dollar gold piece on my watch chain
so the boys'll know I died standin' pat."
Susan T Graul
>
> soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
[...]
> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
> Beats the fuck out of me...
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
you're looking for approval.
sue
Crash Street Kidd
>
> On 17 May 1999, TriStar Remailer wrote:
>
> > Charlton Heston wrote:
> > >On 17 May 1999, TriStar Remailer wrote:
>
> > >[snip some more of anti-hive rant]
> > >
> > >> Beats the fuck out of me...
> > >> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
> > >
No way. It is safe right where it is. I am shocked. Shocked. Shocked
that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way. We
will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....
Crash Street Kidd
>
> TriStar Remailer napisał(a) w wiadomości:
> <1999051723...@cache.sb.vossnet.de>...
> >to read. Most are luzenet dinosaurs from the slimey mudhole of Geektaceous
> >period.
> >The clique has seized control of this region with nothing more than naked
> >with it.'
> >As most of thier enemies are even weaker than they are this tactic has
> >worked pretty well though there are exceptions - Steve and Aaron to name
> >just two.
> >In a classic example of sociobiology in action the clique reserves it's
> >obey its arbitrary rules.
> >What's fascinating about this is that the clique is essentially parasitic.
> >Assimilants believe they have a divine right to set the rules for the
> >millions upon millions of people who now use the internet. But they do not
> >own usenet. No one owns it. They got where they are by winning a few
> >engagements in a war of all against all. And now they bitch when people
> >operate on the same nihilistic principles and attack them. ISPs who do not
> >toss people off based on the word of some biatch or drone quoting from an
> >ancient moldering FAQ are deemed 'irresponsible.'
> >If this were a newsgroup where singles issues were discussed this might
> >have at least some internal logic. But does someone get flamed for
> >discussing Kosovo or World War II here? No. Not so long as the assimilants
> >are enjoying the show.
> >This demonstrates that the concept of 'on topic' or 'appropriate' is
> >entirely the product of what a self selected mob of character assassins
> >enjoys reading and has absolutely nothing to do with being single,
> >relationships, sex, romance or any other vaguely related subject.
> >The clique does not exist to promote knowledge the clique exists to prevent
> >knowledge.
> >Beats the fuck out of me...
> > Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
> >
>
Hah! You haven't seen the Merikan beeatches in wet t-shirts obviously.
Crash Street Kidd
>
> David.
Clarice
> >> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long time, so
> >> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
> > CSK wrote:
> > No way. It is safe right where it is.
You mean tree's FAQ?
OF COURSE it's safe, whereever it is.
I mean who would steal or plagiarize a dreary 30-page document 15 years
out of date and so unrelentingly dull that most newbies who even bother
taking a look at it probably think 'holy shit, this group's gotta by a
fucking JOKE!
Does anyone here really expect newcomers to not only read the WHOLE
thing, but take it *seriously*?
I mean stuff like 'how do you pronounce 'soc.' or 'trygve' etc.
Geez, talk about an exercise in condescenion.
Yes, I read tree's FAQ, otherwise I wouldn't be dissing it.
The worst part about it is that it's written in the kind of politely
patronizing, 'let me explain it to you in excrucating detail to be sure
you understand' style that reminds me of textbooks geared toward the
average intellect of an 8-year old.
Which - who knows - may be appropriate for the dinosaur denizens who
defend tree's fossilized faq.
> >I am shocked. Shocked.
> >Shocked that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way.
I'm not.
I've always said there's hope for Brock.
Plus, there ain't no one 'key' that can protect this 'city' from an
all-out effort at the usenet equivalent of urban renewal.
Not to mention revitalization and rejuvenation.
> >We will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
Translation: Brock, your boink attendance privileges have just been
permanently cancelled.
(relax, that's a good thing)
> TriStar Remailer wrote:
> Too late.
> The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Heh.
Last year I witnessed you single-handedly destroy an entire newsgroup of
rabid fat-accepting cultists, who'd gladly have taken out a contract on
your life, if only they'd been clever enough to figure out how.
Now, I'm witnessing you save a newsgroup from descending further into
the final stages of ossification and mind-numbing hiveology dedicated to
driving out anybody with a mind that refuses to be numbed down
sufficiently to adhere or enforce hive-clique standards.
The reason you can do this successfully is because you, unlike the vast
majority of soc.singlers and usenetters at large do clearly understand
that usenet is not static phenomenon, but an ever-evolving entity that
is shaped not by those who got here first, but by those with the guts to
seize the chance to guide this evolutionary process towards their own
ends.
Whatever those ends may be. The journey, after all, is much more
important and interesting than the destination.
C.
Clarice
>
> So the only one of these regular posters that you think is a hive-member
> is Dawn, huh? You've already eliminated Aaron and Steve, and granted
> pardons to Jeem and Mikey. With Clarice, Dan, Jet, me and you on the outs,
> what's left? Not very friggin' much, just the drve-by drivelers from some
> of the other groups.
What do you mean?
I can think of at least 6-7 assimilants here just off the top of my head
who'd qualify as hive members-in-good-standing (and I don't mean the
cross-posters from down the hall), and if I actually took a look at the
regular posters to this group, I could quickly double that list.
And that doesn't even include anyone whose posts I don't read (but they
most likely qualify, too). Or anyone who's been around for a long time
but doesn't post often enough to even register on my radar.
C.
Brock Hannibal
> Brock Hannibal wrote:
>
> >
> > So the only one of these regular posters that you think is a hive-member
> > is Dawn, huh? You've already eliminated Aaron and Steve, and granted
> > pardons to Jeem and Mikey. With Clarice, Dan, Jet, me and you on the outs,
> > what's left? Not very friggin' much, just the drve-by drivelers from some
> > of the other groups.
>
> What do you mean?
> I can think of at least 6-7 assimilants here just off the top of my head
> who'd qualify as hive members-in-good-standing (and I don't mean the
> cross-posters from down the hall), and if I actually took a look at the
> regular posters to this group, I could quickly double that list.
OK, why don't you make a list? Send it to me privately if you wish. It's
maybe that I don't read a lot of 'em or whatever. I can think of another
half dozen that post regularly. Turtoni's been quiet, cbianco is gone,
Crash and John F. are around. Susan Graul and Cheezits pop in once in a
while. Annette and Angela look in now and then and there's Courageous. So
what do we have a hive of 5 or 6 and an anti-hive of 5 or 6? Not much of
a clique.
> And that doesn't even include anyone whose posts I don't read (but they
> most likely qualify, too). Or anyone who's been around for a long time
> but doesn't post often enough to even register on my radar.
>
What qualifies them as a hive member?
TriStar Remailer
>Davey wrote:
>> Cheer up and stop moaning, already!
>> (Probably nothing much good's happening on the boink anyway.)
>
>Hah! You haven't seen the Merikan beeatches in wet t-shirts obviously.
I've explained many times that if anyone here wants to play thier sex cards
right they have to provide Documentation (tm)
Hell, the only assimilant who ever rose to the level of sweetness was Cheezi=
ts.
The rest are typical defensive luzenet biatches.
They'd have to look like Elle Macpherson to even begin to compensate for tha=
t.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
L Marichak
>
>Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>>forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) ponders:
>>>
>>> soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
>>> Beats the fuck out of me...
>>> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>>
>>you're looking for approval.
>
>Yes, that's why I am so kind.
Or perhaps because any kind of attention, positive or negative, is better than
no attention.
:>: LM :<:
Susan T Graul
>
> Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> >forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) ponders:
> >>
> >> soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
> >> Beats the fuck out of me...
> >> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
> >
> >you're looking for approval.
>
> Yes, that's why I am so kind.
no, that'd be why you are so frustrated by this froup. just look at all
the time & energy you put in to posting here (e.g., rewriting the faq,
creating your own, making up clever songs, flaming and flirting, etc.).
you seemed pretty happy when cbianco and leanne were around, but now
most folks are ignoring you. that's not much fun, is it? personally, i
think your stock dropped when you got into promoting hate and nattering
on about a hivemind. the hate thing turned a lot of folks off and the
hivemind thing, well, we've heard it before.
but this is just one theory.
if you don't like that one, here are some other alternatives:
a) you like enough of the regular posters and/or topics of postage that
you stick around. b) you like to argue & there are a lot of
argumentative people here (this is really a variation on a).
c) you don't like anything about this froup but are addicted and can't
control yourself.
d) you are bored and lonely and even negative attention is better than none.
e) you're a control freak (alpha-male-wannabe) and it burns your butt
that you can't get control here.
feel free to add your own thoughts.
sue
Matt Kennel
:This demonstrates that the concept of 'on topic' or 'appropriate' is
:entirely the product of what a self selected mob of character assassins
:enjoys reading and has absolutely nothing to do with being single,
:relationships, sex, romance or any other vaguely related subject.
The last of the old Republic has been swept away.
The regional governors shall now have direct control over their
territories.
: Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
you started this, anyway.
Aaron R. Kulkis
>
> soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
> to read. Most are luzenet dinosaurs from the slimey mudhole of Geektaceous
> period.
> The clique has seized control of this region with nothing more than naked
> force. As one noted sadist once admitted 'Deservin' ain't got nothing to do
> with it.'
> As most of thier enemies are even weaker than they are this tactic has
> worked pretty well though there are exceptions - Steve and Aaron to name
> just two.
> In a classic example of sociobiology in action the clique reserves it's
> deepest and most savage hatred for those who violate its turf and refuse to
> obey its arbitrary rules.
> What's fascinating about this is that the clique is essentially parasitic.
> Assimilants believe they have a divine right to set the rules for the
> millions upon millions of people who now use the internet. But they do not
> own usenet. No one owns it. They got where they are by winning a few
> engagements in a war of all against all. And now they bitch when people
> operate on the same nihilistic principles and attack them. ISPs who do not
> toss people off based on the word of some biatch or drone quoting from an
> ancient moldering FAQ are deemed 'irresponsible.'
> If this were a newsgroup where singles issues were discussed this might
> have at least some internal logic. But does someone get flamed for
> discussing Kosovo or World War II here? No. Not so long as the assimilants
> are enjoying the show.
> entirely the product of what a self selected mob of character assassins
> enjoys reading and has absolutely nothing to do with being single,
> relationships, sex, romance or any other vaguely related subject.
> knowledge.
> Beats the fuck out of me...
A vary good summary of ALL of society, in fact...
Every organization, no matter how good in the beginning, is eventually
taken over by a parasitic hive.
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathalogical liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
Crash Street Kidd
>
> CSK wrote:
> >Taylor wrote:
> >> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long time, s=
> o
> >> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
> >
> >that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way. We
> >will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
>
> The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
If you think that weak old man had the power to give it to you
then you are farther gone than we had feared.
Crash Street Kidd
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Brock Hannibal
>
> forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) wrote:
> >
> > Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> > >forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) ponders:
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
> > >> Beats the fuck out of me...
