None of my old Republican friends would want Cain as President. But
by running as VP, his presence would do three things. First it
would cut into Obama's almost solid black support. Second it would
make the GOP appear to be racially (and minority) tolerant. Third,
Cain could be used to attack Obama in a way no white person could do
without the Democrats playing the "race card".
Romney or Perry could stay "above the fray" -- and with the issues --
while letting Cain attack Obama personally. Obama would have to
answer back -- or look like a total fool.
There are several states (GA is one) where you can vote in either
primary you wish to. My bet it many blacks will be encouraged to
cross over and vote in the Republican primary for Cain.
Cain should be at the top of the ticket.
Unless I'm missing something, it's going to be Deja Veu all over
again.
--
An independent old cuss,
Randian born, Randian raised
and Randian to the core!
.
Rather than trying to get Southern Baptists to vote for a Mormon and a
black guy with a negro accent, you might as well keep Obama. He's a
Republican in disguise and if you keep him in office, you can still
blame him for everything that's gone wrong and put him in funny monkey
cartoons, claim he pals around with terrorists, doesn't have a valid
birth certificate, and has a phony Social Security card.
>On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:52:31 -0400, Gary <n...@none.com> wrote:
>
>>IMO, a Romney/Cain or Perry/Cain is just about what is going to
>>happen.
>>
>>None of my old Republican friends would want Cain as President. But
>>by running as VP, his presence would do three things. First it
>>would cut into Obama's almost solid black support. Second it would
>>make the GOP appear to be racially (and minority) tolerant. Third,
>>Cain could be used to attack Obama in a way no white person could do
>>without the Democrats playing the "race card".
>>
>>Romney or Perry could stay "above the fray" -- and with the issues --
>>while letting Cain attack Obama personally. Obama would have to
>>answer back -- or look like a total fool.
>>
>>There are several states (GA is one) where you can vote in either
>>primary you wish to. My bet it many blacks will be encouraged to
>>cross over and vote in the Republican primary for Cain.
>
>Rather than trying to get Southern Baptists to vote for a Mormon and a
>black guy with a negro accent, you might as well keep Obama.
Nah, we rather have a real African American. Just think, a black
guy from GA will be the first AA elected to VP. From there, maybe
someday (long time from now) he will be elected as the first AA
president. Ain't life great ?
>He's a
>Republican in disguise and if you keep him in office,
He's "something" in disguise, but I haven't figured what, yet.
>you can still
>blame him for everything that's gone wrong and put him in funny monkey
>cartoons, claim he pals around with terrorists,
I don't think Obama had but one close friend who was a terrorist. He
was the guy who launched his political career.
>doesn't have a valid
>birth certificate,
I'm sure Barry has a valid certificate. I'm just not sure what
country issued it.
>and has a phony Social Security card.
I doubt if he even has one.
Only if the top of the ticket reads: Cain and Keeper.
I agree. Things are looking up. The Democrats act nuttier every day.
What you have missed is that the black population tends to be religious.
Would they vote for a Mormon? Not likely, even if Cain is the VP
candidate.
The Republican strategy seems to me to be pretty clear. Deny the vote
to as many minority voters as possible.
>On 10/12/2011 3:52 PM, Gary wrote:
>> IMO, a Romney/Cain or Perry/Cain is just about what is going to
>> happen.
>>
>> None of my old Republican friends would want Cain as President. But
>> by running as VP, his presence would do three things. First it
>> would cut into Obama's almost solid black support. Second it would
>> make the GOP appear to be racially (and minority) tolerant. Third,
>> Cain could be used to attack Obama in a way no white person could do
>> without the Democrats playing the "race card".
>>
>> Romney or Perry could stay "above the fray" -- and with the issues --
>> while letting Cain attack Obama personally. Obama would have to
>> answer back -- or look like a total fool.
>>
>> There are several states (GA is one) where you can vote in either
>> primary you wish to. My bet it many blacks will be encouraged to
>> cross over and vote in the Republican primary for Cain.
>>
>>
>You have made a very big assumption that blacks will vote for a
>Republican candidate, even if he is black.
I think it's possible. But if they don't vote GOP -- in large
numbers --- it's no big deal. That's not the primary reason to
run Cain as VP.
>The Republicans made that
>mistaken assumption when they put Michael Steele in charge of the
>Republican party. Their strategy was pretty clear to everyone and it is
>unlikely that Michael Steele bought them any black votes.
