Self Service Diagnosis : discretely diagnosing a skin condition
JBScan
Services for discretely diagnosing a skin condition. The system allows
you to anonymously and quickly submit a query to a medical
professional and get a first opinion on a skin ailment that is
plaguing you.
visit : http://diagnosis.jbscan.com
Send comments to : con...@jbscan.com
Steve Daniels
con...@jbscan.com (JBScan), to say:
>Introducing a self-service application designed by JBScan Medical
>Services for discretely diagnosing a skin condition
I have a skin condition.
The skin on my dick is kind of wrinkled, until I think about
doing it with Condoleezza Rice, then it gets tight and shiny.
Does JBScan Medical Services diagnose that?
--
Remember that the First Amendment does not protect people from
being offended by your speech. In fact, it was written to protect
speech that is offensive.
Mike Adams - 27 Aug 04
Fat Naked Dangerous
>On 1 Sep 2004 22:20:01 -0400, something compelled
>con...@jbscan.com (JBScan), to say:
>>Introducing a self-service application designed by JBScan Medical
>>Services for discretely diagnosing a skin condition
>I have a skin condition.
>The skin on my dick is kind of wrinkled, until I think about
>doing it with Condoleezza Rice, then it gets tight and shiny.
>Does JBScan Medical Services diagnose that?
Honey, I think that's a mental condition.
--
Piglet, pig...@piglet.org http://unitedforpeace.org/
End the Occupation of Iraq
1316 days down Ann B. for President!
144 to go. Burlingham/Burlingham in 2004!
Dr. Brat
> sdan...@gorge.net, in article <tm2dj0tsfqnpg2ssi...@4ax.com>, dixit:
>
>>On 1 Sep 2004 22:20:01 -0400, something compelled
>>con...@jbscan.com (JBScan), to say:
>>
>>>Introducing a self-service application designed by JBScan Medical
>>>Services for discretely diagnosing a skin condition
Do we really want to buy anything from a vendor that cannot tell
discreet from discrete?
>>I have a skin condition.
I betcha do! LOL!
>>The skin on my dick is kind of wrinkled, until I think about
>>doing it with Condoleezza Rice, then it gets tight and shiny.
Eeeew. Condi Rice. I had the pleasure of reading (and disagreeing
with) her work long before any of you even knew she existed. SHE's
MINE, dammit!
>>Does JBScan Medical Services diagnose that?
>
> Honey, I think that's a mental condition.
Wull, yah! Sex is mental, unhuh, unhuh.
Elizabeth
--
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~living well is the best revenge~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
The most important thing one woman can do for another is to illuminate
and expand her sense of actual possibilities. --Adrienne Rich
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
A Cycling Troll
wrote:
>Fat Naked Dangerous wrote:
>> sdan...@gorge.net, in article <tm2dj0tsfqnpg2ssi...@4ax.com>, dixit:
>>>On 1 Sep 2004 22:20:01 -0400, something compelled
>>>con...@jbscan.com (JBScan), to say:
<snip>
>Eeeew. Condi Rice. I had the pleasure of reading (and disagreeing
>with)
What did you disagree with in her work, curiosity asks?
Not that I'm terribly familiar with her accademic work...
>her work long before any of you even knew she existed. SHE's
>MINE, dammit!
Spill, baby, spill.
>>>Does JBScan Medical Services diagnose that?
>>
>> Honey, I think that's a mental condition.
>
>Wull, yah! Sex is mental, unhuh, unhuh.
And one gets so when one isn't gettiing enough.
TB
"A liberal is a conservative who's been through treatment."
- Garrison Keillor
Dr. Brat
> On 2 Sep 2004 09:05:05 -0400, "Dr. Brat" <epc...@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Eeeew. Condi Rice. I had the pleasure of reading (and disagreeing
>>with)
>
> What did you disagree with in her work, curiosity asks?
All East European governments were purely Soviet lackeys with no
character of their own at all. She makes conclusions about
Czechoslovakia that she then tries to apply to Poland. Wrong.
> Not that I'm terribly familiar with her accademic work...