> > >
> > >you're looking for approval.
> >
> > Yes, that's why I am so kind.
>
> no, that'd be why you are so frustrated by this froup. just look at all
> the time & energy you put in to posting here (e.g., rewriting the faq,
> creating your own, making up clever songs, flaming and flirting, etc.).
> you seemed pretty happy when cbianco and leanne were around, but now
> most folks are ignoring you. that's not much fun, is it? personally, i
> think your stock dropped when you got into promoting hate and nattering
> on about a hivemind. the hate thing turned a lot of folks off and the
> hivemind thing, well, we've heard it before.
>
> but this is just one theory.
>
> if you don't like that one, here are some other alternatives:
>
> a) you like enough of the regular posters and/or topics of postage that
> you stick around. b) you like to argue & there are a lot of
> argumentative people here (this is really a variation on a).
> c) you don't like anything about this froup but are addicted and can't
> control yourself.
> d) you are bored and lonely and even negative attention is better than none.
> e) you're a control freak (alpha-male-wannabe) and it burns your butt
> that you can't get control here.
>
> feel free to add your own thoughts.
>
> sue
Sue, what do you look like in wet T-shirt?
--
Brock
"Put a $20 gold piece on my watch chain so the boys'll know I died
standin' pat"
Crash Street Kidd
>
> > >> Brock Hannibal wrote:
> > >> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long time, so
> > >> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
>
> > > No way. It is safe right where it is.
>
> OF COURSE it's safe, whereever it is.
> I mean who would steal or plagiarize
Explain how you can plagiarize that which is in the public domain.
> a dreary 30-page document 15 years
> out of date and so unrelentingly dull that most newbies who even bother
> taking a look at it probably think 'holy shit, this group's gotta by a
> fucking JOKE!
>
> Does anyone here really expect newcomers to not only read the WHOLE
> thing, but take it *seriously*?
They can read my short version and get by fine.
See Dulcie's sig-file.
> I mean stuff like 'how do you pronounce 'soc.' or 'trygve' etc.
> Geez, talk about an exercise in condescenion.
You see condescension in lots of places, don't you?
> Yes, I read tree's FAQ, otherwise I wouldn't be dissing it.
> The worst part about it is that it's written in the kind of politely
> patronizing, 'let me explain it to you in excrucating detail to be sure
> you understand' style that reminds me of textbooks geared toward the
> average intellect of an 8-year old.
Perhaps that is what it takes for some people.
> Which - who knows - may be appropriate for the dinosaur denizens who
> defend tree's fossilized faq.
Or the dinosaur denizens who diss it.
> > >I am shocked. Shocked.
> > >Shocked that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way.
>
> I'm not.
> I've always said there's hope for Brock.
So Brock should take this as a new opportunity for some drooling?
By the way, before I went a'boinking you wrote about a disappointing
sexual experience with someone who had bragged about his sexual
prowess. I have a question. Have you and Dan gotten any further on
your efforts to get together for some allegedly earth-shattering
sex. As I recall Dan was offering to pay your airfare to Ohio.
> Plus, there ain't no one 'key' that can protect this 'city' from an
> all-out effort at the usenet equivalent of urban renewal.
We shall withstand.
> Not to mention revitalization and rejuvenation.
To make it a safe place to diss fat support groups? Whatever turns
your crank.
> > >We will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
>
> Translation: Brock, your boink attendance privileges have just been
> permanently cancelled.
Like I would do such a thing to Brockie if I even could. My guess is
that Brockie is a bit better in real life than he is in ascii.
> (relax, that's a good thing)
>
> > TriStar Remailer wrote:
> > Too late.
> > The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
> > Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>
> Heh.
That line is so woolvie it is almost eerie.
> Last year I witnessed you single-handedly destroy an entire newsgroup of
> rabid fat-accepting cultists, who'd gladly have taken out a contract on
> your life, if only they'd been clever enough to figure out how.
We don't have to. We have Kimvy, and several Sue's to keep Jackie
honest.
> Now, I'm witnessing you save a newsgroup from descending further into
> the final stages of ossification and mind-numbing hiveology dedicated to
> driving out anybody with a mind that refuses to be numbed down
> sufficiently to adhere or enforce hive-clique standards.
Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..... Anti-hive swarming in full effect.
<SNIP!> Ass suckage.
Crash Street Kidd
> C.
Brock Hannibal
>
> TriStar Remailer wrote:
> >
> > CSK wrote:
> > >> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long time, s=
> > o
> > >> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
> > >
> > >that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way. We
> > >will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
> >
> > The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
>
> then you are farther gone than we had feared.
>
> Crash Street Kidd
You ain't seen nothin' yet! I can still do whatever I decide to do. In
this case I'm going to encourage the newbies to post personal ads so
you'll have plenty to keep you occupied. How many times have you typed
the word dork, anyway? You'd think a person would get bored eventually,
but no, you're like a little fuckin' rat terrier that keeps retrieving a
ball endlessly, mindlessly.
Susan T Graul
>
> Susan T Graul wrote:
> >
[a very helful and thotful leetle post for jackie]
> >
> > feel free to add your own thoughts.
> >
> > sue
>
> Sue, what do you look like in wet T-shirt?
a) wet
b) that's for me and a few hundred of my closest friends to know and you
to find out.
tee hee -- ah ah *ahchoo*
sue
Susan T Graul
>
> Crash Street Kidd wrote:
> >
> > If you think that weak old man had the power to give it to you
> > then you are farther gone than we had feared.
> >
> > Crash Street Kidd
>
> You ain't seen nothin' yet! I can still do whatever I decide to do.
kick up those heels! dance a jib! ahoy there matey! feisty as a colt
in the springtime, our brockie is.
In
> this case I'm going to encourage the newbies to post personal ads so
> you'll have plenty to keep you occupied.
you do that and and and ... we shall be forced to fart in your general
direction.
How many times have you typed
> the word dork, anyway? You'd think a person would get bored eventually,
> but no, you're like a little fuckin' rat terrier that keeps retrieving a
> ball endlessly, mindlessly.
hey hey hey! don't you be talking to crash thata way. he's a sensitive
sould, with the heart of an artist and the brain of a philosopher.
sue, he keeps 'em in the icebox
Brock Hannibal
>
> I laughed, I cried when on Tue, 18 May 1999 18:52:05 -0700, Brock
> >> >
> >> > CSK wrote:
> >> > >Taylor wrote:
> >> > >> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long time, s=
> >> > o
> >> > >> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
> >> > >
> >> > >No way. It is safe right where it is. I am shocked. Shocked. Shocked
> >> > >that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way. We
> >> > >will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
> >> >
> >> > Too late.
> >> > The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
> >>
> >> then you are farther gone than we had feared.
> >>
> >> Crash Street Kidd
> >
> >this case I'm going to encourage the newbies to post personal ads so
> >the word dork, anyway? You'd think a person would get bored eventually,
> >but no, you're like a little fuckin' rat terrier that keeps retrieving a
> >ball endlessly, mindlessly.
>
> all it took was for Clarice to encourage you?
Heh. Heh. I've been holdin' back. My sweet Clarice brings out the best
in me!
> I mean, people have been
> calling you the net.chihuahua for a few months now, ever since you
> showed up and made your mark white-knighting around, two steps behind
> Dawn.
> Now, all of a sudden, you decide to grow a pair
I had the cojones all along Teddy boy.
>...and you saved it all
> up for Crash?
Oh come one, that was pretty mild, just a little trash talkin' to Crash.
> Ted (help me understand...)
HTH
Crash Street Kidd
>
> Crash Street Kidd wrote:
> >
> > TriStar Remailer wrote:
> > >
> > > CSK wrote:
> > > >Taylor wrote:
> > > >> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long time, s=
> > > o
> > > >> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
> > > >
> > > >No way. It is safe right where it is. I am shocked. Shocked. Shocked
> > > >that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way. We
> > > >will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
> > >
> > > Too late.
> > > The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
> >
> > If you think that weak old man had the power to give it to you
> > then you are farther gone than we had feared.
> >
> > Crash Street Kidd
>
> You ain't seen nothin' yet! I can still do whatever I decide to do. In
> this case I'm going to encourage the newbies to post personal ads so
> you'll have plenty to keep you occupied.
If I was the only one flaming them that strategy might work.
> How many times have you typed
> the word dork, anyway? You'd think a person would get bored eventually,
> but no, you're like a little fuckin' rat terrier that keeps retrieving a
> ball endlessly, mindlessly.
I am never bored. Someone has to take out the trash.
Crash Street Kidd
Crash Street Kidd
>
> Brock Hannibal <hami...@teleport.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sue, what do you look like in wet T-shirt?
>
> a) wet
> b) that's for me and a few hundred of my closest friends to know and you
> to find out.
>
> tee hee -- ah ah *ahchoo*
>
Gusundheit. You looked rather fetching. I almost gave you my wallet.
Crash Street Kidd, but Brock doesn't do boinks, tee hee...
> sue
Crash Street Kidd
> > >
> > > If you think that weak old man had the power to give it to you
> > > then you are farther gone than we had feared.
> > >
> > > Crash Street Kidd
> >
> > You ain't seen nothin' yet! I can still do whatever I decide to do.
>
> in the springtime, our brockie is.
>
> > this case I'm going to encourage the newbies to post personal ads so
> > you'll have plenty to keep you occupied.
>
> direction.
>
> > the word dork, anyway? You'd think a person would get bored eventually,
> > but no, you're like a little fuckin' rat terrier that keeps retrieving a
> > ball endlessly, mindlessly.
>
> sould, with the heart of an artist and the brain of a philosopher.
>
> sue, he keeps 'em in the icebox
That way they are ready to pop into the microwave when I want a midnite
snack or the special stand which makes blood bank sundaes is closed.
Crash Street Kidd, vampyre mode on...
TriStar Remailer
>forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) ponders:
>>
>> soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
>
>[...]
>
>> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
>> Beats the fuck out of me...
>> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>
>you're looking for approval.
Yes, that's why I am so kind.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
TriStar Remailer
>Taylor wrote:
>> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long time, s=
o
>> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
>
>No way. It is safe right where it is. I am shocked. Shocked. Shocked
>that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way. We
>will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
Too late.
The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Dawn O' The Dead
<hami...@teleport.com> wrote:
>On 17 May 1999, TriStar Remailer wrote:
>For a clique there has been an awful lot of rancour among its members
>lately. Maybe they all kissed and made up, but I didn't hear about it if
>they did.
>
>> >Is Clarice part of it?
>
>> No.
>
>> >Dan?
>
>> Puh-leeze.
>
>> >Me?
>
>> You're not an assimilant you're an assimilant sycophant.
>> As this very message I am replying to so clearly demonstrates.
>
>Huh? You're not a Jedi yet, obviously. Almost everyone around here has
>taken their shots at me. Hell, a bunch of them defended you against what
>they percieved as attacks from me.
