Re: Hate Campaign
newpers...@iprimus.com.au
> Some of you will remember me as a former moderator of SSS before I
> became moderator of ASRM.
>
> I now run a news blog and since blogging about a particular issue, I
> have made many enemies in the UK. The campaign includes researching
> spanking newsgroups and reposting my posts on other blogs and forums
> of UK national newspapers.
>
> Now, they have created a spoof site that includes my photograph and is
> designed to mislead readers into thinking it has been published as me.
> The URL is almost the same as my business blog.
>
> It contains many spanking images obtained from other sites. It
> portrays us in a very negative light.
>
> The site in question ishttp://mikehitchen-ionglobaltrends.blogspot.com/
> "Mike The Perv"
>
> Best wishes
>
> Mike (The Guv'nor)
Tony Elka
<d7e24b12-0c4e-4028...@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
newpers...@iprimus.com.au wrote:
> Some of you will remember me as a former moderator of SSS before I
> became moderator of ASRM.
>
> I now run a news blog and since blogging about a particular issue, I
> have made many enemies in the UK. The campaign includes researching
> spanking newsgroups and reposting my posts on other blogs and forums
> of UK national newspapers.
>
> Now, they have created a spoof site that includes my photograph and is
> designed to mislead readers into thinking it has been published as me.
> The URL is almost the same as my business blog.
>
> It contains many spanking images obtained from other sites. It
> portrays us in a very negative light.
>
> The site in question is http://mikehitchen-ionglobaltrends.blogspot.com/
> "Mike The Perv"
>
> Best wishes
>
> Mike
Have you complained to anyone at blogspot.com ?
Tony
newpers...@iprimus.com.au
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hi Tony
Yep, several times - including the matter of over 2,500 attempted
posts to my blog all making references to my mother and my kink. Yet
no action is ever taken!
One of the things I object to is the way they are trying to make out
we are pervs or some sort of freak show,
Mike (The Guv'nor)
record...@googlemail.com
Timor? Wife Jane dying of cancer? I also hate the way you boast
about destroying people's lives (divorce, breakdown and stroke being
three unfortunate outcomes for people you've detailed) and the way you
goad someone you don't like about his daughter dying at birth.
I have absolutely no concern about your spanking kink of course. How
could I ?
Don't make out that you are some professional business man, that's
all. You're as flawed as the rest of us. Don't go crying around the
internet because the truth is detailed in many places.
I do not hate you. Nor am I the master of the blog to which you refer.
newpers...@iprimus.com.au
Oh I see they have sterd here too. How nice. Give my regards to Jeremy
Young the rock spider from Bradford.
newpers...@iprimus.com.au
Btw, for those who do not know, the above was written by a follower of
a rock spider from Bradford called Jermey Young. He launches attacks
on blogs then hides behind an alleged stillborn baby called Ethel. He
is so grief stricken, that Young once described how he imagined me
"wanking" all over a photo of his stillborn baby. Nice man.
record...@googlemail.com
have read the transcripts of everything you have said about trying to
ruin people's lives and I've read the comments you've made about that
stillborn child. "Did Daddy dig you up yet Ethel" being the mildest
of them. I may be wrong but I think that's what prompted the ill-
advised reply from the grieving father, to which you refer. I've read
everything on the site so I know everything you have said. Maybe if
you stopped being so callous you'd get on a bit better.
I am sure you will have the support of many here, but don't ever claim
people have turned against you because you like spanking, as you are
implying. Spanking has got nothing to do with it. It is all about your
nastiness, which pleases you if you're being honest.
You brought it here, not me.
Jim
I say, who ARE these space-occupying lesions?
Jim
spanking
newpers...@iprimus.com.au
As for you not being interested in my kink, the vast majority of posts
against me do nothing but refer to my kink. Names such as "spanky boy"
and other remarks suggesting a rather unsophisticated, schoolboy
mindset befitting your self-righteous hypocrisy.
Let's get something straight shall we. The real reason you and Young
hate me is that I have a successful blog that has won several awards
and nominations. The blog became known as "The Voice" for those
seeking truth and Justice for Madeleine McCann. As soon as I made a
post, people would flock in their thousands and I would get hundreds
of responses in a matter of hours.
Along comes Jeremy Young, a man who had previously attacked other
blogs. He starts blogging and launches an out of the blue attack on
me. He was then joined by two sluts that I had rejected - Jill Havern
form Birmingham author of "Silent Treatment" for whom I had written a
book review, and Jane in Fife, who admitted she tried to hit on me
straight away. That sick bastard wanted to pack up and come to
Australia before she had even talked to me!
