Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
watch
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Jp Blpp
Mar 3, 2011, 3:57:23 AM3/3/11
to
if you were out walking and you saw two people having sex and you could
watch without being seen, would you watch?
watch without being seen, would you watch?
Lusus Naturae
Mar 3, 2011, 8:37:30 AM3/3/11
to
shygu...@webtv.net (Jp Blpp) wrote:
>if you were out walking and you saw two people having sex and you could
>watch without being seen, would you watch?
Sure would! But then, I'm a self-avowed voyeur.
Actually, to be a bit more thoughtful about it, I'd probably watch for a
bit, but wouldn't find it compelling for long unless the action involved
some of my specific kinks.
--
Lusus Naturae
Serene Vannoy
Mar 4, 2011, 10:10:08 AM3/4/11
to
On 03/03/2011 12:57 AM, Jp Blpp wrote:
> if you were out walking and you saw two people having sex and you could
> watch without being seen, would you watch?
>
> if you were out walking and you saw two people having sex and you could
> watch without being seen, would you watch?
>
Probably, at least for a minute or two, but then I'd likely start
feeling either uncomfortable or bored (depending on how hot I found the
sex itself) and move along.
Serene
Tom Allen
Mar 10, 2011, 9:31:44 PM3/10/11
to
Jp Blpp wrote:
> if you were out walking and you saw two people having sex and you could
> watch without being seen, would you watch?
>
> if you were out walking and you saw two people having sex and you could
> watch without being seen, would you watch?
>
Been there, done that.
For me, watching isn't exciting enough - I'd rather be a participant.
--
Tom Allen
http://vanillaedge.wordpress.com
I don't have multiple orgasms, myself. However, I am known to be a carrier.
0 new messages