>
>> >Dawn?
>
>> Bingo.
>
>> >Jet?
>
>> She's an independent contractor.
Wow.
I am a hive of one.
Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Dawn
-------------------
It is absurd to divide people into good or bad. People are
either charming or tedious. -Oscar Wilde
George Davenport
>
> Ted Gavin wrote:
> >
> > My goodness, Brock. Such ire. I didn't think you had it in
> > you. And all it took was for Clarice to encourage you?
>
> Heh. Heh. I've been holdin' back. My sweet Clarice brings out
> the best in me!
>
>
> I had the cojones all along Teddy boy.
Maybe Clarice did, too ...?
Nah.
George (who thinks Clarice writes like a German woman)
--
http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/Bluffs/3289/index.html
02/06/99 Ghost Town! (Rice, California)
Ted Gavin
Hannibal <hami...@teleport.com> wrote:
>Crash Street Kidd wrote:
>>
>> TriStar Remailer wrote:
>> >
>> If you think that weak old man had the power to give it to you
>> then you are farther gone than we had feared.
>>
>> Crash Street Kidd
>
>You ain't seen nothin' yet! I can still do whatever I decide to do. In
>this case I'm going to encourage the newbies to post personal ads so
>you'll have plenty to keep you occupied. How many times have you typed
>the word dork, anyway? You'd think a person would get bored eventually,
>but no, you're like a little fuckin' rat terrier that keeps retrieving a
>ball endlessly, mindlessly.
My goodness, Brock. Such ire. I didn't think you had it in you. And
all it took was for Clarice to encourage you? I mean, people have been
calling you the net.chihuahua for a few months now, ever since you
showed up and made your mark white-knighting around, two steps behind
Dawn.
Now, all of a sudden, you decide to grow a pair...and you saved it all
up for Crash?
Ted (help me understand...)
Ted Gavin http://home.att.net/~tedgavin
-----------------------------------------------------
Man is quite insane. He wouldn't know how to create a
maggot and he creates G-ds by the dozen.
TriStar Remailer
han
>no attention.
I'm sure that would make for a pretty interesting discussion in itself but
attention is not the same thing as approval.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
TriStar Remailer
>000, TriStar Remailer <forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply> wrote:
>:entirely the product of what a self selected mob of character assassins
>:enjoys reading and has absolutely nothing to do with being single,
>:relationships, sex, romance or any other vaguely related subject.
>
>
>The regional governors shall now have direct control over their
>territories.
What old republic?
>: Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>
>you started this, anyway.
This place was a hate machine before I ever heard of the internet.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
TriStar Remailer
>>Tokeman wrote:
>>>Brock wrote:
>>> >Dawn?
>>
>>> Bingo.
>>
>>> >Jet?
>>
>>> She's an independent contractor.
>
>Wow.
>
>I am a hive of one.
Brock's list was deliberately incomprehensive.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
L Marichak
>I'm sure that would make for a pretty interesting discussion in itself but
>attention is not the same thing as approval.
True, but seeking attention can be like seeking approval. By intentionally
trying to draw positive attention to one's self, a person is seeking approval
from whomever their audience may be.
For example, take your view of the hive. If a person looks to draw positive
attention from the hive, they will post in a manner that reflects the norms of
the hive. That doesn't mean that they changed their opinion in order to be in
synch with the hive; they merely expressed their own opinion in a public forum
that supports/applauds their viewpoint.
On the other hand, when it comes to negative attention, it seems a bit
different. A person who seeks out negative attention often wants to fit in,
but instead of adapting to the people around them, they want the people around
them to adapt to suit them. They still want their viewpoints to be considered
to be valid/approved of by others, but they want the others to change their
views so that they match theirs. So they try to draw as much attention to
their view, even in the most annoying ways, hoping to wear down the person from
whom they are seeking approval.
The very act of posting (either positive or negative posts ) is an
attention-seeking behavior, because the person doing the posting wants their
ideas to be read by other people.
So back to the issue of you expressing your opinions unkindly. Aren't you
looking for someone to agree with you/approve of your opinion when you dis fat
chicks? If not, why do you bother to post at all? If you are merely trying to
"educate" fat chicks on what you think is a loss of their market value, aren't
you trying to get them to agree with you that they have a problem? If you are
merely trying to be cruel, aren't you looking for them to agree with your
assessment of them?
)> LM <(
Mike Given
>Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>>forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) ponders:
>>> soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
>>[...]
>>> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
>>> Beats the fuck out of me...
>Yes, that's why I am so kind.
<heh>.
Truly, 'tis I that stand alone as the lone fountain of the milk of
human kindness on this newsgroup.
Mikey (..I lactate for you all..)
--
Email: <wowb...@onix.com>
URL: <http://linux.onix.com/~wowbaggr>
Notice - spamming domains terminated with prejudice.
Dawn O' The Dead
<CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>Susan T Graul wrote:
>> sue, he keeps 'em in the icebox
Mmmm. Testcicles.
>That way they are ready to pop into the microwave when I want a midnite
>snack or the special stand which makes blood bank sundaes is closed.
>
>Crash Street Kidd, vampyre mode on...
Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
kim vawryk
Crash Street Kidd <CrashSt...@earthling.net> felt compelled to
state:
>Susan T Graul wrote:
>> Brock Hannibal <hami...@teleport.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sue, what do you look like in wet T-shirt?
>>
>> a) wet
>> b) that's for me and a few hundred of my closest friends to know and you
>> to find out.
Tramp.
>> tee hee -- ah ah *ahchoo*
>
>Gusundheit. You looked rather fetching. I almost gave you my wallet.
SHHHHHHHHHHHHH. You will wake the soc.men and we will all be sorry.
>Crash Street Kidd, but Brock doesn't do boinks, tee hee...
Wrong coast for Brock.
Kim
you stir my soul
and whet my hunger
and weave that spell
that pulls me under
- L Gowan
TriStar Remailer
>forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) wrote:
>>
>> Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>> >forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) ponders:
>> >>
>> >> soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
>> >
>> >[...]
>> >
>> >> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
>> >> Beats the fuck out of me...
>> >
>> >you're looking for approval.
>>
>> Yes, that's why I am so kind.
>
Actually I am sickened by it.
>just look at all
>the time & energy you put in to posting here (e.g., rewriting the faq,
>creating your own, making up clever songs, flaming and flirting, etc.).
We all have our crosses to bear.
>you seemed pretty happy when cbianco and leanne were around, but now
>most folks are ignoring you.
Some people are trying to ignore me but others have joined in.
I do miss cb and Leanne but I had already begun posting on many of the
topics that have alienated assimilants like you when they were still here.
>that's not much fun, is it?
Yeah, I'm being ignored.
That's why you didn't reply to my post.
>personally, i
>think your stock dropped when you got into promoting hate and nattering
>on about a hivemind.
No, my stock dropped when I stopped aiding and abetting the perimeter defens=
e.
If I wanted approval I could just go back to tossing people into the blood
drenched gears.
But I won't.
It isn't worth it.
>the hate thing turned a lot of folks off
If that's so why do they keep doing it?
>and the
>hivemind thing, well, we've heard it before.
'These are old charges'
>if you don't like that one, here are some other alternatives:
In other words you really have no idea.
Big surprise there.
>a) you like enough of the regular posters and/or topics of postage that
>you stick around.
That's part of it.
>b) you like to argue & there are a lot of
>argumentative people here (this is really a variation on a).
>c) you don't like anything about this froup but are addicted and can't
>control yourself.
>d) you are bored and lonely and even negative attention is better than none=
=2E
My heart it is breakink.
>e) you're a control freak (alpha-male-wannabe) and it burns your butt
>that you can't get control here.
I haven't seen tree post in quite some time...
>feel free to add your own thoughts.
How does it feel to be part of a hate group?
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Clarice
>
> Clarice wrote:
> >
> > > >> Brock Hannibal wrote:
> > > >> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long time, so
> > > >> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
> >
> > > > No way. It is safe right where it is.
> >
> > OF COURSE it's safe, whereever it is.
> > I mean who would steal or plagiarize
>
> Explain how you can plagiarize that which is in the public domain.
I meant plagiarize in the sense of 'passing someone else's work off as
your own'.
I mean why would anyone even want to be *mistaken* for the author of
that verbal sleeping pill, not to mention *claim* authorship?
>
> > a dreary 30-page document 15 years
> > out of date and so unrelentingly dull that most newbies who even bother
> > taking a look at it probably think 'holy shit, this group's gotta by a
> > fucking JOKE!
> >
> > Does anyone here really expect newcomers to not only read the WHOLE
> > thing, but take it *seriously*?
>
> They can read my short version and get by fine.
> See Dulcie's sig-file.
Exactly.
Couple dozen words, tops.
Which begs the question....
> > I mean stuff like 'how do you pronounce 'soc.' or 'trygve' etc.
> > Geez, talk about an exercise in condescenion.
>
> You see condescension in lots of places, don't you?
I see a lot of things.
>
> > Yes, I read tree's FAQ, otherwise I wouldn't be dissing it.
> > The worst part about it is that it's written in the kind of politely
> > patronizing, 'let me explain it to you in excrucating detail to be sure
> > you understand' style that reminds me of textbooks geared toward the
> > average intellect of an 8-year old.
>
> Perhaps that is what it takes for some people.
Speaking of condescension....
>
> > Which - who knows - may be appropriate for the dinosaur denizens who
> > defend tree's fossilized faq.
>
> Or the dinosaur denizens who diss it.
And the purpose of that would be precisely what? Writing a faq, that is,
appropriate for those who dis it?
>
> > > >I am shocked. Shocked.
> > > >Shocked that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way.
> >
> > I'm not.
> > I've always said there's hope for Brock.
>
> So Brock should take this as a new opportunity for some drooling?
Drooling? As in drooling over me?
You misunderstand.
What I meant to say about Brock is that he appears to understand why
Jackie's faq is cooler and more clueful than tree's brittle tome.
> By the way, before I went a'boinking you wrote about a disappointing
> sexual experience with someone who had bragged about his sexual
> prowess.
Not 'bragged' so much as indicated he was good to go.
Turned out he was just bluffing. Or something.
> I have a question. Have you and Dan gotten any further on
> your efforts to get together for some allegedly earth-shattering
> sex?
Did you actually ever score with that cute hockey fan you were bragging
about before you went a'boinking, or didn't she give you her attention
after all, despite her alleged allure?
> As I recall Dan was offering to pay your airfare to Ohio.
You recall incorrectly.
His exact words were that he would be 'willing to underwrite travel
expenses'.
Hell, until just now I didn't even know he lived in Ohio, if that is, in
fact, why you mention Ohio as a rendezvous point.
> > Plus, there ain't no one 'key' that can protect this 'city' from an
> > all-out effort at the usenet equivalent of urban renewal.
>
> We shall withstand.
Rule for a 1,000 years, you will.
