On Sun, 19 May 2013 09:29:15 -0700 (PDT), GLOBALIST <
free....@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sunday, May 19, 2013 10:12:46 AM UTC-5, rumpelstiltskin wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 08:14:36 -0400, Planet Visitor II
>>
>> <
na...@nosuchserver.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, 19 May 2013 04:44:57 -0700, rumpelstiltskin <
rumpels...@x.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> His most recent post was April 19th. Considering his terrible
>> >>health, he might be dead, in which case RIP to a good man.
>> >
>> >I last heard from Earl in a personal e-mail on the 3rd of May. He
>> >noted that he's just very tired, and has trouble even getting to his
>> >computer.
>> >
>> >
>> >Planet Visitor II
>>
>> Thanks, that's good news, or at least not the worst
>> news, at least up to May 3d.
>
>Explain to us what makes having 'liberal' views makes one noble?
First you explain to us how a view that someone can rise from the
dead is evidence of any sanity whatsoever???
>I would rather know someone used common sense and was independent.
You mean like the common sense there is to an argument that
someone is the son of God, died for our "sins," rose from the
dead, and reenters through a vessel presented by a priest along
with the ringing of a bell whenever he is "called."
ding... ding... ding...
>Both terms liberal and conservative are abused and used
>carelessly.
Both terms Christian and Religious are abused and used without
the slightest hint of reality or sanity.
Planet Visitor II