As soon as Young starts attacking, his lackies send out emails and
posts saying "before you attack TFA, take a look at this" referring to
a badly written, grotesque poem about a stillborn baby he alleges is
his daughter.
You then escalated the attack on me planting spies and hacking into my
private forums, then reposting in your own fourth rate blogs and
forums - often altered.
Then you attacked other bloggers connected with me, alleging for
example the following "PROFILE OF MIKE HITCHENYour only commenter
here: Moderator of soc.sexuality spanking. NSW Police investigated
complaint against sick nutter Mike Hitchen. Also uses several
different aliases CarlyMichelle, who is a known drug abuser. Also Mike
Farmer alias, the Realtor who is pretty sick of his name being used
for the purposes of dredging his name through forums. "
In addition, Young's supporters even tried to post sexually oriented
remarks to my blog about Lorraine, known to people here as Madeleine
Brownlowe, and who died in 2006 (a fact referred to in the attempted
posts) after being confiend to a wheelchair all her life.
The report to the police was an allegation that I beat up my mother.
It was lodged by Jill Havern who even boasted about it on Young's blog
http://www.blogger.com/trannyfattyacid.blogspot.com
My mother was there when the police arrived and told them the whole
thing. I showed them what I had received, and they referred to Havern
and Young as a "hoax: by "sick nutters".
So if you want truth, I suggest you, Havern and the Bradford rock
spider, start themselves. As for destroying lives, yes, and it is
something I am proud of. It happens when people cross myself or my
loved ones. You may not be family oriented, but I am.
Mike (The Guv'nor) who uses his real name and does not hide behind
"anons" or use anonomous emailers such as ratmail.com - I leave that
to your little band of two-bob cowards.
newpers...@iprimus.com.au
Yes you are wrong. I made no such reference to the alleged Ethel (btw,
Young gives different dates for her birthday), after he had posted my
late father's name, and full work history to his blog - and after I
had received remarks about my father's death, and my mother.
You and Young are not big on facts are you sweet cheeks?
As for getting on, I am the one getting the hits to my blog, links to
my articles in Time Magazine and CNN.
You said "You brought it here, not me"
Do you make a habit of routinely reading spanking newsgroups? You see
the reason I ask is that I did not tell anyone I posted here. In other
words, you are tracking everywhere I go on the Internet so as you can
launch attacks on forums other than my own.
Kass
idea, how about posting a story or two? Something funny maybe? It
takes more energy to frown than smile! :-) see!
Kass
spanking is the topic of the day
newpers...@iprimus.com.au
Don't worry Kass, I have had my say. But now I am here, I will
probably back. I miss the spanking newsgroups, and it was nice to hear
from so many old friends.
I did lose the "kink" for a few years but it seems to have been
renewed!
I will rest my case now, but will be back on topic:)
Mike (The Guv'nor")
tom
He is so grief stricken, that Young once described how he imagined me
"wanking" all over a photo of his stillborn baby. Nice man.
---
Mike, no he didn't say that! He actually said he WOULDN'T want to
imagine you wanking over a photo of his stillborn daughter - a photo
he wouldn't post in order to prove she existed.
His words were: and I would rather not think of him wanking over
pictures of my children. Easily checkable - it's still on his site.
Please get your facts right and stop twisting everything to meet your
agenda.
spanking
Afani...@gmail.com
Mike Hitchen fell to an all time low when his jealousy and paranoia
got the better of him. His witch hunt of a fellow blogger, known as
TFA, was one of many reasons Mike Hitchens fled the blogsphere.
Hitchen began his tyrade by accusing his posters of being Tfa,
throwing insults to his own fans and being verbally abusive to them.
This caused many to flee from his blog, taking refuge at Tfa's and
discussing the strange behaviour of Hitchens.
On learning that Tfa and his wife had given birth to a still born baby
girl, who they called Ethel, Hitchens used this as a tool to inflict
pain on the couple. He began referring to anyone who didn't agree with
him as "The dead Ethels". Dare anyone question his posts or disagree
with him or they would face a barrage of abuse and be accused of being
Tfa. This caused many more to abandon his blog.
Here is a little transcript of what Hitchen said about TFA
Mike:Hi Ethel
8:48 PM 4/2/08
Mike:Did daddy dig you up again
8:48 PM 4/2/08
Mike: What about your slag mummy?