>
> > Not to mention revitalization and rejuvenation.
>
> To make it a safe place to diss fat support groups? Whatever turns
> your crank.
No, AS IF dissing fat support groups is "unsafe" to do here.
I meant revitalization and rejuvenation in the literal sense of the
words.
>
> > > >We will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
> >
> > Translation: Brock, your boink attendance privileges have just been
> > permanently cancelled.
>
> Like I would do such a thing to Brockie if I even could. My guess is
> that Brockie is a bit better in real life than he is in ascii.
>
> > (relax, that's a good thing)
> >
> > > TriStar Remailer wrote:
> > > Too late.
> > > The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
> > > Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
> >
> > Heh.
>
> That line is so woolvie it is almost eerie.
Palindromes are my specialty.
>
> > Last year I witnessed you single-handedly destroy an entire newsgroup of
> > rabid fat-accepting cultists, who'd gladly have taken out a contract on
> > your life, if only they'd been clever enough to figure out how.
>
> We don't have to. We have Kimvy, and several Sue's to keep Jackie
> honest.
Huh?
I read ssfa before, during and after Jackie's appearance, and when he
says he fucking destroyed that group, he isn't dishonest, he's reporting
the news.
> > Now, I'm witnessing you save a newsgroup from descending further into
> > the final stages of ossification and mind-numbing hiveology dedicated to
> > driving out anybody with a mind that refuses to be numbed down
> > sufficiently to adhere or enforce hive-clique standards.
>
> Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..... Anti-hive swarming in full effect.
And to think this group used to be such a boring place...
>
> <SNIP!> Ass suckage.
The hive smooches, while the rest of us suck each other's asses.
Btw, do you do anal?
C.
TriStar Remailer
> We don't have to. We have Kimvy, and several Sue's to keep Jackie
> honest.
In the end everyone here conceded that I was right about the fat issue.
Hard as they might have tried to softpedal the backpedaling.
or: Who is better looking, Enialle or Dawn?
Oh, and you're the one to talk about honesty lyingsackofshit assimilantboy.
Tell me more about how innocent people who post personal ads are evil...
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
TriStar Remailer
>TriStar Remailer wrote:
>>
>> CSK wrote:
>> >> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long
>> o
>> >> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
>> >
>> >that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way. We
>> >will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
>>
>> The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
>
>then you are farther gone than we had feared.
He did not give it to me.
I took it.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
speaker for soc.singles
TriStar Remailer
>On the other hand, when it comes to negative attention, it seems a bit
,
>but instead of adapting to the people around them, they want the people aro=
und
>them to adapt to suit them. They still want their viewpoints to be conside=
red
>to be valid/approved of by others, but they want the others to change their
>views so that they match theirs. So they try to draw as much attention to
>their view, even in the most annoying ways, hoping to wear down the person
>from
>whom they are seeking approval.
You're quite full of shit.
No surprise there.
I am not persuading I am engaging in social engineering.
I've spelled it out many times.
I don't want your approval I want to throw a wrench into your machine.
It seems to be working.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
L Marichak
>
>You're quite full of shit.
>No surprise there.
>I am not persuading I am engaging in social engineering.
>I've spelled it out many times.
>I don't want your approval I want to throw a wrench into your machine.
>It seems to be working.
You want the machine to work your way.
You want people to tell you how clever you are for you little ditties and your
FAQ.
LM
Angela C. Lukach
Susan T Graul (sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu) writes:
the Hive of One bitched -
>> >
>> >> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
>> >> Beats the fuck out of me...
[sue's other theories snipped]
> d) you are bored and lonely and even negative attention is better than
> none.
> e) you're a control freak (alpha-male-wannabe) and it burns your butt
> that you can't get control here.
>
> feel free to add your own thoughts.
okay... i like these last 2 best.
angie
--
In Honour of Gwyn & Andre's Wedding on May 29th:
the Breeds of the Month are Gaolao & Alberes!
Visit the Cow Palace - www.cyberus.ca/~angela
Le Comte d'Ogre
TriStar Remailer <forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply> wrote:
>CSK wrote:
>> We don't have to. We have Kimvy, and several Sue's to keep Jackie
>> honest.
>
>In the end everyone here conceded that I was right about the fat issue.
Everyone?
>or: Who is better looking, Enialle or Dawn?
Couldn't tell ya. Haven't met either one.
--
"Most people learn from their past mistakes and in future lives go on
to grow into better people. Others, who don't, become ogres."
- E. A. Scarborough, _The Godmother_
Portrait of an Ogre: http://www.iglou.com/profile/view.cgi/ogre
Brock Hannibal
You be a good boy Jackie and do as you're told, and I won't have to tell
your mother.
TriStar Remailer
>TriStar Remailer wrote:
>>
>> CSK wrote:
>> >TriStar Remailer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> CSK wrote:
>> >> >Taylor wrote:
>> >> >> Fix the FAQ, then. Trygve and Portia haven't been seen for a long
>> >> o
>> >> >> I hereby appoint you as the keeper of the FAQ,
>> >> >
>> >> >No way. It is safe right where it is. I am shocked. Shocked. Shocked
>> >> >that you would hand the keys to the city to Jackie in that way. We
>> >> >will have to make note of your indiscretion in your permanent record.
>> >>
>> >> Too late.
>> >> The FAQ, like this group, is now mine.
>> >
>> >If you think that weak old man had the power to give it to you
>> >then you are farther gone than we had feared.
>>
>> He did not give it to me.
>> I took it.
>> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>> speaker for soc.singles
>
>You be a good boy Jackie and do as you're told, and I won't have to tell
>your mother.
Sometimes the only way to be good is not to do what they told ya.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
David J James
<1999051917...@cache.sb.vossnet.de>...
>He did not give it to me.
>I took it.
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
> speaker for soc.singles
That reminds me, Mr Speaker, of a quote from the good old days of yore, when
I used to skip Bible Study on a Wednesday evening and go and furtively watch
a certain classic series...
" 'Real power's not something that they give to you, boaiy, real power's
something thatcha take'. That's what mah Daddy said before he died " (J.R.
Ewing, episode 1509 or thereabouts)
D.
TriStar Remailer
>Jackie wrote:
>>You're quite full of shit.
>>No surprise there.
>>I am not persuading I am engaging in social engineering.
>>I've spelled it out many times.
>>I don't want your approval I want to throw a wrench into your machine.
>>It seems to be working.
>
>You want the machine to work your way.
Working has got nothing to do with it.
>You want people to tell you how clever you are for you little ditties and y=
our
>FAQ.
I posted hundreds of messages on ssfa to a completely hostile audience. The
more clever I was the more they hated me.
Approval has got nothing to do with it.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
TriStar Remailer
>In article <1999051917...@cache.sb.vossnet.de>,
>TriStar Remailer <forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply> wrote:
>>CSK wrote:
>>> We don't have to. We have Kimvy, and several Sue's to keep Jackie
>>> honest.
>>
>>In the end everyone here conceded that I was right about the fat issue.
>
>Everyone?
Yes.
Unless you would like to go on the record disputing my point that women 100
pounds overweight or more are not desirable to the vast majority (over 90%)
of men.
In addition not one assimilant is a fatty fucker. Fereria, Crash and Tree
all admitted that they prefer slender fit women to obese ones.
Though that may have changed... if you consider Steve Chaney to be an
assimilant.
>>or: Who is better looking, Enialle or Dawn?
>
>Couldn't tell ya. Haven't met either one.
But CSK has.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
TriStar Remailer
>Susan T Graul (sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu) writes:
>the Hive of One bitched -
>>> >
>>> >> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
>>> >> Beats the fuck out of me...
>
>[sue's other theories snipped]
>
>> d) you are bored and lonely and even negative attention is better than
>> none.
>> e) you're a control freak (alpha-male-wannabe) and it burns your butt
>> that you can't get control here.
>>
>> feel free to add your own thoughts.
>
>okay... i like these last 2 best.
Gee, that wasn't predictable at all.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
hive, what hive?
L Marichak
>lmar...@aol.com86spam (L Marichak) bzzzd:
>>Jackie wrote:
>>>You're quite full of shit.
>>>No surprise there.
>>>I am not persuading I am engaging in social engineering.
>>>I've spelled it out many times.
>>>I don't want your approval I want to throw a wrench into your machine.
>>>It seems to be working.
>>
>>You want the machine to work your way.
>
>Working has got nothing to do with it.
Then what is it about?
>
>>You want people to tell you how clever you are for you little ditties and y=
>our
>>FAQ.
>
>I posted hundreds of messages on ssfa to a completely hostile audience. The
>more clever I was the more they hated me.
Why do you think that they hated you for it?
And what about soc.singles? Wouldn't you be a wee bit disappointed if you FAQ
and songs were completely ignored?
>Approval has got nothing to do with it.
Then why do it?
All attention-seeking behavior is not approval seeking, but it can be that
sometimes. It could be that you find it intrinsically rewarding to be on
attack-mode and inflict pain. I'm just wondering why it would be worth your
time.
>: LM :<
Aaron R. Kulkis
Very True. Soc.Singles has been a hate-machine since it's inception.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathalogical liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
Crash Street Kidd
>
> Crash Street Kidd wrote:
> >
> > Clarice wrote:
> > >
> > > > >> Brock Hannibal wrote:
[The soc.singles FAQ:]
> I mean why would anyone even want to be *mistaken* for the author of
> that verbal sleeping pill, not to mention *claim* authorship?
It serves its purpose. There have been those who have commented
favourably on the sense of humour displayed.
> > > Does anyone here really expect newcomers to not only read the WHOLE
> > > thing, but take it *seriously*?
> >
> > They can read my short version and get by fine.
> > See Dulcie's sig-file.
>
> Exactly.
> Couple dozen words, tops.
> Which begs the question....
Some people like to read the official FAQ.
> > > Yes, I read tree's FAQ, otherwise I wouldn't be dissing it.
> > > The worst part about it is that it's written in the kind of politely
> > > patronizing, 'let me explain it to you in excrucating detail to be sure
> > > you understand' style that reminds me of textbooks geared toward the
> > > average intellect of an 8-year old.
> >
> > Perhaps that is what it takes for some people.
>
> Speaking of condescension....
Hey I could not possibly be as condescending as some of them deserve.
I get their vacuous insults and empty threats in my inbox. The ones
with entertainment value I repost.
> > > Which - who knows - may be appropriate for the dinosaur denizens who
> > > defend tree's fossilized faq.
> >
> > Or the dinosaur denizens who diss it.
>
> And the purpose of that would be precisely what? Writing a faq, that is,
> appropriate for those who dis it?
I don't think the FAQ is bad. Its purpose is to communicate what
soc.singles is about. It does the job.
> > > I've always said there's hope for Brock.
> >
> > So Brock should take this as a new opportunity for some drooling?
>
> Drooling? As in drooling over me?
> You misunderstand.