Well, unless you're fascinated by the Czechoslovak Army and
civil-military relations, I wouldn't expect you to be.
Plague Boy
> Introducing a spam-service application designed by JBSpamedical
> Services for discretely diagnosing a spam condition. The system allows
> you to spam anonymously and quickly submit a spam query to a spamedical
> professional spam and get a spam spamfirst opinion on a spam ailment that is
> spam spam spam plaguing you. Spam, wonderful spam.
>
> visit : http://diagnosis.jbscan.com
Spam, wonderful spam!
> Send comments to : contac...@jbspam.com
SPAM, WONDERFUL SPAM!!!
SPAM, WONDERFUL SPAM!!!
--
Any woman who looks like a clown exploded on her face
should NOT be allowed to work at the Cosmetics Counter
in MACY'S. -Happy Rhodes
A Cycling Troll
wrote:
>A Cycling Troll wrote:
>> On 2 Sep 2004 09:05:05 -0400, "Dr. Brat" <epc...@mindspring.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Eeeew. Condi Rice. I had the pleasure of reading (and disagreeing
>>>with)
>>
>> What did you disagree with in her work, curiosity asks?
>
>All East European governments were purely Soviet lackeys with no
>character of their own at all. She makes conclusions about
>Czechoslovakia that she then tries to apply to Poland. Wrong.
<boggle> And she's made it to Security Advisor?
Everything is always affected by local factors.
The key question is what exactly and how much! And therin lies the
difficult work when you are an outsider to that group or place.
>> Not that I'm terribly familiar with her accademic work...
>
>Well, unless you're fascinated by the Czechoslovak Army and
>civil-military relations, I wouldn't expect you to be.
You never know. Curiousity leads me down many paths...
Loretta
Boy <Plagu...@earthlink.net> writes
>JBSpam wrote:
>> Introducing a spam-service application designed by JBSpamedical
>> Services for discretely diagnosing a spam condition. The system allows
>> you to spam anonymously and quickly submit a spam query to a spamedical
>> professional spam and get a spam spamfirst opinion on a spam ailment that is
>> spam spam spam plaguing you. Spam, wonderful spam.
>> visit : http://diagnosis.jbscan.com
>
>Spam, wonderful spam!
>
>> Send comments to : contac...@jbspam.com
>
>SPAM, WONDERFUL SPAM!!!
>SPAM, WONDERFUL SPAM!!!
>
--
Loretta
A smile, a song, and a bucket of lard.
Paul Wallich
> On 2 Sep 2004 21:24:33 -0400, "Dr. Brat" <epc...@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>A Cycling Troll wrote:
>>
>>>On 2 Sep 2004 09:05:05 -0400, "Dr. Brat" <epc...@mindspring.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Eeeew. Condi Rice. I had the pleasure of reading (and disagreeing
>>>>with)
>>>
>>>What did you disagree with in her work, curiosity asks?
>>
>>All East European governments were purely Soviet lackeys with no
>>character of their own at all. She makes conclusions about
>>Czechoslovakia that she then tries to apply to Poland. Wrong.
>
>
> <boggle> And she's made it to Security Advisor?
>
> Everything is always affected by local factors.
> The key question is what exactly and how much! And therin lies the
> difficult work when you are an outsider to that group or place.
But the overarching rule for this administration is that local factors
must be ignored in favor of the Grand Plan. (These are the folks who
testified, for example, that there were no significant sectarian
divisions in Iraq.) So in that crowd she fits right in.
paul
miguel
>"Dr. Brat" wrote:
>>Fat Naked Dangerous wrote:
[condi gives steve a chubby]
>>>>Does JBScan Medical Services diagnose that?
>>> Honey, I think that's a mental condition.
>>Wull, yah! Sex is mental, unhuh, unhuh.
Sheesh. And you call yourself a bisexual.
>And one gets so when one isn't gettiing enough.
What's that like?
miguel
songbird
A Cycling Troll wrote:
> Dr. Brat wrote:
> >A Cycling Troll wrote:
> >>Dr. Brat wrote:
> >>
> >>>Eeeew. Condi Rice. I had the pleasure of reading (and disagreeing
> >>>with)
> >>
> >> What did you disagree with in her work, curiosity asks?