8:48 PM 4/2/08
Mike: Is she a junkie like her shag?
8:48 PM 4/2/08
Mike:Is she also an out of work hjunkie?
8:50 PM 4/2/08
Mike:Is that why Ethel died..is that why he asks what did they do
8:51 PM 4/2/08
Mike:He failed her didnt he...he betrayed her, thats why he is bitter
with guilt
8:51 PM 4/2/08
Mike:Just think..poor TFA, let down dear old Ethel
8:52 PM 4/2/08
Mike:What did he do to her...after all, he himself ask the question
8:52 PM 4/2/08
Mike:They killed her. What were they taking. Junkies.
8:52 PM 4/2/08
Mike:The oout of work drunk failed his daughter
8:53 PM 4/2/08
Mike:sad loser who failed his sprog
8:55 PM 4/2/08
This disgusting rant occured after he cried poverty, saying he
couldn't afford the $6 to maintain the private shout box. A mindful
poster rightfully warned the others that Hitchens was "roping them in"
in order to get more donations, after she saw one poster offering
money. The above transcript is Hitchens response. More of his regulars
ran in horror.
Many of his fans bore the brunt of his paranoia and anger. He
published a private conversation he had with a poster, all because he
thought an anonymous poster was her. This caused huge distress for
this lady, resulting in an attempted suicide, something that Hitchen
is proud of and boasts about.
He said himself on 5th Feb 2008
Mike: I have casued an attempted suicide, a marriage break up and a
stroke..and they were cleverer than some clown from effing Bradford
And he said, back in 2001
""People who have hurt or crossed me have suffered nervous breakdowns
and a marriage breakup as a consequence of my actions. I view those as
positive results and any harm done is of no interest to to me. If they
can't do the time, then don't do the crime - I didn't ask them to hurt
me"
You can view this quote on Alt.spanking.reality
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.spanking.reality/browse_thread/thread/52b97017aa8d3a8e/7dd0981809771c90?lnk=gst&q=%20rufus+guv%27nor#7dd0981809771c90
The only reason Mike Hitchen has come in here and disrupted this group
is to try and get some support. He will of course say we are against
him because he is a spanker, but he is only saying this to gain
support.
Just to make clear, the people Mike has slagged off are not against
his spanking at all, in fact, we all say, each to their own.
Of course we do throw the spanking up at him from time to time but
this is because he has the down right hypocrisy to damn a couple who
are swingers and criticize them for swinging at every given
opportunity. This is unacceptable behaviour.
If you all read back over the guv'nors (hitchens) posts when he was on
this site, and on alt.spanking.reality, you will see how he operates.
He eases his way in and doesn't stop until he is running the show.
Dare anyone who gets in his way. He created several sock puppets on
both sites and eventually killed them off with cancer to gain more
sympathy, Aussiegirl, Jane, Mel, and Madelaine being just a few.
You will see how he attacks insults and demeans even the most logical
posters. It is all there if you have time to trawl through his
posts.
Apologies for posting this here in response to M. Hitchens, this
should not have been brought in here in the first place and Mr.
Hitchen should know better.
CrimsnKid6
> I am sure you will have the support of many here, but don't ever claim
> people have turned against you because you like spanking, as you are
> implying. Spanking has got nothing to do with it.
Ummmm, well, in that case...
> It is all about your
> nastiness, which pleases you if you're being honest.
>
> You brought it here, not me.
Feel free to take it elsewhere then...
H.I.A.W.B.,
--C.K.
"Spanking, it's what's for dessert..."
pest
In article <af29933f-0f02-46b2...@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, CrimsnKid6
says...
> recordatte... on a strange dispute:
>
> > I am sure you will have the support of many here, but don't ever claim
> > people have turned against you because you like spanking, as you are
> > implying. Spanking has got nothing to do with it.
>
> Ummmm, well, in that case...
>
> > It is all about your
> > nastiness, which pleases you if you're being honest.
> >
> > You brought it here, not me.
>
> Feel free to take it elsewhere then...
Yeah, me too.
This is like the Star Trek episode where the guy who's black on the left side/white on the
right, and his mirror image, toy with the Enterprise. Wtf needs you guys and your not-our-
problem dispute? Take it back to the planetary surface and blow each other up, for all of me.
> H.I.A.W.B.,
> --C.K.
>
> "Spanking, it's what's for dessert..."