> What I meant to say about Brock is that he appears to understand why
> Jackie's faq is cooler and more clueful than tree's brittle tome.
Jackie's faq is a parody. It is easier to write a parody than the
original, not that I intend to get drawn into a long discussion
about the literary merits of the FAQ vs. Jackie's parodies.
> > By the way, before I went a'boinking you wrote about a disappointing
> > sexual experience with someone who had bragged about his sexual
> > prowess.
>
> Not 'bragged' so much as indicated he was good to go.
> Turned out he was just bluffing. Or something.
Condolences to you.
> > I have a question. Have you and Dan gotten any further on
> > your efforts to get together for some allegedly earth-shattering
> > sex?
>
> Did you actually ever score with that cute hockey fan you were bragging
> about before you went a'boinking, or didn't she give you her attention
> after all, despite her alleged allure?
You confuse public mawkishness with bragging. The very idea that
I would stop posting from under my bed long enough to exchange
email with such a lovely, luscious woman or or actually meet such
a gorgeous creature is just so ridiculous that it strains all
credulity. To suggest that I might go to a boink is obviously
an attempt by my eeeevil roommate to assassinate my character.
> > As I recall Dan was offering to pay your airfare to Ohio.
>
> You recall incorrectly.
> His exact words were that he would be 'willing to underwrite travel
> expenses'.
That sure sounds like offering to pay to me.
> Hell, until just now I didn't even know he lived in Ohio, if that is, in
> fact, why you mention Ohio as a rendezvous point.
I am just a font of information.
> > > Plus, there ain't no one 'key' that can protect this 'city' from an
> > > all-out effort at the usenet equivalent of urban renewal.
> >
> > We shall withstand.
>
> Rule for a 1,000 years, you will.
That isn't very nice.
> > > Last year I witnessed you single-handedly destroy an entire newsgroup of
> > > rabid fat-accepting cultists, who'd gladly have taken out a contract on
> > > your life, if only they'd been clever enough to figure out how.
> >
> > We don't have to. We have Kimvy, and several Sue's to keep Jackie
> > honest.
>
> Huh?
> I read ssfa before, during and after Jackie's appearance, and when he
> says he fucking destroyed that group, he isn't dishonest, he's reporting
> the news.
It is interesting what turns some people's cranks. Of course ssfa
was still there last time I looked so you are talking a symbolic
destruction and not a literal one. Similar to the symbolic
destruction of Dan Mocsny and Aaron Kulkis. Of course, their
resurrection from this destruction has been well documented but
we should not read the Tokeman with a literal interpretation.
> > > Now, I'm witnessing you save a newsgroup from descending further into
> > > the final stages of ossification and mind-numbing hiveology dedicated to
> > > driving out anybody with a mind that refuses to be numbed down
> > > sufficiently to adhere or enforce hive-clique standards.
> >
> > Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..... Anti-hive swarming in full effect.
>
> And to think this group used to be such a boring place...
>
> >
> > <SNIP!> Ass suckage.
>
> The hive smooches, while the rest of us suck each other's asses.
I am just matching and mirroring the anti-hive. It helps me to gain
insight into their motivations.
> Btw, do you do anal?
Why do you ask?
Crash Street Kidd
>
> C.
Crash Street Kidd
>
> On Tue, 18 May 1999 23:44:56 -0400, Crash Street Kidd
> <CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>
> >Susan T Graul wrote:
>
> >> sue, he keeps 'em in the icebox
>
> Mmmm. Testcicles.
>
> >That way they are ready to pop into the microwave when I want a midnite
> >snack or the special stand which makes blood bank sundaes is closed.
> >
> >Crash Street Kidd, vampyre mode on...
>
> Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
Ooooooooohh. I love it when you are naughty.
Come to me and become one of the creatures of the night.
Drink deeply of my blood and become One with the Hive.
Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (mixing metaphors)
broken hearted again...
Susan T Graul
>
> On Tue, 18 May 1999 22:54:11 -0400, when the moons aligned perfectly,
> Crash Street Kidd <CrashSt...@earthling.net> felt compelled to
> state:
>
> >Susan T Graul wrote:
> >> Brock Hannibal <hami...@teleport.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Sue, what do you look like in wet T-shirt?
> >>
> >> a) wet
> >> b) that's for me and a few hundred of my closest friends to know and you
> >> to find out.
>
> Tramp.
<blink>
she likes me! she really likes me!
> >> tee hee -- ah ah *ahchoo*
> >
> >Gusundheit. You looked rather fetching. I almost gave you my wallet.
>
> SHHHHHHHHHHHHH. You will wake the soc.men and we will all be sorry.
walkin' wallets, tweet tweet sweet
walkin' wallets, tweet tweedly-eat
yo walkin' wallets, well we'll really be a walkin' tonight!
> >Crash Street Kidd, but Brock doesn't do boinks, tee hee...
>
> Wrong coast for Brock.
>
> Kim
he will be assuemmilated.
sue-borg
Crash Street Kidd
>
> ogre wrote:
> >In article <1999051917...@cache.sb.vossnet.de>,
> >TriStar Remailer <forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply> wrote:
> >>CSK wrote:
> >>> honest.
> >>
> >
> >Everyone?
>
> Yes.
> Unless you would like to go on the record disputing my point that women 100
> pounds overweight or more are not desirable to the vast majority (over 90%)
> of men.
> In addition not one assimilant is a fatty fucker. Fereria, Crash and Tree
> all admitted that they prefer slender fit women to obese ones.
> Though that may have changed... if you consider Steve Chaney to be an
> assimilant.
>
> >>or: Who is better looking, Enialle or Dawn?
> >
> >Couldn't tell ya. Haven't met either one.
>
> But CSK has.
I have? Probably my eeevil twin masquerading as me.
Crash Street Kidd
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Susan T Graul
>
> Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> bzzzd:
> >
> >no, that'd be why you are so frustrated by this froup.
>
> Actually I am sickened by it.
whatever. maybe you need a vacation. i think you are taking this too
seriously.
[i suggest jackie posts here because he wants approval]
>
> >if you don't like that one, here are some other alternatives:
>
> In other words you really have no idea.
> Big surprise there.
hmm. i know why *i* continue to post here. you were the one who had no idea.
hey, i was just tryin' to help. it's coz i'm such a nice person.
> >a) you like enough of the regular posters and/or topics of postage that
> >you stick around.
>
> That's part of it.
i know.
> >b) you like to argue & there are a lot of
> >argumentative people here (this is really a variation on a).
> >c) you don't like anything about this froup but are addicted and can't
> >control yourself.
> >d) you are bored and lonely and even negative attention is better than none=
> =2E
>
> My heart it is breakink.
i wondered. you don't seem very happy lately.
> >e) you're a control freak (alpha-male-wannabe) and it burns your butt
> >that you can't get control here.
>
> I haven't seen tree post in quite some time...
neither have i. what a coinkydink.
> >feel free to add your own thoughts.
>
> How does it feel to be part of a hate group?
dunno.
sue
Susan T Graul
>
> ogre wrote:
> >In article <1999051917...@cache.sb.vossnet.de>,
> >TriStar Remailer <forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply> wrote:
> >>
> >>In the end everyone here conceded that I was right about the fat issue.
> >
> >Everyone?
>
> Yes.
> Unless you would like to go on the record disputing my point that women 100
> pounds overweight or more are not desirable to the vast majority (over 90%)
> of men.
so now women are only fat if they are 100 pounds overweight?
those goalposts, they keep on trucking.
sue
Crash Street Kidd
>
> <CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>
> >Dawn O' The Dead wrote:
>
> >> Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
> >
> >Ooooooooohh. I love it when you are naughty.
> >Come to me and become one of the creatures of the night.
> >Drink deeply of my blood and become One with the Hive.
>
>
> >Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (mixing metaphors)
> > broken hearted again...
>
> my ample bazooom.
<sniff!> Ah that it were so.
On the other hand... why waste a heartache....
Did you say something about a b-b-b-baz-baz-bazooom...
I think its time to go aboinking again....
Crash Street Kidd
TriStar Remailer
>Jackie wrote:
>
>>lmar...@aol.com86spam (L Marichak) bzzzd:
>>>Jackie wrote:
>>>>You're quite full of shit.
>>>>No surprise there.
>>>>I am not persuading I am engaging in social engineering.
>>>>I've spelled it out many times.
>>>>I don't want your approval I want to throw a wrench into your machine.
>>>>It seems to be working.
>>>
>>>You want the machine to work your way.
>>
>>Working has got nothing to do with it.
>
>Then what is it about?
A Jedi uses his powers for knowledge and defense.
>>>You want people to tell you how clever you are for you little ditties and=
y=3D
>>our
>>>FAQ.
>>
>>I posted hundreds of messages on ssfa to a completely hostile audience. Th=
e
>>more clever I was the more they hated me.
>
>Why do you think that they hated you for it?
Because I was deliberately hurting them.
>And what about soc.singles? Wouldn't you be a wee bit disappointed if you =
=46AQ
>and songs were completely ignored?
What are the odds of that?
>>Approval has got nothing to do with it.
>
>Then why do it?
>
>All attention-seeking behavior is not approval seeking, but it can be that
>sometimes. It could be that you find it intrinsically rewarding to be on
>attack-mode and inflict pain.
I did.
But I got better.
>I'm just wondering why it would be worth your
>time.
When you figure that out tell me.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Dawn O' The Dead
<CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>Dawn O' The Dead wrote:
>> Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
>
>Ooooooooohh. I love it when you are naughty.
>Come to me and become one of the creatures of the night.
>Drink deeply of my blood and become One with the Hive.
Didn't you see the post? I *am* the hive. Just me. Bzzzz.
>Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (mixing metaphors)
> broken hearted again...
You're just saying that so I will take pity on you and clutch you to
my ample bazooom.
Dawn
Ted Gavin
java...@pacifier.com (Dawn O' The Dead) wrote:
>On Wed, 19 May 1999 19:44:54 -0400, Crash Street Kidd
><CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>
>>Dawn O' The Dead wrote:
>
>>> Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
>>
>>Ooooooooohh. I love it when you are naughty.
>>Come to me and become one of the creatures of the night.
>>Drink deeply of my blood and become One with the Hive.
>
>Didn't you see the post? I *am* the hive. Just me. Bzzzz.
>
>>Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (mixing metaphors)
>> broken hearted again...
>
>You're just saying that so I will take pity on you and clutch you to
>my ample bazooom.
>
Speaking of which, how are they?
Ted (thankyouvurrymuch)
Ted Gavin http://home.att.net/~tedgavin
-----------------------------------------------------
Man is quite insane. He wouldn't know how to create a
maggot and he creates G-ds by the dozen.
TriStar Remailer
>> This place was a hate machine before I ever heard of the internet.
>> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>
>Very True. Soc.Singles has been a hate-machine since it's inception.
I don't know that but it wouldn't surprise me.