That was not only brazen -- it was stupid. And as you say,
everybody recognized Steele as a "house person". But Cain has
assets which Steele did not. Cain can attack Obama.
>What you have missed is that the black population tends to be religious.
> Would they vote for a Mormon? Not likely, even if Cain is the VP
>candidate.
Let's agee they go to church. They are not that devout. I really
think a large percent will go for Cain. Majority ? Maybe ....
maybe not.
>The Republican strategy seems to me to be pretty clear. Deny the vote
>to as many minority voters as possible.
Of course. The Republicans haven't done well with minorities since
Reconstruction ended.
We could well see an interesting contest next November. I think
Cain will have a big part in it. But not as president.
Ha, ha, ha. He's a joke.
Thumper
> You have made a very big assumption that blacks will vote for a
> Republican candidate, even if he is black. The Republicans made that
> mistaken assumption when they put Michael Steele in charge of the
> Republican party. Their strategy was pretty clear to everyone and it is
> unlikely that Michael Steele bought them any black votes.
In the back of the Black mind is always a suspicion of a fellow
Black getting too close to the White community. The history
of American slavery divided plantation Blacks into two groups,
the house slaves and the field slaves. The former had feelings
to loyalty to their White masters, the field slave, much less so
frankly hostile to their masters.
As we also know being a Uncle Tom is a problem.
I think Obama successfully navigated these dangerous waters
but I don't know about Cain. My intuition says he is another
political bubble. What is certain is the promotion of
Cain to any important political post will be viewed again
by Europeans as evidence that Americans are crazy.
Explained in Plantation metaphors, the difference between Steele,
Cain and Obama is this. Steele was Masters yard boy. Cain wants
Master to promote him to be the plantations overseer. Obama is
Master's mulatto pet who was raised in the Big House.
>On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:07:45 -0400, Thumper <jayl...@comcast.net>
>wrote:
>Surely you don't think that would keep the Republicans from nominating
>him, do you? Remember George W. Bush? Sarah Palin?
Or Joe Biden ? John Edwards ? Joe Lieberman ? No matter the
party, there's not a lot of difference in the quality of the
candidate.
Let's review ...
Cain's trying to sell his booga-booga 9-9-9 tax plan, Romney's trying
to hide his booga-booga Mormonism, Perry's cajoling everybody into
praying for divine meteorological intervention, and Quackmann's
foisting history and medical lectures on any sap who'll buy 'em.
Yeah.
From here, for our president, it looks like ...
FOUR
MORE
YEARS!
"Akneigh Wombuster" wrote in message
news:1d65bc93-ad09-45a1...@u13g2000vbx.googlegroups.com...
The democrat strategy is to get as many people as possible to vote.
Whether they are American citizens or not.
>On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:07:45 -0400, Thumper <jayl...@comcast.net>
>wrote:
>
>Surely you don't think that would keep the Republicans from nominating
>him, do you? Remember George W. Bush? Sarah Palin?
Maybe they have dumbed down America enough that their math skills are
too low to see that his 999 plan will screw them royally.
This is a guy that says that it's their fault that they are out of a
job and they aren't rich.
Thumper
Nothing new about that. Our right wing posters here in soc.retirement
say that often. So we should not be surprised that a GOP presidential
hopeful plays to people like them. Cain is more outspoken than most
GOP candidates in blaming the poor for their plight, but it is
implicit with the others as well. When Romney boasts "I am unemployed
too" it is a slap in the face and shows incredible insensitivity.
Well, it is much easier for losers to blame anyone but themselves.
>> Maybe they have dumbed down America enough that their math skills
>> are
>> too low to see that his 999 plan will screw them royally.
>>
>> This is a guy that says that it's their fault that they are out of a
>> job and they aren't rich.
>> Thumper
>
> Well, it is much easier for losers to blame anyone but themselves.
What is curious is that so-called "conservatives" should propose
radical change in whatever, except excessive government spending.
Bush 43 changes things a a bit but going the excessive spending
and increase debt route, certainly a radical change.
The Republicans are interested mainly in power for power's sake.
So the issues they stress are in hypocritical contradiction with recent
policies when the conservatives were in power.
Of course the Tea Party recognizes that and is trying to reestablish
the political shape of the Republicans. The problem with this
new global world we live in, with corporation fusion generating
bigger and bigger economic entities is that to resist their
taking complete effective control of things, government also
has to be equally as powerful. So the Tea Party lives in a world
which is not.