--
(pest)
Existence is futile! You will be assimilated!
decapitalize reply-to if you must
else spanking
GrumpyOldPapa
> &c, &c, &c...<all snipped>
>
>>> I say, who ARE these space-occupying lesions?<<<
The collective term is either "Congress" or "Parliament", depending on
the country involved.
Papa
(spanking a sitting duck)
Steven
"GrumpyOldPapa" <Grumpy...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:96f44f49-4a23-4784...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Papa likes to think he knows everything, but come on!! Everyone knows that
Parliament is a cigarette.
Steven (once again providing everyone with useful information while at the
same time, spanking all naughty girls in need)
Tony Elka
<96f44f49-4a23-4784...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
GrumpyOldPapa <Grumpy...@aol.com> wrote:
> Papa
> (spanking a sitting duck)
That duck ain't gonna wanna sit down.
Tony
duck spanking
NYIrishRed
>
> Papa likes to think he knows everything, but come on!! �Everyone knows that
> Parliament is a cigarette.
Hey! that's what I smoked ... when I smoked. Been over twenty years,
but yeah, I enjoyed my Parliaments.
IrishRed --- former smoker
is there a statute of limitations on getting a spanking for smoking?
Steven
"NYIrishRed" <NYIri...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:55141aea-90c7-4ebc...@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
<<IrishRed --- former smoker
Nope and I'm afraid you need a good sound bare bottom spanking for this.
Steven (just giving RED his honest spanko opinion)
mr...@evanescently.com
>
> Papa likes to think he knows everything, but come on!! Everyone knows that
> Parliament is a cigarette.
And all this time I thought it was George Clinton's band! Thanks for
clearing that up.
Fox, in California where smokers are as like to be shot as get a
spanking, learning about the origins of some of his childhood
Wackypacks.
Steven
<mr...@evanescently.com> wrote in message
news:61fa689e-962d-476e...@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 2, 4:59 pm, "Steven" <J...@Smilingwithteeth.com> wrote:
>
> Papa likes to think he knows everything, but come on!! Everyone knows that
> Parliament is a cigarette.
<<And all this time I thought it was George Clinton's band! Thanks for
<<clearing that up.
Nope. It was most likely Uncle John's Band.
Saint Steven (spanking naughty girls just because)
Katharine164
Hi Kass,
Just so you know, Mike was a frequent poster here at one time. He has
friends here. I don't think he brought this here to make a public
fight with someone who followed him here. I think he wanted to appeal
to those in the spanking community, which I think is natural under the
circumstances.
Just thought you might like to know.
Katharine
record...@googlemail.com
originally to appeal to you but he was followed because he is doing
some really awful things to people right now as we speak, trying to
destroy lives. When he was followed he changed his story. The
following is a direct copy/paste of a comment from Mike, from a
Blogger blog that can be viewed by anyone. http://tinyurl.com/2eub4q
"I have an open mind on that one. However, I think it is more likely
given the fact that they are intellectually challenged, that they are
just inadequate little people trying and failing to make a name for
themselves. Everything I do, they fall for, as they are not used to
operating at levels where strategy is involved. They just make
themselves looks stupid, as they did when I lured them into posting on
soc.sexulaity.spanking."
So he says he lured "them" over here. Not exactly in the spirit of
friendship.
Sorry for interrupting, but that's straight from Mike's keyboard and
he definitely says he meant us to come here. This is to keep to the
facts and not be fed by his constant spin.
RA
Tony Elka
<ff84d9f7-0f1e-4a56...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
record...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Sorry Katherine, but you are only part correct. He did come here
> originally to appeal to you but he was followed because he is doing
> some really awful things to people right now as we speak, trying to
> destroy lives.
Trying to destroy lives? How, by typing text?
Tony
spanking
domino
<Kathar...@aol.com> wrote:
>Just so you know, Mike was a frequent poster here at one time. He has
>friends here. I don't think he brought this here to make a public
>fight with someone who followed him here. I think he wanted to appeal
>to those in the spanking community, which I think is natural under the
>circumstances.
I remember Mike. What I don't understand is, if he's having all this
harassment with the fake website, why he would post the URL for it...
ah well...
domino
domino
wrote:
>Sorry Katherine, but you are only part correct. He did come here
>originally to appeal to you but he was followed because he is doing
>some really awful things to people right now as we speak, trying to
>destroy lives.
yeah but... (and I'm not saying Mike is one - I'm speaking generally)
There are always going to be bad people in any public forum who will
do mean and nasty things to others.
'destroying lives' is a bit hyperbolic imo because unless someone
kills you, whilst there may be difficulties and hard times brought to
your door by an evil stranger, then your life is not destroyed,only
challenged.