Every 'best of' post I've seen from the days of the alleged old republic
has been the usual snide condescending flaming of the weak that is also
distilled into tree's carbon frozen faq.
That the hellish kultur of this group resulted in a celibate writing the
old faq sez it all.
Not that you've done anything to improve things...
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
TriStar Remailer
>Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman wrote from some German remailer:
> <1999051917...@cache.sb.vossnet.de>...
>>He did not give it to me.
>>I took it.
>> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>> speaker for soc.singles
>
>
n
>I used to skip Bible Study on a Wednesday evening and go and furtively watc=
h
>a certain classic series...
>
>" 'Real power's not something that they give to you, boaiy, real power's
>something thatcha take'. That's what mah Daddy said before he died " (J.R.
>Ewing, episode 1509 or thereabouts)
I'm gonna have to watch that show.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
have you figured out the davey reference yet?
TriStar Remailer
>forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) wrote:
>>
>> Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> bzzzd:
>
>> >
>> >no, that'd be why you are so frustrated by this froup.
>>
>> Actually I am sickened by it.
>
>whatever. maybe you need a vacation. i think you are taking this too
>seriously.
Or seeing it too clearly.
>[i suggest jackie posts here because he wants approval]
>>
>> >if you don't like that one, here are some other alternatives:
>>
>> In other words you really have no idea.
>> Big surprise there.
>
>hmm. i know why *i* continue to post here. you were the one who had no id=
ea.
That does not contradict my point.
You were speculating about my motives.
Your speculation is all over the map.
The old shotgun fishing manuever.
>hey, i was just tryin' to help. it's coz i'm such a nice person.
That's why you continue looking for something, anything, to get at me.
>> >a) you like enough of the regular posters and/or topics of postage that
>> >you stick around.
>>
>> That's part of it.
>
>i know.
That part is no mystery.
I haven't been faint in my praise of some.
>> >b) you like to argue & there are a lot of
>> >argumentative people here (this is really a variation on a).
>> >c) you don't like anything about this froup but are addicted and can't
>> >control yourself.
>> >d) you are bored and lonely and even negative attention is better than
>>none=3D
>> =3D2E
>>
>> My heart it is breakink.
>
>i wondered. you don't seem very happy lately.
Yes, disapproval of the hive means I'm unhappy.
In case you're wondering things are smashing baby! Yeah!
I loved Episode One.
Thank the Maker!
If it had sucked that would have, like, sucked.
>> >e) you're a control freak (alpha-male-wannabe) and it burns your butt
>> >that you can't get control here.
>>
>> I haven't seen tree post in quite some time...
>
>neither have i. what a coinkydink.
Once I gave him a taste of his own hate he didn't find it much fun here
anymore.
or: nihilists cannot play nicecards
>> >feel free to add your own thoughts.
>>
>> How does it feel to be part of a hate group?
>
>dunno.
Yes you do.
Even if you won't acknowledge what it is.
Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Susan T Graul
>
> lmar...@aol.com86spam (L Marichak) bzzzd:
>
> our
> >FAQ.
>
> I posted hundreds of messages on ssfa to a completely hostile audience. The
> more clever I was the more they hated me.
yeah, and you keep bragging in ss and who knows where else about how
much they hated you over in ssfa, how you laid waste to a group that is,
um, still going strong? bragging in ss, where you say we run a hate
machine. where we therefore should be impressed by your arteestic
display of hatred and laying of wastage. where we should deem you
'evil', and be in awe.
but gosh darn it, we're not. ( except for clarice, that is.)
do you feel cheated, jackie? betrayed? unmanned?
there are far more effective 'hate machines' out there on usenet,
jackie. they're just *way* out of your league. and you know it.
your powers are weak, little man. but we still luv you.
> Approval has got nothing to do with it.
you're aching for it, keedo. admit it. cry it to the heavens, and we
will clapse you to our bazooms.
sue, ya knucklehead
Susan T Graul
>
> Dawn O' The Dead wrote:
> >
> > Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
>
> Ooooooooohh. I love it when you are naughty.
> Come to me and become one of the creatures of the night.
> Drink deeply of my blood and become One with the Hive.
>
i've wondered if mosquitoes were related to vampyres. altho they do
hhmmmmmm more than bzzzzz. mosquitoes, that is. dunno what vampyres do.
> broken hearted again...
ah, dang.
she's just an evil biatch.
sue <sniffle>
Crash Street Kidd
Its his only weakness...
Crash Street Kidd
> sue
Susan T Graul
>
> Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> bzzzd:
> >forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) wrote:
> >>
> >> Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> bzzzd:
> >
> >> >
> >> >no, that'd be why you are so frustrated by this froup.
> >>
> >> Actually I am sickened by it.
> >
> >whatever. maybe you need a vacation. i think you are taking this too
> >seriously.
>
> Or seeing it too clearly.
seeing what? can't figure what would sicken you so. you must have a
very weak stomach. squeamish, even.
> >> >if you don't like that one, here are some other alternatives:
> >>
> >> In other words you really have no idea.
> >> Big surprise there.
> >
> >hmm. i know why *i* continue to post here. you were the one who had no id=
> ea.
>
> That does not contradict my point.
> You were speculating about my motives.
not really. i'm pretty sure i know what your motives are. i was just
curious whether you could be honest about them. apparently not.
> Your speculation is all over the map.
hardly. they were variations on a fairly limited theme.
it says a lot that you think they were all over the map. you really
haven't a clue about what drives you. doesn't that bother you?
> >hey, i was just tryin' to help. it's coz i'm such a nice person.
>
> That's why you continue looking for something, anything, to get at me.
your post was clearly a cry for help.
i'm reaching out to you. i'm here for you, jackie.
> >> My heart it is breakink.
> >
> >i wondered. you don't seem very happy lately.
>
> Yes, disapproval of the hive means I'm unhappy.
> In case you're wondering things are smashing baby! Yeah!
> I loved Episode One.
> Thank the Maker!
> If it had sucked that would have, like, sucked.
living vicariously. hey, whatever floats your boat.
> >> I haven't seen tree post in quite some time...
> >
> >neither have i. what a coinkydink.
>
> Once I gave him a taste of his own hate he didn't find it much fun here
> anymore.
you're getting desperate. he didn't post much even before you showed up.
> >> How does it feel to be part of a hate group?
> >
> >dunno.
>
> Yes you do.
> Even if you won't acknowledge what it is.
like you won't acknowledge that you're desperate for approval.
sue
Crash Street Kidd
>
> forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) wrote:
> >
Marry me?
Crash Street Kidd
Aaron R. Kulkis
I used to read soc.singles in the late 80's. If anything, it was
worse than it is now. One of the reasons I started posting in
here was to demonstrate specifically that the snigglers are so
addicted to spouting hate that they will even attack someone who
is offering up a road to happiness.
Of course, they all happily obliged, not realizing that they
were putting a brick in the wall of their own eventual prison.
Unfortunately, I'm not very skilled at dealinig with people
who's only motivation in life is to lash out at othe people,
but I did know how to expose their hypocrisy in full light.
> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
Aaron R. Kulkis
>
> Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> bzzzd:
> >forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) wrote:
> >>
> >> Susan T Graul <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> bzzzd:
> >
> >> >
> >> >no, that'd be why you are so frustrated by this froup.
> >>
> >> Actually I am sickened by it.
> >
> >whatever. maybe you need a vacation. i think you are taking this too
> >seriously.
>
> Or seeing it too clearly.
>
> >>
> >>
> >> In other words you really have no idea.
> >> Big surprise there.
> >
> >hmm. i know why *i* continue to post here. you were the one who had no id=
> ea.
>
> That does not contradict my point.
> You were speculating about my motives.
Make that hand grenades...
Aaron R. Kulkis
>
> lmar...@aol.com86spam (L Marichak) bzzzd:
> >>You're quite full of shit.
> >>No surprise there.
> >>I am not persuading I am engaging in social engineering.
> >>I've spelled it out many times.
> >>I don't want your approval I want to throw a wrench into your machine.
> >>It seems to be working.
> >
> >You want the machine to work your way.
>
>
> >You want people to tell you how clever you are for you little ditties and y=
> our
> >FAQ.
>
> I posted hundreds of messages on ssfa to a completely hostile audience. The
> more clever I was the more they hated me.
Congratulations, you have reached a state of true freedom.
Jet
Aaron R. Kulkis wrote in message <3743CBCD...@flash.net>...
>A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
>
A foolish man thinks he is wised because he is mocked. Most often it is
because he is an asshole, like you Aaron.
>B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathalogical liar sort.
You are such a fool, you can't tell the difference between a lie and an
obvious joke.
>C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
> sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
> that she doesn't like.
Translation: You can't counter my arguments...
>D: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
> response until their behavior improves.
so you do the virtual equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ear and
screaming "I can't hear you". (How you manage to get both arms and your head
up your ass...)
J
I'm obviously worthy of the time it takes to create 2 epic sigs. :)
David J James
L Marichak (BTW isn't that Gujurati for motherf..ker or am I getting it
confused with 'marikuchut'?) wrote in message:
<19990519171009...@ng-ft1.aol.com>...
>Jackie wrote:
>
>>lmar...@aol.com86spam (L Marichak) bzzzd:
>>>Jackie wrote:
>>>>You're quite full of shit.
>>>>No surprise there.
>>>>I am not persuading I am engaging in social engineering.
>>>>I've spelled it out many times.
>>>>I don't want your approval I want to throw a wrench into your machine.
>>>>It seems to be working.
>>>
>>>You want the machine to work your way.
>>
>>Working has got nothing to do with it.
>
>
>>
y=
>>our
>>>FAQ.
>>
>>I posted hundreds of messages on ssfa to a completely hostile audience.
The
>>more clever I was the more they hated me.
>
>
>and songs were completely ignored?
This kind of discussion is a crock of crap. It's obvious that no-one wants
their posts to be ignored. Who writes with the hope of seeing no reply or
feedback at all? If your posts, Mari(chak)/uchut, were continually ignored,
you'd give up pretty quick in disgust with the whole medium and so would I
if it happened to me and most other people would if it happened to them and
the whole thing would just collapse.
So I just don't understand why someone should be dissed for not wanting
their posts to be ignored. Everyone's the same and it should be bleedin'
obvious.
D.
David J James
TriStar Remailer napisał(a) w wiadomości:
<1999052009...@cache.sb.vossnet.de>...
Unless you refer to Sir Humphrey Davey and his amazing techicolor lamp?
Kindly noblesse oblige me with a clue.
D.
L Marichak
>L Marichak (BTW isn't that Gujurati for motherf..ker or am I getting it
>confused with 'marikuchut'?
I don't know. Why dontcha look it up at get back to us? ;oP
By the way, why are you so hostile towards me?
Probably no one. I was inquiring about Jackie seeking attention and approval.