> >
> >All East European governments were purely Soviet lackeys with no
> >character of their own at all. She makes conclusions about
> >Czechoslovakia that she then tries to apply to Poland. Wrong.
>
> <boggle> And she's made it to Security Advisor?
perhaps she'd learned something since then?
<peeve alert>
what is it with people going back and dredging up all
the old stuff that people have said just to make sure that
they can't get into office later? sure, it might indicate
a person who is mentally a bit off, but realistically, i'd
guess that the only person who'd ever get into office
without a contradiction or idiocy in their past would be
someone who refused to speak.
<here peeve, good peeve, back on chain peeve *click*>
> Everything is always affected by local factors.
> The key question is what exactly and how much! And therin lies the
> difficult work when you are an outsider to that group or place.
yeah. for many places you will be an outsider no longer how
long you live there and no matter how hard you dig.
songbird *peep*
Loretta
<mig...@newsguy.com> writes
>A Cycling Troll wrote:
>>"Dr. Brat" wrote:
>>>> sdan...@gorge.net wrote:
>
>[condi gives steve a chubby]
>
>>>>>Does JBScan Medical Services diagnose that?
>
>>>> Honey, I think that's a mental condition.
>
>>>Wull, yah! Sex is mental, unhuh, unhuh.
>
>Sheesh. And you call yourself a bisexual.
>
>>And one gets so when one isn't gettiing enough.
>
>What's that like?
>
Dreeeeeaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeerrrrggggggggggggh !
HTH
Dr. Brat
> <peeve alert>
>
> what is it with people going back and dredging up all
> the old stuff that people have said just to make sure that
> they can't get into office later?
Just to clarify, I didn't dredge it up. I read it as part of my
research for my dissertation, which was about the Polish military. I
*did* say that I had read it long before any of you had heard of her.
Since there weren't that many people writing on any of the East European
militaries and since I later knew someone who did her dissertation under
Rice's direction, the work stuck with me.
songbird
Dr. Brat wrote:
> songbird wrote:
>
> > <peeve alert>
> >
> > what is it with people going back and dredging up all
> > the old stuff that people have said just to make sure that
> > they can't get into office later?
>
> Just to clarify, I didn't dredge it up. I read it as part of my
> research for my dissertation, which was about the Polish military. I
> *did* say that I had read it long before any of you had heard of her.
> Since there weren't that many people writing on any of the East European
> militaries and since I later knew someone who did her dissertation under
> Rice's direction, the work stuck with me.
sure, but my response wasn't to you, but to TB. her reply implied
that such stuff should have made her bid for Security Advisor
impossible.
songbird
A Cycling Troll
>
>
>A Cycling Troll wrote:
>> Dr. Brat wrote:
>> >A Cycling Troll wrote:
>> >>Dr. Brat wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Eeeew. Condi Rice. I had the pleasure of reading (and disagreeing
>> >>>with)
>> >>
>> >> What did you disagree with in her work, curiosity asks?
>> >
>> >All East European governments were purely Soviet lackeys with no
>> >character of their own at all. She makes conclusions about
>> >Czechoslovakia that she then tries to apply to Poland. Wrong.
>>
>> <boggle> And she's made it to Security Advisor?
>
> perhaps she'd learned something since then?
True, there is that possibility. :)
There are some papers that I wrote back in art school that were piled
deep and high (and I had a gut feeling that they were piled deep and
high , but I had to get them done to finish the course, the course
wasn't key to my major (the major was advertising design, the course
was renaissance art history) and the material that would have helped
me explain what I was really thinking wasn't readily available yet (is
now)). And I wasn't bright enough (or was more concerned with getting
out and earning a dollar - after all, I had a guy waiting for me out
in the west, and I wanted to get there!) to go on and explore some of
my ideas about art at a higher level. That it wasn't just a matter of
the artist working in isolation, developing their ideas on their own,
but that all art happens in a context, and that one must consider
technological and sociological developments in the society around the
imagemakers. All this is being presented with recent exhibitions that
I've attended (impressionism as a side product of industrial change
and pollution in the major European cities, the popularity of Degas
being directly related to his abi\lity to grab new engineering
technologies of the day in the mass reproduction of his sculptures,
etc) by curators of my generatin who _did_ go on and do those studies.