Another thing to consider is the source of the information which is
used to cause these problems... Anything you say online can and will
be used against you if someone has an axe to grind, so anyone using
the interweb should take care not to reveal too much of themselves
unwittingly.
Yet another thing to seriously think about is the concept of accepting
responsibility for one's own actions. You quote Mike saying that he
'lured' people over there. What - are these people so simple-minded
that they allow themselves to be 'lured' - if so they shouldn't be
allowed online in the first place - it's too dangerous a place for
them.
If they *chose* to follow Mike (or indeed anyone) here or anywhere
else, then it's their choice and they should accept any fallout from
their actions.
Domino
spanking
thebig...@googlemail.com
typing how he hopes that man goes to the chemist for enough pills to
take an overdose. This man he's trying to destroy is expecting his
baby to be born any day now. Mike has been typing text to social
services and the police making slanderous claims of paedophilia. He's
twisting some facts to make it look as though he is a concerned
citizen. There is plenty proof out there of the ruinous text Mike has
typed. He boasts in typed text about causing marriage breakdowns,
stokes and suicide attempts. All of this text Mike has typed himself.
More of his typed text:
"People who have hurt or crossed me have attemped suicide, have
suffered nervous breakdowns and marriage breakup as a consequence of
my actions. I view those as positive results and any harm done is of
no interest to me.
---
I find people's weak spots and twist the sword"
What did this man do to hurt or cross Mike Hitchen? Nothing at all. It
started off as a case of mistaken identity resulting in Mike typing
text against an innocent man. Said innocent man responded with typed
text. Lo and behold Mike starts the smear campaign.
Those are facts, not twisted. No doubt Mike will spin you an
alternative version.
Steven
<thebig...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:ccc0849a-fc56-465f...@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> In a way yes, but by trying to drive a man to a nervous breakdown>
If he wants to drive a man to a nervous breakdown, just take him to an
Islanders hockey game. That should do it.
Steven (spanking naughty girls never goes out of season)
Katharine164
On Mar 4, 11:23 pm, recordatte...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Sorry Katherine,
You know, I'd be more impressed if you actually spelled my name
right. There's a reason I'm particular about it, but no need for you
to know it.
You really aren't making any sense and your supposed "proof" could
have been written by anyone and is totally out of context so it's
actually quite meaningless.
Without seeing the entire story from the beginning, in the original
words, it's impossible you really tell anything.
If you must if you must strew this drivel across the Internet, please
take it elsewhere.
And that is all I have to say to you. I regard you as a troll and
stuff you down the official SSS troll hole.
Katharine (with an "a", not an "e")
spanking
Steven
"Katharine164" <Kathar...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e9b9f2c4-b2e7-4b60...@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> If you must if you must strew this drivel across the Internet, please
> take it elsewhere.
>
> And that is all I have to say to you. I regard you as a troll and
> stuff you down the official SSS troll hole.
>
> Katharine (with an "a", not an "e")
For once I agree with Katharine. Please take this stuff elsewhere. Now,
Kath, I am putting you in charge to make sure this thread dies a quick
death. If this guy posts more nonsense I will have no choice but to hold
you personally accountable and that would mean.......a spanking!!!
Steven (spanking girls on the bare bottom)
CrimsnKid6
> Yet another thing to seriously think about is the concept of accepting
> responsibility for one's own actions. �You quote Mike saying that he
> 'lured' people over there. �What - are these people so simple-minded
> that they allow themselves to be 'lured' - if so they shouldn't be
> allowed online in the first place - it's too dangerous a place for
> them.
>
> If they *chose* to follow Mike (or indeed anyone) here or anywhere
> else, then it's their choice and they should accept any fallout from
> their actions.
I'd venture that if a spankophile were to be involved in an online
dispute that was getting vindictive, and was being attacked cyber-
verbally by others for his spanking practices and preferences, he
would want to "lure" his attackers to this newsgroup as a
*battleground* since he would have plenty of allies here if any spanko-
bashing took place.
I also find it hard to credit that Children's Protective Services
would take seriously any "information" that describes the so-called
pedophilic behavior of a mere internet screen name.
If false accusations are being made in RL that's certainly
despicable conduct, but how does that connect to some internet
dispute? I suppose it could all be part of some serious interpersonal
conflict in both *arenas,* but the internet part would be a pale
shadow of the RL situation, wouldn't it?
No need for me to get cyber-spanked by my loving wife...