>If your posts, Mari(chak)/uchut, were continually ignored,
>you'd give up pretty quick in disgust with the whole medium and so would I
>if it happened to me and most other people would if it happened to them and
>the whole thing would just collapse.
Isn't it nice then that we all aren't ignored?
>
>So I just don't understand why someone should be dissed for not wanting
>their posts to be ignored.
How nice of you to play the white knight and try to rescue Jackie from mean ol'
me. But ya know, last time I read his stuff, he wasn't in need of help.
Ooooh! Wait a minute! Are the wagons now circling to protect Jackie? How
funny.
In any case, I wasn't dissing him. The question was about whether or not
Jackie was seeking attention and approval.
In any case, you're not Jackie, and I'm interested in having him answer the
question.
>LM<
L Marichak
>Probably my eeevil twin masquerading as me.
I thought Jackie was your evil twin. Or was it that he's your evil roomate?
>LM<
David J James
L Marichak napisał(a) w wiadomości:
<19990520060116...@ng-ft1.aol.com>...
> "David J James" <dav...@kki.net.pl> wrote:
>
>>L Marichak (BTW isn't that Gujurati for motherf..ker or am I getting it
>>confused with 'marikuchut'?
>
>I don't know. Why dontcha look it up at get back to us? ;oP
>
>By the way, why are you so hostile towards me?
Life is brutal, and I am no exception.
Anyway, that wasn't real hostility(tm), just a friendly poke in the
etymological ribs
It's bloody fantastic(tm).
>>
>>So I just don't understand why someone should be dissed for not wanting
>>their posts to be ignored.
>
>How nice of you to play the white knight and try to rescue Jackie from mean
ol'
>me. But ya know, last time I read his stuff, he wasn't in need of help.
When you attack the speaker, you attack all of us. It's a parliamentary
tradition.
>Ooooh! Wait a minute! Are the wagons now circling to protect Jackie? How
>funny.
Circling wagons were funny in a certain scene from 'Blazing Saddles' in
which Mel Brookes featured as a Yiddish-speaking red indian chief, but I
can't see any intrinsic humour in this. Maybe you're the sort of person
that gets a laugh a minute reading Solzhenitzyn, I don't know.
>In any case, I wasn't dissing him. The question was about whether or not
>Jackie was seeking attention and approval.
And I'm saying that everybody seeks attention and approval. WPOTDYU?
>
>In any case, you're not Jackie, and I'm interested in having him answer the
>question.
>
And I expect your ambition will be fulfilled. In the meantime you've got my
answer as an unexpected bonus(tm).
>>LM<
>
David
PS. You didn't honestly expect 'I know when I'm not wanted, so I'll just
fuck-off (tm) then' did you?
Crash Street Kidd
Maybe he's my evil twin and my evil roommate and a figment of my
imagination. Maybe this whole season has been a dream... Jackie
did say he was going to study up on J.R. from the Dallas series.
<SMOOCHIES!!!>
Crash Street Kidd, getting confused by all these eeevil twins
>
> >LM<
jim dutton
Aaron R. Kulkis <aku...@flash.net> wrote:
>> This place was a hate machine before I ever heard of the internet.
>> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>
>Very True. Soc.Singles has been a hate-machine since it's inception.
Well as far as a dwarf like you is concerned any group would be.
-Jeem, So you've always got that going for you.
========================================================================
http://www.enteract.net/~jjd
Steatopygias's 'R' Us. doh#0000000005 That ain't no Hottentot.
Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. tbtw#6. s.s.m#8. There ain't no more
When I found the skull in the woods, the first thing I did was call the police.
But then I got curious about it. I picked it up, and started wondering who
this person was, and why he had deer horns. - Jack Handey
========================================================================
jim dutton
>>
>> Lee Harvey Oddball wrote:
>> >> This place was a hate machine before I ever heard of the internet.
>> >> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>> >
>> >Very True. Soc.Singles has been a hate-machine since it's inception.
>>
>> Every 'best of' post I've seen from the days of the alleged old republic
>> has been the usual snide condescending flaming of the weak that is also
>> distilled into tree's carbon frozen faq.
>> That the hellish kultur of this group resulted in a celibate writing the
>> old faq sez it all.
>> Not that you've done anything to improve things...
>
>I used to read soc.singles in the late 80's. If anything, it was
>worse than it is now. One of the reasons I started posting in
>here was to demonstrate specifically that the snigglers are so
>addicted to spouting hate that they will even attack someone who
>is offering up a road to happiness.
>
>Of course, they all happily obliged, not realizing that they
>were putting a brick in the wall of their own eventual prison.
>
>Unfortunately, I'm not very skilled at dealinig with people
>who's only motivation in life is to lash out at othe people,
>but I did know how to expose their hypocrisy in full light.
-Jeem, Irina has been in touch with a normal sized american sugar daddy.
========================================================================
http://www.enteract.net/~jjd
Steatopygias's 'R' Us. doh#0000000005 That ain't no Hottentot.
Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. tbtw#6. s.s.m#8. There ain't no more
"For why should my freedom be judged by another's conscience?" --
Paul 1 Corinthians 10:29
========================================================================
John Fereira
>> >000, TriStar Remailer <forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply> wrote:
>> >:This demonstrates that the concept of 'on topic' or 'appropriate' is
>> >:entirely the product of what a self selected mob of character assassins
>> >:enjoys reading and has absolutely nothing to do with being single,
>> >:relationships, sex, romance or any other vaguely related subject.
>> >
>> >The last of the old Republic has been swept away.
>> >
>> >The regional governors shall now have direct control over their
>> >territories.
>>
>> What old republic?
>>
>> >: Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>> >
>> >you started this, anyway.
>>
>> This place was a hate machine before I ever heard of the internet.
>> Jackie 'Anakin' Tokeman
>
>Very True. Soc.Singles has been a hate-machine since it's inception.
You misspelled Usenet. When I posted my first article to net.singles
in 1984 or so I was called an asshole by Oleg Kisilev. I didn't run
off in a huff then because I already knew that from reading other
groups that Usenet wasn't always a friendly place. Net.singles, which
later became soc.singles wasn't all that different from the rest of
Usenet. It still isn't.
John Fereira
Ithaca, NY
ja...@cornell.edu
Dawn O' The Dead
Gavin) wrote:
>I laughed, I cried when on Thu, 20 May 1999 00:40:57 GMT,
>java...@pacifier.com (Dawn O' The Dead) wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 19 May 1999 19:44:54 -0400, Crash Street Kidd
>><CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>>Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (mixing metaphors)
>>> broken hearted again...
>>
>>You're just saying that so I will take pity on you and clutch you to
>>my ample bazooom.
>>
>Speaking of which, how are they?
>
>Ted (thankyouvurrymuch)
Elvis says hi. Nixon is a tad shy at the moment cuz he's got a hickey.
Dawn O' The Dead
<CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>Dawn O' The Dead wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 19 May 1999 19:44:54 -0400, Crash Street Kidd
>> <CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Dawn O' The Dead wrote:
>>
>> >> Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
>> >
>> >Ooooooooohh. I love it when you are naughty.
>> >Come to me and become one of the creatures of the night.
>> >Drink deeply of my blood and become One with the Hive.
>>
>> Didn't you see the post? I *am* the hive. Just me. Bzzzz.
>>
>> >Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (mixing metaphors)
>> > broken hearted again...
>>
>> You're just saying that so I will take pity on you and clutch you to
>> my ample bazooom.
>
><sniff!> Ah that it were so.
>On the other hand... why waste a heartache....
>Did you say something about a b-b-b-baz-baz-bazooom...
>I think its time to go aboinking again....
hee hee.
Uh oh. I'd better stop talking about my breastessesses. We all know I
only do that because I'm compensating for being so ugly.
Dawn
(or you could just call me puss...@hotmail.com)
Dawn O' The Dead
<sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>Crash Street Kidd <CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>
>> Dawn O' The Dead wrote:
>> >
>> > Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
>>
>> Ooooooooohh. I love it when you are naughty.
>> Come to me and become one of the creatures of the night.
>> Drink deeply of my blood and become One with the Hive.
>>
>> Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (mixing metaphors)
>
>i've wondered if mosquitoes were related to vampyres. altho they do
>hhmmmmmm more than bzzzzz. mosquitoes, that is. dunno what vampyres do.
>
>> broken hearted again...
>
>ah, dang.
>
>she's just an evil biatch.
We could beat her up. How dare she trifle with CSK?
I'm sure we could take her.
Then we can blame it on our imaginary roommates.
>sue <sniffle>
Dawn
(sharing the pain)
Dawn O' The Dead
<sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>forwarded-ano...@do.not.reply (TriStar Remailer) wrote:
>>
>> lmar...@aol.com86spam (L Marichak) bzzzd:
>>
>> >You want people to tell you how clever you are for you little ditties and y=
>> our
>> >FAQ.
>>
>> I posted hundreds of messages on ssfa to a completely hostile audience. The
>> more clever I was the more they hated me.
>
>yeah, and you keep bragging in ss and who knows where else about how
>much they hated you over in ssfa, how you laid waste to a group that is,
>um, still going strong?
They were decimated by his unrelentingly brilliant references to
"hungry hungry hippos". O how they wept.
>bragging in ss, where you say we run a hate
>machine. where we therefore should be impressed by your arteestic
>display of hatred and laying of wastage. where we should deem you
>'evil', and be in awe.
It's those soulkiller disses. He does hurt us all so.
>but gosh darn it, we're not. ( except for clarice, that is.)
>
>do you feel cheated, jackie? betrayed? unmanned?
The word "impotent" does come to mind. It must hurt to spend so much
time on soulkiller disses only to have the targets yawn and say,
"Yeah, so? What else ya got?"
>there are far more effective 'hate machines' out there on usenet,
>jackie. they're just *way* out of your league. and you know it.
>
>your powers are weak, little man. but we still luv you.
"We"? You got a spud secreter in yer pocket?
>> Approval has got nothing to do with it.
<snicker> Right.
>you're aching for it, keedo. admit it. cry it to the heavens, and we
>will clapse you to our bazooms.
>
>sue, ya knucklehead
Then he wouldn't be Big Bad Scary Jackie the Soulkiller.
He'd just be ... um ... an impotent anonymous weenie on Usenet. Hmmm.
Wait a minute...
Dawn
Crash Street Kidd
>
> <sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>
> >Crash Street Kidd <CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dawn O' The Dead wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
> >>
> >> Ooooooooohh. I love it when you are naughty.
> >> Come to me and become one of the creatures of the night.
> >> Drink deeply of my blood and become One with the Hive.
> >>
> >> Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (mixing metaphors)
> >
> >i've wondered if mosquitoes were related to vampyres. altho they do
> >hhmmmmmm more than bzzzzz. mosquitoes, that is. dunno what vampyres do.
> >
> >> broken hearted again...
> >
> >ah, dang.
> >
> >she's just an evil biatch.
>
> We could beat her up. How dare she trifle with CSK?