I've formed the opinion over the years that a real artistic genius
really understands the materials that they are working with, and can
engineer them the way an engineer can design with steel, once he/she
understands and knows stress loads and tempering.
Yes, I should have done more math.
Water under the bridge.
Regrets are wasted energy. Get on, deal and do.
> <peeve alert>
>
> what is it with people going back and dredging up all
>the old stuff that people have said just to make sure that
>they can't get into office later? sure, it might indicate
>a person who is mentally a bit off, but realistically, i'd
>guess that the only person who'd ever get into office
>without a contradiction or idiocy in their past would be
>someone who refused to speak.
>
> <here peeve, good peeve, back on chain peeve *click*>
Granted, a good peeve.
I boggle a bit because it still amazes me how far bull headedness and
belief in oneself can take one, if those around you have not done your
due diligence. This is not a put down, but idle admiration, and a
resolve to fact check ad infinitum when I next identify it. And a
dawning realization that I Can Do This Too. (in areas of my interest)
I've been reading alot obout the current team in the White House
through the online versions of the Washington Post and the New York
Times (plus assorted bedside stack books borrowed from the library)
For this foreigner, the strength of your political system is that the
bottom churn is eventually written about and examined. The achilles
heell seems to be that you must be more extreme (or bull headed) on
matters than the electorate to rise to the upper levels. Upon
reflection, that last item applies to all societies.
>> Everything is always affected by local factors.
>> The key question is what exactly and how much! And therin lies the
>> difficult work when you are an outsider to that group or place.
>
> yeah. for many places you will be an outsider no longer how
>long you live there and no matter how hard you dig.
True, but isn't half the art identifying what the surface ripples are
likely to mean?
TB
ElissaAnn
news:o68jj05o467g4mem3...@4ax.com...
[snip]
> That it wasn't just a matter of
> the artist working in isolation, developing their ideas on their own,
> but that all art happens in a context, and that one must consider
> technological and sociological developments in the society around the
> imagemakers. All this is being presented with recent exhibitions that
> I've attended (impressionism as a side product of industrial change
> and pollution in the major European cities, the popularity of Degas
> being directly related to his abi\lity to grab new engineering
> technologies of the day in the mass reproduction of his sculptures,
> etc) by curators of my generatin who _did_ go on and do those studies.
I just attended the Modigliani exhibition at the Jewish Museum.
Fascinating. Lots of masks, lots of people who looked like masks,
expressionless. The eyes were often blank almond shapes. The curator's
voice on the tape said that the mask-like quality of the paintings was
connected to being an Italian Jew. There was a whole room of caryatids.
The curator said that was about living in two worlds, for an Italian Jew in
Paris, where he encountered anti-Semitism. The caryatids were among my
favorites paintings, because of the element of balance. The room of nudes
was wonderful, too. They were the most realistic of the paintings, and
some of the sitters (uh, recliners) had eyes that looked out at the viewer.
The thing about the exhibit that really struck me was that AFAICT,
Modigliani never painted or sculpted anything except people. I don't know
whether that was the choice of the curator of the exhibit, or whether he
really never did anything else. There were no backgrounds, no rooms to see
behind the people, no tables with fruit, no wallpaper, no pictures on the
walls in the paintings, no buildings, no little dogs, no landscape. Just
the people and the simple furniture they're sitting on. I'm used to seeing
portraits with a lot of detail, and many levels. For example, the
Renaissance portraits: the sitter, the fabulous outfit, the gorgeous room,
the little dog at the sitter's feet, the building itself, and the streams
and mountains and sky in the background. I found a portrait in the
Modigliani exhibit with 3 trees, the only trees I found in those several
galleries. No leaves. Only the trunks were visible.
Elissa
--
Harpe Diem! (Seize the harp.)