Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
D-word itself was a euphemism!
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Harry Thompson  
View profile  
 More options Mar 4, 7:00 pm
Newsgroups: soc.retirement
From: Harry Thompson <m...@privacy.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:00:05 -0600
Local: Wed, Mar 4 2009 7:00 pm
Subject: D-word itself was a euphemism!
And here I thought that "depression" was the honest word everybody is
avoiding. But it turns out that "depression" was itself a euphemism for
"crisis", which was a euphemism for "panic."

Here is JK Galbraith on one euphemism replacing another as each got ugly.

 From Chapter 9: The Price

Redefined definitions: panic, crisis, depression, recession, growth
correction

Extracts from "Money: Whence it came, where it went" by John Kenneth
Galbraith (First Published 1975), Page 113

"Where economic misfortune is concerned, a word on nomenclature is
necessary. In the course of his disastrous odyssey Pal Joey, the most
inspired of John O'Hara's creations, finds himself singing in a Chicago
crib strictly for cakes and coffee. He explains this misfortune by
saying that the panic is still on. His term - archaic and thus slightly
pretentious - reflects the unfailing O'Hara ear. During the last century
and until 1907, the United States had panics. But, by 1907, the language
was becoming, like so much else, the servant of economic interest. To
minimize the shock to confidence, businessmen and bankers had started to
explain that any current economic setback was not really a panic, only a
crisis. They were undeterred by the use of this term in a much more
ominous context - that of the ultimate capitalist crisis - by Marx. By
the 1920's, however, the word crisis had also acquired the fearsome
connotation of the event it described. Accordingly, men offered
reassurance by explaining that it was not a crisis, only a depression. A
very soft word. Then the Great Depression associated the most frightful
of economic misfortunes with that term, and economic semanticists now
explained that no depression was in prospect, at most only a recession.
In the 1950s, when there was a modest setback, economists and public
officials were united in denying that it was a recession - only a
sidewise movement or a rolling readjustment. Mr Herbert Stein, the
amiable man whose difficult honor it was to serve as the economic voice
of Richard Nixon, would have referred to the panic of 1893 as a growth
correction"

Lifted from http://lachlan.bluehaze.com.au/books/galbraith_money.html


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google