>
> I'm sure we could take her.
Now, now, behave. I could join the ranks of the bitterboy loser
DORKS!!! and piss and moan about it but overall it was a positive
experience and I wish her well. I learned something about myself
and about how I relate with certain people. I was seriously inspired
for a while and I think analyzing what happened and why will be
another opportunity for growth. When one door closes, another
opens.
I am still the romantic fool I ever was.
> Then we can blame it on our imaginary roommates.
>
> >sue <sniffle>
>
> Dawn
> (sharing the pain)
Crash Street Kidd, could a Leafs fan find happiness with a Wings fan?
It was like Romeo and Juliet only without the poison.
Sadly, waving goodbye... Of course we decided LJBF :-)
Cheezits
the words "h*ve" and "ass*milant".)
On Thu, 20 May 1999, Crash Street Kidd wrote:
[Crash got LBJFed!]
:-(
> I am still the romantic fool I ever was.
Aren't we all.
Sue (smoochies)
--
----- Before you send me spam, check out www.cauce.org -----
"Misery loves company" was originally a typo. It was meant
to be "misery accompanies love". - Jay Scott
Ted Gavin
James" <dav...@kki.net.pl> wrote:
>L Marichak napisał(a) w wiadomości:
><19990520060116...@ng-ft1.aol.com>...
>> "David J James" <dav...@kki.net.pl> wrote:
>>
>>>L Marichak (BTW isn't that Gujurati for motherf..ker or am I getting it
>>>confused with 'marikuchut'?
>>
>>I don't know. Why dontcha look it up at get back to us? ;oP
>I thought you might be able to tell me.
>>
>>By the way, why are you so hostile towards me?
>
>Life is brutal, and I am no exception.
>Anyway, that wasn't real hostility(tm), just a friendly poke in the
>etymological ribs
>
[rampant obliteration of now-pointless text]
>>>This kind of discussion is a crock of crap. It's obvious that no-one wants
>>>their posts to be ignored. Who writes with the hope of seeing no reply or
>>>feedback at all?
>>
>>Probably no one. I was inquiring about Jackie seeking attention and
>approval.
>>
>>>If your posts, Mari(chak)/uchut, were continually ignored,
>>>you'd give up pretty quick in disgust with the whole medium and so would I
>>>if it happened to me and most other people would if it happened to them
>>>and the whole thing would just collapse.
>>
>>Isn't it nice then that we all aren't ignored?
>>
>It's bloody fantastic(tm).
>>>
>>>So I just don't understand why someone should be dissed for not wanting
>>>their posts to be ignored.
>>
>>How nice of you to play the white knight and try to rescue Jackie from mean
>>ol' me. But ya know, last time I read his stuff, he wasn't in need of help.
>
>When you attack the speaker, you attack all of us. It's a parliamentary
>tradition.
>
Oh <yawn>, look Jackie. You have a Hive[tm] now.
Ted (you must be so proud)
Ted Gavin http://home.att.net/~tedgavin
-----------------------------------------------------
"Unabomber Haiku of the Day": | Technology bad
from the Oracle Humor | Please tell me you like my beard
Archives (www.oraclehumor.com)| Or I'll blow you up
Ted Gavin
java...@pacifier.com (Dawn O' The Dead) wrote:
>On Thu, 20 May 1999 00:54:36 -0400, Susan T Graul
><sgr...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>
>>Crash Street Kidd <CrashSt...@earthling.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dawn O' The Dead wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Bite me. I mean that in the good way.
>>>
>>> Ooooooooohh. I love it when you are naughty.
>>> Come to me and become one of the creatures of the night.
>>> Drink deeply of my blood and become One with the Hive.
>>>
>>> Crash Street Kidd, bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (mixing metaphors)
>>
>>i've wondered if mosquitoes were related to vampyres. altho they do
>>hhmmmmmm more than bzzzzz. mosquitoes, that is. dunno what vampyres do.
>>
>>> broken hearted again...
>>
>>ah, dang.
>>
>>she's just an evil biatch.
>
>We could beat her up. How dare she trifle with CSK?
>
>I'm sure we could take her.
>
>Then we can blame it on our imaginary roommates.
>
All the while shouting about how it's all really Angie's fault.
>>sue <sniffle>
>
>Dawn
>(sharing the pain)
>
Ted (cause that's, like, in vogue now, or sumthin')
<CSK> SMOOCHIES!!!! Angie </CSK>
Brock Hannibal
[courtesy cc to Charlotte]
"Charlotte L. Blackmer" wrote:
>
> >>Crash Street Kidd, but Brock doesn't do boinks, tee hee...
> >
> >Wrong coast for Brock.
>
> What is the right coast? Gulf Coast? Cote d'Azur? Kaanapali? The last
> big event before this was in Berkeley, California, which is a longish
> drive or an easy flight from Portland and definitely on the West Coast of
> the US.
Got to schedule these things when some big event in my son's life is not
happening. :-) Beachboink occurred the weekend of his Birthday party at
my house. While you were all being single snigglers I was hosting 10
eight year olds at my house. I don't remember why I didn't make it down
to Charlotte's but I probably had a date or something. <laugh>
--
Brock
"Put a $20 gold piece on my watch chain so the boys'll know I died
standin' pat"
Susan T Graul
>
> Susan T Graul wrote:
> >
[lub letter to jackie sneeped]
> > sue, ya knucklehead
>
> Marry me?
>
> Crash Street Kidd
got room in your freezer? you're on!
sue
Crash Street Kidd
Of course!
> you're on!
Woo woo woo!!!
<SMOOCHIES!!!>
> sue
Crash Street Kidd
Charlotte L. Blackmer
kim vawryk <ki...@akamail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 18 May 1999 22:54:11 -0400, when the moons aligned perfectly,
>Crash Street Kidd <CrashSt...@earthling.net> felt compelled to
>state:
>
>>Susan T Graul wrote:
>>> Brock Hannibal <hami...@teleport.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Sue, what do you look like in wet T-shirt?
>>> a) wet
>>> b) that's for me and a few hundred of my closest friends to know and you
>>> to find out.
>>> tee hee -- ah ah *ahchoo*
The flowers that bloom in the spring, tra la...
>>Gusundheit. You looked rather fetching. I almost gave you my wallet.
Tee hee. She might need it to pay the rest of us off (to not tell -
and I have the negatives ;-).
(But how *do* you look in a sundress, my dear Vlad???)
>SHHHHHHHHHHHHH. You will wake the soc.men and we will all be sorry.
>>Crash Street Kidd, but Brock doesn't do boinks, tee hee...
>
>Wrong coast for Brock.
What is the right coast? Gulf Coast? Cote d'Azur? Kaanapali? The last
big event before this was in Berkeley, California, which is a longish
drive or an easy flight from Portland and definitely on the West Coast of
the US.
I was one of three west coasters at Beachboink. It's doable. I had a
great time once I recovered from the trip ;-). (Speaking of, I suppose
that is what Ian is doing. woo woo.)
I do recommend NOT taking United through Chicago, though. I was five
hours late getting into Raleigh (screwing up my plans to meet friends
for beer and barbeque) and lost my "west coast time advantage" due to
late takeoffs and missed connections caused by thunderstorms near
O'Hare. Almost got a rerun on the way back home from Charlotte for the
same reason, but the friendly UAL agent put us on a direct US Air flight
to SFO. Yeeehaw. No muss, no fuss, and I still got home at a decent
hour. Next time I go out that way, it's definitely US Air for me. And
another Mustang.
CLB, who *loved* seeing her name on all those signs and souvenirs ;-)
------------------------------------------------------
Charlotte L. Blackmer http://www.rahul.net/clb
Berkeley Farm and Pleasure Palace (under construction)
Junk (esp. commercial) email review rates: $250 US ea
Charlotte L. Blackmer
>>>> soc.singles is nothing more than a net hangout for a tiny clique.
>>>[...]
>>>> So, you might ask, what am I doing here?
>>>> Beats the fuck out of me...
>>>you're looking for approval.
>
>>Yes, that's why I am so kind.
>
> <heh>.
>
> Truly, 'tis I that stand alone as the lone fountain of the milk of
>human kindness on this newsgroup.
Jeem will be so crushed.
>Mikey (..I lactate for you all..)
Nice bu^H^Hoobs.
CLB
L Marichak
>L Marichak napisał(a) w wiadomości:
><19990520060116...@ng-ft1.aol.com>...
>> "David J James" <dav...@kki.net.pl> wrote:
>>
>>>L Marichak (BTW isn't that Gujurati for motherf..ker or am I getting it
>>>confused with 'marikuchut'?
>>
>>I don't know. Why dontcha look it up at get back to us? ;oP
>I thought you might be able to tell me.
Nope. I think that I left my Gujurati to English phrase book in my last
apartment when I moved.
>>
>>By the way, why are you so hostile towards me?
>
>Life is brutal, and I am no exception.
>Anyway, that wasn't real hostility(tm), just a friendly poke in the
>etymological ribs
Kinda like a friendly poke in the eye with a sharp stick? ;o) That's okay.
Your linguistic skills are admirable in general.
>>>wrote in message:
>>><19990519171009...@ng-ft1.aol.com>...
<snippity-do-dah>
>>How nice of you to play the white knight and try to rescue Jackie from mean
>ol'
>>me. But ya know, last time I read his stuff, he wasn't in need of help.
>
>
>When you attack the speaker, you attack all of us. It's a parliamentary
>tradition.
That's funny, 'cuz when people are cracking on Aaron for being...well, Aaron, I
don't feel the least bit under attack. But it could just be me.
>
>>Ooooh! Wait a minute! Are the wagons now circling to protect Jackie? How
>>funny.
>
>
>Circling wagons were funny in a certain scene from 'Blazing Saddles' in
>which Mel Brookes featured as a Yiddish-speaking red indian chief, but I
>can't see any intrinsic humour in this.
Jackie has commented on the hive circling the wagons when one of its members
are under attack. I found it amusing that the same happens when he is being
questioned. Does that make him part of the hive?
>Maybe you're the sort of person
>that gets a laugh a minute reading Solzhenitzyn, I don't know.
Couldn't tell ya. I haven't read works by that author.
>
>
>>In any case, I wasn't dissing him. The question was about whether or not
>>Jackie was seeking attention and approval.
>
>And I'm saying that everybody seeks attention and approval. WPOTDYU?
I understand it, and agree with it. But last I read, Jackie didn't agree.
>>
>>In any case, you're not Jackie, and I'm interested in having him answer the
>>question.
>>
>And I expect your ambition will be fulfilled. In the meantime you've got my
>answer as an unexpected bonus(tm).
Lucky me! <g>
>>>LM<
>>
>David
>
>PS. You didn't honestly expect 'I know when I'm not wanted, so I'll just
>fuck-off (tm) then' did you?
No. I would have been surprised and disappointed in you had you ran off that
easily.
<* LM *>